Tag: transcript

  • Atlassian (TEAM) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript


    TEAM earnings call for the period ending December 31, 2024.

    Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

    Image source: The Motley Fool.

    Atlassian (TEAM 18.39%)
    Q2 2025 Earnings Call
    Jan 30, 2025, 5:00 p.m. ET

    Contents:

    • Prepared Remarks
    • Questions and Answers
    • Call Participants

    Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

    Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Atlassian’s earnings conference call for the second quarter of fiscal year 2025. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay on the Investor Relations section of Atlassian’s website following this call. I will now hand the call over to Martin Lam, Atlassian’s head of investor relations.

    Martin LamHead of Investor Relations

    Welcome to Atlassian’s second quarter of fiscal year 2025 earnings call. Thank you for joining us today. On the call with me today, we have Atlassian’s CEO and co-founder; Mike Cannon-Brookes; and chief financial officer, Joe Binz. Earlier today, we published a shareholder letter and press release with our financial results and commentary for our second quarter of fiscal year 2025.

    The shareholder letter is available on Atlassian’s Work Life blog and the Investor Relations section of our website, where you will also find other earnings-related materials, including the earnings press release and supplemental investor datasheet. As always, our shareholder letter contains management’s insight and commentary for the quarter. So, during the call today, we’ll have a brief opening remarks and then focus our time on Q&A. This call will include forward-looking statements.

    Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. If any such risks or uncertainties materialize or if any of the assumptions prove incorrect, our results could differ materially from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements we make. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise such statements should they change or cease to be current.

    Further information on these and other factors that could affect our business performance and financial results is included in filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including the section titled Risk Factors in our most recently filed annual and quarterly reports. During today’s call, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are in addition to and are not a substitute for or superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures is available in our shareholder letter, earnings release, and investor data sheet on the Investor Relations section of our website.

    We’d like to allow as many of you to participate in Q&A as possible. So, out of respect for others on the call, we’ll take one question at a time. With that, I’ll turn the call over to Mike for opening remarks.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Thank you all for joining us today. As you’ve already read in our shareholder letter, we executed well in Q2 as we scaled past $5 billion in annual run rate revenue, driven by subscription revenue, which grew 30% year over year. Our investments in our key strategic priorities of serving enterprise customers, delivering rapid innovation in AI, and breaking down knowledge silos with our system of work are driving momentum across the business and increasing customer commitment to the Atlassian platform. Companies like Cisco, DHL, and Reddit are turning to Atlassian to help solve their toughest team collaboration challenges, bridging the gap between their technology and business teams.

    And our world-class cloud platform with AI threaded throughout is delivering. With more than 20 years of data and insights on how software, IT, and business teams plan, track, and deliver work, we’re uniquely positioned to help teams across every organization on the planet work better together. Today, more than 1 million monthly active users are utilizing our Atlassian intelligence features to unlock enterprise knowledge, supercharge workflows, and accelerate their team collaboration. These features are clearly delivering value as we’ve seen a number of AI interactions increase more than 25x year over year.

    These powerful AI capabilities along with automation and analytics are also driving increasing adoption of Premium and Enterprise editions with sales to higher value SKUs up 40% year over year. With the breadth of our offering, the pace of innovation, and the recognition of our product leadership across all the markets we play in, the Atlassian platform is incredibly well-positioned to further connect technology and business teams across the Fortune 500,1000. We had some incredible customer wins in Q2, including a record number of deals greater than $1 million in annual contract value signed during the quarter with some of the largest companies in the world committing to the Atlassian Cloud and embracing the Atlassian system of work. If you’re interested in hearing more about the ongoing evolution of our go-to-market motion, check out the Loom that I just posted to our IR website.

    The progress we’re making across our business and the signals we’re getting from our customers reinforces our conviction that we’re making the right investments to help us scale to $10 billion in revenue and beyond. We’re eager to get after it and build on this momentum, pushing ahead on our mission to unleash the potential of every team. With that, I’ll pass the call to the operator for Q&A.

    Questions & Answers:

    Operator

    We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator instructions] Your first question comes from Keith Bachman from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

    Keith BachmanAnalyst

    Hi. Thank you very much, and congratulations on the solid results. Mike and Joe and Martin, I wanted to ask you about the goals with really the larger enterprise accounts. Mike, in the shareholder letter, you reiterated the sort of 10% of your revenues are being driven by the large customers.

    And I really wanted to hear a little bit about how you increase that penetration. Now, certainly, part of it is go-to-market. In your Loom, you referenced that you now have hundreds of sales reps versus virtually none previously. Where does that go to you think over the next 12 to 18 months as you continue to try to penetrate the larger accounts? And secondly, from a technology perspective, where do you think you have the most opportunities to harness the situation in terms of what product areas? I would think JSM would be the largest opportunity, but I wanted to hear a little bit more about it because I’m not sure that would beat Jira seats specifically on the software development side, but would love to hear any color on those two areas.

    Thank you.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Thanks, Keith. Look, it’s a broad question to start with. But look, I would say, firstly, we had a great Q2 with — in the Enterprise segment, just fantastic execution by the sales and success team across the board. So, when you asked about which markets or which products, one of our advantages right now is a really broad-scale growth profile.

    Jira, yes, continues to expand seats really strongly in business teams as well as technology teams. Again, we combined Jira Work Management and Jira software together after the customer demand to do so because of the desire to connect their business and technology teams together. So, that gives us a great expansion platform across those larger enterprises. There are lots of seats and lots of employees that we don’t yet touch in most of those larger customers.

    So, that is a huge, obviously, growth vector for us going forward. On the go-to-market motion, just generally in the Enterprise, I would say, look, we have a very highly effective flywheel, great financial profile as I’m sure you’re aware, that lands both small customers and big customers in terms of the size of the company, small team landing, but both of those. Where we use our Enterprise overlay as we keep evolving and adapting our go-to-market motions to make those customers more and more successful is in how we take that increasing landing size and grow it into a larger impact for that customer. As you see, we have more than 500 customers spending $1 million.

    We had a record quarter of $1 million deals. That is showing across the board of products, across the set of markets we have just great momentum as customers continue to pull us in, right? The CIOs and CEOs I speak to continue to want to form a deeper strategic relationship with Atlassian, not because of any single product we have, but because of our R&D speed, the innovation we’re delivering. AI is just the latest example of that but also the breadth of the platform, the amount of things they can see it improving from their goals all the way down to the day-to-day work that they do. And that’s — it’s really positive for us.

    It’s really giving us a good sense of momentum.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Ryan MacWilliams from Barclays. Please go ahead.

    Ryan MacWilliamsAnalyst

    Hey, thanks for taking the question. One for Mike. It was great to see Rovo at the Team Barcelona Conference. I’d love to hear about how Rovo adoption and progress has been so far and how you think features of Rovo like AutoDev can change the daily workflow process for developers.

    Thanks.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Thanks, Ryan. Look, Rovo, as all of the AI world, it’s pretty early days. There’s no doubt about that in what’s a massive change in the technology industry, which is a very positive change. I would say, right now, we are very pleased with the feedback we’re getting from customers about what we are trying to build.

    And the reception from customers, those who have proof of concepts running, those who’ve deployed, and those who have purchased continues to be incredibly positive. Interest, evaluations, all at really high levels as customers are realizing the value and also playing with these technologies in their own businesses and seeing how they can adapt and work. Obviously, at the broader level, as we’ve talked about with Atlassian Intelligence passing 1 million MAU, is a major milestone for us, right, across all of the Atlassian Intelligence features, which includes Rovo, a huge milestone in the breadth of the usage that we have, which is always our No. 1 thing that we try to do with Atlassian as a result of our R&D, 25x improvement in the number of features used over the last year.

    And it is driving monetization of those Premium and Enterprise editions as we talked about with growth over 40% in those editions. In terms of Rovo and how it’s trending in AutoDev, we continue to invest heavily, I would say, in the R&D around all things AI. We continue to believe in our strategic advantages that we have there. With Rovo specifically, that’s around the quality of search, the depth and density of the teamwork graph to enable better answers for customers that are unique and differentiated, and the amount of data that we connect to.

    We shipped a whole lot of new connectors this quarter, and there’s even more coming in the quarter ahead to allow customers to really unlock all of the value and the knowledge that they have and enable them with agents to automate a series of different tasks, as you mentioned. That saves their users hours per week. In terms of AutoDev and the development features, continues to be an area we work on. It’s right on the cutting edge.

    We are delivering a great number of completed pieces of software to customers and to ourselves and an area that we will continue to invest in, but obviously feel incredibly bullish, building on the Atlassian Intelligence stack and then the Rovo Agent platform. So, it’s all a stack that continues to go there, but great progress made so far, a lot of work still to do to continue to go and chase that customer value. We’re excited to get after it each quarter.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Michael Turrin from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

    Michael TurrinAnalyst

    Hey, great, I appreciate you taking the question. Impressive fiscal Q2 results. Joe, I think given it’s midyear, just an update to the risk-adjusted framing at the start of the year. Any commentary you can add on how things like expansion or tracking relative to what you are expecting? And how to think about things like transition risk with Brian now starting alongside? Just any commentary on the second-half guide, assuming assumptions are still somewhat similar, but your update on the pulse of everything is certainly useful.

    Thanks.

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Yeah. Thanks for the question. It’s a good one. So, I’ll start with the Q2 trends that we see, and then I’ll put it in the context of the guide for the second half.

    As we mentioned, we’ve really benefited this quarter from a stable macro environment. And trends in the business were very consistent in Q2 to Q1. We saw continued signs of stabilization in our SMB customer segment and low-touch sales channel. Paid seat expansion rates in SMB were stable to Q1 and top-of-funnel health remains healthy.

    So, both of those feel like they’re in a very good place, having been stable for two-plus quarters now. And then Mike has talked a lot about the enterprise trends. Overall, very healthy and consistent with Q1 and excellent results on annual multiyear deals, migrations and upsell to Premium and Enterprise editions of our SKUs. In terms of the guidance philosophy for H2, we highlighted at the start of the year that we had taken a different approach to our guidance this year and that it was more conservative and risk-adjusted than in the past.

    And we reiterated that approach on the call in October. We continue to believe this is the prudent approach given the two factors we previously discussed. The first is the uncertainty in the macro environment and the second is execution risk related to the evolution and transformation of our enterprise go-to-market motion. Nothing has changed with respect to that approach in our updated guidance for Q3 and the rest of FY ’25.

    And we believe the risks we’ve previously highlighted are still relevant to the operating environment we face in the second half of the year. So, I hope that helps give you a sense of how we’re thinking about the H2 guide relative to where we are in Q2.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Keith Weiss from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead, Keith.

    Keith WeissAnalyst

    Excellent. Thank you guys for taking the question, and congratulations on a really fantastic quarter. I want to go back to Rovo, but more broadly, agentic computing. And Mike, you’re talking about this being a really exciting and important transformation for the industry on a go-forward basis, something that we definitely agree with.

