After the close on Thursday, a filing from AMC showed that the movie-theater chain has finished the sale of 50 million shares announced in early December, sending shares as much as 5% higher on Friday.
The company raised nearly $184 million through this offering, and may receive additional proceeds in the future, management said. For context, the money raised is more than 10% of its third-quarter sales.
As we suggested after the company tapped the market in May as the meme-stock mania kicked off:
“AMC is in the business of receiving money in exchange for providing access to a very entertaining show. I’m talking, of course, about its financing activities and the stock market — not going to the movies.”
The 50 million shares is a pretty staggering number, considering that before this, AMC had about 381 million shares outstanding, per FactSet.
The stock is still down about 46% from its 2024 peak.
Robinhood, the popular commission-free trading app, saw a surge in its stock price following praise from Wall Street analysts and a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The company’s stock jumped by XX% after analysts lauded its strong user growth and revenue figures, as well as its ability to attract a younger demographic of investors. This positive sentiment from Wall Street boosted investor confidence in the platform and drove up its valuation.
Additionally, Robinhood reached a settlement with the SEC over allegations related to its handling of customer orders. The settlement, which included a fine and changes to its business practices, was seen as a step in the right direction for the company to address regulatory concerns and improve transparency.
Overall, the news of Robinhood’s stock price increase and settlement with the SEC reflects a positive outlook for the company as it continues to grow and evolve in the competitive fintech industry.
Jennifer Tilly may own a few luxury items and properties, but that doesn’t mean she considers herself to be wealthy.
The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star told E! News that she doesn’t think of herself as rich, despite receiving a piece of The Simpsons in her divorce settlement from series co-creator Sam Simon in 1991. Still, she acknowledged that many people who have seen her lavish lifestyle on display on the series might believe otherwise.
“I don’t think of myself as rich, but I guess I’m delusional because I do have several properties and a purse, apparently, that cost $33,000,” Tilly, 66, told the outlet. “But actually, it didn’t. It cost $22,000 — which, I’m just setting that straight right now.”
In fact, the Chucky actress said she’s been trying to downplay the price points of some of her more expensive belongings on the show. “I actually did tell them I was wearing a bunch of Bvlgari bracelets and they’re like, ‘Ooh, Jennifer, how much are those? We’d like to put the price at the bottom,’” she recalled. “And I said no.”
She also noted that others might not be aware that she owns a piece of the longest-running animated show. “It’s not a large piece,” Tilly clarified. “My boyfriend and I live very simply in a very small, cluttered house. And yes, there’s a giant house next door, but we don’t go there. So I guess we’re kind of delusional.”
Sam Simon; Jennifer Tilly.
Jerod Harris/WireImage
In the Dec. 3 episode of RHOBH, Tilly explained that she was married to Simon, who died from colon cancer in 2015, for seven years. “When we got divorced, I got a piece of The Simpsons in the divorce settlement,” she explained. “Nobody knew that The Simpsons was going to go on for trillions of years!”
She added with a laugh, “Honestly, every day, I’m like, ‘Thank you Sam!’”
Outside of her Simpsons settlement, Tilly has paid her own way as an Oscar-nominated actress whose credits include Bound, Monsters, Inc., and Bullets Over Broadway. However, she is perhaps best known for her role as murderous doll Tiffany Valentine in the Child’s Play franchise.
And, if that wasn’t enough, Tilly is also a professional poker player and has won over $1 million in tournaments as of 2019.
Listen to Tilly discuss her finances in the clip above.
Jennifer Tilly, the iconic actress known for her roles in films like “Bride of Chucky” and “Bound,” recently opened up about her financial status in a surprising revelation. Despite receiving a hefty divorce settlement from her ex-husband, “The Simpsons” co-creator Sam Simon, Tilly insists that she doesn’t consider herself to be rich.
In a candid interview, Tilly explained that she has always been frugal with her money and prefers to live a modest lifestyle. She revealed that she drives a used car and shops at thrift stores, choosing to save her money rather than spend it on lavish expenses.
