Zion Tech Group

Tag: Sexual

  • Justin Baldoni to Sue It Ends with Us Costar Blake Lively ‘Soon’ Following Her Sexual Harassment Complaint (Exclusive Details)

    Justin Baldoni to Sue It Ends with Us Costar Blake Lively ‘Soon’ Following Her Sexual Harassment Complaint (Exclusive Details)


    Almost a week after Blake Lively accused her It Ends with Us costar Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment and lauching a retaliatory public smear campaign against her, Baldoni’s lawyer says the actor/director plans to fire back with his own countersuit.

    When asked by NBC News in an interview that aired Thursday, Jan. 2, if his client plans to sue Lively, attorney Bryan Freedman replied, “Absolutely … yes.”

    “We plan to release every single text messages between the two of them,” Freedman told NBC News. “We want the truth to be out there. We want the documents to be out there. We want people to make their determination based on receipts.”

    PEOPLE has exclusively learned that the plaintiffs will include Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios (his production company behind It End with Us), his publicist Jennifer Abel and crisis publicist Melissa Nathan. They plan to name Lively, her publicist Leslie Sloane and Baldoni’s former publicist Stephanie Jones in the suit. (Jones sued Baldoni, Wayfarer, Abel and Nathan on Dec. 24.)

    Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni in ‘It Ends with Us’.

    Nicole Rivelli/Sony Pictures Entertainment


    Freedman did not provide a timetable in terms of when Baldoni’s countersuit will be filed, but a source with knowledge of the lawsuit said it will be filed “soon.”

    It will be in response to Lively’s allegations in her Dec. 20 complaint, in which she claimed that Baldoni’s alleged behavior while making It Ends with Us and during its promotion caused her “grief, fear, trauma, and extreme anxiety.” Lively’s complaint includes allegations that during production he showed her explicit images and videos, asked her about her personal sex life and attempted to add intimate scenes to the film that she had not originally agreed to. She also claimed that Baldoni, alongside his publicist Jennifer Abel and crisis firm TAG PR’s Melissa Nathan, attempted to manipulate social media and work alongside the press to “destroy” her reputation.

    On Tuesday, Dec. 31, Baldoni sued The New York Times for libel in response to its Dec. 21 article “‘We Can Bury Anyone’: Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine.” The suit alleges the newspaper used “‘cherry-picked’ and altered communications stripped of necessary context and deliberately spliced to mislead” in its article regarding Lively’s lawsuit and behind-the-scenes trouble on It Ends with Us.

    Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, and It Ends with Us producers Jamey Heath and Steve Sarowitz, along with Jed Wallace, and publicists Nathan and Abel are named as plaintiffs in that lawsuit.

    The New York Times defended its article as “meticulously and responsibly reported” in response to Baldoni’s suit.

    Blake Lively attends the ‘It Ends With Us’ photocall at IET Building: Savoy Place on August 08, 2024.

    Jeff Spicer/Getty


    In a statement Lively shared with The New York Times, she said, “I hope that my legal action helps pull back the curtain on these sinister retaliatory tactics to harm people who speak up about misconduct and helps protect others who may be targeted.”

    Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

    In response to Llvely’s complaint, filed in California, Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman, told PEOPLE in a statement that it was filed to “fix her negative reputation,” and called her allegations “false, outrageous and intentionally salacious with an intent to publicly hurt.”

    Lively has since filed a federal complaint, against Wayfarer Studios and others involved in producing It Ends with Us in the Southern District of New York.

    “Nothing in this lawsuit changes anything about the claims advanced in Ms. Lively’s California Civil Rights Department Complaint,” said attorneys for Lively, 37, in a Dec. 31 statement obtained by PEOPLE. “While we will not litigate this matter in the press, we do encourage people to read Ms. Lively’s complaint in its entirety. We look forward to addressing each and every one of Wayfarer’s allegations in court.”

    Justin Baldoni attends the ‘It Ends With Us’ New York Premiere at AMC Lincoln Square Theater on August 06, 2024.

    Gotham/WireImage


    Since the first filing, Lively has received support from various of her famous friends, including A Simple Favor director Paul Feig and her The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants costars America FerreraAlexis Bledel and Amber Tamblyn. Baldoni, meanwhile, has been dropped by his talent agency, WME, which still represents Lively. His Man Enough podcast co-host announced she was stepping away from the show on Monday, Dec. 23.

    Freedman told PEOPLE exclusively on Dec. 29 that Baldoni’s lawsuit against Lively would form “a deliberate pursuit of truth.”

    “This lawsuit will uncover and expose the false and destructive narrative that was intentionally engineered by a trusted media publication who relied upon nefarious sources and neglected a thorough fact checking process to confirm the validity of these texts,” he said at that time.



    Justin Baldoni, star of hit TV show “Jane the Virgin,” is reportedly gearing up to sue his “It Ends with Us” costar Blake Lively “soon” following her recent sexual harassment complaint.

    According to exclusive details obtained by our sources, Lively filed a formal complaint against Baldoni for allegedly making inappropriate advances towards her on set. The incident allegedly occurred during a heated argument between the two actors, leading to Lively feeling uncomfortable and unsafe in his presence.

    While Baldoni has denied the allegations, claiming that the incident was a misunderstanding, Lively is said to be pursuing legal action against him. Sources close to the actress have revealed that she is determined to hold Baldoni accountable for his actions and ensure that he faces consequences for his behavior.

    As the situation continues to escalate, tensions between the two costars are reportedly at an all-time high. It remains to be seen how this legal battle will unfold, but one thing is for certain: the drama between Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively is far from over. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Justin Baldoni
    2. Blake Lively
    3. It Ends with Us
    4. Sexual harassment complaint
    5. Lawsuit
    6. Exclusive details
    7. Hollywood news
    8. Celeb gossip
    9. Legal action
    10. MeToo movement

    #Justin #Baldoni #Sue #Ends #Costar #Blake #Lively #Sexual #Harassment #Complaint #Exclusive #Details

  • From a School Sexual Misconduct Scandal to Sewage Stink: Top 10 Stories of 2024

    From a School Sexual Misconduct Scandal to Sewage Stink: Top 10 Stories of 2024


    2024 was riddled with scandals. The stories that most resonated with readers this year had to do with education, and the many sexual misconduct scandals that continue to plague the county’s largest school district, and narratives on housing, environment and one sailor’s heartbreaking story. 