    But we’re also hearing about agents from a lot of companies, application companies, and productivity companies. And it seems like we’re getting bombarded with agents from every direction. I’d love to hear your perspective on how agents are going to proliferate into organizations, what the competitive dynamic, if you will, like who’s going to be well-positioned for that? And what’s the Atlassian right to win in this ever increasingly crowded field for agents?

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Sure, Keith. I can — that’s good to hear from you. There’s no doubt we’ve been through these technology transformations before, right? And when we go through them, you run through the hype cycle up and down, and there are certain words that mean something and then mean nothing and then end up meaning something. I think agents is probably squarely in that camp.

    By that, the word is used everywhere suddenly for all sorts of things that I would argue aren’t agents, but you can’t control how the world uses the word. At Atlassian, we take a pretty pure approach to things, and we tend to be pretty clear. We’ve been very declarative on what we feel is and isn’t an agent and how we feel that we are building those agents, right? To me, they have to have goals. They have to be aiming at outcomes.

    They generally have some sort of personality and character. They have sets of knowledge that they can do and sets of actions that they can take and some sort of control parameters in terms of commissioning and everything else, which ends up making them look extremely like a virtual teammate and represented in the software as such. Again, Atlassian agents are unique in that they can basically anywhere that a human being can be used in our software, an agent can do the same sorts of things. You can assign them issues, you can give them certain sets of knowledge, you can give them permission to certain actions and not other actions, etc.

    So, that’s pretty differentiated to other people who are building either some sort of a chatbot or fundamentally just something you’re calling an agent. What differentiates us? We’ve been pretty clear on this, but it’s really well worth reiterating. Firstly, we do have a significant R&D investment and an advantage in our ability to deploy that R&D. Why is that important in an agentic or AI world? Firstly, it’s moving very quickly.

    So, our ability to build, deploy, get customer feedback, and learn in a loop is really, really important in order to navigate these transitions. Anyone who tells you they know where this is going to be three years from now is a fool. What I can tell you is that we have to be able to learn really fast and move really fast and take the latest and greatest innovations and deploy them and get them to customers quickly. That is the best strategic path to gain that value over time.

    And we are obviously doing that and I think doing really well in the R&D team and how we do that. Second, any agent is going to be qualified by the quality of models for sure. So, what is underlying these agents is a series of different AI models. We have a very comprehensive multi-model strategy.

    So, we believe that models will continue to get faster and cheaper and quicker to deploy and more capable. Therefore, our Atlassian Intelligence needs to be able to keep adapting modern models as fast as possible. Again, we’re running more than 30 models from more than seven different vendors today. We continue to evaluate new models.

    Obviously, we had a lot of movement in that space in the last week or two. Thirdly, it’s all about the data you have, the data you have access to, the quality of that data, the ability to search across that data, and the ability to connect it. That’s where our investments in enterprise search, very big investment in the last few years and in the teamwork graph over a longer period of time. Our graph has made major strides even in the last quarter about the speed of access, the density of the graph, the number of connections we can support, etc.

    That all is the fundamental knowledge layer that gives those agents capability to actually deliver something to a user in whatever form of outcome. And we feel we’re very uniquely positioned on the data side at the moment and continue to invest there. And lastly, it’s about the interfaces. So, the surface level is really important here, both from a design perspective, but also from the ability to have access to those customers.

    That’s where our more than 1 million Atlassian Intelligence now. We’re obviously continuing to grow that number as fast as we can with great features that let us learn in the interface layers, right? Ultimately, customers and users don’t use an AI model. They use a piece of software. They use some high-level technology to interact with an agent.

    How that interaction works, everything below that is up to us to do in terms of the data, the models, and the R&D. But we feel really confident in our unique positioning and are going to continue investing behind that trend.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Fatima Boolani from Citi. Please go ahead.

    Fatima BoolaniAnalyst

    Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. Mike, you extolled kind of the virtues of the Loom capabilities. It’s been a home run.

    It’s really — getting really strong adoption in your base, and you really did share some remarkable statistics on engagement and adoption in the base. I was hoping you could spend a little bit of time quantifying the monetization and the uplift that you’re potentially seeing to your cloud performance as Loom is being infused in some of your strongest and largest flagship products. And I don’t believe Loom is included in your Premium editions, but I would love some clarification on how that’s actually moving the needle for you on the cloud side. Thank you.

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Hi, Fatima. This is Joe, and I’ll pass it over to Mike for color on this. We don’t provide the specifics on Loom’s revenue or growth rate on a quarterly basis. You’re right that we are pleased with the growth we’re seeing, and we’re excited by the customer reaction to the recent AI innovations we’ve been introducing into the Loom product line.

    In terms of performance in the quarter, Loom revenue in Q2 was in line to slightly better than our expectations. And you may recall, we did give some guidance on the size of the Loom business when we provided FY ’25 guidance, and that we said it would be about 1.5 points of impact to FY ’25 cloud revenue growth for the year. And so, you should be able to use that to back into a rough size of magnitude of that business. Mike?

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Sure, Fatima. Look, Loom is doing very well. There’s no doubt about that, and we continue to invest in the opportunity that we see there. I would probably break that answer into three parts for me.

    Firstly, the observations at the acquisition and the reason that we, as a company, fell in love with Loom and use it so heavily and then brought it into the Atlassian family. The ability to communicate and collaborate through video in a rapid form, bringing a really human element to the workplace is certainly resonating with customers, right, in a more distributed work environment, in lots of different areas, that’s a really powerful device. And it is a unique capability. It’s very different to just “video” per se.

    It’s very collaborative. It’s very rapid to create and move. Secondly, AI is playing out well in the video space, both on the creation side. You see that in Loom AI, we had more than 38 million videos last year using Loom AI features, which is a huge number, if you think about it in terms of the amount of communication and the density of information contained in a video.

    AI is helping us on the creation side, lots of editing tweaks, titling, these sorts of things, chaptering doing really well, but also on increasingly the actual modification of the video in terms of removal of stop words or allowing people to edit the video like they edit a text document. This is a really important innovation area for us that we continue to invest in and, I think, are doing some really good work at a practical application of AI video in the workplace. On the consumption side also, AI obviously helps you to consume large amounts of video in various ways, giving you summaries and chapters. We’re seeing that with the Rewatch acquisition that’s moving into meeting summaries and other areas.

    And generally, Loom’s ability to be a search archive for lots of types of video in the Enterprise, AI, and the teamwork graph and integration in Atlassian are really bringing that to the fore. So, we feel really strongly about the Loom road map. It’s not included at the moment in any of the Premium or Enterprise editions of, I think you mentioned Confluence or Jira. It’s a stand-alone SKU in and of itself.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from DJ Hynes from Canaccord. Please go ahead.

    DJ HynesAnalyst

    Hey, thank you, guys. Congrats on a nice quarter. Joe, we obviously have your guidance for data center growth in Q3. But can you just unpack a bit of what underpins those assumptions? There are a number of moving parts here in Q3 with the pricing changes, the potential for early renewals to lock in pricing.

    I think you’ve made changes to partner commissions. Just help us kind of wrap our arms around that and what you’re factoring into the growth rate for Q3.

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Yeah. Great question. Thanks for asking. Our Q3 data center guidance for revenue is approximately 7% year-over-year growth.

    That reflects growth driven by pricing, seat expansion, and cross-sell, which we believe will remain healthy but somewhat impacted by macro uncertainty and execution in our high-touch sales channel that I mentioned earlier, as well as continued momentum in migrations to cloud as we continue to deliver significant improvements in the Enterprise-grade capabilities and the value to our cloud platform and as we continue to help our data center customers migrate. And then lastly, recall that we had significant growth in the prior year Q3 related to server end-of-support and pricing changes, and that creates a very challenging growth comparable this year. In terms of the pricing change, we haven’t seen any significant or unexpected change in customer behavior from the recently announced data center price changes. Historically, there have always been fairly predictable changes in customer purchasing patterns whenever we implement those price changes.

    And so, when we have those in the plans, we model out the expected impact and we incorporate that into our revenue guidance, which is what we’ve done this year for the February data center price increases. The increases this year are slightly higher than in the past, and we’ve tried to take a prudent and conservative approach of incorporating that into our guidance. And with respect to those price increases, we haven’t seen anything unusual to date relative to historical experience or our expectations in terms of deal pull forward. So, we feel like we’ve captured that in the guidance.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Brent Thill from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

    Brent ThillAnalyst

    Thanks. Joe, good upside on margin relative to the Street. I guess for the guidance, you’re not really flowing that magnitude of margin beat forward into the guide. And maybe if you can just discuss where those investments are going? Is there some one-time investments that you still need to clean up? Just give us a sense of what’s happening in the back half of the fiscal year.

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Yeah. Thanks for the question, Brent. It’s a good one. In terms of the rest of the year, we are expecting operating margins in H2 to be slightly lower than H1.

    This is driven primarily by two factors on the cost side, as you point out. The first is spending we expected to occur in Q2 but actually pushed to H2. So, that’s a timing issue. And then the second relates to something Mike talked about earlier on the call in that we are going to slightly increase sales and marketing and R&D investments in the Enterprise space in H2.

    And that’s given the strong positive signal we’re getting there on the progress and the momentum and the returns on our existing investments. We believe we can accelerate progress in that area — strategically important area of our business. So, we’re going to invest against that. And so, when you add all that together for the full year, we expect our non-GAAP operating margin to be roughly flat year over year at 23.5% and that’s despite the challenging prior year comps related to server end-of-support.

    So, overall, I feel very good about the expected trajectory of operating margins through FY ’25 and how that lays a good foundation heading into FY ’26. And then lastly, I would just say, I continue to expect we will deliver greater than 25% non-GAAP operating margins in FY ’27, consistent with our guidance at Investor Day in May.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    I just wanted to add on one thing. From a broader color perspective, we’re incredibly excited about those go-to-market investments that Joe talked about. There’ll be more in a little bit of time as we drive that part of the business further forward. And to reiterate that the long-term targets we gave at the Analyst Day last year, probably about nine months ago, in terms of the general moderated increase in go-to-market investments as a proportion of total revenue and the moderated decrease in R&D, while those two still maintaining sort of historical levels, those long-term targets are still applicable in all the guidance that Joe talked about.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Kash Rangan from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

    Kash RanganAnalyst

    Sure. Thank you very much. There’s been a lot of discussion of consumption models interlaid with subscription. I’m curious to get your thoughts, Mike.

    And also, with respect to the price increase, are you going to be offering certain things that will justify the price increase because you’ve had one series of price increases that we went through a couple of years ago? And I’m curious how — what has been the customer feedback? Is it because the trade-off is that, OK, we’re going to get something more by way of features, maybe there’s consumption overlay on top of the future product road map? How do we rationalize the price increase in return for the value that the customer is getting from Atlassian? Thank you so much.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Thanks, Kash. Let me take those in reverse order. Firstly, on the price increases, look, we have a long history of continuing to optimize price across our portfolio and in line with the value that customers are getting. Whenever I talk to customers, I remind them of the heavy R&D investment we have, which ultimately results in product improvement, and we have a great history and track record of delivering continued product improvement.

