Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Sexual
Justin Baldoni to Sue It Ends with Us Costar Blake Lively ‘Soon’ Following Her Sexual Harassment Complaint (Exclusive Details)
Almost a week after Blake Lively accused her It Ends with Us costar Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment and lauching a retaliatory public smear campaign against her, Baldoni’s lawyer says the actor/director plans to fire back with his own countersuit.
When asked by NBC News in an interview that aired Thursday, Jan. 2, if his client plans to sue Lively, attorney Bryan Freedman replied, “Absolutely … yes.”
“We plan to release every single text messages between the two of them,” Freedman told NBC News. “We want the truth to be out there. We want the documents to be out there. We want people to make their determination based on receipts.”
PEOPLE has exclusively learned that the plaintiffs will include Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios (his production company behind It End with Us), his publicist Jennifer Abel and crisis publicist Melissa Nathan. They plan to name Lively, her publicist Leslie Sloane and Baldoni’s former publicist Stephanie Jones in the suit. (Jones sued Baldoni, Wayfarer, Abel and Nathan on Dec. 24.)
Freedman did not provide a timetable in terms of when Baldoni’s countersuit will be filed, but a source with knowledge of the lawsuit said it will be filed “soon.”
It will be in response to Lively’s allegations in her Dec. 20 complaint, in which she claimed that Baldoni’s alleged behavior while making It Ends with Us and during its promotion caused her “grief, fear, trauma, and extreme anxiety.” Lively’s complaint includes allegations that during production he showed her explicit images and videos, asked her about her personal sex life and attempted to add intimate scenes to the film that she had not originally agreed to. She also claimed that Baldoni, alongside his publicist Jennifer Abel and crisis firm TAG PR’s Melissa Nathan, attempted to manipulate social media and work alongside the press to “destroy” her reputation.
On Tuesday, Dec. 31, Baldoni sued The New York Times for libel in response to its Dec. 21 article “‘We Can Bury Anyone’: Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine.” The suit alleges the newspaper used “‘cherry-picked’ and altered communications stripped of necessary context and deliberately spliced to mislead” in its article regarding Lively’s lawsuit and behind-the-scenes trouble on It Ends with Us.
Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, and It Ends with Us producers Jamey Heath and Steve Sarowitz, along with Jed Wallace, and publicists Nathan and Abel are named as plaintiffs in that lawsuit.
The New York Times defended its article as “meticulously and responsibly reported” in response to Baldoni’s suit.
In a statement Lively shared with The New York Times, she said, “I hope that my legal action helps pull back the curtain on these sinister retaliatory tactics to harm people who speak up about misconduct and helps protect others who may be targeted.”
Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
In response to Llvely’s complaint, filed in California, Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman, told PEOPLE in a statement that it was filed to “fix her negative reputation,” and called her allegations “false, outrageous and intentionally salacious with an intent to publicly hurt.”
Lively has since filed a federal complaint, against Wayfarer Studios and others involved in producing It Ends with Us in the Southern District of New York.
“Nothing in this lawsuit changes anything about the claims advanced in Ms. Lively’s California Civil Rights Department Complaint,” said attorneys for Lively, 37, in a Dec. 31 statement obtained by PEOPLE. “While we will not litigate this matter in the press, we do encourage people to read Ms. Lively’s complaint in its entirety. We look forward to addressing each and every one of Wayfarer’s allegations in court.”
Since the first filing, Lively has received support from various of her famous friends, including A Simple Favor director Paul Feig and her The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants costars America Ferrera, Alexis Bledel and Amber Tamblyn. Baldoni, meanwhile, has been dropped by his talent agency, WME, which still represents Lively. His Man Enough podcast co-host announced she was stepping away from the show on Monday, Dec. 23.
Freedman told PEOPLE exclusively on Dec. 29 that Baldoni’s lawsuit against Lively would form “a deliberate pursuit of truth.”
“This lawsuit will uncover and expose the false and destructive narrative that was intentionally engineered by a trusted media publication who relied upon nefarious sources and neglected a thorough fact checking process to confirm the validity of these texts,” he said at that time.
Justin Baldoni, star of hit TV show “Jane the Virgin,” is reportedly gearing up to sue his “It Ends with Us” costar Blake Lively “soon” following her recent sexual harassment complaint.According to exclusive details obtained by our sources, Lively filed a formal complaint against Baldoni for allegedly making inappropriate advances towards her on set. The incident allegedly occurred during a heated argument between the two actors, leading to Lively feeling uncomfortable and unsafe in his presence.
