Tag: shifted

  • South County Shifted Right in November, Highlighting Democrats’ Vulnerability 


    This story is part of a series from Public Matters, a reporting project in collaboration with KPBS and inewsource. Read more stories here.

    Four years ago, the Democratic party appeared on its way to dominating South San Diego County.

    In 2020, South County voters elected a Democrat to the County Board of Supervisors, ending generations of Republican control. Democrats held majorities on two of the region’s three major City Councils and were inching toward controlling a third. Republicans found themselves outnumbered on voter registration rolls by nearly two to one.

    Last November, that forward momentum came to a screeching halt.

    Voice of San Diego, along with our Public Matters partners KPBS and inewsource, recently crunched the numbers and looked at how voting patterns in San Diego County changed from 2020 to 2024. 

    Bucking its reputation as a sure bet for Democrats, South County lurched noticeably to the right in November. Even more surprising, the shift was most pronounced along the U.S.-Mexico border, defying some analysts’ predictions that Donald Trump’s hardline anti-immigration rhetoric would alienate Latinos and voters with cross-border ties.

    In San Diego City Council District 8, where three-quarters of residents are Latino and many live within sight of the border, Trump’s share of the vote jumped by as much as a third, depending on the precinct. In 2020, just 29 percent of voters in San Ysidro backed Trump. Four years later, Trump’s share rose to 41 percent—more than a third higher. Shifts were similar, if slightly smaller, in Nestor, National City and Chula Vista.

    To understand this unexpected trend, we assembled a cross-section of local voters in National City and asked them to share how they voted and what issues mattered most to them. Their thoughtful, insightful answers ranged widely but converged on a common theme.

    National City voter Sherry Gogue summed it up well: “We’re tired of the status quo. We want change. We’ve had the same thing over and over. And not much change has occurred.”

    Our panel of 10 voters included Democrats, Republicans and one independent. They differed on a few issues, especially the extent to which government should seek to reduce economic and social inequality.

    But they were united in a shared belief that San Diego’s — and the nation’s — current leaders do not appear up to the task of solving major problems. Regardless of party, they wanted change. They wanted leaders who made good on campaign promises and showed tangible progress toward making San Diego better.

    Several issues emerged as common sources of frustration.

    Micaela Polanco, an independent who co-owns a mortuary in National City and voted for Kamala Harris, said she observed people in her community feeling a mounting “sense of insecurity” about what she described as a seeming lack of control over the U.S.-Mexico border.

    “There were a lot of people coming from…all over the world, and it was impacting our border,” she said. “That’s what I think happened with the uptick in people voting for Trump…People really believe that Trump will at least have more of an enforcement to the immigration rules and regulations. Whereas under the Biden and Kamala Harris administration, it was more loose or they weren’t really tying up the enforcement.”

    Other voters pointed to homelessness, public drug use and an overall sense of disorder. Sandy Naranjo, a Democrat from San Diego and former port commissioner, said that near her children’s school, “I would wake up, and what do I see? I see a sidewalk that needs to be fixed. I see human trafficking happening on a Tuesday morning. And this is all exposed to my kids. And so [voters] are getting tired of their local agencies not being able to change [things].”

    Economic insecurity also ranked high. Liliana Armenta, a National City Republican, said she was friends with both Democrats and Republicans. Regardless of party, she said, “Ultimately, I believe we’re all looking at our own family economy and our own family life, at our own family security. I look at myself. I have two kids in college. But I have my 14-year-old daughter here [at home]. And I want to vote and want to make decisions that are going to impact her here in the near future.”

    Though political analysts frequently describe American voters as almost irreparably divided, the voters in our panel were remarkably united on several so-called hot button issues.

    Asked about rights for transgender people, all agreed that no one should be discriminated against on the basis of sexual identity—though a few objected to a recently adopted California policy that prevents schools from alerting parents when children question their gender identity at school.

    They agreed that racism remains a problem in American society, though some wished more credit was given to recent progress on the issue.

    All said they viewed America as a nation of immigrants, though even those from immigrant families said they preferred immigrants to follow legal pathways toward citizenship.

    Ultimately, they said, such social issues mattered less in the voting booth than more basic concerns, such as the cost of living and public safety. As Armenta put it: “How are we going to fix it? Who’s going to fix it the best?”

