Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Risks
Cybersecurity in the Cloud: Risks and Strategies for Protection
In recent years, the use of cloud computing has skyrocketed, with businesses of all sizes turning to cloud services for flexibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. However, as more data and applications are moved to the cloud, cybersecurity concerns have also increased. The shared nature of cloud environments and the potential for unauthorized access make them attractive targets for cybercriminals. In this article, we will explore the risks associated with cybersecurity in the cloud and discuss strategies for protecting sensitive data and applications.One of the biggest risks of using cloud services is the potential for data breaches. Cloud providers store vast amounts of data from multiple clients on shared servers, making them prime targets for hackers looking to steal sensitive information. In addition, misconfigured cloud settings can leave data exposed to unauthorized access, leading to potential data leaks. To mitigate this risk, organizations should implement strong encryption measures to protect data both in transit and at rest. Regular security audits and monitoring can also help detect and address any vulnerabilities in the cloud environment.
Another common cybersecurity risk in the cloud is the threat of malware and ransomware attacks. Malicious actors may use phishing emails or other tactics to gain access to cloud accounts and deploy malware that can disrupt operations or steal sensitive information. To combat this risk, organizations should implement multi-factor authentication and access controls to limit who can access cloud resources. Regularly updating software and conducting security training for employees can also help prevent malware attacks.
In addition to external threats, organizations must also be aware of insider risks in the cloud. Employees with access to sensitive data or applications may inadvertently or intentionally expose information, leading to data breaches or other security incidents. To address this risk, organizations should implement strict access controls and monitor employee activity in the cloud environment. Regularly reviewing and updating user permissions can help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data.
Overall, protecting data and applications in the cloud requires a multi-faceted approach that includes encryption, access controls, monitoring, and regular security audits. By implementing these strategies, organizations can reduce the risk of cyberattacks and safeguard their sensitive information in the cloud. As the use of cloud services continues to grow, it is essential for businesses to prioritize cybersecurity and take proactive steps to protect their data and infrastructure.
The Risks and Rewards of IT Outsourcing
In today’s fast-paced business world, many companies are turning to IT outsourcing as a way to cut costs, improve efficiency, and gain access to specialized skills and expertise. While outsourcing can offer a number of benefits, such as cost savings and increased flexibility, it also comes with its fair share of risks and challenges.One of the main benefits of IT outsourcing is cost savings. By outsourcing IT functions to a third-party provider, companies can reduce their overhead costs, such as salaries, benefits, and infrastructure expenses. This can result in significant cost savings, especially for small and medium-sized businesses that may not have the resources to maintain an in-house IT department.
In addition to cost savings, outsourcing can also provide companies with access to specialized skills and expertise. IT outsourcing providers often have a team of highly skilled professionals who can handle a wide range of IT tasks, from software development to network security. This can help companies stay competitive in today’s rapidly changing business environment, where technology plays a crucial role in driving innovation and growth.
However, while outsourcing can offer many benefits, it also comes with its fair share of risks. One of the main risks of IT outsourcing is the potential for data breaches and security vulnerabilities. When companies outsource IT functions to a third-party provider, they are essentially handing over sensitive data and information to an external party. This can create security risks, as the outsourced provider may not have the same level of security measures in place as the company itself.
Another risk of IT outsourcing is the potential for communication and coordination challenges. When IT functions are outsourced to a third-party provider, it can be difficult to maintain clear communication and ensure that tasks are being completed in a timely and efficient manner. This can result in delays, misunderstandings, and ultimately, a lack of accountability for the outsourced functions.
Despite these risks, many companies continue to embrace IT outsourcing as a way to improve efficiency, cut costs, and gain access to specialized skills and expertise. By carefully evaluating the risks and rewards of outsourcing, companies can make informed decisions about whether outsourcing is the right choice for their business. Ultimately, successful IT outsourcing requires careful planning, clear communication, and ongoing monitoring to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks.