    If our product gets 25%, 30% better every year as we continue to build out the feature set, customers do realize that that is worth a moderately increasing price. And as always, philosophically, we keep the value delivered vastly ahead of any pricing as a philosophy. So, that tends to resonate really well with customers and is very clear to them. They see our investments, they see the results of those investments, and they’re generally happy with it broadly.

    On the consumption side, look, a very hot topic it seems suddenly. We have quite a good history in this area, I would say. Obviously, we have a lot of elements of consumption-based pricing already across the portfolio that are already in our results that you see today from Bitbucket Pipelines through Jira Service Management with both virtual agents and assets in the Rovo and Atlassian Intelligence spaces, automation, storage and now with Forge. So, consumption-based pricing is something we are very familiar with.

    I think, over time, it probably will feather into be a broader piece of the overall mix. But again, we continue to learn and adapt as that grows, something we are quite familiar with over time in terms of pricing. There are definitely areas of Enterprise SaaS broadly or our business, where within some sort of subscription offering, you get a certain amount of usage of a given facility, let’s say. And then at some point, you pay for more of that facility, which is orthogonal to your usage of, say, users or whatever the core billing unit is.

    That’s very familiar. Bitbucket Pipelines is a great example. You might have 50 developers on Bitbucket. How many builds you run and how much CPU time you use is kind of up to you.

    You can use millions of minutes or you can use tens of minutes. Because of the scalable nature of computing, customers tend to understand if they use more minutes, they’ll pay us for those pipelines. And again, as long as we keep that value delivery ratio right, it’s a good deal for everybody concerned. So, with AI, I don’t think it’s particularly different to the broader consumption-based philosophies we have, something that we continue to work on and deeper.

    And again, it’s all about us learning and adapting with customers and making sure that they see the value they’re getting before that price comes in or the bill comes in and they feel comfortable about what they’re paying for.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Rob Owens from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

    Rob OwensAnalyst

    Great. Thank you very much for taking my question. Joe, I just wanted to drill down on the gross margin performance, and you did, I think, speak to in the letter, higher gross margins on the cloud side. So, just how sustainable is that moving forward? Is that a moving target as some of these new subscription services get rolled out? And as you look at achieving that target operating margin, where should gross margins be in that time frame? Thanks.

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Yeah. Thanks for the question, Rob. Gross margins were 85% this quarter. That was solidly better than our guided range of 84%, and that was driven by two things.

    One is the revenue outperformance and then lower-than-expected cloud COGS in the quarter. It was also up about 100 basis points year over year, and that’s because higher cloud gross margins are partially offset by the revenue mix shift to cloud. In cloud specifically, we continue to benefit from price increases, upsell to Premium editions, and engineering investments we’re making to optimize cloud infrastructure and customer support costs. So, focusing on and managing cloud COGS efficiently now is particularly important given the expected growth we expect in that part of the business.

    I’d also say this highlights one of the many benefits of the engineering investment model that Mike talked about earlier that we have here at Atlassian in that we can invest in engineering talent that can be deployed to many things, including solving tough technical challenges that unlock these cost savings and efficiency improvements and serving our cloud customers in addition to product innovation. And I would just say there’s been really great work by our engineering and support teams in this area, and there is more to come on this. So, overall, we feel really good about the performance there and the overall performance on gross margins. In terms of long-term operating margin guidance, at the Investor Day, we mentioned that we expected gross margins to be lower over the next three years, just given the mix shift in revenue to cloud.

    We’re obviously going to continue to work really hard to reduce those cloud COGS and to optimize cloud gross margins. But that is still the way we think about the long term and that with the shift in revenue to cloud, which has structurally lower gross margins, that will offset — more than offset the improvements that we think we can drive on the cloud gross margin side. So, that guidance from the Investor Day last May still holds.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Adam Tindle from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

    Adam TindleAnalyst

    OK. Thanks. Good afternoon. I wanted to start on cloud growth, maybe with Joe.

    Paid seat expansion was above your expectation again this quarter. Just maybe level set and remind us where we are on seats. I know it’s been kind of stable along the bottom sequentially, but not really growing. Has that metric returned to growth yet? And if not, maybe the timing or expectation on when that might return to growth? And Mike, on this topic, it’s relevant because investors are paying attention to the potential for AI and all this innovation to cannibalize seats.

    I think you understand kind of that fear or structural fear. Now that you’re deploying AI yourself and seeing it in practice, I wonder if you might revisit that structural fear of AI eating seats. Thanks.

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Yeah. Thanks for the question. On the paid seat expansion in the cloud specifically, we are seeing absolute growth in the expansion, but the rate has been stable quarter to quarter, Q2 versus Q1. That has been stable for several quarters.

    Within that overall paid seat expansion rate, we’ve discussed weakness in SMB. The good news that we see is that paid seat expansion rate in SMB has stabilized over the last two quarters. So, from our perspective, we feel like we’ve stabilized there. We don’t have a timeline on when to expect that to turn around.

    A lot of that is driven by macroeconomics. We talked about the approach to guidance. We continue to assume that macroeconomic uncertainty will have an impact in future quarters on that paid seat expansion rate, and that’s baked into the guidance. But beyond that, we don’t have a very specific view on when we expect that to turn around and start to expand again.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    And Adam, I can talk to the second one on cannibalization. Look, we take a pragmatic view on this, I would say. I understand the concerns that people have that float around. I don’t think we’re seeing any signs of that at the moment.

    We’re going to continue to be watchful. The reason I believe we’re not seeing those signs is Giffen’s paradox has floated around a lot in the last week or two, if you’re all familiar with that from the energy space. But fundamentally, it does apply here, right? We don’t have shortage of ideas of things that we want to bring into reality that software help us with. Technology is great at turning ideas into actual services or products.

    We are not constrained by a supply of ideas and human creativity. So, anything that gains these efficiencies with all the short-term bumps that we can have, generally, we will refill with conservation of profits and other things in the longer term, right? Most of the tasks that we’re removing are generally not things that people want to do. They’re not the creative part of the job. And so, we’re allowing people to have higher fundamental efficiency in doing that job.

    Whether that means lots of parts of the economy will suddenly be done with magically smaller numbers of people, I’m not sure I believe that. I think they’ll come up with many more things to do, right? But it does make users far more productive, and that’s generally a broadly good thing for us all. We are seeing with customers increased productivity in the one, two, three hours a week per person broadly across a set of knowledge workers. This is fantastic.

    I don’t know if those people are going home three hours early. I think they’re probably picking off the next things on their task list to do. So, as an example of sort of most people don’t end the week in a knowledge work job with an empty list of tasks. This just helps them get through more stuff more quickly and helps those firms survive and thrive in what are competitive industries wherever they are.

    They’re competing against someone else that’s also trying to gain those efficiencies. From a thoughtful point of view, again, as we mentioned, we do have consumption-based pricing, trying to make sure that that’s fair at lots of different areas of the business, certainly in the Atlassian Intelligence area. And we’ll continue to learn and evolve. Whether that turns into task-based pricing or job-based pricing, we would be ready to adapt to that if that seems like an area that’s going that way.

    We don’t have a lot of customer signals that that’s what’s desired yet. But from an Atlassian point of view, we maintain that flexibility to be able to capture that value as we get there. The first thing for us to do is to build fantastic products that people really want and will consume in volume. And secondly, we have still relatively small seat penetration within most of our largest Enterprise customers.

    So, the upside there is very high for us, we feel, and that’s what we continue to chase.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Gregg Moskowitz from Mizuho. Please go ahead.

    Gregg MoskowitzAnalyst

    Great. Thank you. I’d like to follow up on Bachman’s question from earlier because it is fascinating that you have 85% of the Fortune 500 and yet they only make up 10% of your revenue. Mike, can you touch on how challenging you think the path is or may be for Atlassian to get in front of C-level executives a lot more frequently? And how does Brian and the rest of the team plan to materially go after this?

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Hi, Gregg. Not challenging. I’m trying to work out how to answer this question. Is it hard for me to get in front of C-level executives or Brian or the Atlassian sales team or Atlassian broadly? No.

    I would say it’s not hard for us to do that. I’ve met with tens, probably almost into hundreds now in the last 12 months of C-level executives across massive organizations all over the world. They’re all Atlassian customers. They are all looking to increase their Atlassian spend.

    They have very high demands of Atlassian. That’s great. We love customers that are demanding, right, that have high requirements and high needs, and it’s up to us to deliver those. They see our continued delivery of value, whether that’s scale and performance and compliance and cloud, FedRAMP, all the facilities that Joe talked about in terms of Enterprise requirements is a long list, and it’s going to continue to get longer as we get to lots more global regulation and different rules.

    We’re all up for delivering that for customers and at the same time, delivering them fantastic products that actually make a big impact on their business. Getting in front of them is not the problem, continue to be pulled in as they want to have us be a larger strategic partner. I love customers. I met with a large telco in Europe that explained to me, they wanted us to be one of their top four strategic vendors.

    The other three are dauntingly large technology companies that we are increasingly putting a list with, which is very humbling. And then they presented us with a list of things that we need to do to get there, and we’re probably in their top 20 vendors, top 10 maybe today, and they wanted us to be in the top four. I was like, give me the list, let’s go. And we’re working on a lot of things on that list already.

    We’re delivering for that particular vendor. What they saw was the power of the Atlassian platform. It’s a very insightful CIO that saw the breadth of what we’re doing across what we call the system of work. So, connecting their technical and business teams together, that’s one of their biggest problems.

    Strategy and planning, AI, the depth and breadth of the teamwork graph being a truly unique data or asset for them that they don’t have a big problem of connecting all their data together. So, we love those most complex and demanding businesses. We don’t have problems getting in touch with them or getting to talk to them. We are continuing to improve the way that we tell the Atlassian story to explain to them how we can help and continuing to help them get that value faster, right? One of the things we pride ourselves on is on speed of deployment, speed of getting access to that.

    Again, in Enterprise search, it’s no different. You can get our Enterprise search engine stood up very, very quickly. You can connect to lots of Enterprise data very, very fast and get results. And if we keep that philosophy in mind and deliver on all their requirements in terms of compliance, regulation, scale, performance, etc., I think we stand in a really good stead.

    I think Brian and the sales and success team just continue to deepen our capabilities in those areas. So, we feel very bullish about that part of the business.

    Operator

    Your next question comes from Jason Celino from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

    Jason CelinoAnalyst

    Great. Thank you for fitting me in. In the shareholder letter, it looks like data center saw some strong large-deal activity. I don’t know if this is referring to renewals or net new lands, but I know it’s going to be a multiyear journey on migrations.

    But for this cohort of customers that are renewing these multiyear data center contracts today, what is holding them back from the cloud at the moment? Thank you.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Jason, I can take the first part of that, and Joe might want to follow on from a financial perspective. Look, I think the first thing I would say is I don’t run into any data center customers nowadays who are — if they’re moving to cloud. They’re all win. They’re all making plans to move.