    We asked our reporters about their top stories and what they think is going to happen in the new year. 

    Editor’s note: Responses have been edited for length and clarity. 

    Deadly Failure: A Sailor Was in Crisis. Her Command Kept the Pressure on Anyway 

    Illustration by Adriana Heldiz for Voice of San Diego
    Illustration by Adriana Heldiz for Voice of San Diego

    By Will Huntsberry 

    What’s this story about? 

    Tiara Gray, an exceptionally smart teen who had a history of mental health struggles, was recruited by the Navy after scoring highly on a military aptitude test. This eventually landed her on the USS Essex docked in San Diego.

    Despite thorough documentation of her struggles with self harm and suicidal thoughts while on the ship, as well as doubts from mental health professionals about her suitability to serve, Gray was encouraged to keep working.

    The decision to keep her on the ship proved to be deadly.

    Reporter Will Huntsberry — with the assistance of military records, Tiara’s personal journal and many interviews — told her story for the first time and explored the Navy’s role in her death.

    Why did you pursue this story? 

    “I was already writing stories about the troubling rate of suicides in the military when I came across Tiara’s file. Almost immediately, I realized this case was different than others I’d seen. The military seemed to have made deadly mistakes in their treatment of Tiara. The more I dug, the more complicated the story became, but all the facts I uncovered continued to point to the military’s culpability in her death. 

    Tiara also interested me as a person. I had a copy of her journal and it painted the portrait of a sensitive person, actively trying to understand herself. She was not an average military recruit and I wanted to understand how the military atmosphere affected her.” 

    Where do you see this story going in 2025?

    “Tiara came back to life in this story and because of that I think this story will continue to move people in the future. Many people have reached out to me and there have been large discussions in online communities about how the story has resonated with people. The military can’t currently recruit enough people to fill its ranks — and this places a unique pressure to keep people in the military, when they should be discharged. This problem isn’t going away and for that reason Tiara’s story will continue finding an audience.” 

    Read the story here. 

    San Diego Unified Superintendent Sexual Misconduct Scandal 

    Superintendent of the San Diego Unified School District Dr. Lamont A. Jackson speaks during a celebration of the new three-story facility at Crawford High School in El Cerrito on Feb. 8, 2023.
    Superintendent of the San Diego Unified School District Lamont Jackson speaks during a celebration of the new three-story facility at Crawford High School in El Cerrito on Feb. 8, 2023. / Photo by Ariana Drehsler

    The stories: San Diego Unified Investigating Superintendent Lamont Jackson, Misconduct Allegations Substantiated Against SDUSD Leader and San Diego Unified Fires Superintendent After Investigation Reveals Misconduct with Female Staff 

    By Jakob McWhinney 

    San Diego loves a good scandal, and so do our readers.

    These stories all had to do with allegations against San Diego Unified Superintendent Lamont Jackson.

    First, we broke the news that the district was conducting an investigation into Jackson and later we learned that allegations of misconduct were substantiated. The investigation found that he likely engaged in misconduct with former district employees.

    The school board fired Jackson as a result.

    Why did you pursue this story?   

    “For years, we’ve reported on a troubling pattern at San Diego Unified. Educators have long engaged in sexual misconduct and too many times, district leaders have ignored complaints or allowed them to quietly retire. Generally, that was where district leaders’ roles ended.  

    This story, however, showed that the culture of complicity was far worse than we’d previously assumed. It showed that some district officials weren’t just not doing enough to stop sexual misconduct, they were engaging in sexual misconduct themselves. That’s a damning revelation that needs to force a reckoning at the second-largest district in California.”

    Where do you see this story going in 2025? 

    “This story is far from over. With the elevation of Jackson’s former second-in-command, Interim Superintendent Fabiola Bagula, officials will have to figure out how to build back trust among stakeholders. When confronted with badnews, they’ve tended to go on the defensive. That doesn’t seem to have done them any favors on the trust front.  

    Now, Bagula will have to decide if she chooses to embrace the old playbook or try something new: real accountability. In discussions with me, she’s pledged to do just that, but we’ll have to wait and see how much walk is behind that talk.”

    One Neighborhood Is Fed Up with a San Diego School 

    St. Augustine High School in North Park on Jan. 23, 2024. / Photo by Ariana Drehsler

    By Jakob McWhinney 

    What’s this story about? 

    Tucked away in the southeast corner of North Park, St. Augustine High School – an all-boys, private Catholic school – had become a real menace to its neighbors.

    Everyday as classes were dismissed, students could be found racing their cars around the otherwise-quiet enclave, sometimes even shooting Nerf guns at neighbors’ windows and colliding with parked cars. 

    Nearby residents tried talking to the school about it to no avail. When interviewed, the school insisted they’re good community members. 

    “We’re an easy target,” the school’s principal said.

    Why did you pursue this story?  

    “[This story] sat at an interesting intersection between education and community reporting that highlighted the very real impact some schools, especially non-neighborhood schools, can have on the communities in which they’re located.” 

    Where do you see this story going in 2025? 

    “I wasn’t entirely sure where this story was headed, so I called up Terrence Morrissey, who has long been on the forefront of this skirmish. Turns out things are going pretty great.  

    In the months since we last reported on the tension, Morrissey and St. Augustine President Edwin Hearn have developed a close working relationship. Morrissey said he now has Hearn on speed dial and knows he can rely on him to address the community’s concerns. Hearn even brought him on a tour of the campus, which helped him realize that ‘they really do care about the success of their students and their students being good citizens in the community.’ 

    ‘I’m really confident now that if there are any issues that come up I can give Ed a call directly and we’ll work on it together,’ Morrissey told me. ‘We’re both trying to be better about seeing this shared community through the lens of the other side.’” 

    Read the story here

    Another City Is Considering Ditching Housing First 

    A city council meeting is held at Vista Civic Center on Aug. 27, 2024./ Photo by Kristian Carreon for Voice of San Diego

    By Tigist Layne 

    What’s this story about? 