Dr Tabinda Sarwar: AI tool is predicting health risks in aged care
Reading Time: 4 minutesAustralia’s aged care system is a lifeline for nearly half a million older Australians. As of June 30, 2023, 456,000 Australians were utilising aged care services, with 193,000 in residential care and 258,000 receiving home care support, the AIHW’s GEN Aged Care Data revealed. This support system, however, faces immense pressure to meet the growing demand for quality care.
Addressing these challenges head-on, Telstra Health and RMIT University along with the Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre have unveiled a groundbreaking AI-powered tool to predict health risks, transforming the way aged care facilities monitor and manage resident well-being.
RMIT University’s project lead and data scientist, Dr Tabinda Sarwar, says the tool is a much-needed advancement for a burdened system.
“The tool is capable of automatically monitoring both structured and free-text electronic patient records for 36 evidence-based indicators of deterioration,” explains Dr Sarwar. “These indicators are further linked to predicting various health risks, providing a comprehensive system to support nursing staff and improving resident care outcomes.”
Dr Tabinda Sarwar, lead researcher on the aged care tool. (Source: Supplied) “In aged care homes, the elderly are provided with care and support, with nursing staff responsible for both their daily needs and health monitoring. This dual responsibility creates a significant workload as staff must oversee multiple residents and their varying health conditions. Given this existing burden, introducing a manual screening tool is not an optimal solution.”
In collaboration with Telstra Health, RMIT developed a data-driven tool designed to not only monitor residents’ health conditions but also predict adverse health events.
This digital health tool is now winner of the Research Australia’s Digital & Data Health Innovation Award for 2024.
For the team, this recognition holds immense significance.
“It represents both recognition and achievement in making a positive difference—enhancing the work of nursing staff and, in turn, improving the quality of life for elderly residents in aged care homes,” Dr Sarwar shares.
The team also won the Cooperative Research Australia’s Excellence in Innovation award earlier this year (Source: Supplied) How the tool works
The tool relies on daily operational data collected at aged care homes.
“Nursing staff routinely document notes and record health-related details, which formed the foundation for developing this tool,” Dr Tabinda Sarwar adds.
By processing this data with natural language processing (NLP) techniques, the tool identifies early signs of deterioration and generates predictive alerts for various health risks. Geriatric assessments, observation charts, and progress notes are key data inputs, ensuring a comprehensive approach to health monitoring.
“We applied advanced data analysis and machine learning techniques to daily collected information, enabling us to predict signs of deterioration,” Dr Sarwar explains. “This includes risks such as falls, depression, and even mortality, based on evidence from the extracted data.”
The team also won the Cooperative Research Australia’s Excellence in Innovation award earlier this year. (Source: Supplied) Telstra Health’s Clinical Manager system, deployed in over 360 facilities across Australia, provided the essential infrastructure for the project. The collaboration also included input from aged care nursing staff and support from the Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre (CRC).
“Telstra Health provided access to aged care homes and nursing staff, while RMIT contributed researchers and technical experts to develop digital tools and solutions,” Dr Sarwar notes. “This project would not have been possible without the pivotal role played by the Digital Health CRC. By bridging academia and industry, the Digital Health CRC showcased the immense potential of collaborative efforts in leveraging technology to address complex health challenges.”
Overcoming healthcare challenges
Developing a universal solution for diverse aged care facilities was no small feat. Nursing staff across different homes highlighted unique challenges, requiring the tool to be highly adaptable.
“Consequently, designing a solution that could address broader issues and have a meaningful impact on a larger population proved to be the most complex part of the project,” she adds.
To validate the tool’s usability, the team conducted an independent study to ensure that the developed solution is user-friendly and can be easily adopted by nursing staff without difficulty.
“To validate and evaluate its performance and accuracy, we employed statistical and machine learning techniques, which were essential for ensuring the tool’s clinical feasibility. Additionally, the prediction of deterioration relied on machine learning models, highlighting the critical role of data mining and machine learning in the success of the project.”
Dr Sarwar says the tool could transform the aged care industry. (Source: Supplied) The tool is currently with Telstra Health, which is in the process of deployment.