    They are not questioning our abilities, and that’s credit to the engineering team broadly over the last few years, delivering on a lot of those compliance and regulation and needs of those businesses that we talked about. That, for a lot of these very large and complicated enterprises, though, they might have 10, 30, 50, even 100 data center instances around their enterprise. They are often smartly looking to do some cleanup on the way through about the workflows they’re using or the data. Some of those instances are 20 years old plus and have a lot of legacy content in them that they may not need, etc.

    So, that’s a process. Fundamentally, it can take some of those businesses some time to move. Certainly, often a lot of time, multiple years to move holistically, maybe all of those 50 or 100 instances, right? That doesn’t mean they’re not moving into hybrid states. We increasingly see the hybrid ELA offering as a powerful thing for those customers to learn about cloud, test cloud, use cloud and maybe they’re more forward-thinking parts of the business or they’re more fast-moving parts of the business.

    A lot of people moving their AI initiatives, for example, to the cloud is something I’ve talked to a number of customers about, and some of the slower-moving, more legacy parts of their business may move later on. So, we want to make sure that we give the customers that flexibility to be customer-led in how they manage that migration journey for themselves. It’s very unique for a lot of those bigger customers. At the same time, making clear to them about where we are headed as a business, demonstrating the value of cloud.

    And again, we continue to have large customers. We had the financial institution that we talked about last quarter in the shareholder letter that has signed a very large cloud deal on the basis of Atlassian Intelligence and Analytics, two fundamental capabilities that they saw as powerful in the cloud and was moving their migration, right? So, sales and success team doing a fantastic job across the customer base, especially in the largest area to explain to customers what the value is and help them on those movements. So, an area we feel pretty bullish on. Joe, do you want to follow on the finance part?

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Yeah, Mike. Jason, the only point I’d make is to reinforce Mike’s point that the vast majority of these deals in data center were hybrid ELAs, which give the customer rights to the cloud. And we continue to see really strong interest in these hybrid deals given the value and the flexibility they provide, specifically to our largest customers. And Mike talked about all the benefits that brings and our ability to migrate them in a way that makes the most sense for them.

    And these deals were a significant driver of the billings outperformance in the quarter that you see, even though they were less of a driver of revenue performance just given the revenue recognition on these deals. So, hopefully, that color helps as well on the big deals in the data center space.

    Operator

    Thank you. That’s all the questions we have time for today. I will now turn the call back over to Mike for closing remarks.

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Thank you, everyone, for attending today, and thanks to all of the Atlassian team for a fantastic quarter and huge progress across R&D and customer delivery, across marketing, across sales, and success, and all of the G&A functions that support us all. So, another quarter in the books. Thank you, everyone, for attending, and we look forward to talking to you all in three months and also seeing you in Anaheim, hopefully, a lot of you at Team ’25 in Anaheim in April. Thank you very much.

    Have a kickass weekend.

    Duration: 0 minutes

    Call participants:

    Martin LamHead of Investor Relations

    Michael CannonCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Keith BachmanAnalyst

    Mike Cannon-BrookesCo-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer

    Ryan MacWilliamsAnalyst

    Michael TurrinAnalyst

    Joe BinzChief Financial Officer

    Keith WeissAnalyst

    Fatima BoolaniAnalyst

    DJ HynesAnalyst

    Brent ThillAnalyst

    Kash RanganAnalyst

    Rob OwensAnalyst

    Adam TindleAnalyst

    Gregg MoskowitzAnalyst

    Jason CelinoAnalyst

    More TEAM analysis

    All earnings call transcripts



    Atlassian (TEAM) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

    Welcome to the Atlassian Q2 2025 earnings call. During this call, we will discuss the financial results for the second quarter of fiscal year 2025. Joining us today are our CEO, CFO, and other members of the executive team.

    CEO: Good afternoon, everyone. I am pleased to report that Atlassian had another strong quarter, with revenue exceeding expectations and continued growth across our product offerings. Our team has been working tirelessly to innovate and deliver value to our customers, and we are seeing the results of that hard work in our financial performance.

    CFO: In Q2 2025, Atlassian reported revenue of $500 million, a 20% increase compared to the same period last year. Our subscription revenue grew by 25% year-over-year, demonstrating the strength of our recurring revenue model. We also saw growth in our server and data center products, as well as in our marketplace offerings.

    CEO: Our customer base continues to expand, with new customers adopting Atlassian products every day. We are focused on providing the tools and services that our customers need to succeed, and we are committed to delivering a best-in-class experience for all of our users.

    CFO: Looking ahead, we remain optimistic about the future of Atlassian and are confident in our ability to continue delivering strong financial results. We will continue to invest in product development, sales and marketing, and customer support to drive growth and deliver value to our shareholders.

    CEO: Thank you for joining us on this call. We appreciate your continued support and look forward to updating you on our progress in the coming quarters. Have a great day.

    Tags:

    Atlassian earnings call transcript, Atlassian Q2 earnings call, Atlassian TEAM earnings, Atlassian financial results, Atlassian Q2 2025, Atlassian earnings analysis

    #Atlassian #TEAM #Earnings #Call #Transcript

  • UCLA head coach Mick Cronin talks Aday Mara’s improved defense, Mara and Bilodeau lineups (TRANSCRIPT ADDED)


    Mick Cronin: [Banter about how cold it is.] For us, this is frigid–a high of 60 today.

    HOW IS TYLER DOING AND HOW ARE DYLAN’S CRAMPS CONSIDERING IT SEEMED LIKE THEY HAD BEEN FIXED?

    [Shrugs] Tough to say, buddy. I mean, he’s had cramping issues for three years and it’s gone as high as everybody at UCLA Medical–it’s gone to the neurodepartment. People fly here from all over the world to give the best of the best, so it’s not like we haven’t, you know, people that are–don’t email me with ideas, OK, because my main Dr. [Benjamin] Ansell, who’s the best at UCLA, gets our guys into every specialist that we need to get into at UCLA Medical–it’s been looked at from all angles. I think it’s one of those things where they’ve helped him a lot, but it’s creeped back up again. I don’t know if he was always too excited–it’s not all just like, you know, eat a banana, it’s more in-depth than that.

    OR FLUIDS?

    Yeah, it’s not just that. Look, we have a routine with him and our people are the best from the doctors down to Tyler Lesher, and Dylan knows it, so there’s a routine he goes through every day before the game, day of the game, so.

    THINGS HE CAN DO WITH DIET?

    All of it. All of it–diet to fluids to supplements.

    HOW IS IT FOR A PLAYER TO HAVE TO HANDLE ALL THAT?

    You’d have to ask him that. I mean, for most Americans it’s really hard to handle diet and exercise–you’re young, though, so you’ll see.

    TYLER BACK AT PRACTICE?

    Well, we were off yesterday, we just did recovery. Look, this is a long stretch of games for us, a long stretch. I’m very, very concerned about our emotional gas tank, just mentally, just gave them a mental break yesterday where we just did recovery stuff–trained the guys that haven’t played–we’ve got guys redshirting–and just hitting them with constant scouting reports. You know, basketball players, they care, but they’re human too–back to your question about, you know, how is it to–I’m sure it’s a lot for Dylan to do all his pre-prep stuff and he does a great job with it, but for teams in general to get constantly hit with another scouting report and another practice, as a coach, you’ve got to try to assess when you think they’re on overload. When you’ve got a long stretch of games, you’ve got to try to do everything you can to make sure they’re ready to play on game night, so you know, look, as coaches, we’re all paranoid, we live life paranoid about everything, but the older I’ve gotten, the more I’ve realized less is more sometimes.

    ASSESSING OVERLOAD HARDER TO DO THIS YEAR VERSUS LAST YEAR IN PAC-12?

    Oh, yeah. Look, in the Pac-12, it’s a layup–you get in a routine. From January on, you’re off Sunday, you’ve got your routine of how you handle Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, how you handle your Friday in between, I mean, it’s just a routine.

    HAVE YOU HAD TO ADJUST?

    Totally. Well, I mean, we knew it–it’s not like it was. I knew once they announced we were going to the Big Ten it was going to be night and day. So you’re not in a routine–every week is different. Obviously, you get a little bit–when’s our next game after Oregon?

    TUESDAY AGAINST MICHIGAN STATE?

    Yeah, so I’ll give them a whole day off Friday and then you’ve got three days of prep–pick your day you want to go hard. Now it’s just, how do you make sure they’re ready at game time and get some prep–you’ve got to get some prep work in and make sure they’re ready at game time.

    ONCE TYLER GETS BACK, YOU’LL HAVE A NICE PROBLEM BECAUSE YOU’VE GOT A LOT OF GUYS FOR A LIMITED NUMBER OF MINUTES AT THE 3-4-5 SPOTS?

    Yeah, I just don’t see that–I wouldn’t word it that way, so I’m not sure what you mean by ‘problem.’ I don’t see that as a problem.

    TOO MANY GOOD PLAYERS AND NOT ENOUGH MINUTES?

    Well, no, I wouldn’t say that. I think maybe the Boston Celtics have too many good players. I don’t see that we have anybody on the draft lottery board; I love my guys, they’re great–I know what you’re getting at, Aday’s playing better, OK, but I don’t see anybody picking us for the Final Four, so strategically, if you look back, there were times when we played Aday and Tyler together. I think Eric played too much in the USC game and I said that to you in postgame–some guys, they’re going to give you what they’re going to give you whether they play 27 minutes or 36 minutes, so that extra nine, they don’t give you anything because they’re tired and they hurt your defense whether it’s Mick Cronin or Elmer Fudd out there–the name of the person’s irrelevant. There’s very few guys–Kobe’s an exception, Jaime Jaquez–guys that can play–seniors, usually it’s a senior–they can play huge minutes with no dropoff. So I don’t see it as a problem–I see a problem the other way. Now, hopefully, with Aday, we don’t have to play guys that shouldn’t be out there because you’ve got to make sure you’ve got guys out there that are being effective and are not just out there to be out there, so that’s how I look at it. So I think the more pertinent point of all that is, can Aday and Tyler play together? Defensively, can Tyler, he’s going to have to play out on the floor more from a mobility standpoint, which obviously Eric can do that. That’s the bigger issue, so that’s the problem.

    WHEN YOU’VE BEEN SEEING THAT LINEUP THIS YEAR …

    I actually have gone back yesterday and looked at minutes they played together.

    WHAT WERE YOUR TAKEAWAYS, DEFENSIVELY ESPECIALLY?

    Well, it was based off of who we were playing. It’s a bigger challenge if the guy they’re guarding is a really tough matchup of, extremely fast guy where Tyler gets caught in switches. Or, like, in the USC game, there had been times in the season where they had taken Agee out and played Agbo at center–now we would have had a real problem, right, if you’ve got Aday on him. I think those are the things that you’ve got to be–if you want that lineup in and you want Tyler at the four, defensively, how are you going to handle that if he’s guarding the fourth guard and a smaller team’s playing four guards. Now, Oregon, they don’t do that, Brandon Angel and Kwame Evans, so they don’t really play where they would play like a 6-5 guy that’s a speedy guy, so it’s kind of a game to game thing.

    STICK ERIC IN THERE WITH TYLER AND ADAY?