    That shared sense of frustration with the status quo could become a factor in the upcoming race to replace recently resigned San Diego County Board of Supervisors Chair Nora Vargas.

    Vargas, who represented South County, campaigned and won as an avowed progressive. Her embrace of left-leaning causes persisted until her final weeks in office, when she championed a controversial policy limiting county agencies’ cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

    Just four years after Vargas took office, South County’s political landscape appears vastly different.

    As Naranjo put it: “There’s going to be a shift to the right because we have Democrats in power, and they’re not doing what they’re supposed to do.”



    In the recent November elections, South County took a surprising turn to the right, showcasing the vulnerability of Democrats in the region. Traditionally seen as a stronghold for liberal voters, this shift has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about the changing political landscape.

    With key races in the area going to Republican candidates, it is clear that Democrats need to re-evaluate their strategies and appeal to a broader range of voters. The results of the election have exposed cracks in the party’s support base and highlighted the need for a more inclusive and dynamic approach.

    As we look towards future elections, it is crucial for Democrats to engage with the community, listen to their concerns, and offer solutions that resonate with a wider audience. The recent shift in South County serves as a wake-up call for the party to adapt and evolve in order to maintain their relevance and competitiveness in the region.

    Tags:

    1. South County political shift
    2. November election results
    3. Democrats’ vulnerability in South County
    4. Political landscape in South County
    5. Shift to the right in South County
    6. Election analysis: South County
    7. Democratic Party’s challenges in South County
    8. South County voting trends
    9. Impact of November elections in South County
    10. South County political dynamics

    #South #County #Shifted #November #Highlighting #Democrats #Vulnerability

  • Chula Vista, San Ysidro voters shifted right in 2024


    As Justin Hodge’s daughter played at a park in San Ysidro, he watched protectively from a picnic bench. But there’s something else coming that Hodge feared he might not be able to protect his family from. 

    “I’m scared.” Hodge said. “I’m scared for them more than anything.” 

    With president-elect Donald Trump taking office Monday, Hodge worries about both his daughters, 7 and 15. For president, he voted for Vice President Kamala Harris believing she would have a better chance at moving the country forward. 

    “I honestly just didn’t want to go backwards. I don’t want to ‘make America great again,’” he said, referring to Trump’s campaign slogan. “America was never great to begin with for people of color, so I just didn’t want that.” 

    But the same news that makes Hodge scared for the future makes Leonard Cuen, whose family owns San Ysidro Feed & Supply, just down the street from the playground, optimistic about his. 

    “I’m excited. I’m excited, I’m excited,” Cuen said. “I can’t wait to see how much my taxes dropped. I can’t wait to hear all my buddies that are looking for jobs, telling me they got jobs.” 

    Political attitudes are shifting on a national scale and locally. Although Harris won a majority of votes across the county, she received more than 120,000 fewer votes than Joe Biden did in 2020. Voter turnout was down overall in November, but Trump lost a fraction of the votes Democrats did between the elections. 

    In fact, Trump made gains, winning more votes and losing by smaller margins in some communities, according to a KPBS analysis of vote data from both years. 

    The KPBS analysis relied on maps created by consolidating precinct data received from the San Diego County Registrar of Voters. The maps only show votes for Democratic and Republican candidates, not third party candidates. 

    Among the communities with the most significant rightward shift is San Ysidro, whose residents are 90% Hispanic and live along the U.S.-Mexico border. Harris won a majority of votes there, too, but Trump gained about 13 percentage points compared to 2020. 

    Similarly in Chula Vista, where about 60% of residents are Hispanic, Trump gained about 7 percentage points, winning 41% of the vote in November. 

    Meanwhile, Democrats lost ground in Chula Vista and San Ysidro: Harris had 17,000 fewer votes than Biden in the communities combined.

    Political scientists say more research is needed to understand what that rightward shift means, but that San Ysidro and Chula Vista had particularly pronounced rightward shifts provides a clue. 

    “That could certainly be part of that national trend among conservative leaning Latinos to realign with the Republican Party,” said Casey Dominguez, a professor and department chair of political science and international relations at the University of San Diego.

    That “ideological sorting” could be driven by Latinos with more conservative views on a variety of issues, from immigration to the economy to abortion, Dominguez said. 