“We have been informed that numerous aged care homes have already expressed interest in adopting the tool,” Dr Tabinda Sarwar says.
Telstra Health holds the rights to the tool so any plans to expand its functionality to predict additional health risks depend on their future strategies.
But Dr Sarwar points out: “This tool has the potential to be extended to other healthcare settings, such as hospitals, and could play a key role in transforming the healthcare industry.”
READ ALSO: Aged care facility for South Asian seniors gets off the ground
As technology continues to advance, new tools are being developed to help improve healthcare for the elderly. One such tool is an artificial intelligence (AI) system created by Dr. Tabinda Sarwar, a leading researcher in the field of geriatric care.This AI tool is revolutionizing the way health risks are predicted in aged care facilities. By analyzing data from patients’ medical records, as well as information on their lifestyle and habits, the system can accurately identify potential health issues before they become serious.
Dr. Sarwar’s AI tool has already been implemented in several aged care facilities, with impressive results. By predicting health risks early on, doctors and caregivers are able to intervene sooner and provide more effective treatment, ultimately improving the quality of life for elderly patients.
With the aging population increasing globally, tools like Dr. Sarwar’s AI system are becoming more essential in ensuring the well-being of older adults. By harnessing the power of technology, we can better care for our elderly loved ones and ensure they live longer, healthier lives.
Tags:
- Dr Tabinda Sarwar
- AI tool
- health risks
- aged care
- predictive healthcare
- artificial intelligence
- elderly health
- healthcare technology
- predictive analytics
- elderly care innovation
#Tabinda #Sarwar #tool #predicting #health #risks #aged #care
FDA approves Ozempic to reduce risks from chronic kidney disease in diabetes patients
CNN
—
Ozempic, the blockbuster GLP-1 drug that was originally approved to treat type 2 diabetes, has now also been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce certain risks associated with chronic kidney disease, drugmaker Novo Nordisk said Tuesday.
A Phase 3 clinical trial found that injections of the semaglutide medication once weekly reduced the risk of kidney disease worsening by 24% in people who also had diabetes. It also reduced the risk of kidney failure and cut the risk of death from heart disease by about 5% in adults with both type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, the company said in a news release.
Chronic kidney disease is a common complication for people living with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of kidney failure, which is one of the leading causes of death in the US and worldwide; about a third of adults with diabetes also have chronic kidney disease, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The clinical trial tested the efficacy of Ozempic when added to the standard of care, not as a replacement for other treatments for disease management such as medicines to manage blood pressure, including ACE inhibitors and ARBs. About 3,500 adults across 28 countries were enrolled in the trial, which started in 2019 and followed participants for an average of about 3½ years.
The new indications, approved Tuesday by the FDA, make Ozempic the most broadly indicated drug in its class, with the largest set of specific medical conditions that it may be prescribed to treat.
Novo Nordisk is conducting a different study to understand how and why semgalutide seems to reduce the progression of kidney disease, said Stephen Gough, global chief medical officer and senior vice president at Novo Nordisk. But even though scientists don’t fully understand the mechanisms behind them, the positive effects are strong: The clinical study was stopped early after reaching positive endpoints sooner than expected, and no new safety risks were identified in this trial, he said.
Get CNN Health’s weekly newsletter
“This really means something to the patients,” Gough told CNN. “The impact on not just kidney disease but also cardiovascular disease and on all-cause death.”
Ozempic and other semaglutide injections such as Wegovy have been in short supply for years due to their rapid popularity. The FDA now lists Ozempic as “available,” but there is still high demand.
“This is a medicine that’s already available, both in diabetes clinics and now in renal clinics, so I would hope the uptake would start pretty quickly,” Gough said, adding that he hopes the confidence that comes with the data behind this approval will aid clinicians who are making daily decisions about how and when to use different treatments.
“It does help clinicians with their decision-making process, and it helps them focus those medicines to the patients who will benefit the most,” he said.