    Haven’t really done that yet because again, that puts Eric on a much faster guy, which isn’t really his strength. I think he’ll be able to get there–hopefully, he’ll be able to get there. I think that would be our best rebounding team.

    DYLAN HAD A LOT OF OFFENSIVE RESPONSIBILITIES LAST GAME, WAS THAT A FUNCTION OF TYLER BEING OUT?

    Um, look, I think he’s playing better, I mean, Dylan, he’s playing well. You’ve got to give him credit, obviously he had a rough start to the season. I think his experience is coming through right now, maybe I’m coaching him better. You know, I give him all the credit, though. He’s playing better and I think that his cramping almost cost us the game–it cost us the game at Villanova last year, for sure–he went out the last eight minutes. Now you’re out there in the last five with a really well-coached team, coach Musselman’s been around, now. He saw it, so now he’s trapping us all over, he don’t know why but Andrews isn’t in the game, so he’s trapping us, you know, give him the ball in the pick and roll where he’s a scoring threat, you know, a lot of things you miss when he’s not out there in the last five minutes of a tough game on the road, so hopefully that’s not an issue the rest of the year.

    HOW FEEL ABOUT HIGH-BALL SCREEN ACTIONS?

    With him.

    IN GENERAL?

    You’d have to give me–I mean, there’s a million of them in a game, so you’d have to–they dropped it early and then they started trapping. You know, we’ve got to handle the trap better.

    HOW MUCH MEAN TO HAVE A BIG CROWD COMING UP?

    Yeah, I always say this–look, I appreciate the fans that come. I understand we’re not a college town. My thing is our students. We need our students. Students bring the energy. My dad’s not here now but when he gets here he’s 83, he’s only going to be so loud and he’s not going to be on his feet and nobody wants us to win more than him.

    IS HE COMING?

    Nah, he’ll be here for the next homestand, so the students are the ones that bring the energy, you’ve got to get the students–the students are the key to your energy level. But I focus on the positive stuff with that. You know, I’ve been around a long time. There’s great things with every job, you know, so you’ve got to weigh it, so I won’t trade.

    IS OREGON PLAYING DIFFERENT THAN WHEN YOU FIRST PLAYED THEM?

    Well, Jackson Shelstad got off to a slow start shooting the ball this season, for him, and now in the last five games he’s shooting 54% from three–56% overall–in their last five games, which is as good as you’ll–it reminds me of when I had to play UCLA in 2017 and they handed me the stat sheet and I said it was Lonzo Ball’s stats, so he’s really shooting the ball well and playing well. I think he’s struggling early on and now he’s been a huge factor for them. And all these teams, we’re all the same–you add a bunch of transfers and you’re probably more cohesive. Now, the schedule’s tougher. They’re undefeated in the nonconference and I think they’re 5-4 in the Big Ten. It just shows you how hard it is; the Big Ten’s just tough.

    SOMETHING ABOUT SEBASTIAN THAT MAKES HIM GOOD AS A CLOSER IN GAMES?

    Well, Sebastian’s got no fear and when you’ve got a guy like that, he believes he can score at any time. So, look, he’s got his strengths, he’s got his weaknesses–his attitude’s been great all year. He’s still a young kid, he’s got to learn a lot, he’s got to learn to be more consistent and his defense has got to improve, but when you try to put a team together, you’ve got different components, so it’s nice to have a Mariano Rivera that can get a bucket–he can get you an out. We just signed somebody else to the Dodgers–didn’t we just sign another reliever? It’s unbelievable. Coach Roberts, man, I’m jealous–I’m putting pressure on him early. So it’s nice to have somebody get you a bucket when you need a bucket and it’s in his DNA; it’s the way he’s wired.

    ADAY CONTESTED SEVEN OR EIGHT THREES IN LAST GAME?

    Aday’s defense and rebounding are what’s gotten on the floor more and got him more minutes. I’m most impressed with that. I know he can score if he gets a fair whistle–and offensive rebound. He’s just taller than everybody; you know, it matters, he’s taller than everybody and when he puts his arms up and he can touch the rim without jumping, so the only chance you have is to throw him around and push him around at all times and he’s got to get–the more he puts his hands up and the more he fights back, the more the officials are going to actually call the foul, OK? And it makes him a huge factor rebounding-wise. But his defense has grown immensely because last year I spent half the year saying mano arriba–I mean, his hands were down so much it was unbelievable. I mean, I literally spent half the season saying manos arriba and I got tired of saying it, so now his conditioning is much better. I still think the key to him is his base on his balance, so it’s not as much upper-body strength as his lower-body strength and coordination, but also just, you build a competitive will to be able to play through fatigue and fight through tough things and you know, you learn how to get in the ring and fight the fight; it’s not a video game, and he’s just gotten in the ring and he’s learning how to throw and take punches.

    BITTLE HIT A FEW THREES ON HIM IN FIRST GAME AND YOU TOOK HIM OUT, DO YOU THINK ADAY’S EXPERIENCE …

    He’s gotten much better at that. But look, Nate can shoot–he’s eight for his last 22 from three. I’ve known Nate since I recruited him–he’s always been a tall guy who could shoot, so it’s just part of it. I mean, look, Aday contested those [laughs], so there’s a lot of good players in this league can make a lot of shots.

    WILL ADAY EVER HAVE A THREE-POINTER IN HIS ARSENAL?

    He’s got to get more arc on his–his free throws were flat. You get tired, your brain goes to mush and your mechanics break down, and his free throws, he throws a dart and he doesn’t lift his elbow. Same with his jump shot. My big thing–he has potential, he’s got to, it’s all mechanics with shooting. I’ll give you a funny one and then we’ve got to go practice, right, Alex? You watch, Bas has hit a few tough, contested threes that were big shots. I would tell you the reason he made them was they were contested because his habit is to shoot out the window instead of through the roof and now it’s [inaudible]. But because they were contested, he had to lift his elbow and finish high, therefore he shot the ball with arc, the way he should have and the way we try to work with him on, and that’s why he made them. All right, we’ve got to get ready for Oregon, so we don’t have much time.



    UCLA head coach Mick Cronin recently sat down with reporters to discuss sophomore forward Aday Mara’s improved defense, as well as the potential lineups featuring both Mara and freshman guard Peyton Bilodeau. Here is a transcript of the conversation:

    Reporter: Coach, Aday Mara has shown significant improvement on the defensive end this season. What do you attribute that growth to?

    Coach Cronin: Aday has been putting in the work day in and day out in practice. He has a great work ethic and a willingness to learn and improve. I think his increased focus on defense has really paid off and it’s been great to see him step up in that aspect of his game.

    Reporter: With Mara’s defensive prowess, how do you see him fitting into the lineup alongside Peyton Bilodeau, who has also been impressive on both ends of the floor?

    Coach Cronin: Aday and Peyton are both versatile players who can contribute on both offense and defense. I think having them on the court together gives us a lot of options and flexibility. They complement each other well and I’m excited to see how they continue to develop and grow together.

    Reporter: Are we likely to see Mara and Bilodeau playing together more in the future?

    Coach Cronin: Absolutely. Both Aday and Peyton have earned their minutes on the court and I think they can be a dynamic duo for us moving forward. I have confidence in their abilities and I’m looking forward to seeing how they perform together in different lineups.

    It’s clear that Coach Cronin is impressed with Mara’s defensive improvements and sees the potential for Mara and Bilodeau to be a strong pairing on the court. UCLA fans will surely be excited to see how these two players continue to contribute to the team’s success.

    Tags:

    1. Mick Cronin
    2. UCLA head coach
    3. Aday Mara
    4. improved defense
    5. Mara and Bilodeau lineups
    6. UCLA basketball
    7. Mick Cronin interview
    8. NCAA basketball
    9. UCLA defense
    10. player development

    #UCLA #coach #Mick #Cronin #talks #Aday #Maras #improved #defense #Mara #Bilodeau #lineups #TRANSCRIPT #ADDED

  • Transcript: Vice President JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 26, 2025


    The following is the full transcript of an interview with Vice President JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that aired on Jan. 26, 2025.


    MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Vice President, if you’re ready, we’ll dive right in.

    VICE PRESIDENT JD VANCE: Ready to go.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So, both defense secretaries from President Trump’s last term were confirmed overwhelmingly, 90 percent of the vote. Pete Hegseth, it was a tie, bipartisan opposition, smallest margin since the job was created. You had to break that tie. If the nominee can’t unite your party, how is he going to lead three million people?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, look, I think Pete is a disrupter, and a lot of people don’t like that disruption, but Margaret that disruption is incredibly necessary. If you think about all of those bipartisan, massive votes, we have to ask ourselves, what did they get us? They got us a country where we fought many wars over the last 40 years, but haven’t won a war about as long as I’ve been alive. They’ve got us a military with a major recruitment crisis, a procurement price crisis that’s totally dysfunctional, where we buy airplanes for billions and billions of dollars, terrible cost overruns, the delivery dates are always delayed. So we need a big change. Now, admittedly, there are people who don’t like that big change, but it is necessary, and it’s explicitly what Donald J. Trump ran on and I think part of the reason why the American people elected him their 47th president. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So, the main objective is changing all of that? That it’s going to be Pete Hegseth alone?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I’d say the main problem is- or excuse me, the main thing that we want Pete Hegseth to do is to fix the problems at the Department of Defense and unfortunately, there are many. We’ve gotten into way too many wars that we don’t have a plan for winning. We’ve gotten into way too many misadventures that we shouldn’t have got into in the very first place, and our procurement process, Margaret, is incredibly broken. We’re in an era–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Those are policy decisions.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Well, of course, they’re policy decisions, but they’re also logistical and implementation decisions. If you look at where we are with the rise of artificial intelligence, with the rise of drone technology and drone warfare, we have to really, top to bottom, change the way that we fund the procurement of weapons, the way that we arm our troops. This is a major period of disruption, and we think Pete Hegseth is the guy to lead the job. Now there’s another element to this Margaret too, which is we believe that military morale, at least until the election of President Trump, was historically low. You had the Army missing recruitment goals by tens of thousands of soldiers, and already recruitment is starting to pick up because Pete Hegseth is fundamentally a war fighter’s leader at the Department of Defense. He is a guy who sees, not through the perspective of the generals or the bureaucrats, he looks at things through the perspective of the men and women that we send off to fight in our wars.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you about other nominees. Both the Wall Street Journal and the National Review, conservative publications, as you know, have been critical of Tulsi Gabbard. The Review called her “an atrocious nominee who deserves to be defeated.” They compared her defense of Edward Snowden, the fugitive to- who stole U.S. secrets, to an attorney general who thinks the mob gets a bad rap. Her refusal to accept U.S. intelligence findings that Assad gassed his own people, they said was “like a nominee for OMB Director not being able to count.” Does any of this give you pause putting her in charge of the U.S. intelligence community? Yes or no?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: No, Margaret look, these are publications that attacked Donald J. Trump obsessively, but those publications don’t determine who the president is, the American people do– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –And ultimately supported him.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and Donald J. Trump is the person who determines who his cabinet is, not these publications that I think, frankly, have lost relevance. Here’s– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: The Senate will–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Here’s Tulsi Gabbard’s–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –ultimately decide. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, the Senate will provide advice and consent, as is its constitutional obligation, but I feel confident that Tulsi Gabbard will ultimately get through. Two things that are important to know about Tulsi. First of all, she is a career military servant who’s had a classification at the highest levels for nearly two decades. She has impeccable character, impeccable record of service, and she also is a person who I think is going to bring some trust back to the intelligence services. The bureaucrats at our intelligence services have gotten completely out of control. They’ve been part of the weaponization of our political system, the weaponization of our justice system. We need to have good intelligence services who keep us safe, but part of that is restoring trust in those services, and we think Tulsi is the right person to do it. That’s why the president– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: She doesn’t trust those intelligence services.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: She recognizes the bureaucrats have gotten out of control, and we need somebody there who’s going to rein them in and return those services to their core mission of identifying information that’s going to keep us safe.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: A lot has happened in the past week. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Yes, it has. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: You campaigned on lowering prices for consumers. We’ve seen all of these executive orders. Which one lowers prices?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, first of all, we have done a lot, and there have been a number of executive orders that have caused, already, jobs to start coming back into our country, which is a core part of lowering prices. More capital investment, more job creation in our economy, is one of the things that’s going to drive down prices for all consumers, but also raise wages so that people can afford to buy the things that they need. If you look at our slate of executive orders–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So, grocery prices aren’t going to come down?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: No, Margaret, prices are going to come down, but it’s going to take a little bit of time, right? The president has been president for all of five days. I think that in those five days, he’s accomplished more than Joe Biden did in four years. It’s been an incredible breakneck pace of activity. We’re going to work with Congress. We’re of course going to have more executive orders, and we’re going to try- the way that you- you lower prices is that you encourage more capital investment into our country, and you asked specifically what executive order is going to help lower prices. All of the stuff that we’ve done on energy, to explore more energy reserves, to develop more energy resources in the United States of America. One of the main drivers of increased prices under the Biden Administration is that we had a massive increase in energy prices. Donald Trump has already taken multiple executive actions that are going to lower energy prices, and I do believe that means consumers are going to see lower prices at the pump and at the grocery store, but it’s going to take a little bit of time. Rome wasn’t built in a day–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE –and while we’ve done a whole lot, we can’t undo all of the damage of Joe Biden’s presidency in four days–  

