Zion Tech Group

Tag: Revisiting

  • Kliff Kingsbury and Patrick Mahomes in college: Revisiting Texas Tech’s ‘Air Raid’ offense led by Chiefs QB


    Two NFL teams competing in their respective conference championship games — the Commanders and the Chiefs — share a special connection through Texas Tech.

    While Washington and Kansas City won’t face off against each other Sunday, Commanders offensive coordinator Kliff Kingsbury and Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes share plenty of history.

    The two joined forces for the Red Raiders, with Kingsbury as the head coach and Mahomes as his quarterback. Let’s revisit their history with one another, how much success they had together and more.

    SN’S PLAYOFFS HQ: Live NFL scores | Full NFL schedule | Updated NFL bracket

    Did Kliff Kingsbury coach Patrick Mahomes at Texas Tech?

    Yes, Kingsbury coached Mahomes during his tenure as head coach at Texas Tech.

    Kingsbury was hired to coach the program in December 2012. Kingsbury played for the Red Raiders from 1998-2002.

    Texas Tech offered Mahomes, a three-star quarterback recruit, in January 2013. Kingsbury reportedly heard about Mahomes from the previous Tech coaching staff and immediately recruited him after watching his high school tape. 

    “I could see what I thought he could be,” Kingsbury said via ESPN in 2022. “… I loved how he’d extend plays and I don’t think anybody thought he’d still be doing it at this level the way he does it. But he has a special knack at it, probably the best ever at doing it.

    “We went after him hard and knew that we needed to get him.”

    Mahomes played his senior season at Whitehouse High School in Texas during the 2013 season. He won the Texas AP Player of the Year award as a senior, and he signed with Tech’s 2014 recruiting class while Kingsbury was leading the Red Raiders to an 8-5 record during his first season in 2013.

    As a true freshman in Lubbock in 2014, Mahomes played in seven games with seven starts. Although the Red Raiders struggled and finished 4-8 that season, Mahomes threw for 1,547 yards with 16 touchdowns and just four interceptions. 

    Mahomes won the starting job for the 2015 season. He had a breakout year, throwing for 4,653 yards with 36 touchdowns and 15 interceptions, adding 456 yards with 10 scores that season. Tech finished 7-6 that season. Mahomes became one of just five quarterbacks in FBS history to pass for 4,000 yards and 30 touchdowns while rushing for at least 450 yards with 10 scores, and he set a Tech single-season record for passing yards.  

    But that wasn’t even close to what he did during his 2016 season. Mahomes had an even better junior year, throwing for 5,052 yards, an FBS-leading 41 touchdowns and 10 interceptions, plus 260 yards rushing and 12 scores. He was the first Tech signal-caller to lead the nation in passing yards since Graham Harrell in 2008 and — wait for it — Kingsbury in 2002.

    Mahomes also set NCAA records, most notably in a game against Oklahoma in 2016. Tech was facing its former quarterback in Baker Mayfield, who transferred from Tech in 2014, after somewhat of a beef developed between the quarterback and Kingsbury during the 2013 season. 

    Mayfield and Mahomes set off fireworks that night in Lubbock. Oklahoma won, 66-59, and both offenses combined to set the all-time Division I single-game yardage record with 1,708. Mahomes had some impressive individual game records in this one, too:

    • He set an NCAA record for individual offense in a game, with 819 combined passing and rushing yards.
    • His 734 passing yards tied Washington State’s Connor Halliday for the most passing yards in a Division I game.
    • He set several other Big 12 records, including most completions in a game (52), previously held by Kingsbury.
    • He set Tech single-game records for passing yards (734), pass attempts (88), completions (52), most plays (100) and yards of total offense (819) 

    The two quarterbacks set an FBS record for the combined offense by two players, with 1,383, as well as breaking the combined passing yardage in any NCAA game, with 1,279. The game featured 78 combined first downs, which tied an NCAA record. 