The FDA has recently approved the use of Ozempic for reducing the risks associated with chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes. This is a significant development in the field of diabetes management, as chronic kidney disease is a common complication of diabetes and can lead to serious health issues if not properly addressed.Ozempic, also known as semaglutide, is a once-weekly injectable medication that helps lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition to its blood sugar-lowering effects, studies have shown that Ozempic can also help reduce the risk of kidney damage in diabetic patients.
Chronic kidney disease is a serious complication of diabetes that can lead to kidney failure if not properly managed. By reducing the risks associated with kidney disease, Ozempic has the potential to improve the overall health and quality of life for diabetes patients.
The approval of Ozempic for reducing the risks of chronic kidney disease in diabetes patients is a significant milestone in the field of diabetes management. It provides healthcare providers with another tool to help prevent and manage complications associated with diabetes, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
Tags:
- FDA approval
- Ozempic
- Chronic kidney disease
- Diabetes patients
- Risk reduction
- FDA regulations
- Diabetes management
- Kidney health
- Health news
- Medical breakthrough
#FDA #approves #Ozempic #reduce #risks #chronic #kidney #disease #diabetes #patients
Federal employee lawsuit alleges security, privacy risks in new OPM communications system
Federal employees have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration’s Office of Personnel Management, after the agency created and began testing an email system meant to deliver mass communications directly to federal employees’ inboxes.
The lawsuit from two anonymous federal employees in the executive branch alleges OPM violated the 2002 E-Government Act by not releasing details of how the communication system will manage federal employees’ personal information stored in the system.
Kel McClanahan, executive director of the National Security Counselors law firm, filed the pro bono lawsuit on behalf of the plaintiffs, alleging that the email system poses security risks for federal employees’ personal information.
“A one-stop shop for information about every government employee in the federal executive branch is just a treasure trove for hackers, or even just curiosity seekers,” McClanahan said in an interview.
The 2002 E-Government Act requires agencies to complete a “privacy impact assessment” for any new online federal system by analyzing how personally identifiable information will be collected, stored, protected, shared and managed within that system. Agencies are required to make the assessment public unless it would raise concerns with national security or reveal classified information.
“People have a right to know where their information is being stored by the government and how well it’s being protected,” McClanahan said.
OPM first announced the testing of its new mass communications system last week. In the following days, some federal employees said they received test emails from OPM asking them to reply “yes” to confirm whether they received the message.
“OPM is testing a new capability allowing it to send important communications to ALL civilian federal employees from a single email address,” the agency wrote in a Jan. 23 announcement. “Testing of this messaging system functionality is expected as soon as this week.”
The purpose of OPM’s mass communications system is unclear, but federal employees in the lawsuit pointed to the possibility of OPM using the communication method to send updates about reductions in force (RIFs). OPM declined to comment on both the lawsuit and the intentions of the new mass communication system.
Regardless of the purpose for the messaging system, McClanahan said the data security of federal employees’ personal information is the central point of the Jan. 27 complaint.
“We have no idea what this system is. We have no idea what the nature of the system is. All we know is that by OPM’s own language, it is a new distribution and response system,” McClanahan said. “If they’re going to set up a new system to do something that’s going to collect all this information, they have to ensure that it’s secure, and they have to ensure that people know that it’s secure — but they haven’t done any of that.”
Several federal agencies have also reportedly sent messages to their employees about OPM’s communications system, according to the lawsuit. For example, the lawsuit states that on Jan. 23, the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security emailed employees to make them aware of the OPM email tests, and that the emails “can be considered trusted.”
The lawsuit, however, alleges that the communications are not being sent securely due to how quickly OPM began sending out the messages.
“Secure communications take time and coordination to plan and implement,” the lawsuit states. “Standard email is not encrypted, and it is common practice among hackers — including hackers affiliated with hostile foreign services — to begin attempting to access a new U.S. government device as soon as they learn of its deployment.”
The plaintiffs also pointed to the 2015 OPM data breach, which put personal data of roughly 22 million current and former federal employees at risk.