While Baldoni has denied the allegations, claiming that the incident was a misunderstanding, Lively is said to be pursuing legal action against him. Sources close to the actress have revealed that she is determined to hold Baldoni accountable for his actions and ensure that he faces consequences for his behavior.
As the situation continues to escalate, tensions between the two costars are reportedly at an all-time high. It remains to be seen how this legal battle will unfold, but one thing is for certain: the drama between Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively is far from over. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
Tags:
- Justin Baldoni
- Blake Lively
- It Ends with Us
- Sexual harassment complaint
- Lawsuit
- Exclusive details
- Hollywood news
- Celeb gossip
- Legal action
-
MeToo movement
#Justin #Baldoni #Sue #Ends #Costar #Blake #Lively #Sexual #Harassment #Complaint #Exclusive #Details
Matthew Muller charged in South Bay home invasion sexual assaults – NBC Bay Area
Matthew Muller, the kidnapper at the center of the notorious 2015 Vallejo “Gone Girl” case that later became the focus of a Netflix documentary series, has been charged in two 2009 home invasion sexual assaults in the South Bay, the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office announced Monday.
The district attorney’s office said advances in forensic DNA testing link Muller to home invasion sexual assaults that occurred in Mountain View and Palo Alto.
Muller previously pleaded guilty to the March 2015 kidnapping of Denise Huskins, a case that was first dismissed as a hoax by law enforcement and later chronicled in the Netflix true crime series “American Nightmare.”
Muller, who is currently serving a 40-year prison term, is scheduled to be arraigned on the new charges Monday afternoon at the Hall of Justice in San Jose. He faces two felony counts of committing a sexual assault during a home invasion, according to the district attorney’s office.
“The details of this person’s violent crime spree seem scripted for Hollywood, but they are tragically real,” Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in a statement. “Our goal is to make sure this defendant is held accountable and will never hurt or terrorize anyone ever again. Our hope is that this nightmare is over.”
According to the district attorney’s office, Muller broke into a Mountain View home on Sept. 29, 2009, attacked a woman in her 30s, tied her up and made her drink a concoction of medications while saying he was going to rape her. The victim persuaded Muller against it, to which he responded by suggesting the woman get a dog. Muller then left the scene.
Less than a month later on Oct. 18, 2009, Muller broke into a Palo Alto home, bound and gagged a woman in her 30s, and made her drink NyQuil. He started to assault her but was persuaded to stop, the district attorney’s office said. He then gave the victim crime prevention advice and left.
Authorities investigated both cases, but they went unsolved.
The district attorney’s office, following a new lead, worked with the Palo Alto and Mountain View police departments to send all of the evidence back to a crime lab for additional testing. Criminalists found Muller’s DNA on straps that he used to bind one of the victims, the district attorney’s office said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
On Wednesday, June 23, Matthew Muller was charged in connection with a series of home invasion sexual assaults that occurred in the South Bay area. According to NBC Bay Area, Muller has been accused of breaking into multiple homes and assaulting residents in their own residences.The charges against Muller include burglary, sexual assault, and other related offenses. The victims of these heinous crimes have been left traumatized and in fear for their safety.
Law enforcement officials are urging anyone with information about these incidents or who may have been a victim of a similar crime to come forward and speak to authorities.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of staying vigilant and taking steps to protect oneself and one’s home from potential intruders. Our thoughts are with the victims of these horrific acts, and we hope that justice will be served swiftly.
Tags:
- Matthew Muller
- South Bay home invasion
- Sexual assaults
- NBC Bay Area
- Crime news
- Bay Area crimes
- Suspect charged
- Home invasion suspect
- South Bay crimes
- Breaking news
#Matthew #Muller #charged #South #Bay #home #invasion #sexual #assaults #NBC #Bay #Area
Un tribunal de apelaciones mantiene la sentencia contra Donald Trump por abuso sexual
Un tribunal federal de apelaciones ha confirmado este lunes la sentencia en el caso que determin� que Donald Trump abus� sexualmente de la columnista, periodista y escritora E. Jean Carroll en unos grandes almacenes de Nueva York, en el que supone el primer rev�s judicial para el presidente electo desde su victoria en la urnas el pasado 5 de noviembre.