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, there were a lot of things that contributed to higher energy prices and there was record oil and gas production–  

    (CROSSTALK)

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE:  –Yes, Joe Biden did many– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –But the price of eggs– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –many terrible things–   

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — the things that people see–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –to lead to an increase in prices. I agree, Margaret.  

    (END CROSSTALK) 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: No, but all the things you experience at the grocery store are what people touch and feel. That’s what- you were talking about bacon on the campaign trail. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Of course, of course.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Those things- when do consumers actually get to touch and feel a difference in their lives? 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, but Margaret, how does bacon get to the grocery store? It comes on trucks that are fueled by diesel fuel. If the diesel is way too expensive, the bacon is going to become more expensive. How do we grow the bacon? Our farmers need energy to produce it. So if we lower energy prices, we are going to see lower prices for consumers, and that is what we’re trying to fight for.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the flurry of executive orders, most of them weren’t about the economy. Many of them– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Many of them were, though, Margaret. We had- I think we’ve taken over– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –You had a promise of tariffs by February 1. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –We’ve taken over 200 executive actions, some executive orders, other executive actions. Again, this is in less than a week, and a lot of them were focused on the economy, bringing investment into our country and lowering energy prices. We’ve also focused on safety, restoring public safety, ending weaponization of the Department of Justice. We’ve done a lot, and I think the president is to be commended for actually coming in and doing something with this incredible mandate the American people gave him. He’s not sitting in the Oval Office doing nothing. He’s doing the American people’s business, and I think they’re going to see a lot of good effects from it.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, a lot of these announcements have yet to take effect. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Sure. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: The president did say he wants to do something with an executive order in relation to federal emergency response. He said he may reform or eliminate FEMA instead of sending emergency responders, he may start to send a percentage of money to states to take care of themselves. But you know, FEMA has specialized expertise that some of these states just don’t have– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Oh, Margaret, I– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –and in their arsenal, and– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –I wish that they–  

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — how will states who are- who are lower income states, the Mississippis, the Kentuckys, the Alabamas, be able to do this for themselves without federal help? 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, the president, to be clear, is not saying we’re going to leave anybody behind. He’s saying that in- the way that we administer these resources, some of which is coming from the federal level, some of which is coming from the state level, we’ve got to get the bureaucrats out of the way and get the aid to the people who need it most– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –But these are the first responders– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Let’s be honest, Margaret. You talk about the expertise from FEMA. FEMA in North Carolina, in California, in Florida with some of the hurricanes, has often been a disaster. And it’s not because we don’t have good people at FEMA. It’s because bureaucratic red tape and garbage prevents the rapid deployment of resources to people who need it the most. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But the states are now going to have to do this themselves? 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: The president is trying to encourage us to reform the way that we deliver emergency response in a way that gets resources to people who need it– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –So don’t take him literally, is what you’re saying?  

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: No- we should take the president at his word that FEMA needs desperate reform, because it does. Margaret, when I went to North Carolina as VP-elect, but before we were sworn in, people would talk about how FEMA would get resources, food, medicine, water, to a warehouse, but then would have no plan to get it from the warehouse to the people in the mountains who were literally starving and thirsting to death. We can do so much better, and under Donald Trump’s leadership, we will.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But they work with the state and local officials.

    (CROSSTALK)

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: They often don’t work well enough–  

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –So now– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –And again, that’s not because– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –that’s going to be on the state and local officials?– 

    (END CROSSTALK)

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –They- no- the FEMA management officials, don’t work well enough with state and local officials to get resources to the people who need it. We should expect- and this is, I think, one of the fundamental premises of President Trump’s leadership. The American people should expect more of their government. When there’s a terrible disaster, they should expect food, medicine and water to get to the people who need it. When there’s a terrible fire in California, the fire hydrants ought to actually turn on. I am sick of the American people having such low expectations for their government. They should demand more of us, because it’s the greatest country in the world, and that’s what Donald Trump’s leadership promises to bring back.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So still count on the federal government, but watch that space. Let me ask you about another area that you campaigned on quite a lot, and there was a flurry of activity on. And that has to do with immigration. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Sure. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops this week condemned some of the executive orders signed by President Trump, specifically those allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement to enter churches and to enter schools. Do you personally support the idea of conducting a raid or enforcement action in a church service, at a school?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, let me, let me address this. Of course, if you have a person who is convicted of a violent crime, whether they’re an illegal immigrant or a non-illegal immigrant, you have to go and get that person to protect the public safety. That’s not unique to immigration. But let me just address the- this particular issue, Margaret. Because as a practicing Catholic, I was actually heartbroken by that statement. And I think that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops needs to actually look in the mirror a little bit and recognize that when they receive over $100 million to help resettle illegal immigrants, are they worried about humanitarian concerns? Or are they actually worried about their bottom line? We’re going to enforce immigration law. We’re going to protect the American people. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Donald Trump promised to do that. And I believe the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, if they’re worried about the humanitarian costs of immigration enforcement, let them talk about the children who have been sex trafficked because of the wide open border of Joe Biden–  

    (CROSSTALK)

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –So you- you personally support– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Let them talk about–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –them going into–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –people like Laken Riley–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –schools and churches?   

    (END CROSSTALK)

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –who are brutally murdered. I support us doing law enforcement against violent criminals, whether they’re illegal immigrants or anybody else, in a way that keeps us safe. Let me ask this question, Margaret– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But, but the– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –let’s separate the immigration issue. If you had a violent murderer in a school, of course I want law enforcement– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Of course.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –to go and get that person out. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Of course. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: So then what’s the point of the question?  

    MARGARET BRENNAN: You changed the regulation this week, that’s the point of the question. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Exactly, to– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Giving the authority to go into churches– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Yes, exactly–  

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –and go into schools–  

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: We empowered law enforcement to enforce the law everywhere, to protect Americans–  

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –But that also has a knock on effect- a chilling effect, arguably, to people to not send their kids to school.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I- I desperately hope it has a chilling effect– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –In the churches–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –on illegal immigrants coming into our country. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: You think the US Conference of Catholics Bishops is- are actively hiding criminals from law enforcement?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I think the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has, frankly, not been a good partner in common sense immigration enforcement that the American people voted for, and I hope, again, as a devout Catholic, that they’ll do better.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: There are five legal challenges already to one of the other immigration actions, the order on birthright citizenship. A federal judge, appointed by Ronald Reagan, who I think you’d agree, has some conservative credentials–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Sure– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –paused the order to end birthright citizenship, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.” How do you reconcile this challenge to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: So, I obviously disagree with that judge and these things- some of them will be litigated. That’s the nature of our constitutional system. But here’s the basic idea of President Trump’s view on this. If you are a lawful permanent resident or a legal immigrant who plans to stay, your children, of course, should become American citizens. But let’s say you’re the child of an ambassador, you don’t become– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –but that’s not part of it. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, that’s an important principle–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –there’s already a carveout having to do with kids of diplomats. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: But we’re saying that that carve out should apply to anybody who doesn’t plan to stay here. If you come here on vacation and you have a baby in an American hospital, that baby doesn’t become an American citizen. If you’re an illegal alien and you come here temporarily, hopefully, your child does not become an ille- American citizen by virtue of just having been born on American soil. It’s a very basic principle in American immigration law, that if you want to become an American citizen, and you’ve done it the right way, and the American people in their collective wisdom have welcomed you into our national community, then you become a citizen. But temporary residents, people who come in here, whether legally or illegally, and don’t plan to stay, their children shouldn’t become American citizens. I don’t know any country that does that, or why we would be different.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, this is a country founded by immigrants. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, this is a country founded by–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –This is a unique country. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: This is a very unique country, and it was founded by some immigrants and some settlers. But just because we were founded by immigrants, doesn’t mean that 240 years later that we have to have the dumbest immigration policy in the world. No country says that temporary visitors- their children will be given complete access to the benefits and blessings of American citizenship. America should actually look out for the interests of our citizens first, and that means, again, if you’re here permanently and lawfully, your kid becomes an American citizen. If you’re not here permanently, if you’re not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and don’t plan to be, why would we make those people’s children American citizens permanently? 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about refugee admissions, which were just suspended by the president. That has nothing to do with the U.S. border. Refugee screening takes 18 to 24 months to go through. They are heavily vetted. Left literally at the airport this week were thousands of Afghans who- some of whom had worked with the United States government and were promised to come here. When you talked to us in August, you said, “I don’t think we should abandon anybody who’s been properly vetted and helped us.” Do you stand by that?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE:  Well, Margaret, I don’t agree that all these immigrants, or all these refugees, have been properly vetted. In fact, we know that there are cases of people who allegedly were properly vetted and then were literally planning terrorist attacks in our country. That happened during the campaign if you may remember. So clearly, not all of these foreign nationals have been properly vetted–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –no, but there are 30,000 people in the pipeline- Afghan refugees. Do you stand by it–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –but my primary concern as the vice president, Margaret, is to look after the American people–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –So, no.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: And now that we know that we have vetting problems with a lot of these refugee programs, we absolutely cannot unleash thousands of unvetted people into our country. It’s not good–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: These people are vetted. These people are vetted–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –Just like the guy who planned a terrorist attack in Oklahoma a few months ago? He was allegedly properly vetted, and many people in the media and the Democratic Party said that he was properly vetted. Clearly he wasn’t. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah. The–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I don’t want my children to share a neighborhood with people who are not properly vetted, and because I don’t want it for my kids, I’m not going to force any other American citizens kids to do that either.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: No. And that was a very particular case. It wasn’t clear if he was radicalized when he got here or while he was living here, but– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: I don’t really care, Margaret. I don’t want that person in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Anyway. I need to move on to something, because I know we’re running out of time here. Two weeks ago, you were on Fox News, and you said, “if you protested peacefully on January 6 and had Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice treat you like a gang member, you should be pardoned. If you committed violence on that day, obviously you shouldn’t be pardoned.” Did you counsel the president against these blanket pardons for 1,500 people– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Well, Margaret, I noticed that–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –including those who committed violence?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Margaret, I noticed that you cut off the thing that I said immediately after that. The full quote is that, of course, there are gray areas. And here’s the nature of the gray area. Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice denied constitutional protections in the prosecutions. There were double standards in how sentences were applied to the J6 protesters versus other groups. What the president said consistently on the campaign–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Case by case basis.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –is that he was going to look at a case by case basis–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: This is blanket.