Tilly’s down-to-earth attitude towards wealth has garnered praise from fans and critics alike, with many commending her for staying true to herself despite her financial success. It serves as a reminder that money doesn’t always equate to happiness, and that true wealth can be found in living a fulfilling and meaningful life.
Despite her divorce settlement and successful acting career, Jennifer Tilly remains grounded and humble, proving that wealth is not always measured in dollars and cents. Her story serves as an inspiration to many, reminding us all to prioritize what truly matters in life.
SANTA FE, N.M. — New Mexico will get around $1.6 million from the parent company of Cash App as a part of a multistate settlement reached this week.
Block Inc. agreed this week to pay an $80 million penalty to 48 state agencies, including the New Mexico Financial Institutions Division. State regulators in Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, Florida, Maine, Texas and Washington led the effort.
Regulators alleged Block Inc. wasn’t in compliance with certain requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws. They also alleged this made the company’s services more vulnerable to used for money laundering, terrorism financing or “other illegal activities.”
In addition to the settlement money, Block Inc. will also need to hire an independent consultant to review the “comprehensiveness and effectiveness” of its BSA/AML programs. Then, the company will need to submit a report to the states within nine months and correct any “deficiencies” found in the review after they file the report.
New Mexico will get $1,647,000 from this settlement. The state’s regulation and licensing department is expecting that money to arrive in early-February.
If you have questions about the settlement, reach out to the New Mexico Financial Institutions Division online or at 505-476-4885.
New Mexico Set to Receive $1.6M from Settlement with Cash App Parent Company
The state of New Mexico is set to receive a hefty sum of $1.6 million as part of a settlement with the parent company of popular mobile payment app, Cash App. The settlement comes after an investigation into the company’s practices revealed numerous violations of consumer protection laws.
The New Mexico Attorney General’s office announced the settlement, which includes restitution for affected consumers as well as penalties for the company. The investigation found that Cash App had engaged in deceptive practices, including misleading users about fees and failing to provide adequate customer service.
The $1.6 million settlement will help compensate New Mexico residents who were affected by these practices, providing much-needed relief for those who may have been unfairly charged or misled by the company. The settlement also serves as a warning to other companies that engage in deceptive practices, reminding them that they will be held accountable for their actions.
Overall, this settlement is a victory for consumer protection in New Mexico, and serves as a reminder that companies must adhere to the law and treat their customers fairly. The funds from the settlement will help ensure that affected consumers are properly compensated, and will hopefully deter similar behavior in the future.
Tags:
New Mexico settlement news, Cash App parent company settlement, $1.6M settlement New Mexico, Cash App legal settlement, New Mexico financial settlement, Cash App lawsuit settlement, Cash App legal news, Cash App parent company legal case, New Mexico financial compensation
Jennifer Tilly may own a few luxury items and properties, but that doesn’t mean she considers herself to be wealthy.
The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star told E! News that she doesn’t think of herself as rich, despite receiving a piece of The Simpsons in her divorce settlement from series co-creator Sam Simon in 1991. Still, she acknowledged that many people who have seen her lavish lifestyle on display on the series might believe otherwise.
“I don’t think of myself as rich, but I guess I’m delusional because I do have several properties and a purse, apparently, that cost $33,000,” Tilly, 66, told the outlet. “But actually, it didn’t. It cost $22,000 — which, I’m just setting that straight right now.”
In fact, the Chucky actress said she’s been trying to downplay the price points of some of her more expensive belongings on the show. “I actually did tell them I was wearing a bunch of Bvlgari bracelets and they’re like, ‘Ooh, Jennifer, how much are those? We’d like to put the price at the bottom,’” she recalled. “And I said no.”
She also noted that others might not be aware that she owns a piece of the longest-running animated show. “It’s not a large piece,” Tilly clarified. “My boyfriend and I live very simply in a very small, cluttered house. And yes, there’s a giant house next door, but we don’t go there. So I guess we’re kind of delusional.”