    Although Mahomes had a sensational season, it was an up-and-down year for the Red Raiders. Texas Tech started off the season 5-2 but lost three straight to Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and West Virginia. The Red Raiders ended up losing four of their last six games, including their 56-27 loss to LSU in the Texas Bowl.  

    Mahomes declared for the NFL draft after that 2016 season. 

    Did Patrick Mahomes win the Heisman?

    No, Patrick Mahomes never won the Heisman, despite the huge numbers he put up over his last two seasons at Texas Tech. He was never a finalist, either.  

    One of the biggest reasons behind the snub is Texas Tech being largely out of the national spotlight, finishing a combined 11-14 over his last two seasons. The Heisman consistently goes to players on teams winning at a high level. There has been just one Heisman winner whose team had a losing record — Notre Dame quarterback Paul Hornung, whose Irish team went 2-8 in 1956.

    Just two other winners were on teams with  four or more losses: 1969’s winner, quarterback Steve Owens, who finished 6-4 at Oklahoma, and 1935’s winner, quarterback Jay Berwanger whose Chicago team went 4-4.

    Patrick Mahomes college stats

    Season 

    Comp. %

    Pass Yards

    TDs

    INTs

    Rush Yards

    Rush TDs

    2014

    56.8

    1,547

    16

    4

    104 

    0

    2015

    63.5

    4,653

    36

    15

    456

    10

    2016

    65.7

    5,052

    41

    10

    260

    12

    Texas Tech Air Raid offense

    Kingsbury learned the Air Raid offense when he was playing at Texas Tech under Mike Leach. Leach, who is largely credited with bringing the Air Raid offense to college football, was mentored by legendary coach Hal Mumme, and the two first ran the offense together at Iowa Wesleyan College, which played in the NAIA. 

    As the name suggests, the offense is pass-heavy and utilizes multiple receivers to spread the defense out while attacking downfield. It doesn’t feature much of a running game, either. Quarterbacks typically run the offense out of the shotgun, and it’s usually a fast-paced system, most of the time going no-huddle. 

    In Washington, the Commanders don’t run a pure Air Raid system, even though there are elements to it in the system. Jayden Daniels’ running ability paired with Brian Robinson’s rushing attack makes it a bit more of a hybrid Air Raid.   

    Unsurprisingly, Mahomes thrived in the offense in Lubbock. 

    Kliff Kingsbury college record

    Kingsbury finished 35-40 over six seasons at Texas Tech. His best finish was the 8-5 year he had in 2013, and he never could top that over his next five seasons. 

    Why did Kliff Kingsbury leave Texas Tech?

    Kingsbury was fired by Texas Tech in November 2018 after the Red Raiders finished 5-7. That marked Tech’s third straight season under .500. While Kingsbury had some talented offenses, his defenses struggled throughout his entire tenure, and Tech never was truly a contender in the Big 12. 

    Kingsbury was hired by the Arizona Cardinals in January 2019, just a few months after he was fired by Texas Tech. He went 28-37-1 with the Cardinals over four seasons, with just one winning season in 2021.

    He spent the 2023 season as a senior offensive analyst with USC before joining Dan Quinn’s Commanders staff before the 2024 season. It’s safe to say he’s found massive success in Washington so far.

    MORE NFL PLAYOFF NEWS:



    Kliff Kingsbury and Patrick Mahomes are two names that are synonymous with the high-flying, high-scoring offense that Texas Tech became known for during their time together in college. Kingsbury, the head coach at the time, and Mahomes, the star quarterback, formed a dynamic duo that captivated fans with their explosive passing attack.

    The ‘Air Raid’ offense, a system developed by Mike Leach and Hal Mumme, emphasizes spreading the field with multiple receivers and throwing the ball downfield frequently. Kingsbury, a former quarterback himself who played in a similar system at Texas Tech, was the perfect orchestrator for this style of offense. And Mahomes, with his strong arm and uncanny ability to extend plays, was the perfect triggerman.