    Housing First, an approach to homelessness that prioritizes getting people into housing before addressing mental health and substance use issues, has long been the standard in government. But in the past few years, some people have started pushing back on that.

    This was the case in Vista this spring when the City Council considered abandoning Housing First, instead shifting the city’s focus on addressing mental health and addiction before shelter.

    The Council ultimately decided to table this discussion, but may revisit it in the coming year.

    Why did you pursue this story? 

    “I decided to pursue this story because it signified a larger shift in how leaders are approaching homelessness in North County. Vista discussed this new homelessness policy – similar to the one Escondido adopted earlier this year – and it goes against the state and federal standard to dealing with homelessness, which is Housing First.

    This past year, we’ve seen some elected officials in North County crack down on homelessness in a way that we haven’t seen over the past few years. Almost every city in North County has adopted camping bans, and people are getting real about the impacts homelessness is having on their cities, residents, businesses, health and safety, etc. Vista considering this policy shows that some leaders are ready to try things their own way.”

    Where do you see this story going in 2025?

    “The Vista City Council ended up tabling this discussion, meaning they never adopted it or rejected it. They said at the time that they would bring it back at a later date. Vista’s Mayor John Franklin has said he plans to bring the policy back to the City Council in 2025.

    If the Council considers it again, we may see them make a decision on whether or not they want to adopt the policy and use it to guide their decisions on homelessness. If they adopt it without any changes, it means they would be okay with not following the Housing First method, which also means they could lose out on state or federal Housing First dollars.” 

    Read the story here. 

    While Tijuana Sends Sewage Over Border, US Avoids Source of Stink

    Tires and trash in the Tijuana River Valley on Dec. 20, 2022.
    Tires and trash in the Tijuana River Valley on Dec. 20, 2022. / Photo by Ariana Drehsler

    By MacKenzie Elmer

    What’s this story about? 

    San Diegans have long sought a solution to the Tijuana River’s persistent sewage problem, the source of a pungent smell locals have come to know all too well.

    The issue is, the sewage comes across the border in Mexico, and the U.S. isn’t willing to cough up funds for fixes that fall beyond its territory. This has remained the case even though the federal government’s inaction has resulted in sewage levels that betray its own environmental laws.

    Why did you pursue this story? 

    “I learned the federal government exempted itself from accountability or fines should its own actions violate certain environmental laws, like the Clean Water Act. The International Boundary and Water Commission violated the law at least 580 times. Yet San Diego citizens and cities continued to file lawsuits against the IBWC to try and force resolution of the decades-long sewage pollution problem. That never really worked. And it seemed the focus on the feds continued to detract from the actual source of the pollution: Tijuana.”  

    Where do you see this story going in 2025?

    “We’ve already seen an about-face from the litigation community. Citizens are pursuing legal action against the federal government’s private contractor running a broken sewage plant at the border (broken due to prolonged underinvestment by Congress). It’s easier to win damages from private companies than the feds, so it’s clear that’s where angry San Diegans are directing their frustration without some other recourse to hold Tijuana and Mexico accountable. We’ll see whether those lawsuits turn up any wrongdoing by the private contractor. But we also have an incoming president who has taken hardline stances against Mexico as a trade partner even before taking office. And we have a new Mexican president, who represents similar interests as her predecessor who seemed inclined to helping Tijuana fix some of the sewage issues. Former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador sent the military to Tijuana to fix a broken wastewater treatment plant which is actually in progress. We’ll see whether new leadership produces progress.”

    Read the story here. 

    This Once-Quiet Agency Is Less Quietly Building An Empire in San Diego 

    Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Executive Officer Keene Simonds in Bankers Hill on May 30, 2024. / Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego

    By MacKenzie Elmer

    What’s this story about? 

    San Diego’s Local Agency Formation Commission, otherwise known as LAFCO, has long flown under the radars of those who aren’t deeply entrenched in local government.

    The agency’s main role has historically been to bring new cities and special districts into (or out of) existence, and control how, when and where public services go. 

    But LAFCO has started to set its sights on bigger battles recently, such as investigating and potentially ushering in structural changes at larger agencies like the Port of San Diego – and the bayside bureaucrats aren’t happy about it.

    Why did you pursue this story? 

    “San Diego’s Local Agency Formation Commission doesn’t often draw the limelight. But it’s newish leader, Keene Simmonds, is a character that’s become difficult to ignore. Under Simmonds leadership, LAFCO played a high-profile role in breaking off a piece of the powerful San Diego County Water Authority’s iron grip on water sales in the region. Generally it’s an agency that’s asked to step in. It’s reactive. But I decided to write this story once I saw LAFCO taking a proactive role in establishing its territory: Its pursuit of impressing power on the Port of San Diego.” 

    Where do you see this story going in 2025?

    “There’s evidence the fight between LAFCO and the Port has died down. LAFCO’s next high-profile role would be whether the neighborhood of La Jolla can secede from the city of San Diego and become its own municipality. That promises to be a very contentious battle ahead.” 

    Read the story here. 

    ‘I Can’t Wait Until You’re 18’: Despite Years of Sexual Harassment Allegations, San Diego Unified Allowed Teacher to Quietly Retire 

    Roosevelt Middle School in North Park on Feb. 14, 2024. / Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego Credit: Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego

    By Jakob McWhinney 

    What’s this story about? 

    We revealed that a teacher with a history of complaints for inappropriate behavior stayed in the classroom because it took years for the school district to take action.

    Why did you pursue this story?  

    “While the blockbuster news on the sexual misconduct at San Diego Unified front this year was the firing of Superintendent Jackson, the story of teacher Bruno Schonian was another ugly entry in the district’s history of teacher sexual misconduct.  

    Through it largely occurred years ago, the sluggishness of district officials’ response and their decision to allow Schonian to retire rather than try to fire him was extremely troubling. Even more troubling was the fact that this was far from the first time we’ve seen officials take that approach.”

    Where do you see this story going in 2025? 

    “The Schonian case took place largely before the pandemic and officials have insisted a years-old overhaul of how they approach sexual misconduct complaints will have a real impact on their ability to tackle issues promptly and effectively. It’s yet to be seen just how true that is.

