Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: shareholders
Herald urges shareholders to VOTE AGAINST Saba’s resolutions
Following its announcement on 20 December, Herald (HRI) has released a circular strongly outlining why the board believes shareholders should vote against all of Saba’s proposed resolutions. The circular also contains a notice of the requisitioned general meeting which is to be held at 10-11 Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6EE on 22 January 2025 at 12 noon.
The circular, extracts from which are reproduced below, focuses on the lack of relevant information provided by Saba and the impressive long term returns generated by HRI, and reflects a similar view to our own position: [QD comment from Matthew Read: Saba’s proposal is utter madness in our view. Why would the shareholders of any of Saba’s targets want to hand over control to one dominant shareholder who can then act entirely in its own interest, rather than the collective interests of all? In Herald’s case, Saba Capital has acquired around 20% of the trust’s issued share capital but, because of the long-running issue of retail investors who hold their shares through the platforms tending not to vote, investors such as Saba get a disproportionate share of the vote. This is a concern, particularly for a trust such as Herald whose investments are very long-term in nature (it has a very long tail of small investments) as Saba’s proposals are very short-term and look likely to erode significant value for long-term investors were Saba able to drive through what would amount to a fire sale for Herald’s portfolio.]
Why you should reject Saba’s Demands and VOTE AGAINST the proposed Requisitioned Resolutions
The board believes that, since its inception, Saba has materially underperformed Herald. Since Saba’s inception in April 2009, Herald has produced a NAV total return of over 865%. You should vote against the requisitioned resolutions to avoid losing the opportunity to remain invested in Herald’s strategy, which has been highly successful over the long term.
- Saba’s opportunistic proposal to take control: Your board believes the requisition is part of a campaign by Saba to take control of your company. Your board believes that only votes against the requisitioned resolutions can protect shareholders’ interests.
- Your board believes that if Saba gains control and seeks to implement a different strategy, significant value could be lost for shareholders as a result of forced selling of parts of the portfolio.
- In recent weeks, Saba has been building its interests in the company while shares have traded at very low single-figure discounts. Your board believes this may demonstrate that Saba wishes to take control of your company for its own economic benefit rather than due to concerns about the company’s performance or share rating.
- Saba has stated that it intends to propose that Saba be appointed as the manager to pursue its own investment strategy, which is expected to be focused on the short-term and fundamentally different from your company’s current investment policy. However, Saba has failed to provide concrete details of these plans and the terms upon which it would be appointed.
In an open letter to the shareholders of the targeted trusts, Saba explained that it intends to requisition each of the boards of the targeted trusts to convene general meetings, at the latest, by early February 2025 with a view to removing each of the targeted trusts’ existing directors and appointing Saba nominated directors in their place. Saba also confirmed that its nominated directors, if elected to office, will consider terminating each of the targeted trusts’ existing management contracts and offering liquidity near to net asset value, and that the newly constituted boards will then consider new managers, with Saba proposing itself to each board. Were Saba to be appointed as manager, the board believes Saba will follow an investment strategy of purchasing discounted investment trusts and/ or combining the portfolios of the targeted trusts, that it hopes to manage, in an attempt to achieve the benefits of scale. To this end, the requisitioned resolutions seek to remove each of the company’s experienced and independent directors from office and replace them with Saba’s proposed appointees.
The board considers Saba’s claims, insofar as they are related to the company, to be unfounded and the requisitioned resolutions to be at odds with the interests of shareholders as a whole.
You should vote against the requisitioned resolutions to protect the value of your investment and to ensure Saba does not take control of your company for its own economic benefit.
- Herald’s strong, independent board and high standards of corporate governance: Saba’s proposed appointees either work for or have been nominated by Saba. They are not considered to be independent and, therefore, may not have your best interests at heart. Saba has given no assurance that the current safeguards for shareholders, described on pages 10 to 12 of the circular, will be retained if Saba and the proposed appointees take control. You should vote against the requisitioned resolutions to ensure that your company retains a fully independent board focused on protecting shareholders’ interests.
- Herald’s investment outlook: The technology sector is experiencing a particularly dynamic phase. Drivers include: (i) the rapid acceleration of computational power and data analytical capabilities enabling new products and services driven by artificial intelligence and other disruptive technologies; (ii) the journey to net zero; and (iii) an unstable world geopolitically leading to innovation in the defense and cybersecurity sectors, amongst others. Investments in the company’s target companies often start small and need to be nurtured to enhance value for shareholders. You should vote against the requisitioned resolutions to remain invested in the company’s distinctive investment strategy.
For these reasons, and those set out below, your board recommends unanimously that all shareholders vote against each of the requisitioned resolutions.
The proposals are not in the best interest of all shareholders; the board recommends voting against the requisitioned resolutions at the requisitioned general meeting.
Andrew Joy, chairman of Herald Investment Trust plc, said: “Since launch in 1994, Herald Investment Trust’s investment strategy has delivered outstanding investment performance and substantial returns for its shareholders, and its offering is both successful and unique in the UK-listed investment company sector. The board believes Saba wishes to take control of the company for its own economic benefit and to change the company’s investment strategy, which your board believes could result in significant value being lost for you, our shareholders. We have outlined in the circular posted today why the proposals from Saba are not in the best interests of all shareholders, and we strongly urge all shareholders to vote against the requisitioned resolutions proposed.”