The lawsuit additionally references a recent Reddit post from an account claiming to be a long-time career federal employee at OPM. The employee stated that former OPM CIO Melvin Brown “was pushed aside just one week into his tenure because he refused to setup email lists to send out direct communications to all career civil servants.”
The Reddit poster additionally stated that agencies are being directed to send lists of federal employees to OPM Chief of Staff Amanda Scales, a former employee at xAI, which is owned by billionaire Elon Musk. Musk is also a leader of the Department of Government Efficiency, which is facing its own series of legal action.
In the Jan. 27 complaint against OPM, the plaintiffs are seeking to file the lawsuit as a class action lawsuit. They are calling for OPM to promptly conduct a privacy impact assessment for the new communications system.
Copyright
© 2025 Federal News Network. All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
In a recent federal employee lawsuit, concerns have been raised about the security and privacy risks associated with a new communications system implemented by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The lawsuit alleges that the new system leaves sensitive employee information vulnerable to hacking and unauthorized access.The OPM, which oversees the federal government’s human resources and personnel data, rolled out the new communications system in an effort to streamline operations and improve efficiency. However, employees have expressed concerns about the system’s lack of encryption and other security measures, which could potentially expose sensitive personal and financial information to cyber threats.
The lawsuit highlights the importance of robust security measures in all government communications systems, particularly those handling sensitive employee data. As federal employees continue to work remotely and rely on digital platforms to carry out their duties, it is crucial that agencies prioritize cybersecurity and data protection to safeguard against potential breaches and privacy violations.
The outcome of the lawsuit remains to be seen, but it serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges and risks associated with modernizing government communications systems. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative that agencies prioritize security and privacy to ensure the safety and wellbeing of their employees and the integrity of sensitive data.
Tags:
- Federal employee lawsuit
- OPM communications system
- Security risks
- Privacy risks
- Lawsuit allegations
- Federal government data breach
- OPM security breach
- Employee privacy concerns
- Government communication system lawsuit
- Legal action against OPM
#Federal #employee #lawsuit #alleges #security #privacy #risks #OPM #communications #system
Weather Impact Alert issued for Monday, Jan. 27, due to strong gusts of wind bringing increased fire risks
The Storm Track 8 team has issued a Weather Impact Alert for Monday, Jan. 27, due to gusty winds capable of increasing risks of fire and shifting outdoor furniture.
MOLINE, Ill. — The Storm Track 8 team has issued a Weather Impact Alert for Monday, Jan. 27, due to strong wind gusts up to 40 to 45 miles per hour bringing increased fire risks.
Gusty winds 40 to 45 miles per hour will increase the fire danger risk in the Quad Cities region. The gusts might also affect outdoor decorations and furniture placement and positioning. Driving conditions, especially over bridges, could be impacted, especially for high-profile vehicles. Area residents should fasten, secure loose objects, and not consider burning outdoors.
Timing of the Weather Impact Alert
The Weather Impact Alert goes into effect at 9 a.m. Monday and runs through 7 p.m. It’s possible a wind advisory will be issued for portions, if not all, of the area.
Stay weather aware by downloading the Storm Track 8 mobile app to get live weather alerts sent straight to your phone.
Follow the StormTrack8 weather team on social media:
Attention residents,A Weather Impact Alert has been issued for Monday, Jan. 27, due to strong gusts of wind expected to bring increased fire risks to our area. It is important to exercise caution and be vigilant during this time.
Please refrain from any outdoor burning or activities that could potentially spark a fire. Secure any loose objects around your property that could be picked up by the wind and cause damage.
Stay informed by monitoring local news and weather updates, and follow any instructions or warnings issued by authorities. Your safety is our top priority.
Let’s work together to stay safe and protect our community from the potential dangers of these weather conditions. Thank you for your cooperation. Stay safe!