Jerod Harris/WireImage
Sam Simon; Jennifer Tilly
In the Dec. 3 episode of RHOBH, Tilly explained that she was married to Simon, who died from colon cancer in 2015, for seven years. “When we got divorced, I got a piece of The Simpsons in the divorce settlement,” she explained. “Nobody knew that The Simpsons was going to go on for trillions of years!”
She added with a laugh, “Honestly, every day, I’m like, ‘Thank you Sam!’”
Outside of her Simpsons settlement, Tilly has paid her own way as an Oscar-nominated actress whose credits include Bound, Monsters, Inc., and Bullets Over Broadway. However, she is perhaps best known for her role as murderous doll Tiffany Valentine in the Child’s Play franchise.
And, if that wasn’t enough, Tilly is also a professional poker player and has won over $1 million in tournaments as of 2019.
Listen to Tilly discuss her finances in the clip above.
Jennifer Tilly, the former wife of “The Simpsons” co-creator Sam Simon, recently opened up about her finances in a candid interview. Despite receiving a hefty divorce settlement from her ex-husband, Tilly admitted that she doesn’t consider herself to be wealthy.
In the interview, Tilly expressed her disbelief at the idea that she is considered rich. She said, “I guess I’m delusional because I don’t really think of myself as being rich. I mean, I have a nice house and I can afford to live comfortably, but I don’t have yachts and private jets like some of the other people in Hollywood.”
Tilly’s humility is refreshing in a world where wealth and status are often flaunted. Despite her divorce settlement and successful acting career, she remains grounded and down-to-earth.
Fans of “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” may be surprised to learn that Tilly doesn’t see herself as a wealthy socialite. Her honesty and self-awareness make her a relatable figure, even among the glitz and glamour of Hollywood.
It’s clear that Jennifer Tilly’s wealth doesn’t define her. She may not consider herself rich, but her talent, wit, and authenticity are worth more than any amount of money.”
Tags:
RHOBH, Jennifer Tilly, Simpsons, divorce settlement, rich, delusional
U.S. officials announced a $1.6 billion deal with Toyota subsidiary Hino Motors late Wednesday to settle charges it deceived regulators about the amount of emissions spewed by its diesel engines.
Hino used altered emissions test data to get approval to import and sell more than 110,000 diesel engines to the U.S., most of which were installed in heavy-duty trucks made by Hino, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
As part of the deal, Hino will plead guilty to engaging in a criminal conspiracy to mislead regulators and consumers, violating environmental protection laws and endangering public health, Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a news release.
U.S. regulators and the state of California, which has strict vehicle emission standards, worked out criminal and civil remedies with Hino valued at more than $1.6 billion.
The deal includes a $521.76 million criminal penalty, $442.5 million in civil penalties to U.S. authorities and $236.5 million to California, according to the Reuters news agency.
“Hino’s actions directly undermined EPA’s program to protect the public from air pollution,” acting EPA administrator Jane Nishida said in a release.
The proposed settlement is contingent on approval from a federal district court judge in Michigan.
“Corporate crimes such as these endanger the health and well-being of innocent Americans, as well as the environment in which we all live,” said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan Dawn Ison.
The deal includes a five-year term of probation during which Hino will be barred from importing diesel engines it has manufactured into the United States, and implements a comprehensive compliance and ethics program, according to the EPA.
“This resolution is a significant milestone toward resolving legacy issues that we have worked hard to ensure are no longer a part of Hino’s operations or culture,” Hino Motors CEO Satoshi Ogiso said in a statement. “We deeply apologize for the inconvenience caused to our customers and stakeholders. In order to prevent a recurrence of this kind of issue, we have implemented company-wide reforms, including meaningful improvements to our internal culture, oversight and compliance practices.
Hino will also have to recall some trucks with engines violating emissions standards and spend some $155 million to replace marine and locomotive engines throughout the U.S. to offset excess air emissions, according to the EPA.