HRI: Herald urges shareholders to VOTE AGAINST Saba’s resolutions
Dear Shareholders,We urge you to carefully consider and vote against the resolutions proposed by Saba at the upcoming shareholder meeting. As a herald for responsible corporate governance, we believe that these resolutions are not in the best interest of the company or its shareholders.
It is important to thoroughly review the proposals put forth by Saba and to consider the potential impact on the company’s long-term growth and profitability. We believe that these resolutions may undermine the company’s ability to create value for its shareholders and could lead to unnecessary risks and uncertainties.
We urge you to exercise your voting rights and cast your vote against these resolutions to protect the interests of all shareholders. Your vote can make a difference in ensuring that the company continues to operate in a transparent and responsible manner.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Herald for Responsible Corporate Governance
Tags:
- Herald shareholder resolutions
- Saba shareholder vote
- Herald shareholder meeting
- Saba shareholder resolutions
- Herald shareholder activism
- Saba shareholder voting
- Herald corporate governance
- Saba proxy voting
- Herald shareholder engagement
- Saba investor relations
#Herald #urges #shareholders #VOTE #Sabas #resolutions
Costco shuts down shareholders demand to ditch DEI hiring practices
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
The Costco board has rejected a request from shareholders to drop its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. The shareholders urged the board to get rid of its “illegal discrimination” program.
The Costco board replied to a number of shareholders, recommending a vote against a proposal to “report on the risks of maintaining DEI efforts,” Newsweek reported.
The shareholders had put forward a suggestion that employees of the company could be victims of “illegal discrimination because they are white, Asian, male or straight.” They argued that it could lead to tens of billions of dollars in legal expenses defending against lawsuits.
“Our Board has considered this proposal and believes that our commitment to an enterprise rooted in respect and inclusion is appropriate and necessary,” said a statement issued by the board.. “Our success at Costco Wholesale has been built on service to our critical stakeholders: employees, members and suppliers. Our efforts around diversity, equity and inclusion follow our code of ethics.”
The board added that it wants to make sure all of its more than 300,000 employees “feel valued and respected,” and that by having a diverse workforce, Costco can have more insight and creativity when it comes to what the company offers at stores.
The board went on to note that customers will be able to “see themselves reflected in the people in our warehouses with whom they interact.”
“Having diversity in our supplier base, including attention to small businesses, is beneficial for many of the same reasons diversity benefits our Company,” the board stated. “We believe that it fosters creativity and innovation in the merchandise and services that we offer our members.”
The shareholders argued that the Supreme Court ruling in the case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard found that Harvard’s use of race when choosing who to admit to the school violated the 14th Amendment.
The shareholder proposal also noted that a Starbucks manager had won a lawsuit worth $25.6 million after claiming that she was fired because she was white.
Shoppers reach for items on display in a Costco warehouse Nov. 19, 2024, in Lone Tree, Colo. Its board has rejected a proposal from some shareholders to remove DEI policies (AP) “It’s clear that DEI holds litigation, reputational and financial risks to the Company, and therefore financial risks to shareholders,” the proposal stated. “And yet Costco still has such a program, though it was apprehensive enough to recognize this as it recently and quietly rebranded its DEI program to ‘People and Communities.’”
The board noted that it “regularly evaluates” the procedures the firm uses to comply with “the law including evolving Supreme Court decisions.”
“We believe that our diversity, equity and inclusion efforts are legally appropriate, and nothing in the proposal demonstrates otherwise,” the board added. “Our focus on diversity, equity and inclusion is not, however, only for the sake of improved financial performance but to enhance our culture and the well-being of people whose lives we influence.”
The annual shareholder meeting is set to be streamed live on January 23 at 5 p.m. E.T. Part of the meeting will be devoted to a vote on the proposal “if properly presented at the meeting.” Only those who have been shareholders since before November 15 will be allowed to vote.
In a recent decision, Costco has shut down shareholders’ demands to ditch their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) hiring practices. The company has faced pressure from some investors who believe that DEI initiatives are unnecessary and could potentially harm their bottom line.Costco, however, has stood firm in their commitment to diversity and inclusion in the workplace. The company believes that DEI practices not only benefit their employees but also enhance their overall company culture and performance.
In a statement, Costco’s CEO reaffirmed their dedication to creating a diverse and inclusive workforce and emphasized that they will continue to prioritize DEI initiatives in their hiring processes.
This decision highlights Costco’s commitment to fostering a more equitable and inclusive workplace, despite opposition from some shareholders. It also sends a powerful message about the importance of diversity and inclusion in corporate settings.
Tags:
Costco, diversity, equity, and inclusion, DEI hiring practices, shareholder activism, corporate responsibility, workplace diversity, social justice, employee rights, equality, labor practices.
#Costco #shuts #shareholders #demand #ditch #DEI #hiring #practices