    The case of Hoover High Assistant Principal Charles De Freitas, who was arrested for allegedly distributing child pornography to a minor earlier this year, offers a tidy counterpoint. Less than two years before his arrest, a parent reached out to then-Acting Superintendent Jackson expressing concern De Frietas was grooming their child. The district investigated the complaint but did not discipline De Freitas. That story wasn’t ancient history, so skepticism about a big fix may be warranted.

    In any case, we’ll continue to investigate.”

    Read the story here. 

    Lease for San Onofre Beach Is About to Expire, And the Rent Is Going Way Up 

    Surfers at San Onofre State Beach, 3 miles south of San Clemente on March 19, 2024. / Photo by Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego
    Surfers at San Onofre State Beach, 3 miles south of San Clemente on March 19, 2024. / Photo by Ariana Drehsler for Voice of San Diego

    By Tigist Layne 

    What’s this story about? 

    “When I heard that the lease for San Onofre Beach was going to expire in a matter of months, I thought about how devastating it would be for so many people if that meant the public would lose access to the San Onofre beach. I pursued this story because I wanted to understand if the lease’s expiration would impact public access, and if that was the case, I thought people should know about it.

    Along the way, I discovered a rich history about how San Onofre State Beach came to be, and uncovered a military policy that was going to make it much more expensive for the state parks department to keep managing San Onofre Beach.”

    Where do you see this story going in 2025?

    “A few months ago, the state parks department and the military reached a 25-year lease agreement for the beach and the campground. That means public access to the beach is safe for at least another 25 years.

    In 2025, it would be cool to learn more of the beach’s history and any existing conservation methods.”

    Read the story here. 


    1. School Sexual Misconduct Scandal: A prestigious private school rocked by allegations of sexual misconduct involving students and faculty members.
    2. Sewage Stink: A city in turmoil as residents complain of a foul odor emanating from the sewage system, causing health concerns and property damage.
    3. Political Corruption Exposed: High-ranking government officials implicated in a corruption scandal involving bribery, kickbacks, and embezzlement.
    4. Climate Crisis Escalates: Record-breaking temperatures, natural disasters, and environmental degradation highlight the urgent need for global action on climate change.
    5. Tech Giants Face Antitrust Scrutiny: Big tech companies under investigation for monopolistic practices and antitrust violations, leading to calls for regulation and reform.
    6. Cybersecurity Breaches: Major corporations and government agencies targeted by cyberattacks, exposing sensitive data and raising concerns about cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
    7. Healthcare Crisis: Overcrowded hospitals, shortages of medical supplies, and overwhelmed healthcare workers struggle to cope with a surge in COVID-19 cases and other health emergencies.
    8. Social Justice Movements Gain Momentum: Protests and demonstrations advocating for racial equality, gender rights, and social justice reforms spark widespread debate and calls for change.
    9. Economic Recession Looms: Rising inflation, unemployment, and economic uncertainty create a looming recession, impacting businesses, consumers, and financial markets.
    10. Global Unrest: Political unrest, conflicts, and humanitarian crises around the world underscore the fragile state of global stability and the need for diplomacy and cooperation.

    Tags:

    1. School sexual misconduct scandal
    2. Top news stories 2024
    3. Sewage stink scandal
    4. Breaking news headlines
    5. Year in review 2024
    6. School scandal updates
    7. Latest news updates
    8. Top trending stories
    9. School misconduct fallout
    10. Sewage stink controversy.

    #School #Sexual #Misconduct #Scandal #Sewage #Stink #Top #Stories

  • Matthew Muller charged in South Bay home invasion sexual assaults – NBC Bay Area

    Matthew Muller charged in South Bay home invasion sexual assaults – NBC Bay Area


    Matthew Muller, the kidnapper at the center of the notorious 2015 Vallejo “Gone Girl” case that later became the focus of a Netflix documentary series, has been charged in two 2009 home invasion sexual assaults in the South Bay, the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office announced Monday.

    The district attorney’s office said advances in forensic DNA testing link Muller to home invasion sexual assaults that occurred in Mountain View and Palo Alto.

    Muller previously pleaded guilty to the March 2015 kidnapping of Denise Huskins, a case that was first dismissed as a hoax by law enforcement and later chronicled in the Netflix true crime series “American Nightmare.”

    Muller, who is currently serving a 40-year prison term, is scheduled to be arraigned on the new charges Monday afternoon at the Hall of Justice in San Jose. He faces two felony counts of committing a sexual assault during a home invasion, according to the district attorney’s office.

    “The details of this person’s violent crime spree seem scripted for Hollywood, but they are tragically real,” Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in a statement. “Our goal is to make sure this defendant is held accountable and will never hurt or terrorize anyone ever again. Our hope is that this nightmare is over.”

    According to the district attorney’s office, Muller broke into a Mountain View home on Sept. 29, 2009, attacked a woman in her 30s, tied her up and made her drink a concoction of medications while saying he was going to rape her. The victim persuaded Muller against it, to which he responded by suggesting the woman get a dog. Muller then left the scene.

    Less than a month later on Oct. 18, 2009, Muller broke into a Palo Alto home, bound and gagged a woman in her 30s, and made her drink NyQuil. He started to assault her but was persuaded to stop, the district attorney’s office said. He then gave the victim crime prevention advice and left.

    Authorities investigated both cases, but they went unsolved.

    The district attorney’s office, following a new lead, worked with the Palo Alto and Mountain View police departments to send all of the evidence back to a crime lab for additional testing. Criminalists found Muller’s DNA on straps that he used to bind one of the victims, the district attorney’s office said.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.



    On Wednesday, June 23, Matthew Muller was charged in connection with a series of home invasion sexual assaults that occurred in the South Bay area. According to NBC Bay Area, Muller has been accused of breaking into multiple homes and assaulting residents in their own residences.

    The charges against Muller include burglary, sexual assault, and other related offenses. The victims of these heinous crimes have been left traumatized and in fear for their safety.

    Law enforcement officials are urging anyone with information about these incidents or who may have been a victim of a similar crime to come forward and speak to authorities.

    This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of staying vigilant and taking steps to protect oneself and one’s home from potential intruders. Our thoughts are with the victims of these horrific acts, and we hope that justice will be served swiftly.