Tags:
- Weather Impact Alert
- Monday, Jan. 27
- Strong gusts of wind
- Increased fire risks
- Weather warning
- Fire danger
- Wind advisory
- Weather forecast
- Weather update
- Emergency alert
#Weather #Impact #Alert #issued #Monday #Jan #due #strong #gusts #wind #bringing #increased #fire #risks
Tuesday in Nebraska: Fire Risks, Wind Gusts, and Rain Chances by Week’s End
-Advertisement-
Omaha, NE – Nebraska residents should brace for elevated fire risks on Tuesday as warm, breezy weather continues across the state. Temperatures will climb into the mid-50s, coupled with gusty winds reaching up to 25-30 mph, creating prime conditions for fires to ignite and spread rapidly.
According to the National Weather Service (NWS) in Omaha, the areas near the Platte and Elkhorn rivers are also at risk of ice jams due to rising temperatures. Ice jams could result in minor flooding, prompting local officials to monitor river levels closely. Residents should remain vigilant and avoid flood-prone areas.
The week ahead includes a mix of sunny skies through Wednesday, followed by increasing rain chances Thursday into Friday, with up to a ¾ inch of precipitation expected in some areas. Winds will ease midweek, with temperatures cooling slightly into the 40s by Friday.
Drivers are urged to use caution along Nebraska highways, especially during high wind periods. Avoid outdoor burning to minimize fire risks. The warm, dry conditions will likely subside by the weekend, offering cooler, clearer weather for outdoor activities.
Stay informed with regular updates from local authorities and prepare for changing conditions.
Be sure to follow us on Instagram & like us on Facebook to stay up-to-date on more relevant news stories and SUPPORT LOCAL INDEPENDENT NEWS!
Tuesday in Nebraska: Fire Risks, Wind Gusts, and Rain Chances by Week’s EndAs we head into another week in Nebraska, residents are being urged to stay vigilant as fire risks remain high across the state. With dry conditions and gusty winds in the forecast, the potential for wildfires to spread rapidly is a major concern.
The National Weather Service has issued a Red Flag Warning for much of Nebraska, indicating that conditions are ripe for the rapid spread of fires. It is important for everyone to exercise caution and avoid any activities that could potentially spark a blaze.
In addition to the fire risks, strong wind gusts are expected throughout the day on Tuesday. Wind speeds could reach up to 30 mph in some areas, posing a threat to any existing fires and making it difficult for firefighters to contain them.
However, there is some hope on the horizon. By the end of the week, there is a chance for some much-needed rain to move through the region. While the exact timing and amounts are still uncertain, any precipitation would be a welcome relief for firefighters and residents alike.
In the meantime, it is crucial for everyone to stay informed and prepared for any potential fire threats. Keep an eye on local news and weather updates, and be ready to take action if necessary. Together, we can work to keep Nebraska safe during this challenging time.
Tags:
- Nebraska weather
- Tuesday forecast
- Fire risks
- Wind gusts
- Rain chances
- Weekly weather update
- Nebraska climate
- Weather hazards
- Weather predictions
- Nebraska storms
#Tuesday #Nebraska #Fire #Risks #Wind #Gusts #Rain #Chances #Weeks
Is drinking alcohol bad for your health? New dietary guidelines will weigh risks and benefits
CNN
—
Most adults in the United States drink alcohol, but there is steadily growing public concern about the health effects of moderate drinking.
The latest science supports those concerns, but two recent government reports suggest potential benefits exist alongside potential risks – and some experts say that formal dietary recommendations, due to be reviewed this year, could take a more nuanced approach.
It is well-established that excessive alcohol use, including binge drinking and heavy drinking, has significant negative health effects. But recent studies have found that even low levels of drinking may be harmful, and the World Health Organization has said that “no level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health.”
The current Dietary Guidelines for Americans, from the US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture, say that men should limit their daily alcohol intake to two drinks or less, and one drink or less for women.
These guidelines are up for review this year, and two recent reports meant to inform that process came to seemingly competing conclusions – continuing a longstanding debate on how to weigh the potential risks and benefits of alcohol.
But public attitudes in the US are already changing.