    Hector Gastelum, another Chula Vista resident, voted for Trump in all three general elections he ran in. Gastelum said he is a lifelong Republican, but has become more conservative as he’s gotten involved in politics. He thinks other Latinos will do the same. 

    “Most Latinos go to church. Most Latinos are conservative. But they’re not Republican yet,” said Gastelum, who was a member of a local water board and ran for mayor of Chula Vista in 2018. 

    Gastelum said the high cost of groceries, gas and housing under Biden have “punished regular citizens” and that the Latinos joining the Republican Party are “here to stay.” 

    “Republicans need to make sure they deliver on promises to keep Latinos long term,” Gastelum said. 

    Cuen, the owner of the feed and supply store on San Ysidro Boulevard, said Trump’s first term has already proven his success. 

    “All my taxes went down, all my customers making more money, all my customers spending more money because they had more,” Cuen said. 

    The biggest issue for Cuen in this election was immigration, but he thinks Trump will do a better job on foreign policy and the economy. 

    There are other explanations for Trump’s win and increased support for him locally, including the global “anti-incumbent” trend, Dominguez said. That movement is “elevating left-wing parties in places that had been governed by conservatives, and right-wing parties in places that had been governed by moderates and liberals,” she said.

    Thad Kousser, a political science professor at UC San Diego, puts emphasis on the idea that Trump’s win could be more due to Democratic voters not showing up to vote. Voter turnout overall was down in 2024 compared to 2020, when there was record turnout following the pandemic. 

    “The story of 2024 was demoralized Democrats,” Kousser said, including those who were “unenthusiastic” about the economy. 

    For Carlos Castro, a Chula Vista resident, it wasn’t the economy but U.S. support for Israel in the war in Gaza that convinced him not to vote for either candidate. In the 2020 election, Castro voted for then-Democratic candidate Joe Biden. This year, he wrote-in for Green Party candidate Jill Stein. 

    “With the recent news of how the Democrats have been handling, and how much of our tax money had been sent to Israel to this genocide, I just didn’t want to be part of that anymore,” Castro said. 

    That was also a top issue for Sebastian Martinez, a Chula Vista resident who does community service work, including with the food bank and unhoused people. He also didn’t vote for Trump or Harris.

    “On all the core issues that I do work in, Democrats have not shown up to the table on that, and it’s just frustrating to keep being a part of that cycle,” Martinez said.

    U.S. support for Israel drove a partisan divide nationally. Voters who said U.S. support for Israel is too strong were more likely to have voted for Harris, according to exit polls. Meanwhile, Trump voters made up most of those who said that support is not strong enough. 

    Arturo Castro, a resident of neighboring Bonita, where voting trends were similar to Chula Vista’s, voted for Harris because “she’s more honest.” He said his priority was “having someone who’s truthful in the White House and doesn’t embarrass the country with lies, makes up stories and isn’t accountable for his actions.” 

    Khristina Lambert, a National City resident who was with her toddler at a Chula Vista park on a recent afternoon, said she didn’t vote for president in November because she didn’t like either candidate. But now that Trump is leading the country for another four years, she’s bracing herself and her family. 

    “I just keep praying. Can’t do nothing but pray,” Lambert said. “You just gotta keep living. We done made it through Bush and everybody else. We can make it through him another term.” 

    As Lambert left the park that afternoon, she chased after her toddler through a grass field, barely keeping up. 

    “You win!” she said.

    Type of Content

    News: Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.



    In the recent 2024 election, voters in Chula Vista and San Ysidro showed a noticeable shift towards the right. Traditionally seen as strongholds for liberal and progressive ideologies, these communities surprised many political analysts with their support for conservative candidates and policies.

    This shift in political alignment has sparked discussions and debates among residents, with some attributing it to changing demographics, economic concerns, and shifting cultural values. The increase in support for right-leaning candidates has also raised questions about the future direction of these communities and how they will address issues such as affordable housing, education, and healthcare.

    As Chula Vista and San Ysidro continue to evolve and grow, it will be interesting to see how this newfound political shift will impact local governance and community dynamics. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    Chula Vista, San Ysidro, 2024 election, political shift, conservative voters, California politics, voting trends, right-leaning voters, San Diego County, election analysis, political landscape, voting patterns, voting demographics.