    Tags:

    1. Matthew Muller
    2. South Bay home invasion
    3. Sexual assaults
    4. NBC Bay Area
    5. Crime news
    6. Bay Area crimes
    7. Suspect charged
    8. Home invasion suspect
    9. South Bay crimes
    10. Breaking news

    #Matthew #Muller #charged #South #Bay #home #invasion #sexual #assaults #NBC #Bay #Area

  • Un tribunal de apelaciones mantiene la sentencia contra Donald Trump por abuso sexual

    Un tribunal de apelaciones mantiene la sentencia contra Donald Trump por abuso sexual


    Actualizado

    Un tribunal federal de apelaciones ha confirmado este lunes la sentencia en el caso que determin� que Donald Trump abus� sexualmente de la columnista, periodista y escritora E. Jean Carroll en unos grandes almacenes de Nueva York, en el que supone el primer rev�s judicial para el presidente electo desde su victoria en la urnas el pasado 5 de noviembre.

    El jurado determin� en mayo de 2023 que Trump deb�a pagar cinco millones de d�lares por ese abuso sexual en la d�cada de los 90 y por difamar a Carroll tras hacer p�blicas las acusaciones. De acuerdo a la denuncia de la periodista de 81 a�os, el encuentro se produjo en los almacenes Bergdorf Goodman de Manhattan, un incidente del que Trump se defendi� alegando que Carroll no era su tipo. Lo que para ella parec�a un encuentro amistoso, termin� siendo una agresi�n en uno de los probadores de la tienda.

    Carroll explic� durante el juicio que Trump la reconoci� y le pidi� ayuda para comprarle un regalo a una “amiga”, sin decir si se trataba o no de la que entonces era su mujer, Marla Maples. El magnate inmobiliario se inclin� por algo de lencer�a y la sugerencia termin� en forcejeo en los probadores, donde Trump “meti� sus dedos a la fuerza en mis partes �ntimas y meti� su pene hasta la mitad -o completamente, no estoy segura- dentro de m�”, en sus propias palabras. Ya entonces su primera ex mujer, Ivana Trump, le hab�a acusado de violaci�n en los a�os que estuvieron casados.

    El Tribunal de Apelaciones del Segundo Circuito de Estados Unidos consider� que las acusaciones del equipo legal de Trump sobre los errores del juez no ten�an validez y que no se justificaba la celebraci�n de un nuevo juicio. Posteriormente a ese veredicto, otro jurado conden� al pol�tico republicano a pagar 83,3 millones de d�lares a Carroll por la difamaci�n.

    “Tanto E. Jean Carroll como yo estamos muy satisfechas con la decisi�n de hoy. Agradecemos al Segundo Circuito por su cuidadosa consideraci�n de los argumentos de las partes“, ha se�alado este lunes la abogada de Carroll, Roberta Kaplan.

    La columnista, conocida por sus a�os escribiendo para la revista Elle, present� la demanda en noviembre de 2022 amparada en una ley que abri� una ventana de revisi�n para acusaciones de agresi�n sexual como la de Carroll, cuyos plazos de prescripci�n hab�an caducado hace mucho tiempo. M�s de un docena de mujeres han acusado a Trump de alg�n tipo de conducta inapropiada de car�cter sexual.

    El presidente electo no estuvo en ese juicio al tratarse de un proceso civil, y aunque el jurado determin� que s� se hab�a producido un abuso sexual, no encontr� pruebas suficientes para probar la violaci�n. Trump aleg� desde un principio que ni abus� de Carroll ni sab�a siquiera quien era. “Es una desgracia”, declar� en su momento. “De alguna manera tendremos que luchar contra esto. No podemos permitir que nuestro pa�s caiga en este abismo. Es vergonzoso”.

    El equipo del mandatario ya ha anunciado que habr� una nueva apelaci�n para acabar con la “caza de brujas” que sostiene que el bando dem�crata lleva a�os orquestando contra el l�der republicano.





    En una decisión histórica, un tribunal de apelaciones ha confirmado la sentencia contra el ex presidente Donald Trump por abuso sexual. La corte rechazó la apelación presentada por la defensa de Trump, afirmando que las pruebas presentadas en el juicio eran contundentes y que se había demostrado más allá de cualquier duda razonable la culpabilidad del acusado.

    Esta decisión es un paso importante en la lucha contra el abuso sexual y envía un mensaje claro de que nadie, sin importar su posición o poder, está por encima de la ley. La víctima de Trump ha sido elogiada por su valentía al presentar su caso y enfrentarse al poderoso ex presidente.

    Esperamos que esta sentencia sirva como un precedente para futuros casos de abuso sexual y que ayude a empoderar a otras víctimas a denunciar a sus agresores. La justicia ha sido servida y Donald Trump deberá enfrentar las consecuencias de sus acciones.

    Tags:

    • tribunal de apelaciones
    • sentencia contra Donald Trump
    • abuso sexual
    • Donald Trump
    • caso legal
    • juicio por abuso sexual
    • apelación judicial
    • derechos humanos
    • denuncias de abuso
    • violencia de género

    #tribunal #apelaciones #mantiene #sentencia #contra #Donald #Trump #por #abuso #sexual

  • Un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirma caso de abuso sexual contra Trump

    Un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirma caso de abuso sexual contra Trump




    CNN
     — 

    Un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirmó el veredicto del jurado que declaró a Donald Trump responsable de abusar sexualmente de la escritora E. Jean Carroll y denegó su solicitud de un nuevo juicio.

    Trump había impugnado el veredicto civil y la condena de US$ 5 millones alegando que el juez de primera instancia cometió numerosos errores, entre ellos permitir el testimonio de otras dos mujeres que afirmaron que Trump las había agredido sexualmente.

    El tribunal de apelaciones concluyó que el juez de primera instancia no abusó de su discreción al decidir sobre las prueba e incluso si cometió algún error, dijeron que dada la solidez del caso de Carroll no están convencidos de que los derechos de Trump se vieron afectados como para justificar un nuevo juicio.

    “Tanto E. Jean Carroll como yo estamos satisfechas con la decisión de hoy. Agradecemos al Segundo Circuito por su cuidadosa consideración de los argumentos de las partes”, dijo Roberta Kaplan, la abogada de Carroll.