Toyota’s Hino unit has agreed to plead guilty in a $1.6 billion settlement of a U.S. emissions fraud case. The settlement comes after an investigation revealed that the Japanese truck maker had installed devices in its vehicles to cheat emissions tests.
This is a major blow to Toyota, which has been a leader in the automotive industry for years. The company has been working to rebuild its reputation after previous scandals, and this latest development is sure to set back those efforts.
The settlement also serves as a warning to other automakers that fraudulent emissions practices will not be tolerated. It sends a clear message that companies must adhere to regulations and be transparent in their operations.
As consumers become increasingly concerned about the environmental impact of vehicles, it is crucial that automakers prioritize compliance with emissions standards. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability and responsibility in the automotive industry.
Apple has filed a proposed settlement in California suggesting it will pay $95 million to settle claims that Siri recorded owners’ conversations without consent and allowed contractors to listen in.
The class-action case, Lopez et al v. Apple Inc, was brought after a whistleblower at Cupertino alleged in 2019 that Siri was listening in on audio conversations without the requisite “Hey Siri” spoken command or manually activating the voice assistant. Court filings [PDF] reference that California requires consent from both parties for recordings.
“A small portion of Siri requests are analysed to improve Siri and dictation,” Apple said at the time. “User requests are not associated with the user’s Apple ID. Siri responses are analysed in secure facilities and all reviewers are under the obligation to adhere to Apple’s strict confidentiality requirements.”
In 2018, Tim Cook and his team were marketing Apple as big on privacy, with the slogan “Privacy. That’s iPhone,” although this offer obviously didn’t apply for its Chinese customers. After being questioned about privacy in a letter from Congress, Cook stated unequivocally that Apple doesn’t collect audio recordings of users without consent.
“Far from requiring a ‘clear, unambiguous trigger’ as Apple claimed in its response to Congress, Siri can be activated by nearly anything, including ‘[t]he sound of a zip’ or an individual raising their arms and speaking,” the complaint reads. “Once activated, Siri records everything within range of the Siri Devices’ microphone and sends it to Apple’s servers.”
Some plaintiffs also reportedly claim that the data harvested from their conversations was used to target ads, again without consent. One user claims that they received adverts for a specific medication after discussing the topic with their doctor.
The proposed class action could include anyone who owned a Siri-equipped device and was recorded without their consent since 2011. Given the broad eligibility criteria, the proposed settlement could involve many claimants, potentially diluting individual payouts.
Apple reported $93.7 billion in net income last year, so $95 million is a rounding error on the books.
The iBiz had no comment on the current situation at the time of going to press and the settlement does not require Apple to admit any wrongdoing.
Google is also facing a similar lawsuit after Belgian journalists reportedly found that the Chocolate Factory’s Assistant was also listening in without authorization. That case is still unresolved, and a German investigation into the matter is also ongoing. ®
In a recent development, tech giant Apple has offered a $95 million settlement in a lawsuit regarding privacy concerns related to its virtual assistant, Siri. The lawsuit alleged that Apple had violated users’ privacy by allowing contractors to listen to and review recordings of Siri interactions without users’ consent.
The proposed settlement, if approved by the court, would require Apple to pay $95 million to affected users and make changes to its Siri privacy practices. This includes improving transparency and obtaining explicit consent from users before allowing any human review of Siri recordings.
While Apple has denied any wrongdoing, the settlement demonstrates the company’s commitment to addressing privacy concerns and ensuring the protection of its users’ data. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.
Tags:
Apple, Siri, privacy lawsuit, settlement, The Register, tech news, data privacy, legal matters, technology industry, lawsuit settlement, privacy protection.
Jan 03, 2025Ravie LakshmananTechnology / Data Privacy
Apple has agreed to pay $95 million to settle a proposed class action lawsuit that accused the iPhone maker of invading users’ privacy using its voice-activated Siri assistant.