A new CNN poll conducted by SSRS released Friday finds that half of US adults say that moderate drinking is bad for health, more than double the share who said the same two decades ago. Women and adults younger than 45 are more likely than men and older adults to say that moderate drinking is bad for health, as were Democrats and independents.
Just 8% of US adults say that drinking in moderation is good for your health, according to the new CNN poll, about one-third of the share that said the same in 2005. Another 43% of adults say that moderate drinking makes no difference to health.
There is a known link between alcohol and cancer, and any amount of drinking raises that risk. For Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy, this “direct link” was sufficient to issue an advisory and call for an updated health warning label on alcoholic beverages to highlight it.
“Alcohol is a well-established, preventable cause of cancer responsible for about 100,000 cases of cancer and 20,000 cancer deaths annually in the United States – greater than the 13,500 alcohol-associated traffic crash fatalities per year in the US – yet the majority of Americans are unaware of this risk,” Murthy said in a statement earlier this month.
The new CNN poll finds a broad 74% majority of the US public would favor new alcoholic beverage labels warning about the risk of cancer like Murthy suggests. Democrats, women and people of color are especially likely to support a revision of the warning label, but 69% or more adults of all age, gender, partisan and racial groups said they would be in favor.
The CNN Poll was conducted by SSRS from January 9-12 among a random national sample of 1,205 adults drawn from a probability-based panel. Surveys were either conducted online or by telephone with a live interviewer. Results among the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.
Weighing risks and benefits
One of the reports meant to inform the next edition of dietary guidelines – requested by Congress and published last month by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine – reinforced the link between alcohol and cancer, but to varying degrees of certainty. The researchers, who analyzed findings from about two dozen studies, concluded with “moderate certainty” that the risk of developing breast cancer was higher among those who drank in moderation than those who didn’t drink at all. There was “low certainty” that the risk of breast cancer and colorectal cancer were higher for those who drank more in moderation than those who drank less, and no association with other throat and neck cancers.
But the same report also found some potential positive associations between moderate drinking and health. Compared with people who never consume alcohol, those who drink in moderation were at lower risk of heart attack and nonfatal stroke. And overall mortality from any cause was also found to be lower among those who drank in moderation compared with those who never drank.
“Many lifestyle choices carry potential risks, and the consumption of alcohol is no exception,” Michael Kaiser, executive vice president and director of government affairs for WineAmerica, a nonprofit organization that represents the interests of the wine industry, told CNN in an email.
“We encourage all adults who choose to drink to adhere to the Dietary Guidelines and consult with their healthcare providers. No one should drink to achieve health benefits, and some people should not drink at all,” he said, adding that the organization supports the use of this study to inform the guidelines as Congress intended and as previously done.
The other report, published last week by an independent panel convened by HHS’ Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking, also found lower risk of stroke among those who had an average of one drink per day, a lower risk of diabetes among women who drink at this level, and increased risk for certain types of cancer.
But it conversely found that the risk of dying from alcohol use begins at low levels of average use and increases as levels of alcohol consumption increases.
Many experts respect the complexity of the science, but warn against viewing drinking alcohol as a categorically healthy habit.
“It’s misleading to say that the science isn’t settled,” said Dr. Katherine Keyes, a professor at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health whose research focuses on substance use epidemiology.
“There were differences in methodology and that’s why there are some differences in the results. But when you pull apart the studies, the underlying science is consistent,” said Keyes, who was part of the independent panel convened by HHS. “There are some conditions where we did see a benefit or an inverse relationship at very low levels, but they’re really outweighed by the conditions where you see not a benefit.”
Dr. Ned Calonge, chair of the committee that wrote the National Academies report, warns that the link his group found between lower all-cause mortality and moderate drinking should not be interpreted as a summary of the relationship between alcohol and health – quite the opposite, in fact.
“All cause mortality is, I would say, a problematic outcome, because it includes so many different outcomes, which increases the potential risk of bias associated with things called confounding factors, other factors that might be responsible for the outcome,” said Calonge, who is also an associate dean for public health practice and professor of epidemiology at the Colorado School of Public Health and professor of family medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Research on the health effects of alcohol has some significant holes, which contributes to broader possibilities for interpreting the data.