    During their time together at Texas Tech, Kingsbury and Mahomes lit up the scoreboard, setting numerous school and conference records in the process. In their final season together in 2016, Mahomes threw for over 5,000 yards and 41 touchdowns, leading the Red Raiders to a 5-7 record.

    Their success at Texas Tech paved the way for both Kingsbury and Mahomes to find success at the next level. Kingsbury went on to become the head coach of the Arizona Cardinals in the NFL, while Mahomes was drafted by the Kansas City Chiefs and has since become one of the league’s brightest stars, winning a Super Bowl in just his second season as a starter.

    As we continue to marvel at the success of Mahomes and the Chiefs in the NFL, it’s worth revisiting their time together at Texas Tech and the foundation that was laid for their future success. The ‘Air Raid’ offense led by Kingsbury and Mahomes was a sight to behold, and it’s no surprise that they have continued to light up the scoreboard at the highest level of football.

    Tags:

    1. Kliff Kingsbury
    2. Patrick Mahomes
    3. Texas Tech
    4. Air Raid offense
    5. Chiefs QB
    6. College football
    7. Texas Tech football
    8. Kliff Kingsbury coaching
    9. Patrick Mahomes college career
    10. Texas Tech offense

    #Kliff #Kingsbury #Patrick #Mahomes #college #Revisiting #Texas #Techs #Air #Raid #offense #led #Chiefs

  • How Did the Chiefs Land Hollywood Brown? Revisiting How Kansas City Acquired the $7 Million WR


    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1w0XtN_0yFwzguZ00

    The Kansas City Chiefs began last year’s offseason with one goal in mind: improving the offense. After leading the league in dropped catches and struggling throughout the year, the team wanted to kick it into the next gear. They found their answer quickly in Marquise “Hollywood” Brown.

    But a full regular season later, how is the move looking for both sides?

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3td5xU_0yFwzguZ00
    Dive into Pro Football Network’s FREE Mock Draft Simulator and run a mock by yourself or with your friends!

    Chiefs Signed Hollywood Brown in Free Agency

    After releasing Marquez Valdes-Scantling early in the offseason, the Chiefs were looking to make a big free agency splash. And they got their man in Brown. It was a relatively low-risk hire, as the Chiefs signed him for one year at just $7 million.

    Brown started his career with the Baltimore Ravens after being taken in the first round of the 2019 NFL Draft. He spent three seasons there, with him having his one-and-only 1,000-yard season in his last season with the team.

    Afterward, Brown was traded to the Arizona Cardinals, where he spent two seasons.

    Before Kansas City, Brown had caught 313 passes for 3,644 yards and 28 touchdowns. In 2023, he caught 51 receptions on 101 targets for 574 yards and four touchdowns in 14 games. So, the upside was clear to the Chiefs when making the move.

    Since moving on from Tyreek Hill to shore up the defense, Kansas City hadn’t had a true long-ball threat on the roster. But with Brown in the mix, the Chiefs finally had the chance to let Patrick Mahomes air it out once again.

    Brown’s Injury and Return

    Unfortunately, things didn’t exactly go according to plan. While Kansas City capped off a terrific regular season with a 15-1 record before resting its starters in Week 18, they did most of the work without Brown on the roster.

    In the first week of the preseason, Brown caught a pass from Mahomes against the Jacksonville Jaguars. Yet, he landed awkwardly on his shoulder, beginning an injury and long rehabilitation process that would see him miss the first 15 weeks of the season.

    Meanwhile, the Chiefs’ offense was far from excellent, hovering at or near the top 10 according to PFN’s Offense+ metric , but they continued to find ways to win regardless.

    Then, before Week 16, the positives started pouring in.

    After being on injured reserve since September, Brown was finally ready to make his return in Week 16 against the Houston Texans. In the next two weeks, Brown recorded 45 and 46 yards, respectively, as he tried to grow accustomed to the offense. However, his impact was far greater than just the raw yardage he put up.