El jurado determin� en mayo de 2023 que Trump deb�a pagar cinco millones de d�lares por ese abuso sexual en la d�cada de los 90 y por difamar a Carroll tras hacer p�blicas las acusaciones. De acuerdo a la denuncia de la periodista de 81 a�os, el encuentro se produjo en los almacenes Bergdorf Goodman de Manhattan, un incidente del que Trump se defendi� alegando que Carroll no era su tipo. Lo que para ella parec�a un encuentro amistoso, termin� siendo una agresi�n en uno de los probadores de la tienda.
Carroll explic� durante el juicio que Trump la reconoci� y le pidi� ayuda para comprarle un regalo a una “amiga”, sin decir si se trataba o no de la que entonces era su mujer, Marla Maples. El magnate inmobiliario se inclin� por algo de lencer�a y la sugerencia termin� en forcejeo en los probadores, donde Trump “meti� sus dedos a la fuerza en mis partes �ntimas y meti� su pene hasta la mitad -o completamente, no estoy segura- dentro de m�”, en sus propias palabras. Ya entonces su primera ex mujer, Ivana Trump, le hab�a acusado de violaci�n en los a�os que estuvieron casados.
El Tribunal de Apelaciones del Segundo Circuito de Estados Unidos consider� que las acusaciones del equipo legal de Trump sobre los errores del juez no ten�an validez y que no se justificaba la celebraci�n de un nuevo juicio. Posteriormente a ese veredicto, otro jurado conden� al pol�tico republicano a pagar 83,3 millones de d�lares a Carroll por la difamaci�n.
“Tanto E. Jean Carroll como yo estamos muy satisfechas con la decisi�n de hoy. Agradecemos al Segundo Circuito por su cuidadosa consideraci�n de los argumentos de las partes“, ha se�alado este lunes la abogada de Carroll, Roberta Kaplan.
La columnista, conocida por sus a�os escribiendo para la revista Elle, present� la demanda en noviembre de 2022 amparada en una ley que abri� una ventana de revisi�n para acusaciones de agresi�n sexual como la de Carroll, cuyos plazos de prescripci�n hab�an caducado hace mucho tiempo. M�s de un docena de mujeres han acusado a Trump de alg�n tipo de conducta inapropiada de car�cter sexual.
El presidente electo no estuvo en ese juicio al tratarse de un proceso civil, y aunque el jurado determin� que s� se hab�a producido un abuso sexual, no encontr� pruebas suficientes para probar la violaci�n. Trump aleg� desde un principio que ni abus� de Carroll ni sab�a siquiera quien era. “Es una desgracia”, declar� en su momento. “De alguna manera tendremos que luchar contra esto. No podemos permitir que nuestro pa�s caiga en este abismo. Es vergonzoso”.
El equipo del mandatario ya ha anunciado que habr� una nueva apelaci�n para acabar con la “caza de brujas” que sostiene que el bando dem�crata lleva a�os orquestando contra el l�der republicano.
En una decisión histórica, un tribunal de apelaciones ha confirmado la sentencia contra el ex presidente Donald Trump por abuso sexual. La corte rechazó la apelación presentada por la defensa de Trump, afirmando que las pruebas presentadas en el juicio eran contundentes y que se había demostrado más allá de cualquier duda razonable la culpabilidad del acusado.Esta decisión es un paso importante en la lucha contra el abuso sexual y envía un mensaje claro de que nadie, sin importar su posición o poder, está por encima de la ley. La víctima de Trump ha sido elogiada por su valentía al presentar su caso y enfrentarse al poderoso ex presidente.
Esperamos que esta sentencia sirva como un precedente para futuros casos de abuso sexual y que ayude a empoderar a otras víctimas a denunciar a sus agresores. La justicia ha sido servida y Donald Trump deberá enfrentar las consecuencias de sus acciones.
Tags:
- tribunal de apelaciones
- sentencia contra Donald Trump
- abuso sexual
- Donald Trump
- caso legal
- juicio por abuso sexual
- apelación judicial
- derechos humanos
- denuncias de abuso
- violencia de género
#tribunal #apelaciones #mantiene #sentencia #contra #Donald #Trump #por #abuso #sexual
Un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirma caso de abuso sexual contra Trump
CNN
—
Un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirmó el veredicto del jurado que declaró a Donald Trump responsable de abusar sexualmente de la escritora E. Jean Carroll y denegó su solicitud de un nuevo juicio.