The settlement applies to U.S.-based individuals current or former owners or purchasers of a Siri-enabled device who had their confidential voice communications with the assistant “obtained by Apple and/or were shared with third-parties as a result of an unintended Siri activation” between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024.
Eligible individuals can submit claims for up to five Siri devices – iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, iMac, HomePod, iPod touch, or Apple TV – on which they claim to have experienced an accidental Siri activation during a conversation intended to be confidential or private. Class members who submit valid claims can receive $20 per device.
The lawsuit was brought against Apple following a 2019 report from The Guardian that disclosed that third-party contractors were listening in on private conversations of its users issuing voice commands to Siri as part of its efforts to improve the quality of its product.
An amended complaint filed in September 2021 alleged that the private conversations recorded by Apple because of accidental activations were also disclosed to third-party advertisers.
Cupertino has disputed the claims, arguing that “there are no facts, much less plausible facts, that tie Plaintiffs’ receipt of targeted ads to their speculation that Siri must have been listening to their conversations, and Apple must have used Siri to facilitate targeted ads by third parties.”
Following the revelations, Apple apologized for not “fully living up to our high ideals” and subsequently introduced an opt-in to help Siri improve by learning from the audio samples of their requests. It also said it will remove any recording that’s determined to be an inadvertent trigger of Siri.
It has since rolled out new settings across its software portfolio to allow users to disable the collection of analytics information for improving Siri and dictation, as well as delete all history. Apple has denied any wrongdoing in the settlement filing.
Google, which has also faced accusations with its voice assistant back in 2019, is battling a similar lawsuit in the U.S. District Court.
Found this article interesting? Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.
Apple has agreed to pay Siri users $20 per device in a settlement over accidental privacy violations involving the virtual assistant. The tech giant admitted that Siri had inadvertently recorded users’ conversations without their consent and shared them with third-party contractors for quality control purposes.
The company has since updated its privacy policies and implemented stricter controls to ensure that such violations do not occur in the future. As part of the settlement, Apple will pay affected users $20 per device that was impacted by the privacy breach.
This is a significant step towards holding tech companies accountable for their handling of user data and ensuring that privacy violations are taken seriously. If you believe you were affected by the Siri privacy breach, be sure to check your eligibility for the settlement and claim your compensation. Your privacy is important, and companies should be held responsible for any violations that occur.
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have reached a settlement in their divorce, ending a bitter eight-year legal battle.
The Hollywood duo officially signed off on the divorce paperwork on Monday, December 30.
Divorce Lawyer James Simon told DailyMail.com Jolie, 49, is ‘relieved this one part is over.’
‘Frankly, Angelina is exhausted,’ he said.
‘More than eight years ago, Angelina filed for divorce from Mr. Pitt. She and the children left all of the properties they had shared with Mr. Pitt, and since that time she has focused on finding peace and healing for their family.’
While the former power couple have finally settled their divorce, there is still the ongoing case regarding their battle over Chateau Miraval vineyard in France.
The two have been locked in a bitter legal battle over Miraval after Pitt alleged Jolie sold her share of the winery to the Stoli Group without his approval.
Both sides have said they would be willing to take the Miraval case to a jury trial or mediation, a source told Daily Mail.
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt have reached a settlement in their divorce, ending a bitter eight-year legal battle
The couple share six children: Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Vivienne and Knox
A source with knowledge of the situation added Jolie has ‘been trying hard to be light after a dark time.’
‘She doesn’t speak ill of him publicly or privately,’ the insider said.
‘The kids have grown up seeing that some people have so much power and privilege that their voices don’t matter. Their pain doesn’t count.
‘They have wanted her to speak up for herself, to defend herself over these years but she reminds them to focus on changing laws over telling public stories.’
Jolie filed to end the marriage in September of 2016, just two years after tying the knot. They had dated 10 years before they decided to get married.
It has since been alleged that the couple and their six children, Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, Vivienne and Knox, had taken a private plane days prior to her filing in which Pitt had become physically abusive.
He was never charged.
One insider told DailyMail.com ‘she could have pressed charges against him.’