    In just two games, Brown became an easy target for Mahomes to convert third downs, helping the best third-down team in the NFL to grow even more lethal.

    Further, over that two-game stretch, the Chiefs averaged 28 points per game, their highest mark for any two-game sample this season.

    Even though they were able to skate through the regular season largely without Brown, Kansas City’s quest for the first-ever three-peat will require him to come in handy during the length of the playoffs.



    The Kansas City Chiefs made a major splash in the offseason by acquiring wide receiver Hollywood Brown in a surprising move. The $7 million deal raised eyebrows across the league, leaving many wondering how the Chiefs managed to land such a coveted player. Let’s take a closer look at how Kansas City pulled off this unexpected acquisition.

    It all started with the Chiefs’ need for a dynamic playmaker on offense. After losing some key players in free agency, including Sammy Watkins, the team was looking to fill the void with a player who could stretch the field and create mismatches for opposing defenses. Hollywood Brown, known for his speed and big-play ability, was the perfect fit for what the Chiefs were looking for.

    The Chiefs wasted no time in pursuing Brown once he became available in free agency. They offered him a lucrative contract that not only matched his market value but also provided him with the opportunity to play alongside superstar quarterback Patrick Mahomes. The allure of playing for a championship contender and catching passes from one of the best quarterbacks in the league was too good for Brown to pass up.

    In the end, it was a combination of the Chiefs’ aggressive pursuit of Brown, their attractive offer, and the opportunity to play for a winning team that sealed the deal. The addition of Hollywood Brown adds another dimension to an already potent Chiefs offense, making them even more dangerous for opposing defenses.

    As the season unfolds, all eyes will be on Hollywood Brown and how he integrates into the Chiefs’ high-powered offense. If he can live up to his potential and make an impact on the field, the $7 million investment will surely be worth it for Kansas City. Stay tuned to see how this exciting acquisition plays out for the Chiefs in the upcoming season.

    Tags:

    Kansas City Chiefs, Hollywood Brown, NFL, wide receiver, Kansas City Chiefs roster, Kansas City Chiefs trade, Baltimore Ravens trade, NFL draft, NFL free agency, Kansas City Chiefs acquisitions

    #Chiefs #Land #Hollywood #Brown #Revisiting #Kansas #City #Acquired #Million

  • Revisiting Jamie Lee Curtis’ 1999 Sci-Fi Horror Movie


    The movie Virus did not officially scuttle across screens until 1999, but its biomechanical horrors first sprang to life a bit earlier. The road to screen adaptation was not straightforward for Navy SEAL turned writer Chuck Pfarrer; he first pitched his high concept to Universal Pictures, only to then have it land at Dark Horse Comics. Upon the series’ success, Pfarrer tried his luck again with Universal. This time, though, producer Gale Anne Hurd was there to help get Virus optioned as well as find a potential director.

    It was in 1995 that Universal first approached John Bruno about helming Virus. Initially, the visual effects artist was hesitant about directing a feature, and Pfarrer’s screenplay was a major factor in that uncertainty; he found it to be too dense and complicated for his liking. Yet after a talk with colleague and friend James Cameron, Bruno eventually accepted the offer, providing that he could make changes to the story. Bruno and Species franchise scribe Dennis Feldman revised the script together, which led to their changing the nationality of the haunted ship from Chinese to Russian, making the computer virus into an electricity-based entity from space, and generally adapting the original comic rather than Pfarrer’s newer treatment.