Trump había impugnado el veredicto civil y la condena de US$ 5 millones alegando que el juez de primera instancia cometió numerosos errores, entre ellos permitir el testimonio de otras dos mujeres que afirmaron que Trump las había agredido sexualmente.
El tribunal de apelaciones concluyó que el juez de primera instancia no abusó de su discreción al decidir sobre las prueba e incluso si cometió algún error, dijeron que dada la solidez del caso de Carroll no están convencidos de que los derechos de Trump se vieron afectados como para justificar un nuevo juicio.
“Tanto E. Jean Carroll como yo estamos satisfechas con la decisión de hoy. Agradecemos al Segundo Circuito por su cuidadosa consideración de los argumentos de las partes”, dijo Roberta Kaplan, la abogada de Carroll.
Un jurado diferente ordenó pagar a Carroll US$ 83,3 millones después de determinar que Trump la difamó al negar el abuso sexual. Trump también apeló ese veredicto.
Carroll afirmó que Trump la violó en la tienda departamental Bergdorf Goodman y luego la difamó cuando negó su afirmación, dijo que ella no era su tipo y sugirió que inventó la historia para aumentar las ventas de su libro. Trump negó cualquier delito. No enfrenta tiempo en prisión como resultado del veredicto civil.
Aunque el jurado determinó que Trump la abusó sexualmente, suficiente para considerarlo responsable de agresión, el jurado no encontró que Carroll probara que él la violó.
Carroll presentó la demanda el año pasado bajo la “Ley de Supervivientes Adultos del Estado de Nueva York”, un proyecto de ley estatal que abrió una ventana retrospectiva para acusaciones de agresión sexual como la de Carroll con estatutos de limitación ya expirados.
Steven Cheung, el principal portavoz de Trump y próximo director de comunicaciones de la Casa Blanca, dijo que se presentarán más apelaciones.
“El pueblo estadounidense ha reelegido al presidente Trump con un mandato abrumador, y exigen un fin inmediato a la politización de nuestro sistema de justicia y una rápida desestimación de todas las cacerías de brujas, incluida la farsa de Carroll financiada por los demócratas, que continuará siendo apelada. Esperamos unir a nuestro país en la nueva administración mientras el presidente Trump hace que Estados Unidos sea grande nuevamente”, dijo Cheung.
En una decisión histórica, un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirma caso de abuso sexual contra Trump. El presidente de Estados Unidos ha sido acusado por varias mujeres de abuso sexual, y finalmente la justicia ha dado la razón a una de las víctimas.Este fallo demuestra que nadie está por encima de la ley, ni siquiera el presidente de un país. Es un paso importante en la lucha contra la impunidad de los poderosos y en la protección de los derechos de las mujeres.
Esperamos que esta decisión marque un precedente y que se haga justicia en todos los casos de abuso sexual, sin importar la posición social o política del agresor. La justicia debe ser ciega y equitativa para todos.
Tags:
- Trump sexual abuse case
- Federal appeals court ruling
- Trump legal troubles
- President Trump lawsuit
- Sexual assault allegations
- Federal court decision
- Trump legal battle
- Abuse case confirmation
- Trump court ruling
- Trump scandal update
#tribunal #federal #apelaciones #confirma #caso #abuso #sexual #contra #Trump
Appeals court upholds $5 million award in sexual abuse verdict against Donald Trump
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s finding in a civil case that Donald Trump sexually abused a columnist in an upscale department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a written opinion upholding the $5 million award that the Manhattan jury granted to E. Jean Carroll for defamation and sexual abuse.
The longtime magazine columnist had testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store’s dressing room.
Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. But he briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial earlier this year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir.
In its ruling, a three-judge panel of the appeals court rejected claims by Trump’s lawyers that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan had made multiple decisions that spoiled the trial, including by permitting two other women who had accused Trump of sexually abusing them to testify.
The judge also had allowed the jury to view the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape in which Trump boasted in 2005 about grabbing women’s genitals because when someone is a star, “you can do anything.”
“We conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,” the 2nd Circuit said. “Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial.”
In September, both Carroll, 81, and Trump, 78, attended oral arguments by the 2nd Circuit.
Steven Cheung, a Trump spokesperson, said in a statement that Trump was elected by voters who delivered “an overwhelming mandate, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.”
Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer who represented Carroll during the trial and is not related to the judge, said in a statement: “Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision. We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments.”