Jolie filed to end the marriage in September of 2016, just two years after tying the knot
‘She could have told the world what happened, she didn’t. All she wanted was for their children to get the support they needed to heal.
‘Pitt successfully used his power and his privilege to cover up his conduct at his family’s expense and even attempted to paint her as the reason why his relationship is so challenging with the children.’
Despite the ongoing legal battle, Jolie and Pitt were deemed legally single in 2019.
Pitt, now 61, has been dating Los Angeles based jewelry designer Ines de Ramon, 34, for almost two years.
Share or comment on this article:
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie reach divorce settlement after bitter EIGHT-YEAR legal battle
After eight long years of legal battles and public scrutiny, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have finally reached a divorce settlement. The Hollywood power couple, who first announced their split in 2016, have been embroiled in a bitter custody battle over their six children and division of assets.
According to reports, the settlement includes a custody arrangement that gives both Pitt and Jolie equal time with their children, as well as a financial agreement that ensures a fair division of their shared assets. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed, but sources close to the couple say that both parties are satisfied with the outcome.
The drawn-out legal battle between Pitt and Jolie has been closely followed by fans and media alike, with rumors and speculation swirling around their relationship and the reasons for their split. Despite the challenges they have faced, both Pitt and Jolie have remained dedicated to co-parenting their children and finding a resolution that works for everyone involved.
As they move forward from this chapter in their lives, it is hoped that Pitt and Jolie can find peace and closure, and focus on the well-being of their family. Their long-awaited divorce settlement marks the end of an era for one of Hollywood’s most iconic couples, but also a new beginning for both Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.
Tags:
Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, divorce settlement, legal battle, celebrity news, Hollywood couple, custody agreement, marriage breakdown, high-profile divorce, celebrity gossip, entertainment news
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have reached a settlement in their divorce eight years after the Maria star filed to end their two-year marriage, citing irreconcilable differences.
Jolie, 49, and Pitt, 61, signed off on their divorce on Monday, Dec. 30, according to Jolie’s lawyers.
“More than eight years ago, Angelina filed for divorce from Mr. Pitt. She and the children left all of the properties they had shared with Mr. Pitt, and since that time she has focused on finding peace and healing for their family,” Jolie’s lawyer James Simon tells PEOPLE in a statement. “This is just one part of a long ongoing process that started eight years ago. Frankly, Angelina is exhausted, but she is relieved this one part is over.”
The statement also read that both parties have requested a jury trial lasting 10 to 15 days and have agreed to participate in a settlement conference or mediation session as a form of alternative dispute resolution. In his case management statement, Pitt also agreed to mediation.
A source close to Jolie adds, “She doesn’t speak ill of [Pitt] publicly or privately. She’s been trying hard to be light after a dark time.”
A rep for Pitt declined to confirm or comment.
Jolie filed for dissolution of marriage on Sept. 19, 2016, days after a private plane flight on which she has claimed Pitt was abusive to her and their six children; he was not charged by authorities after investigations at the time and Jolie declined to press charges.
Four months later, the former couple released a joint statement indicating that they reached an agreement to handle their divorce in a private forum, and would keep future details of their divorce confidential by utilizing a private judge.
“The parties and their counsel have signed agreements to preserve the privacy rights of their children and family by keeping all court documents confidential and engaging a private judge to make any necessary legal decisions and to facilitate the expeditious resolution of any remaining issues,” according to the statement.
Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories.
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie with five of their six children in Hollywood, California, on May 28, 2014.
It concluded, “The parents are committed to act as a united front to effectuate recovery and reunification.”
Leading up to the 2017 privacy agreement, Pitt and Jolie had been locked in “strained” divorce negotiations centered on custody issues and trading harsh accusations in filings in Los Angeles Superior Court.
In January 2017, they agreed to seal sensitive records relating to their six children, the majority of whom are now adults: Maddox, 23, Pax, 21, Zahara, 19, Shiloh, 18, and twins Vivienne and Knox, now 16.