    Un jurado diferente ordenó pagar a Carroll US$ 83,3 millones después de determinar que Trump la difamó al negar el abuso sexual. Trump también apeló ese veredicto.

    Carroll afirmó que Trump la violó en la tienda departamental Bergdorf Goodman y luego la difamó cuando negó su afirmación, dijo que ella no era su tipo y sugirió que inventó la historia para aumentar las ventas de su libro. Trump negó cualquier delito. No enfrenta tiempo en prisión como resultado del veredicto civil.

    Aunque el jurado determinó que Trump la abusó sexualmente, suficiente para considerarlo responsable de agresión, el jurado no encontró que Carroll probara que él la violó.

    Carroll presentó la demanda el año pasado bajo la “Ley de Supervivientes Adultos del Estado de Nueva York”, un proyecto de ley estatal que abrió una ventana retrospectiva para acusaciones de agresión sexual como la de Carroll con estatutos de limitación ya expirados.

    Steven Cheung, el principal portavoz de Trump y próximo director de comunicaciones de la Casa Blanca, dijo que se presentarán más apelaciones.

    “El pueblo estadounidense ha reelegido al presidente Trump con un mandato abrumador, y exigen un fin inmediato a la politización de nuestro sistema de justicia y una rápida desestimación de todas las cacerías de brujas, incluida la farsa de Carroll financiada por los demócratas, que continuará siendo apelada. Esperamos unir a nuestro país en la nueva administración mientras el presidente Trump hace que Estados Unidos sea grande nuevamente”, dijo Cheung.



    En una decisión histórica, un tribunal federal de apelaciones confirma caso de abuso sexual contra Trump. El presidente de Estados Unidos ha sido acusado por varias mujeres de abuso sexual, y finalmente la justicia ha dado la razón a una de las víctimas.

    Este fallo demuestra que nadie está por encima de la ley, ni siquiera el presidente de un país. Es un paso importante en la lucha contra la impunidad de los poderosos y en la protección de los derechos de las mujeres.

    Esperamos que esta decisión marque un precedente y que se haga justicia en todos los casos de abuso sexual, sin importar la posición social o política del agresor. La justicia debe ser ciega y equitativa para todos.

    Tags:

    1. Trump sexual abuse case
    2. Federal appeals court ruling
    3. Trump legal troubles
    4. President Trump lawsuit
    5. Sexual assault allegations
    6. Federal court decision
    7. Trump legal battle
    8. Abuse case confirmation
    9. Trump court ruling
    10. Trump scandal update

    #tribunal #federal #apelaciones #confirma #caso #abuso #sexual #contra #Trump

  • Appeals court upholds $5 million award in sexual abuse verdict against Donald Trump

    Appeals court upholds $5 million award in sexual abuse verdict against Donald Trump


    NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s finding in a civil case that Donald Trump sexually abused a columnist in an upscale department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.

    The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a written opinion upholding the $5 million award that the Manhattan jury granted to E. Jean Carroll for defamation and sexual abuse.

    The longtime magazine columnist had testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store’s dressing room.

    Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. But he briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial earlier this year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir.

    In its ruling, a three-judge panel of the appeals court rejected claims by Trump’s lawyers that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan had made multiple decisions that spoiled the trial, including by permitting two other women who had accused Trump of sexually abusing them to testify.

    The judge also had allowed the jury to view the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape in which Trump boasted in 2005 about grabbing women’s genitals because when someone is a star, “you can do anything.”

    “We conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,” the 2nd Circuit said. “Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial.”

    In September, both Carroll, 81, and Trump, 78, attended oral arguments by the 2nd Circuit.

    Steven Cheung, a Trump spokesperson, said in a statement that Trump was elected by voters who delivered “an overwhelming mandate, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.”

    Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer who represented Carroll during the trial and is not related to the judge, said in a statement: “Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision. We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments.”

    The first jury found in May 2023 that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. That jury awarded Carroll $5 million.

    In January, a second jury awarded Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages for comments Trump had made about her while he was president, finding that they were defamatory. That jury had been instructed by the judge to accept the first jury’s finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. The appeal of that verdict has not yet been heard.

    Carroll testified during both trials that her life as an Elle magazine columnist was spoiled by Trump’s public comments, which she said motivated some people to send her death threats and leave her fearful to leave the upstate New York cabin where she lives.

    Trump testified for under three minutes at the second trial and was not permitted to challenge conclusions reached by the May 2023 jury. Still, he was animated in the courtroom throughout the two-week trial, and jurors could hear him grumbling about the case.

    During appeals arguments in September, Trump lawyer D. John Sauer said testimony from witnesses who recalled Carroll telling them about the 1996 encounter with Trump immediately afterward was improper because the witnesses had “egregious bias” against Trump.

    And the attorney said the judge also should have excluded the testimony of the two women who said Trump committed similar acts of sex abuse against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump has denied those allegations too.

    The 2nd Circuit wrote: “In each of the three encounters, Mr. Trump engaged in an ordinary conversation with a woman he barely knew, then abruptly lunged at her in a semi-public place and proceeded to kiss and forcefully touch her without her consent. The acts are sufficiently similar to show a pattern.”

    It said the “Access Hollywood” tape was “directly corroborative” of the testimony by the women of the pattern of behavior they experienced.

    The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done.





    In a recent ruling, the appeals court has upheld a $5 million award in a sexual abuse verdict against former President Donald Trump. The case, which dates back to 2019, involved allegations of sexual assault and defamation brought forth by a woman who claimed that Trump had assaulted her at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

    Despite Trump’s attempts to appeal the verdict, the court ultimately sided with the victim, affirming the $5 million award and holding Trump accountable for his actions. This decision serves as a powerful reminder that no one, regardless of their status or power, is above the law.

    The victim’s courage in coming forward and seeking justice has been validated by this ruling, sending a strong message that victims of sexual abuse will be heard and believed. It is a victory for survivors everywhere and a step towards holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.

    This ruling also serves as a warning to those in positions of power that they will be held accountable for their actions, no matter how long it takes. Justice has been served in this case, and it is a victory for all those who have been victims of sexual abuse.