    #Chula #Vista #San #Ysidro #voters #shifted

  • We Finally Know Why ‘Mickey 17’ Has Shifted Release Dates Four Times


    One of the more intriguing projects set to release this year is Mickey 17, the upcoming space sci-fi thriller starring Robert Pattinson that comes from Bong Joon-ho. Joon-ho most recently directed Parasite, the 2019 smash hit psychological thriller that became the first foreign language film to win Best Picture at the Academy Awards. It’s no secret that Mickey 17 has had a rough go of things for the last few years; the film has since switched release dates four times, originally slated to drop on March 29, 2024. Now confirmed for release on March 7 later this year, a new report from Deadline has provided a peek behind the curtain at exactly what has been going on with Mickey 17, and why it’s taken so long to make it to the big screen.

    Deadline reports that the film was finished in January 2023, roughly two years ago, but that Joon-ho and Warner Bros. have been exchanging ideas about what should and shouldn’t go in the final cut, which the director ultimately gets the final say on. The studio has reportedly not been blown away by the reception for the first two trailers for Mickey 17, which have paled in comparison to the trailers for Superman and Minecraft in an audience-interest-gauging metric. Warner Bros. has sunk $80 million into the making of Mickey 17, which also stars Oscar-nominees Mark Ruffalo, Toni Collette, and Steven Yeun, meaning it will need close to $200 million to break even. Joon-ho is a tough director to analyze via box office performance, with hits like Parasite at $262 million being scattered in with straight-to-streaming releases like Okja, but Warner Bros. remains hopeful that Mickey 17 can still be a huge profit at the box office.

    The Success of ‘Mickey 17’ Relies on Robert Pattinson

    Another interesting tidbit in the new report from Deadline is that part of the reason Mickey 17 has been delayed is to give Pattinson, who has been busy with other projects, time to promote the film without fear of scheduling conflicts. Warner Bros. is reportedly planning to drop one final trailer for Mickey 17 between now and the release date to help build anticipation for the film, which could turn into a major financial disaster if audiences don’t show up to theaters to see the star-studded cast on an epic space adventure. The film follows Mickey (Pattinson), an “expendable” who journeys to a treacherous ice planet to colonize new territory, but every time he dies he is reincarnated to begin his mission anew.

    Mickey 17 hits theaters on March 7. Stay tuned to Collider for future updates and coverage of the film and watch Joon-ho’s last Oscar-winning outing, Parasite, on Max.

    Mickey 17 Temp Poster

    Mickey 17

    Director

    Bong Joon-ho

    Writers

    Bong Joon-ho

    WATCH ON MAX



    The highly anticipated film ‘Mickey 17’ has been making headlines for constantly shifting its release dates, leaving fans puzzled and frustrated. However, the mystery behind these changes has finally been revealed.

    According to sources close to the production, the delays were caused by unforeseen challenges during filming, such as weather disruptions, casting issues, and post-production complications. These unexpected hurdles forced the filmmakers to continuously push back the release date in order to ensure that the final product met their high standards.

    Despite the setbacks, the team behind ‘Mickey 17’ remained dedicated to delivering a top-quality film and refused to rush the process. They are confident that the extra time and effort put into the project will result in a truly exceptional cinematic experience for audiences.

    While it may have been a bumpy road to get to this point, fans can now rest assured that ‘Mickey 17’ is on track for a successful release. Stay tuned for further updates and mark your calendars for the new and final release date.

    Tags:

    1. Mickey 17 release date
    2. Mickey 17 delayed
    3. Mickey 17 movie updates
    4. Mickey 17 production news
    5. Mickey 17 release date changes
    6. Mickey 17 movie delays
    7. Mickey 17 film release updates
    8. Mickey 17 latest news
    9. Mickey 17 movie release details
    10. Mickey 17 production delays

    #Finally #Mickey #Shifted #Release #Dates #Times

  • Why odds have shifted against Bulldogs in Sugar Bowl, playoffs

    Why odds have shifted against Bulldogs in Sugar Bowl, playoffs


    Georgia football boarded the bus to head to Caesars Superdome on Thursday back in the underdog role once more.