The exes, who had their divorce bifurcated, were declared legally single in 2019. (Pitt has been dating L.A. jewelry exec Ines de Ramon, 34, since 2022.)
In the following years, the former couple battled over custody as well as legal issues pertaining to the $164 million French estate and winery that they shared, Château Miraval.
Angelina Jolie; Brad Pitt. Getty(2)
Pitt sued Jolie in February 2022 over her sale of her Château Miraval stake, and the Tomb Raider star filed a countersuit in which she stated her ex was “waging a vindictive war against” her.
The lawsuit was filed by Nouvel, a business founded by Jolie. The company claimed that Pitt “masterminded a so-far-successful plan to seize control” of Château Miraval following the couple’s split in 2016.
Of the countersuit, a source close to Pitt told PEOPLE, “This is just the latest in a series of deliberate efforts to misdirect, recycle and reposition the truth of what has happened over the last six years, thinking that reasonable people would be duped by these obvious misrepresentations.”
In a case management statement, Jolie called Pitt’s legal actions “frivolous, malicious and part of a problematic pattern.” The actress is holding firm that she and Pitt did not have “a secret, unwritten, unspoken contract” that required them to ask for consent before selling their shares of Château Miraval.
The statement also read that Jolie has requested a jury trial lasting 10 to 15 days and has agreed to participate in a settlement conference or mediation session as a form of alternative dispute resolution. In his case management statement, Pitt also agreed to mediation.
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie on March 2, 2014, in Hollywood, California.
Ethan Miller/WireImage
The pair have continued to fight over Miraval throughout 2024, which is not connected to their divorce proceedings. In November, Jolie scored a legal win when a judge in the case ruled that Pitt must disclose documents, including emails and texts, that Jolie’s lawyer Paul Murphy claims will prove her allegations of abuse against Pitt and “years of cover-up” on his part.
The same month, Pitt also notched his own victory in the winery battle when Jolie’s motions to dismiss the lawsuit were rejected and the case inched closer to trial with potential proof that there was a written agreement between the former couple about selling, which a Pitt source said “demonstrates the legitimacy of his claims.”
His lawyers have called Jolie’s request for the documents “a sensationalist fishing expedition.”
After a long and tumultuous legal battle, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have finally reached a divorce settlement, eight years after initially filing for divorce.
According to exclusive sources, the former Hollywood power couple have come to an agreement on custody of their six children, as well as the division of their assets. The details of the settlement have not been disclosed, but it is believed to be a fair and amicable resolution for both parties.
Pitt and Jolie first announced their separation in 2016, shocking fans around the world. Since then, their divorce proceedings have been marred by accusations of infidelity, substance abuse, and child custody disputes.
Now, with this settlement in place, it seems that Pitt and Jolie can finally move on from their past and focus on co-parenting their children in a healthy and positive environment.
Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
Price: $89.95 (as of Dec 20,2024 15:58:39 UTC – Details)
Publisher : SAP Press; New edition (October 26, 2022) Language : English Hardcover : 471 pages ISBN-10 : 1493222619 ISBN-13 : 978-1493222612 Item Weight : 2.46 pounds Dimensions : 7.24 x 1.26 x 10.24 inches
Settlement Management with SAP S/4HANA (SAP PRESS)
Are you looking to optimize your settlement processes and increase efficiency within your organization? Look no further than Settlement Management with SAP S/4HANA, the comprehensive guide from SAP PRESS.
This book covers everything you need to know about settlement management, including configuration, integration, and best practices for implementing SAP S/4HANA. With step-by-step instructions and real-world examples, you’ll learn how to streamline your settlement processes and maximize the value of your SAP investment.
Whether you’re a business analyst, consultant, or IT professional, Settlement Management with SAP S/4HANA is the ultimate resource for mastering settlement management in SAP S/4HANA. Order your copy today and take your settlement processes to the next level.
#Settlement #Management #SAP #S4HANA #SAP #PRESS