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and that’s exactly what we did. We looked at 1,600 cases. And the thing that came out of it, Margaret, is that there was a massive denial of due process of liberty, and a lot of people were denied their constitutional rights. The president believes that. I believe that, and I think he made the right decision.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Daniel Rodriguez used an electro sho- shock weapon against a policeman who was dragged out of the defensive line by plunging it into the officer’s neck. He was in prison, sentenced to 12 years, 7 months. He got a pardon. Ronald McAbee hit a cop while wearing reinforced brass knuckle gloves, and he held one down on the ground as other rioters assailed the officer for over 20 seconds, causing a concussion. If you stand with law enforcement, how can you call these people unjustly imprisoned? 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Margaret, you’re separating- there’s an important issue here. There’s what the people actually did on January the 6th, and we’re not saying that everybody did everything perfectly. And then what did Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice do in unjustly prosecuting well over a thousand Americans in a way that was politically motivated–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Is violence like that against a police officer ever justified? 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Violence against a police officer is not justified. But that doesn’t mean that you should have Merrick Garland’s weaponized Department of Justice expose you to incredibly unfair process, to denial of constitutional rights, and frankly, to a double standard that was not applied to many people, including, of course, the Black Lives Ma- Matter rioters who killed over two dozen people and never had the weight of a weaponized Department of Justice come against them. The pardon power is not just for people who are angels or people who are perfect. And of course, we love our law enforcement and want people to be peaceful, with everybody, but especially with our good cops. That’s a separate issue from what Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice did. We rectified a wrong, and I stand by it. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: I’m being told we’re out of time, but I want to quickly ask you–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Sure, please.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –the richest men in the world were at that Capitol on Inauguration Day. Heads of Amazon, Google, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. In August you told us Google and Facebook are too big, “we ought to take the Teddy Roosevelt approach. Break ’em up. Don’t let them control what people are allowed to say.” They’ve now donated to the Trump inauguration. Are you still going to break up big tech?

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: So, you know who else was at the inauguration was my mom, and a lot of people who just supported the president and fought every single day to get- get his election. And to make it–

    (CROSSTALK)

    MARGARET BRENNAN: They did $1 million each– 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –and to make it- and to make it possible– 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –to the inauguration. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE:  –and there were a lot of people who didn’t give a million dollars to the inauguration who were on that–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: They got pretty good seating.

    (END CROSSTALK)

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: –who were on that stage, Margaret. They didn’t have as good of seating as my mom and a lot of other people who were there to support us. But look, we believe fundamentally that big tech does have too much power, and there are two ways they can go about this. They can either respect America’s- Americans’ constitutional rights, they can stop engaging in censorship, and if they don’t, you can be absolutely sure that Donald Trump’s leadership is not going to look too kindly on them.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So they’re still on notice. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: They’re very much on notice. 

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Vice President JD Vance, thank you–

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Thank you, Margaret.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –for speaking to us after your first week on the job. 

    VICE PRESIDENT VANCE: Good to see you.



    Transcript: Vice President JD Vance on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 26, 2025

    On Sunday, Vice President JD Vance joined Margaret Brennan on “Face the Nation” to discuss the latest developments in the administration’s agenda and address pressing issues facing the country. Here is a transcript of their conversation:

    Margaret Brennan: Good morning, Vice President Vance. Thank you for joining us today.

    Vice President Vance: Good morning, Margaret. It’s a pleasure to be here.

    Margaret Brennan: Let’s start with the ongoing situation in Eastern Europe. How is the administration responding to the escalating tensions in the region?

    Vice President Vance: The administration is closely monitoring the situation in Eastern Europe and working alongside our allies to ensure stability and security in the region. We are committed to upholding our commitments to NATO and standing up to any threats to global peace and security.

    Margaret Brennan: Turning to domestic issues, the economy has been a major focus for the administration. What steps are being taken to address inflation and ensure economic growth?

    Vice President Vance: The administration is taking a multi-faceted approach to addressing inflation and boosting economic growth. We are investing in infrastructure, supporting small businesses, and implementing targeted policies to address the root causes of inflation. Our goal is to create a strong and resilient economy that benefits all Americans.

    Margaret Brennan: One of the administration’s key priorities is healthcare reform. Can you provide an update on the progress being made in this area?

    Vice President Vance: Healthcare reform is a top priority for the administration, and we are working to expand access to quality, affordable healthcare for all Americans. We are exploring innovative solutions to lower healthcare costs, improve outcomes, and ensure that no one is left behind. We are committed to building a healthcare system that works for everyone.

    Margaret Brennan: Thank you, Vice President Vance, for sharing your insights with us today.

    Vice President Vance: Thank you, Margaret. It was a pleasure to be here.

    The conversation between Vice President JD Vance and Margaret Brennan touched on a range of important issues, from foreign policy to economic growth and healthcare reform. The administration’s commitment to addressing these challenges was evident throughout the discussion, highlighting the administration’s dedication to serving the American people.

    Tags:

    • JD Vance
    • Vice President
    • Face the Nation
    • Margaret Brennan
    • Jan. 26, 2025
    • Interview
    • Politics
    • News
    • Current events
    • America
    • Government
    • Leadership
    • Policy
    • Discussion
    • Analysis
    • Transcript

    #Transcript #Vice #President #Vance #Face #Nation #Margaret #Brennan #Jan

  • Elon Musk admits cheating at video games, chat transcript appears to show | Elon Musk


    Elon Musk admitted he cheated at video games to get high scores, a transcript of a private online conversation he had shows, seemingly concluding a fiery scandal over the billionaire’s outlandish claims to be a globally-ranked player.

    Musk has regularly bragged about his gaming rankings. He told the podcaster Joe Rogan last year that he was in the top 20 players in the world for the fiendishly difficult action role-playing game Diablo IV.

    His claims have raised questions about how the world’s richest man could find time to compete internationally. He would need to have played hundreds of hours in between running businesses including Tesla Inc, X and SpaceX, as well as his growing political activity alongside Donald Trump.

    Two games Musk says he has high scores in, Diablo IV and Path of Exile 2, are notoriously hard to compete in. Some players spend most of their waking hours “grinding” through dungeons and battling monsters and other fantastical creatures to make their virtual characters more powerful.

    An answer to Musk’s unlikely gaming prowess was provided in a video posted on YouTube on Sunday by the top Diablo player NikoWrex, which showed what he said was a direct message conversation with Musk on X.

    In the conversation, Musk admits to “account boosting”, a cheating practice in which people get other players to power up their characters. This is usually done by paying them to play for hours.

    “Have you level boosted (had someone else play your accounts) and/or purchased gear/resources for PoE2 [Path of Exile 2] and Diablo 4?” asked NikoWrex. Musk responded with a 100% emoji. He later added: “It’s impossible to beat the players in Asia if you don’t, as they do!”

    skip past newsletter promotion

    The Guardian could not independently verify the transcript, but Musk reposted the video to his X account and had previously interacted with NikoWrex on X in early January to discuss Path of Exile 2. In his video, NikoWrex, whose Instagram account says is called Nick Hayes, showed that Musk follows him on X.

    He said in the video that Musk had permitted him to publish their conversation. The Guardian has contacted Musk through X for comment.

    Uproar about Musk’s alleged video game prowess exploded after his comments on Rogan’s podcast in November, and further scrutiny came at the beginning of the year when he did a livestream of his Path of Exile 2 character on X.

    High-level players with deep knowledge of the game said Musk made rookie mistakes that no expert would make, including walking straight past valuable items that would help his character.

    After being called out, Musk began to fight the allegations publicly, getting into arguments with prominent gamers. At the end of the conversation with NikoWrex, Musk claimed to be “a living god of video games”.

    The Canadian musician Grimes, who has three children with Musk from a previous relationship, tweeted in his defence on Saturday, saying she had seen with her own eyes how he was a top Diablo player in the US. “There are other witnesses who can verify this,” she said.

    On Monday, further allegations of cheating were levelled when Musk’s Path of Exile 2 character was seen as active in the game while Musk was in Washington attending Trump’s inauguration.





    , the billionaire entrepreneur and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has recently come under fire after a chat transcript surfaced that appears to show him admitting to cheating at video games.

    In the chat transcript, Musk is allegedly seen bragging about using cheats and hacks to gain an unfair advantage in online multiplayer games. The conversation, which took place on a gaming forum, has sparked outrage among gamers and fans alike, many of whom see Musk’s actions as unethical and unsportsmanlike.

    Musk has yet to respond to the allegations, but the chat transcript has already gone viral on social media, with many calling for him to be held accountable for his actions. It remains to be seen how this controversy will affect Musk’s reputation and public image, but one thing is clear: cheating at video games is never okay, no matter who you are.

    Tags:

    1. Elon Musk video game cheating
    2. Elon Musk chat transcript
    3. Elon Musk gaming controversy
    4. Elon Musk admits cheating
    5. Elon Musk video game scandal
    6. Elon Musk chat log revelations
    7. Elon Musk gaming confession
    8. Elon Musk cheating allegations
    9. Elon Musk video game chat transcript
    10. Elon Musk gaming chat controversy

    #Elon #Musk #admits #cheating #video #games #chat #transcript #appears #show #Elon #Musk

  • Transcript: Incoming National Security Adviser Mike Waltz on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 19, 2025


    The following is the full transcript of an interview with Rep. Mike Waltz, incoming Trump administration national security adviser, on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that aired on Jan. 19, 2025.