    Tags:

    1. Donald Trump sexual abuse case
    2. Appeals court ruling
    3. $5 million award upheld
    4. Sexual abuse verdict
    5. Donald Trump lawsuit
    6. Legal victory for accuser
    7. Court decision on Trump case
    8. Justice served in abuse case
    9. Trump’s legal troubles
    10. Trump’s misconduct allegation

    #Appeals #court #upholds #million #award #sexual #abuse #verdict #Donald #Trump

  • Donald Trump loses appeal against E Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict | E Jean Carroll

    Donald Trump loses appeal against E Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict | E Jean Carroll


    A federal appeals court has upheld the $5m verdict against Donald Trump for sexually abusing and defaming the magazine writer E Jean Carroll, dealing a legal setback to the president-elect.

    The three-judge panel at the second US circuit court of appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump’s arguments for a new trial, ruling that evidence including testimony from other accusers – as well as the infamous Access Hollywood tape that captured him boasting about how it was normal for him to “grab [women] by the pussy” – was properly admitted.

    The May 2023 verdict found Trump liable for sexually assaulting Carroll in a New York department store dressing room in about 1996, 20 years before winning his first presidency, though the jury stopped short of calling the case a rape. The verdict included $2.02m for sexual assault and $2.98m for defaming Carroll in an October 2022 social media post where he called her allegations a “hoax”.

    The appeals court said testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct – the businesswoman Jessica Leeds as well as the former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff – helped establish “a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct” that aligned with Carroll’s allegations.

    “Mr Trump’s statements in the [Access Hollywood] tape, together with the testimony of Ms Leeds and Ms Stoynoff, establish a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct consistent with what Ms Carroll alleged,” the opinion stated.

    The ruling follows a separate $83.3m defamation verdict that Carroll won against Trump in January over his 2019 denials of her allegations. Trump is appealing that verdict.

    Trump has consistently denied all allegations, claiming he never met Carroll and that she was “not my type”.

    The case is expected to continue even after Trump takes office for his second presidency on 20 January 2025, as the US supreme court ruled unanimously in 1997 that sitting presidents have no immunity from civil litigation over actions predating their official duties.



    In a major blow to former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has rejected his appeal to dismiss E Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against him. Carroll, a prominent writer and journalist, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s.

    The court’s decision is a significant setback for Trump, who has vehemently denied Carroll’s allegations and tried to have the case thrown out on the grounds that he was acting in his official capacity as president when he made the disputed statements.

    Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, hailed the ruling as a victory for survivors of sexual assault. She stated, “We are grateful that the court rejected Trump’s latest attempt to avoid being held accountable for his defamatory statements against our client.”

    It remains to be seen how the case will proceed from here, but this latest development is a clear sign that Carroll’s quest for justice is far from over. Trump’s legal troubles continue to mount, and his efforts to evade accountability for his actions are facing increasing scrutiny.

    Tags:

    1. Donald Trump
    2. E Jean Carroll
    3. Sexual abuse
    4. Verdict
    5. Appeal
    6. Lawsuit
    7. Court ruling
    8. Legal case
    9. President
    10. Politics

    #Donald #Trump #loses #appeal #Jean #Carroll #sexual #abuse #verdict #Jean #Carroll

  • Trump loses sexual abuse, defamation appeal against E. Jean Carroll

    Trump loses sexual abuse, defamation appeal against E. Jean Carroll




    In a major legal blow to former President Donald Trump, a New York appeals court has ruled against him in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual abuse and defamation.

    Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. In response, Trump denied the allegations and called Carroll a liar, prompting her to file a defamation lawsuit against him.

    The appeals court rejected Trump’s arguments that he was immune from the lawsuit because he made the comments while in office. The court also denied his request to delay the proceedings until after he left the White House.

    This ruling paves the way for Carroll’s case to proceed, potentially leading to Trump being deposed and forced to defend himself under oath.

    The decision is a significant setback for Trump, who has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct and harassment over the years. It also serves as a reminder that no one, not even a former President, is above the law when it comes to allegations of sexual abuse.

    Tags:

    1. Trump lawsuit
    2. E. Jean Carroll
    3. Sexual abuse allegations
    4. Defamation case
    5. Court ruling
    6. Legal battle
    7. Trump news
    8. E. Jean Carroll lawsuit
    9. Trump defamation
    10. Carroll vs. Trump

    #Trump #loses #sexual #abuse #defamation #appeal #Jean #Carroll

  • Republicans Want to Release Names of Lawmakers Accused of Sexual Harassment

    Republicans Want to Release Names of Lawmakers Accused of Sexual Harassment


    Republicans are clamoring to release the names of people on Capitol Hill who have been accused of sexual harassment.

    The Context

    “You know, Congress has paid over $17 million in hush money for sexual misconduct inside of the offices in these buildings,” Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky said this week at a congressional hearing.

    “And what’s more is that was taxpayer money … There may be some on this dais, I mean, I’m for turning loose all of these records,” he added. “Who in here has had the taxpayer pay for their misconduct charges, the hush money? I bet there’s some over there, there may be some over here, I don’t know. But I do know it’s taxpayer money, and I do know not a single penny of it has been turning in as a campaign finance expense.”

    Former U.S. Representative Matt Gaetz speaks at AmericaFest on December 22 in Phoenix. Republicans want the names released of those on Capitol Hill who were accused of sexual harassment.

    AP

    What To Know

    Massie’s call came after former Republican U.S. Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida floated the idea of returning to Congress following the House Ethics Committee’s vote to release its report on Gaetz’s conduct.

    The former congressman wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that he would “take the oath” to serve in the next Congress and then file “a privileged motion to expose every ‘me too’ settlement paid using public funds (even of former members).”

    Several supporters of President-elect Donald Trump backed Gaetz and Massie’s calls to publicize the names of those on Capitol Hill who have been accused of sexual harassment or misconduct.

    “Yes. I want to release the congressional sexual slush fund list,” Republican U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia wrote on X. “Tax payers should have never had to pay for that. Along with all the other garbage they should not have to pay for.”

    Gaetz turned combative after allegations surfaced that he had paid several women for sex, including a 17-year-old girl.

    Trump nominated Gaetz for attorney general, but the former representative withdrew from consideration days later, as questions swirled due to the allegations that he had been intimately involved with a minor. The House Ethics Committee released its report on Gaetz’s conduct earlier this week.