“Moderate” drinking is not consistently defined, and grouping people into different categories – such as zero to three drinks per day – could skew averages when the outcomes may be very different for people at the low end of that category and the high end of that category.
The National Academies report addressed this in their finding about breast cancer risk, noting that higher amounts of drinking are associated with higher risk of breast cancer than lower amounts – even within levels considered to be “moderate.”
The gold standard for scientific research is a randomized controlled trial that actively monitors direct comparisons between scenarios with little external variability, but most studies on alcohol’s effects are based on observation without intervention.
When reviewing findings from observational studies, the strongest conclusions are drawn from strong associations between two factors, Calonge said. But the associations found in the National Academies report – the relative risks in the positive and negative directions – were not very strong, he said.
“We can’t prove cause with observational studies,” Calonge said. “These effects are important from a public health standpoint, but we can’t get above moderate certainty because there could be additional research that has different findings.”
Despite the gaps in research, many experts say the evidence of risk is too strong to be ignored.
“Even if you were to align and agree that a line of evidence is closer to the truth for one disease state, you would then look over and recognize that if you just look at a different disease outcome, the findings might go in a completely different direction,” said Dr. Ahmed Tawakol, a cardiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital.
If a new drug was being studied to reduce heart disease and the clinical trials revealed that it also raised the risk of developing cancer, that drug would never be approved, he said.
“When you use that same frame of mind in reference to alcohol, we’d say that alcohol appears to have some mechanistic actions that are beneficial, but at the same time, it comes at a consequence of really unacceptable side effects,” he said. “It becomes clear that alcohol shouldn’t be considered something that you do for the purpose of health.”
Get CNN Health’s weekly newsletter
Some research suggests that part of the way alcohol use may reduce the risk of heart attacks is the impacts it has on the limbic system, such as limiting stress signals in the brain. But there are less risky ways to achieve that same goal, Tawakol said, such as exercise that comes with multiple benefits.
Still, Tawakol says that he doesn’t usually take a strong stance against alcohol when advising his patients.
“I worry when I see this kind of black and white approach,” he said. “If you choose to drink alcohol, make sure it’s done in moderation, and also put it in the context of other lifestyle factors so that you can further buffer the potential adverse effects.”
Despite broad support of a new warning label on alcoholic beverages, US adults are virtually split on whether the government should provide health recommendations to the public or leave it to Americans to make up their own minds, according to the new CNN poll.
And many are already making their own choices. About 4 in 10 adults say that they don’t drink at all, while about 1 in 8 say that they’ve participated in Dry January – with more than half of that group saying they’re doing so this year. This idea is more popular among younger Americans, with nearly 1 in 5 adults younger than 45 participating in Dry January at some point.
CNN’s Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this report.
Alcohol consumption is a topic that has long been debated among health professionals and the general public. While moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with certain health benefits, such as a reduced risk of heart disease, excessive drinking can have detrimental effects on overall health.The upcoming release of new dietary guidelines will aim to provide a more comprehensive overview of the risks and benefits associated with alcohol consumption. These guidelines will take into account a range of factors, including individual health status, genetic predispositions, and potential interactions with medications.
It is important for individuals to be informed about the potential risks associated with alcohol consumption, including an increased risk of liver disease, certain cancers, and mental health issues. By understanding the potential consequences of excessive drinking, individuals can make more informed choices about their alcohol consumption.
Ultimately, the decision to drink alcohol should be based on an individual’s personal health goals and preferences. The new dietary guidelines will aim to provide a balanced perspective on the risks and benefits of alcohol consumption, empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their health.
Tags:
- drinking alcohol
- health risks of alcohol
- alcohol consumption
- dietary guidelines
- alcohol and health
- alcohol benefits
- alcohol guidelines
- alcohol impact on health
- alcohol consumption risks
- alcohol and well-being
#drinking #alcohol #bad #health #dietary #guidelines #weigh #risks #benefits