    Spread across four issues, Dark Horse’s Virus (1992) follows the crew of the Electra as they first survive a Pacific typhoon, then battle the monsters lurking inside of a hulking and seemingly empty Chinese seacraft. Similarly, the movie has the diverse crew of the Sea Star, a dwindling tugboat captained by Donald Sutherland’s Everton, discovering the Vladislav Volkov and the biomechanoids aboard that, like their comic equivalents, cannot be allowed to escape via transmission. And helping Jamie Lee Curtis and William Baldwin’s characters evade death is now Joanna Pacula’s Nadia, the sole Russian survivor.

    virus

    Image: A page from the Virus comic series, written by Chuck Pfarrer and illustrated by Howard Cobb.

    The discrepancies between the cinematic adaptation and its source material are noticeable yet also nothing outrageous. Character names have largely been changed, with the exceptions of Foster (Curtis) and Richie (Sherman Augustus), but it is clear who everyone else is channeling, based on his or her function in the story. Leading man Steve Baker (Baldwin) is an approximation of his more macho parallel, Averil, and Apia is switched out with a deckhand named Hiko (Cliff Curtis). Pacula’s Nadia fills in for Mallone, the only other female character from the comic, and Sutherland’s Captain Everton endures that same horrific transformation in store for Captain Powell.

    Naturally, the Virus comic plays out like a movie, given its beginnings and Pfarrer’s original intentions, however, the comic’s breakneck pacing does not leave room for anything besides constant emergency situations and adrenaline-fueled action. In addition, the scant downtimes have the characters barely pondering the origin or purpose of their adversaries. In the movie, though, a straight answer for the aliens’ arrival is given; they are, like the Sea Star crew, here to salvage. In their case, for spare body parts after deeming humans nothing more than a virus. While that bit of information might have been best inferred, moviegoers can appreciate the clarification.

    Virus is dismissed as just another helping of streamlined genre fare, but in its defense, the movie attempted to add a shred of meat to a barebones plot. Reading the comic series helps make that distinction clearer. Nevertheless, for a more full-clad experience of the same story, S. D. Perry’s novelization does the job and then some.

    Bruno expressed his approval in the tie-in book’s foreword: “The film was completed by the time I read the final novelization of Virus. I was ecstatic. Here was the story as I had always imagined it. Through all the various drafts of the screenplays. A seafaring tale with all the ideas (all the best ideas) completed as a continuous story, right there on the page. I could take my time to savor the moments. Taste them. I could spend time with Foster, Steve, or the Captain at my own pace. […] That is why I’m so happy with the way [Stephani] Danelle Perry finished the story, expanding on the original idea. Filling in the gaps. She made it her own. The way I hoped it would be.”

    virus

    Image: The Virus novelization by S. D. Perry.

    The Tor Books-published novelization was released in August of 1998 to coincide with the movie’s slated summer premiere. However, plans changed, and Virus was pushed to October before finally ending up in January of ‘99. The delay could have been owed to the fact that Curtis’ more highly anticipated horror pic, Halloween H20: 20 Years Later, was scheduled a week before Virus’ original opening date. And maybe bad buzz, following the first postponement, led to the ultimate destination of January a.k.a. a dumping ground month. Not everyone puts stock in the dump-months theory, but Virus’ glut of negative reviews — Roger Ebert compared the movie to the equally disliked Deep Rising, and Variety’s Joe Leydon called it “derivative” — only reinforce the notion.

    Despite the movie’s bad press, S. D. Perry’s literary companion is an enjoyable read that, in part, surpasses its celluloid counterpart. That part in question, of course, pertains to those characters who came across as one-dimensional and underdeveloped on screen. As an alternative, Perry makes the cast more engaging. The story unfolds near exactly the same as it does in Bruno’s version, although now there is bonus insight into the Sea Star’s motley crew as they fend off the metallic menace.

    What Bruno and Feldman had originally planned for Foster and her shipmates, in terms of characterization and background, was rescued from the cutting room floor and restored in the novelization. Perry conjured up a proper — not to mention dread inducing — journey before ever revealing the biomechanoids. In the meantime, the author probed the interiors of each Sea Star crewmember, exposing their flaws and innermost thoughts. Most everyone in this mixed lot is as testy and discontent as their screen variants, but now the source of that restlessness is transparent.

    virus

    Image: The cast of Virus includes William Baldwin, Cliff Curtis, Sherman Augustus, Joanna Pacula and Jamie Lee Curtis.