    Notre Dame is a 1-point favorite to beat the Bulldogs in the Sugar Bowl CFP quarterfinal, which is scheduled to kick off at 4 p.m.

    The Irish originally opened as a 1-point favorite shortly after its 27-17 CFP first-round win over Indiana before the line quickly shifted to favor Georgia. The Bulldogs were as much as a 2-point favorite before the odds shifted back in Notre Dame’s favor on Wednesday night.

    Per Draft Kings future odds, Georgia would be a 1-point favorite over Penn State with a win, while the Irish would be a 1-point underdog should that matchup occur.

    Ohio State is a 6-point favorite over Texas in the Cotton Bowl CFP quarterfinal that will be played at 7:30 p.m. on Jan. 10 at the Cotton Bowl in Arlington, Texas.

    There are several possible explanations for why the odds in the Notre Dame game have shifted against the Bulldogs, among them the SEC’s less-than-stellar 7-5 record to date:

    • Florida 33, Tulane 8

    • Texas 38, Clemson 24

    • Ohio State 42, Tennessee 17

    • Navy 21, Oklahoma 20

    • Vanderbilt 35, Georgia Tech 27

    • Arkansas 39, Texas Tech 26

    • USC 35, Texas A&M 31

    • Missouri 27, Iowa 24

    • Michigan 19, Alabama 13

    • Illinois 21, South Carolina 17

    • LSU 44, Baylor 31

    • Texas 39, Arizona State 31

    There has been some speculation from analysts that perhaps the SEC isn’t as good as it has been in past seasons, which was a hotly debated topic throughout the CFP committee’s rankings.

    This, even though the SEC entered this season’s expanded 12-team CFP 16-6 in all-time college football playoff games dating back to its origin following the 2014 season.

    The Big Ten entered these playoffs a cumulative 5-7, the ACC 6-6, the Big 12 was 1-6, the American 0-1 and the now-defunct Pac 12 was 2-3.

    The SEC’s record against other conference teams since the playoff era (2014 season) was 14-4 entering into this postseason.

    This season’s SEC saw a great deal more parity and depth, with home field advantage meaning more than ever. SEC teams ranked in the Top 25 finished the regular season just 16-15 in true road games this season.

    The transfer portal had much to do with the SEC’s parity and certainly some of the success other teams have enjoyed in the playoff, particularly Ohio State.

    The Buckeyes, the odds-on favorites to win the CFP have benefitted greatly from the addition of former Alabama safety Caleb Downs, Ole Miss running back Quinshon Judkins along with former Kansas State quarterback Will Howard.

    Time will tell how it all plays out, and it’s a good bet there will be plenty of reflection after the CFP Championship Game plays out at 7:30 p.m. on Jan. 20 in Mercedes-Benz Stadium.

    Championship Odds

    (Per Fanduel)

    Ohio State +110

    Texas +380

    Penn State +460

    Georgia +750

    Notre Dame +750



    The Georgia Bulldogs entered the college football playoffs as one of the favorites to win it all, but after a stunning loss to Alabama in the SEC Championship game, the odds have shifted against them in the Sugar Bowl.

    With a matchup against the high-powered Michigan Wolverines looming, the Bulldogs will have their work cut out for them. The Wolverines have been on a roll, boasting a strong defense and a potent offense led by quarterback Cade McNamara.

    Additionally, the Bulldogs will be without star receiver George Pickens, who suffered a torn ACL in the SEC Championship game. His absence will be a huge blow to Georgia’s passing game and could make it difficult for them to keep up with Michigan’s scoring.

    On top of that, the loss to Alabama seemed to expose some weaknesses in Georgia’s defense, which had been touted as one of the best in the country. If they can’t tighten things up on that side of the ball, they could be in for a long night against the Wolverines.

    While the Bulldogs still have a talented roster and a strong coaching staff led by Kirby Smart, the odds are now against them as they prepare for the Sugar Bowl. It will be crucial for them to regroup and refocus if they hope to make a run in the playoffs.

    Tags:

    sugar bowl odds, playoff predictions, college football playoffs, georgia bulldogs, underdog story, sports betting analysis, championship contenders, football playoffs, ncaa football analysis

    #odds #shifted #Bulldogs #Sugar #Bowl #playoffs