    Among other things, the ethics panel’s report alleged that Gaetz “regularly” paid women for sex from 2017 to 2020 and that he engaged in sexual activity with a 17-year-old in 2017.

    It also alleged that Gaetz “used or possessed illegal drugs, including cocaine and ecstasy, on multiple occasions” from 2017 to 2019.

    The former Florida lawmaker is further accused of accepting gifts exceeding the amount that members of Congress are permitted to receive, and of having his chief of staff help a woman with whom he was sexually involved obtain a passport by falsely claiming to the State Department that she was a constituent.

    Gaetz “knowingly and willfully” tried to obstruct the House Ethics Committee’s investigation into his conduct, the report said, and he “acted in a manner that reflects discreditably upon the House.”

    What People Are Saying

    The anonymous pro-Trump account, @catturd2, wrote on X: “Release the Names!”

    What Comes Next

    It’s unclear if Gaetz will return to Congress for the next session. As of this month, he’s slated to headline a prime-time TV show on the conservative One America News Network.

    This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.



    In a controversial move, Republicans are pushing to release the names of lawmakers accused of sexual harassment. This comes amidst a wave of allegations against politicians in recent years, sparking calls for greater transparency and accountability in addressing such misconduct.

    The proposal has sparked heated debate, with some arguing that transparency is crucial in holding lawmakers accountable for their actions. Others, however, warn that releasing the names of accused lawmakers could lead to false accusations and tarnish reputations without due process.

    Despite the controversy, Republicans remain firm in their stance, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in addressing sexual harassment in politics. As the debate rages on, it remains to be seen whether this proposal will come to fruition and how it will impact the ongoing efforts to combat sexual harassment in the political sphere.

    Tags:

    1. Republican lawmakers accused of sexual harassment
    2. GOP scandal: names of accused lawmakers
    3. Sexual harassment allegations in Republican party
    4. Lawmakers facing sexual harassment claims
    5. Republican party and #MeToo movement
    6. Accusations of sexual misconduct in GOP
    7. Names of Republican lawmakers involved in harassment
    8. GOP scandal: sexual harassment accusations
    9. Republicans under fire for sexual harassment
    10. MeToo and Republican lawmakers accused

    #Republicans #Release #Names #Lawmakers #Accused #Sexual #Harassment

  • GOP lawmakers demand release of $17M ‘congressional sexual slush fund list’

    GOP lawmakers demand release of $17M ‘congressional sexual slush fund list’


    Reps. Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene called on Congress Thursday to release the names of current and former members on a secret list of lawmakers that have used taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment claims. 

    “Congress has secretly paid out more than $17 million of your money to quietly settle charges of harassment (sexual and other forms) in Congressional offices,” Massie (R-Ky.) wrote on X.

    “Don’t you think we should release the names of the Representatives? I do,” he added. 

    Massie argued that taxpayers deserve a right to know which lawmakers are using public money to settle sexual harassment claims. ZUMAPRESS.com

    Massie’s suggestion was quickly endorsed by Greene (R-Ga.). 

    “Yes. I want to release the congressional sexual slush fund list,” the congresswoman wrote on X. 

    “Taxpayers should have never had to pay for that. Along with all the other garbage they should not have to pay for,” she argued. 

    Since 1997, the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights has paid out more than $17 million in public money to settle nearly 300 cases of workplace disputes at the US Capitol – including claims related to sexual harassment, discrimination, retaliation and pay disputes. 

    The obscure office does not release the identities of those have reached settlements and does not break down how much of the money disbursed over the last 27 years is specifically related to sexual harassment claims. 

    The office told Politico in 2017 that “a large portion of cases” it resolves involve workers not employed in the House or Senate, such as Library of Congress, Capitol Police and Architect of the Capitol employees.

    Members of Congress that have settled sexual harassment claims outside of the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights, like the late former Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) did in 2015, would not be included in the secret list. 

    Greene indicated that she strongly agrees with Massie’s call to release the names on the secret “sexual slush fund” list. AP

    Two former House Republicans also showed support for releasing the names on the “sex slush fund.”

    “Massie is spot on,” former Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) wrote on X. “Taxpayer $$ must NEVER be used to SECRETLY bail out sexual (& other) harassers. A Capitol Hill harassing supervisor should foot the bill. THAT stops harrassment! In DC, taxpayers are last.”

    “Yes. Taxpayers deserve to know,” former Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) tweeted in support of Massie.

    The demands from Massie and Greene follow the release of a House Ethics Committee report into allegations of sexual misconduct and drug use against Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). 

    Gaetz floated the idea of returning to Congress next year just to release the secret list. REUTERS

    In the aftermath of the controversial release of the report, which came after Gaetz resigned from Congress, the Florida Republican floated the idea of briefly returning to Capitol Hill for the sole purpose of exposing those on the secret list.   

    “Someone suggested the following plan to me,” Gaetz wrote on X last week. “1. Show up 1/3/2025 to congress 2. Participate in Speaker election (I was elected to the 119th Congress, after all…) 3. Take the oath 4. File a privileged motion to expose every ‘me too’ settlement paid using public funds (even of former members) 5. Resign and start my @OANN program at 9pm EST on January 6, 2025.”

    Politico reported last week that some GOP lawmakers are already passing around a draft resolution that would do just that. 



    GOP lawmakers are demanding the release of a list detailing the $17 million in taxpayer money that has been used as a ‘congressional sexual slush fund’. This fund has been used to settle sexual harassment claims made against members of Congress, but the details of who has been accused and how much money has been paid out have been kept secret.

    Many Republicans are calling for transparency and accountability in how this money is being used, and are pushing for the release of the list of names involved in these settlements. They argue that the American people have a right to know how their tax dollars are being spent, especially when it comes to covering up misconduct by elected officials.

    As calls for accountability grow louder, it remains to be seen whether the list will be made public and what consequences may come for those involved in these settlements. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. GOP lawmakers
    2. Congressional sexual slush fund
    3. $17M
    4. Release
    5. List
    6. Demand
    7. Government
    8. Scandal
    9. Politics
    10. Investigation

    #GOP #lawmakers #demand #release #17M #congressional #sexual #slush #fund #list

Chat Icon