Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday drew ridicule and ire after she boldly declared during her first briefing as the new Trump White House press secretary:
“This administration believes that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional.”
Critics didn’t have to do too much work to point out that birthright citizenship is outlined, as follows, in the 14th Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Michael Steele, the former chair of the Republican National Committee, wrote on social media: “And on what constitutional principle is this belief based?”
President Donald Trump’s niece, Mary Trump, commented: “The Constitution is unconstitutional is quite a gauntlet to throw down.”
And Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) shared a screenshot of “the Literal Constitution.”
Trump signed an executive order to ban birthright citizenship on his first day back in office as part of his wider anti-immigrant agenda. The move faced an immediate legal challenge from Democratic-led states and last week a federal judge temporarily blocked it as “blatantly unconstitutional.”
Leavitt also received flak during her briefing debut for a highly-contested claim about America having previously sent $50 million worth of condoms to Gaza and for promising to tell “the truth from this podium every single day.”
Related…
White House Press Secretary’s ‘Unconstitutional’ Claim Is Quickly Dismantled By Critics
Recently, the White House Press Secretary made a bold claim that was quickly met with criticism and scrutiny from legal experts and pundits alike. The claim in question was deemed to be unconstitutional by many, prompting a swift dismantling of the argument.
Critics pointed out that the claim made by the Press Secretary was not supported by the Constitution or legal precedent. They argued that such a claim would set a dangerous precedent and undermine the rule of law in the country.
Legal experts weighed in on the matter, highlighting the flaws in the Press Secretary’s argument and pointing out the potential consequences of such a stance. They emphasized the importance of upholding the Constitution and protecting the rights of all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.
In the face of mounting criticism, the White House Press Secretary was forced to backtrack on their statement and clarify their position. However, the damage had already been done, with many questioning the motives behind the initial claim and calling for accountability.
Overall, the swift dismantling of the ‘unconstitutional’ claim by critics serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that all government officials adhere to the principles outlined in the Constitution. It also highlights the power of informed criticism in holding those in positions of power accountable for their actions and statements.
Tags:
White House Press Secretary, unconstitutional claim, critics, dismantled, White House, press secretary, criticism, government, unconstitutional statement, political, analysis, response, controversy, debunked, fact check, opinion, legal experts.
#White #House #Press #Secretarys #Unconstitutional #Claim #Quickly #Dismantled #Critics