    The literary depiction of Foster, the ostensible protagonist of Virus, is hoping to forge her own path after only being known as an admiral’s daughter. Or as Richie likes to call her, a “rich bitch.” Truth be told, the Sea Star’s navigator resents her privileged upbringing as much as those around her, and that bitterness comes out during Foster’s flagrant defiance of authority. Particularly when she and Captain Everton butt heads over the chain of command. Then there is Everton who is, without question, an aggravating, sexist and conniving fellow, but he is both haunted and deadened by a failed marriage. The reminder of his unfaithful ex-wife is with him every day; she christened the Sea Star, and he never bothered to change the name.

    Surprisingly, the character who Perry expounded on the most was Hiko Alailima. This extensive detailing resulted in a decent sum of Maori culture and family history. And based on the sizable spotlight she gave Hiko, it is possible that the author was trying to avoid the “noble savage” problem that often occurs with characters like Apia, Hiko’s analogous character in the comic. Also of note is how Hiko’s fate changed in the novelization; unlike in the movie, he survives along with Foster and Baker. This outcome was, presumably, due to Perry adapting a prior version of the screenplay, one proceeding the “jump scare” pick-up that later became the movie’s official ending. 

    Richie is another supporting character who receives more substantial attention in the novelization. On top of his unambiguous affinity for marijuana, Richie’s crucial change of heart happens more organically as well as affectingly in the book. As Richie hears Foster and Nadia’s screams of terror in the distance, he stops in his tracks to question his selfish actions; he reflects on that strange feeling of guilt stirring inside of him. Perry was wise to then articulate this sudden inner conflict: “He hadn’t needed [Foster and Nadia], that was for certain. But maybe they had needed him; maybe if he had stayed with them, they wouldn’t be screaming right now.” That internal dialogue adds just the right amount of weight to Richie’s typically off-putting character and makes his ultimate sacrifice all the more emotional.

    virus

    Image: Donald Sutherland’s Virus character Captain Everton meets with the enemy.

    Overall, the Virus novelization better portrays the ragtag quality of the Sea Star gang. This is an ensemble of misfits and lost souls who could not cut it in normal life anymore. Foster was habitually noncompliant, Richie’s substance affection got him booted from the Navy, Hiko never quite recovered from the loss of his parents, and Baker is commitment phobic. By airing everyone’s dirty laundry, though, Perry makes this cast of characters more accessible. The simple thrills of the humans’ clashes with the biomechanoids are undeniable, however, now there is more reason to root for them.

    The major draw of Virus, in any form, is its collection of cybernetic creatures. The novelization’s own brand of nightmare fuel exists in potent spurts; Perry was morbid with each hazardous encounter. For instance, the lumbering eyesore that Richie and helmsman Woods (Marshall Bell on screen) spot early on is described as “alive, but it was only part human. The rest was metal and wire, cords and circuits set into flesh that was starting to decay. It was a man, half of his skull cleanly removed, the exposed brain glistening. Wires extended out from the gelatinous mass and twisted behind the creature. […] Cracked, dripping flesh hung from the skeletal fingers.” With vivid descriptions like that, it is easier to imagine those unnatural horrors within the Volkov.

    Perry’s aptitude for gory details aside, Bruno’s movie remains the clear champion when it comes to manifesting the monsters. That menagerie of frankensteined mechani-freaks on display is touted as the flick’s one redeeming aspect — even the most disparaging critic could not help but be in awe of Steve Johnson and XFX’s craftsmanship. And not to be forgotten, Mayling Cheng’s immersive and impeccable production design also, and rightfully, comes up in the movie’s reappraisals. Without Cheng’s efforts, that solid mix of practical and digital artistry, one that elevates Virus a notch or two on the scale of sheer entertainment, would have a less atmospheric place to unfold.