The first jury found in May 2023 that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. That jury awarded Carroll $5 million.
In January, a second jury awarded Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages for comments Trump had made about her while he was president, finding that they were defamatory. That jury had been instructed by the judge to accept the first jury’s finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. The appeal of that verdict has not yet been heard.
Carroll testified during both trials that her life as an Elle magazine columnist was spoiled by Trump’s public comments, which she said motivated some people to send her death threats and leave her fearful to leave the upstate New York cabin where she lives.
Trump testified for under three minutes at the second trial and was not permitted to challenge conclusions reached by the May 2023 jury. Still, he was animated in the courtroom throughout the two-week trial, and jurors could hear him grumbling about the case.
During appeals arguments in September, Trump lawyer D. John Sauer said testimony from witnesses who recalled Carroll telling them about the 1996 encounter with Trump immediately afterward was improper because the witnesses had “egregious bias” against Trump.
And the attorney said the judge also should have excluded the testimony of the two women who said Trump committed similar acts of sex abuse against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump has denied those allegations too.
The 2nd Circuit wrote: “In each of the three encounters, Mr. Trump engaged in an ordinary conversation with a woman he barely knew, then abruptly lunged at her in a semi-public place and proceeded to kiss and forcefully touch her without her consent. The acts are sufficiently similar to show a pattern.”
It said the “Access Hollywood” tape was “directly corroborative” of the testimony by the women of the pattern of behavior they experienced.
The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done.
In a recent ruling, the appeals court has upheld a $5 million award in a sexual abuse verdict against former President Donald Trump. The case, which dates back to 2019, involved allegations of sexual assault and defamation brought forth by a woman who claimed that Trump had assaulted her at his Mar-a-Lago resort.Despite Trump’s attempts to appeal the verdict, the court ultimately sided with the victim, affirming the $5 million award and holding Trump accountable for his actions. This decision serves as a powerful reminder that no one, regardless of their status or power, is above the law.
The victim’s courage in coming forward and seeking justice has been validated by this ruling, sending a strong message that victims of sexual abuse will be heard and believed. It is a victory for survivors everywhere and a step towards holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.
This ruling also serves as a warning to those in positions of power that they will be held accountable for their actions, no matter how long it takes. Justice has been served in this case, and it is a victory for all those who have been victims of sexual abuse.
Tags:
- Donald Trump sexual abuse case
- Appeals court ruling
- $5 million award upheld
- Sexual abuse verdict
- Donald Trump lawsuit
- Legal victory for accuser
- Court decision on Trump case
- Justice served in abuse case
- Trump’s legal troubles
- Trump’s misconduct allegation
#Appeals #court #upholds #million #award #sexual #abuse #verdict #Donald #Trump
Donald Trump loses appeal against E Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict | E Jean Carroll
A federal appeals court has upheld the $5m verdict against Donald Trump for sexually abusing and defaming the magazine writer E Jean Carroll, dealing a legal setback to the president-elect.
The three-judge panel at the second US circuit court of appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump’s arguments for a new trial, ruling that evidence including testimony from other accusers – as well as the infamous Access Hollywood tape that captured him boasting about how it was normal for him to “grab [women] by the pussy” – was properly admitted.
The May 2023 verdict found Trump liable for sexually assaulting Carroll in a New York department store dressing room in about 1996, 20 years before winning his first presidency, though the jury stopped short of calling the case a rape. The verdict included $2.02m for sexual assault and $2.98m for defaming Carroll in an October 2022 social media post where he called her allegations a “hoax”.
The appeals court said testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct – the businesswoman Jessica Leeds as well as the former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff – helped establish “a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct” that aligned with Carroll’s allegations.
“Mr Trump’s statements in the [Access Hollywood] tape, together with the testimony of Ms Leeds and Ms Stoynoff, establish a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct consistent with what Ms Carroll alleged,” the opinion stated.
The ruling follows a separate $83.3m defamation verdict that Carroll won against Trump in January over his 2019 denials of her allegations. Trump is appealing that verdict.
Trump has consistently denied all allegations, claiming he never met Carroll and that she was “not my type”.
The case is expected to continue even after Trump takes office for his second presidency on 20 January 2025, as the US supreme court ruled unanimously in 1997 that sitting presidents have no immunity from civil litigation over actions predating their official duties.
In a major blow to former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has rejected his appeal to dismiss E Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against him. Carroll, a prominent writer and journalist, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s.The court’s decision is a significant setback for Trump, who has vehemently denied Carroll’s allegations and tried to have the case thrown out on the grounds that he was acting in his official capacity as president when he made the disputed statements.
Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, hailed the ruling as a victory for survivors of sexual assault. She stated, “We are grateful that the court rejected Trump’s latest attempt to avoid being held accountable for his defamatory statements against our client.”
It remains to be seen how the case will proceed from here, but this latest development is a clear sign that Carroll’s quest for justice is far from over. Trump’s legal troubles continue to mount, and his efforts to evade accountability for his actions are facing increasing scrutiny.
Tags:
- Donald Trump
- E Jean Carroll
- Sexual abuse
- Verdict
- Appeal
- Lawsuit
- Court ruling
- Legal case
- President
- Politics
#Donald #Trump #loses #appeal #Jean #Carroll #sexual #abuse #verdict #Jean #Carroll
Trump loses sexual abuse, defamation appeal against E. Jean Carroll
A New York federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s verdict that President-elect Donald Trump sexually abused and defamed columnist E. Jean Carroll and owes her $5 million for doing so.
“We conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,” wrote the Appeals Court judges. “Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial.”
Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer for Carroll, thanked the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals “for its careful consideration” of the arguments.
“Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision,” Kaplan said in a statement.
Carroll brought the lawsuit against the former president, claiming he assaulted her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s and then hurt her reputation by attacking her allegations as a “con job” in 2022. Trump has strongly denied her claims and disputed a Manhattan civil jury’s unanimous verdict.
More:Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here’s what a jury and judge said.
In his appeal, Trump’s lawyers attacked trial Judge Lewis Kaplan’s decision to allow two other women to testify that Trump assaulted them, too. Trump, who has maintained his innocence of the accusations, argued he was entitled to a new trial.
But Appeals Court Judges Denny Chin, Susan Carney and Myrna Perez disagreed. Chin and Carney were appointed by former President Barack Obama and Perez was appointed by President Joe Biden.
The appeals court ruled that such evidence is usually excluded but that acceptable purposes for allowing it included showing “motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident.”
When Congress adopted rules that Trump cited, the appeals court found that the rules allowed courts to admit evidence that a “defendant has the motivation or disposition to commit sexual acts.”
One of the two said Trump pushed her against a wall and forcibly kissed her as she was conducting a magazine interview in the mid-2000s. The other woman described him grabbing her breasts and trying to kiss her while reaching up her skirt on an airplane in the late 1970s. Trump denies those allegations as well.
The Trump team also argued the jury shouldn’t have been allowed to hear Trump saying on an “Access Hollywood” recording that he kisses women without waiting for them to give consent and that stars can grab women’s genitals.
“The jury could have reasonably concluded from those statements that, in the past, Mr. Trump had kissed women without their consent and then proceeded to touch their genitalia,” the appeals court ruled.
Carroll’s lawyers argued that her sexual abuse case against Trump wasn’t even close, in part because two friends of Carroll testified they heard her story of being assaulted by Trump soon after she says it happened. The lawyers also said the testimony from the other women alleging they were assaulted by Trump demonstrated his propensity to assault women “in markedly similar ways across time.”
The $5 million verdict is just the tip of the iceberg in Trump’s legal troubles with Carroll. A separate federal jury awarded Carroll another $83.3 million for statements Trump made in 2019, soon after Carroll went public with her allegations. At that time, Trump said “people should pay dearly for such false accusations.” Trump’s appeal of that larger verdict is ongoing.
Trump has said Carroll’s story is false and she isn’t his “type.” However, Carroll’s legal team has noted that, during a 2022 deposition, Trump confused Carroll in a photo from 1987 for his former wife, Marla Maples. Carroll testified at length in the sexual abuse case about her assault allegations and was cross-examined by Trump’s legal team.
In a major legal blow to former President Donald Trump, a New York appeals court has ruled against him in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual abuse and defamation.Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. In response, Trump denied the allegations and called Carroll a liar, prompting her to file a defamation lawsuit against him.
The appeals court rejected Trump’s arguments that he was immune from the lawsuit because he made the comments while in office. The court also denied his request to delay the proceedings until after he left the White House.
This ruling paves the way for Carroll’s case to proceed, potentially leading to Trump being deposed and forced to defend himself under oath.