    Universal invested a sizable chunk of time and money into Virus, even going so far as providing it the sort of ancillary merchandise usually reserved for blockbusters. This included, on top of the novelization, a Europe-only video game and a line of toys. Needless to say, the movie underperformed, and it was ripped to shreds by audiences, critics, and later its own headliner. Jamie Lee Curtis has since said Virus is the “unbelievably bad movie” that she whips out whenever actors compare their worst-ever projects. So, indeed, there are shortcomings; from the writing to the characters, they are ever-present. Appreciators of horror and sci-fi pulp, however, can still admire the loud and flashy delivery, the array of special effects, and perhaps most of all, unique creature designs that have only gotten creepier with time.

    virus

    Image: Jamie Lee Curtis’ Virus character Foster tries to escape Goliath.



    “Unleashing Terror: A Look Back at Jamie Lee Curtis’ 1999 Sci-Fi Horror Movie ‘Virus’”

    In the late ’90s, Jamie Lee Curtis starred in the thrilling sci-fi horror film “Virus,” which combined elements of alien invasion, technological terror, and survival horror. Directed by John Bruno, the film follows a crew of salvage ship members who come across a mysterious abandoned Russian research vessel, only to discover that it has been infected by a malevolent alien entity.

    As the crew members fight for their lives against the deadly creature that can assimilate both machines and humans, Curtis’ character, Kit Foster, emerges as a strong and resourceful leader. Known for her iconic roles in horror classics like “Halloween,” Curtis brings her signature intensity and charisma to the role, anchoring the film with a compelling performance.

    Despite mixed reviews upon its release, “Virus” has since gained a cult following among fans of the genre, thanks to its thrilling action sequences, practical effects, and eerie atmosphere. With its blend of sci-fi and horror elements, the film offers a unique and chilling experience that is sure to keep viewers on the edge of their seats.

    So, if you’re in the mood for a spine-tingling thrill ride, consider revisiting Jamie Lee Curtis’ underrated gem “Virus” and prepare to be engulfed by its terrifying tale of survival in the face of unimaginable horror.

    Tags:

    Jamie Lee Curtis, 1999 movie, sci-fi horror, Halloween H20, film analysis, iconic actress, scream queen, cult classic, horror film, science fiction, thriller, movie review, revisiting classic films, top horror movies of the 90s.

    #Revisiting #Jamie #Lee #Curtis #SciFi #Horror #Movie

  • Apple Replay: A Guide to Revisiting Your Favorite Music, TV Shows, and Movies

    Apple Replay: A Guide to Revisiting Your Favorite Music, TV Shows, and Movies


    Apple has recently launched a new feature called Apple Replay, which allows users to easily revisit their favorite music, TV shows, and movies from the past year. This feature is perfect for those who want to relive some of their favorite moments or discover new content that they may have missed.

    With Apple Replay, users can access a personalized playlist of their most-played songs from the year, as well as a list of their top TV shows and movies. This makes it easy to see what content has made the biggest impact on your life over the past year, and allows you to easily revisit those moments with just a few clicks.

    In addition to providing users with a snapshot of their favorite content from the past year, Apple Replay also offers recommendations for new music, TV shows, and movies that you may enjoy based on your listening and viewing habits. This can help you discover new content that you may have overlooked, and expand your entertainment horizons.

    To access your Apple Replay playlist, simply visit the Apple Music website and log in with your Apple ID. From there, you can view your personalized playlist and explore recommendations for new content to enjoy.

    Overall, Apple Replay is a great tool for music, TV, and movie lovers who want to easily revisit their favorite content from the past year and discover new entertainment options. Whether you’re looking to relive some of your favorite moments or discover new content that you may have missed, Apple Replay has you covered.

Chat Icon