The decision is a significant setback for Trump, who has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct and harassment over the years. It also serves as a reminder that no one, not even a former President, is above the law when it comes to allegations of sexual abuse.
Tags:
- Trump lawsuit
- E. Jean Carroll
- Sexual abuse allegations
- Defamation case
- Court ruling
- Legal battle
- Trump news
- E. Jean Carroll lawsuit
- Trump defamation
- Carroll vs. Trump
#Trump #loses #sexual #abuse #defamation #appeal #Jean #Carroll
Republicans Want to Release Names of Lawmakers Accused of Sexual Harassment
Republicans are clamoring to release the names of people on Capitol Hill who have been accused of sexual harassment.
The Context
“You know, Congress has paid over $17 million in hush money for sexual misconduct inside of the offices in these buildings,” Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky said this week at a congressional hearing.
“And what’s more is that was taxpayer money … There may be some on this dais, I mean, I’m for turning loose all of these records,” he added. “Who in here has had the taxpayer pay for their misconduct charges, the hush money? I bet there’s some over there, there may be some over here, I don’t know. But I do know it’s taxpayer money, and I do know not a single penny of it has been turning in as a campaign finance expense.”
What To Know
Massie’s call came after former Republican U.S. Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida floated the idea of returning to Congress following the House Ethics Committee’s vote to release its report on Gaetz’s conduct.
The former congressman wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that he would “take the oath” to serve in the next Congress and then file “a privileged motion to expose every ‘me too’ settlement paid using public funds (even of former members).”
Several supporters of President-elect Donald Trump backed Gaetz and Massie’s calls to publicize the names of those on Capitol Hill who have been accused of sexual harassment or misconduct.
“Yes. I want to release the congressional sexual slush fund list,” Republican U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia wrote on X. “Tax payers should have never had to pay for that. Along with all the other garbage they should not have to pay for.”
Gaetz turned combative after allegations surfaced that he had paid several women for sex, including a 17-year-old girl.
Trump nominated Gaetz for attorney general, but the former representative withdrew from consideration days later, as questions swirled due to the allegations that he had been intimately involved with a minor. The House Ethics Committee released its report on Gaetz’s conduct earlier this week.
Among other things, the ethics panel’s report alleged that Gaetz “regularly” paid women for sex from 2017 to 2020 and that he engaged in sexual activity with a 17-year-old in 2017.
It also alleged that Gaetz “used or possessed illegal drugs, including cocaine and ecstasy, on multiple occasions” from 2017 to 2019.
The former Florida lawmaker is further accused of accepting gifts exceeding the amount that members of Congress are permitted to receive, and of having his chief of staff help a woman with whom he was sexually involved obtain a passport by falsely claiming to the State Department that she was a constituent.
Gaetz “knowingly and willfully” tried to obstruct the House Ethics Committee’s investigation into his conduct, the report said, and he “acted in a manner that reflects discreditably upon the House.”
What People Are Saying
The anonymous pro-Trump account, @catturd2, wrote on X: “Release the Names!”
What Comes Next
It’s unclear if Gaetz will return to Congress for the next session. As of this month, he’s slated to headline a prime-time TV show on the conservative One America News Network.
This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.
In a controversial move, Republicans are pushing to release the names of lawmakers accused of sexual harassment. This comes amidst a wave of allegations against politicians in recent years, sparking calls for greater transparency and accountability in addressing such misconduct.The proposal has sparked heated debate, with some arguing that transparency is crucial in holding lawmakers accountable for their actions. Others, however, warn that releasing the names of accused lawmakers could lead to false accusations and tarnish reputations without due process.
Despite the controversy, Republicans remain firm in their stance, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in addressing sexual harassment in politics. As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen whether this proposal will come to fruition and how it will impact the ongoing efforts to combat sexual harassment in the political sphere.
Tags:
- Republican lawmakers accused of sexual harassment
- GOP scandal: names of accused lawmakers
- Sexual harassment allegations in Republican party
- Lawmakers facing sexual harassment claims
- Republican party and #MeToo movement
- Accusations of sexual misconduct in GOP
- Names of Republican lawmakers involved in harassment
- GOP scandal: sexual harassment accusations
- Republicans under fire for sexual harassment
-
MeToo and Republican lawmakers accused
#Republicans #Release #Names #Lawmakers #Accused #Sexual #Harassment