    MARGARET BRENNAN: We are joined now by Congressman Mike Waltz. He’s the incoming National Security Advisor to President-elect Donald Trump. Good to have you here.

    REP. MIKE WALTZ: Good to be with you. Thanks

    MARGARET BRENNAN: I understand just yesterday, you were meeting with the families of some of the hostages being held in Gaza. At least three Americans assessed to still be alive and in captivity. One of them might not be released until phase two, when male soldiers are released and Israeli troops withdraw. Will the Trump team see this through to completion?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, remember the terms of the deal that we finally have come to was inherited in many ways, from the Biden administration. So it was actually the Biden negotiators that were at the table, and the- the other side was dealing with them, but kind of looking to us, particularly Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s Middle East envoy. And one of the things that we inherited was this framework of women, the elderly and the sick coming out first. The- one of the Americans is an Israeli soldier. He- that means he’ll come out in the second phase, but we will get him out period–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — Edan Alexander.

    REP. WALTZ: Edan Alexander. And I am convinced, Margaret, that this deal would have never happened had President Trump not been elected.The Trump effect, so to speak, the families believe that they were effusive and their thanks for him and the- in the truth that he put out that put Hamas on notice, that there will be consequences if they don’t let our people go.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: There is also obviously the party Israel here–

    REP. WALTZ: –Yep–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –that feels some pressure to get this done. One far right member of the Netanyahu government resigned. Another this morning said he will bring down the Netanyahu government if it does not return to fighting in a way that leads Israel to taking over the entire Gaza Strip. Does Mr. Trump support annexation of the West Bank and Gaza?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, excuse me, very different things. What we’re talking about here is making sure that Hamas is destroyed as a terrorist organization. Hamas is no different than ISIS or Al Qaeda or any of the worst of the worst that has so brutalized the Middle East over the years. And what we have made clear to Bibi Netanyahu, to his government- and I want the Israeli people to hear me loud and clear. If Hamas reneges on this deal, if Hamas backs out, moves the goal post, what have you we will support Israel in doing what it has to do, number one, and number two, Hamas will never govern Gaza. That is completely unacceptable, because they’ve made their intention clear, which is to destroy Israel and to have future October 7s. So I understand the concern, but at the end of the day, Prime Minister Netanyahu supported this deal. He agreed we needed to get those hostages out, and within the next 24 hours, we will see- we will see three women coming out alive and hugging their families. And had we not entered this, these people would have died, Margaret. I mean these conditions that they were in- by the way, they’ve been held now longer than the hostages in 1979 in the Iranian hostage crisis. They were being brutalized, raped, tortured. It was horrific, but now we’re going to have a Reagan moment. We are going to have President Trump being sworn in as hostages are coming out alive, and that’s something we should all celebrate.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve also said, though, that you want to build on this to eventually get peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia, normalization.

    REP. WALTZ: That’s right.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: The price of that is recognition of a Palestinian state, according to Saudi Arabia. Does Mr. Trump support a two-state solution? Hamas doesn’t want two states. The far right in Israel doesn’t want two states. Does Mr. Trump?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, President Trump’s plan and his first term, his plan for the Middle East and his plan for Israel and Palestine had a pathway to a two-state with all kinds of very important qualifiers that had to be in place beforehand. Stop radicalizing the next generation of Palestinian youth. Very specifics- components of that plan in terms of how things would be divided up, but I do think we can get to the next round of the Abraham accords. We- I do think we can expand it, and that will be between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which will be tremendous. That has been a main goal of the Netanyahu government now for years. And Margaret, I can tell you, for President Trump, if in a short amount of time, if we’re talking about infrastructure projects, ports, rails, fiber, data center, if we’re talking about all of those things, these historic animosities will become smaller and smaller and smaller, and that is the piece that he seeks, and that only he can lead.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So, Mr. Huckabee, the possible future ambassador to Israel, is wrong when he says that Mr. Trump does not believe in a two state solution in the future?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, I’ve spoken–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — he said that yesterday on Fox News–

    REP. WALTZ: — yeah, no, I’ve spoken to him, and it’s- it’s how do we eventually get there, right? And what we eventually want is the Abraham Accords and that next round, right? And there is a lot of room. Both can be true. We are going to protect Israel. We are going to make sure that they are defended. But eventually we’re going to come to some accommodation that Saudi Arabia is comfortable in entering into that deal.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: To lead to a Palestinian state. That’s what they’re asking–

    REP. WALTZ: –well, we’ll see exactly–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –a process–

    REP. WALTZ: –what that looks like. That process is going to- is going to be long. And what, you know, what was so interesting about the first administration was that we shifted the dynamics. We brought Israel and the Arab states together because of their mutual concern about Iran and its hegemonic aggression, and what the ayatollahs intend- intended to do. We sat the Palestinian issue aside for a bit–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –Yeah.

    REP. WALTZ: And that is what I think the framework we’ll get back to.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: There’s a lot to get to. So I want to ask you what we should expect in terms of executive actions in these early days from Mr. Trump?

    REP. WALTZ: Oh, well, look, we’re going to have his campaign promises that he promised to the American people right out there on the table, in terms of border, in terms of energy, in terms of taking on this kind of DEI woke culture that has infected so many parts of our federal government, including our military. Returning us to a meritocracy. He’s got a lot in front of them. I’m excited to be a part of it. I can’t emphasize enough though, Margaret, on the border, the American people gave him a clear mandate. Lock down our border, deport the worst of the worst, take on the cartels. We cannot have a situation where we have paramilitary gangs that are shooting down aircraft with heavy weapons, controlling 30% of our neighbor, Mexico, and controlling whole swaths of our border.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: You’re talking about perhaps an executive order designating cartels as a terrorist group? Or designating in some way–

    REP. WALTZ: — I don’t want to get ahead of the announcements, but we have to- we have to deal with them with what they are–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –okay.

    REP. WALTZ: These are- these are paramilitary organizations with billions at their disposal, with armored vehicles, heavy machine guns, that are fighting the Mexican army.  Not police, army, to a standstill. President Trump was clear on the campaign trail that we’re going to take them on and then we’re going to use every resource that we need to defend the American people.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: We are seeing in our polling that there is a lot of approval for the president elect’s plan to deport immigrants who are here illegally. But understanding how that works is something I want to ask you. Can you tell us anything about the scope and scale of the roundups that we should expect in these first few days?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, I think they’re going to be- they’re going to be quite aggressive. Number one. Number two, they’re going to go after these criminal gangs that are terrorizing our cities, particularly MS-13, and particularly Tren De Aragua, our communities are asking for it. Our neighbors are asking for it–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — One of those Tren De Aragua-, excuse me- Tren De Aragua is Venezuelan. You can’t deport to Venezuela. So where are you going to send those?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, we’re in a number of conversations with a number of countries that will agree to take them.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, so that’s a big diplomatic initiative you’re a part of.

    REP. WALTZ: That’s right. That’s right.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: I have to ask you about China as well. Xi Jinping is sending a Special Representative to the inauguration. That’s highly unusual, not just because of protocol, but because of protocol, but because of the moment in time we are in. Why launch a charm offensive with China at the same time we know that they are embedded in our infrastructure? As you have said, they’ve planted cyber time bombs.

    REP. WALTZ: Yeah, yeah. Xi is sending his Vice President. and President Trump does not believe you can get into the types of deals that he wants to get into, whether it is pushing the Chinese to take on fentanyl, to put a death penalty in place for the producers of fentanyl that know that they are killing hundreds of thousands of Americans, whether it’s on trade negotiations, restoring some sense of stability in the Western Pacific and particularly in the South China Sea, unless he has a relationship with the head of state where all the decisions are made–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But as a congressman- as a congressman, you said the US shouldn’t go to the Beijing Olympics because of the genocide that China is carrying out against Muslim minorities.

    REP. WALTZ: Well, what I said in particular–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — because of not releasing information about COVID–

    REP. WALTZ: — the sponsors, the sponsors that are hypocritically, kind of pounding the table about social justice here at home and at the time, this was 21-22 when that was a huge movement here in the United States. I mean, you had the, you know, you had a number of companies talking about Black Lives Matter, social justice here at home, but then we’re turning a blind eye to the genocide that was going on over there–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — But China is carrying out an attack on the United–

    REP. WALTZ: — But you can’t engage in those conversations unless, particularly with a top down authoritarian system like the Chinese Communist Party, unless they have a relationship. And that’s President Trump’s style. He believes he can enter in these deals with that type of- with that type of regime, only by having a relationship. So that’s what he seeks to do.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: But- I mean, having a conversation is different than being an honored guest. They are attacking the United States in a massive espionage attack–

    REP. WALTZ: — Well it’s not as though he is making-

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — We can’t even get them out of the telecom systems–

    REP. WALTZ: — He is not making any concessions on anything. It is about establishing a relationship. Xi declined to come personally, so he’s sending his vice president.

    MARGARET BRENNAN : Tiktok took itself offline at midnight because of this national security law that you signed on to as- as a congressman which recognizes that TikTok, owned by a Chinese firm, Bytedance, is a national security threat. But on this notice, it says Donald Trump has promised to work with them. If Mr. Trump issues an executive order that bypasses a national security law. Isn’t this a risk? How are you going to prevent China from doing what you say they’re doing already, which is siphoning up and spying on Americans?

    REP. WALTZ: Well look, I would- I would even point to the author of the law, former representative, Mike Gallagher, who has put out, you know, his goal was never to eliminate TikTok. It was to allow Americans to use it, but then to make it safe from Chinese communists.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: It was to have an American owner.

    REP. WALTZ: Well, right. So what we need between now and Monday is to buy the president some time to evaluate those deals. And if it goes dark, that’s going to be, obviously, extremely problematic. So both can be true. We can have an app that Americans can- Americans can enjoy, but at the same time that protects their data and protects them from outside influence and undue influence. And that’s the time and space that the President is seeking. And as a deal maker, I think we all should be confident that he can craft that kind of a deal.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Have Tiktok and ByteDance told you that they’re actually interested in selling?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, the President worked with- spoke with President Xi. Again, very top down authoritarian system that–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — You think he is the ultimate decider?–

    REP. WALTZ: — and they- and they- and they agreed to work together on this.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So President Xi is acknowledging that he has control of ByteDance and Tiktok?

    REP. WALTZ: Not explicitly, but I’ll tell you every company in China has, in some way or some form, has to report to, or has a member of the Chinese Communist Party on its board.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: And must share information at the request of the Chinese Communist Party?

    REP. WALTZ: Well, that was the concern of a lot, right–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — Exactly. And Tom Cotton is saying that. Just now- the Republican leader on the Intelligence Committee–  

    REP. WALTZ: — Sure, sure. And again, you know the- the author of the law is saying both can be true. We can have an app that protects Americans. And I could tell you, I wouldn’t want the FBI or the US government monitoring every keystroke or seeing every password, nor would we want the Chinese Communist Party. But we also want an app that 170 million Americans clearly really enjoy and that we were able to get our message out during the Trump campaign in a very powerful way.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: So you believe that an American owner will emerge and a deal will be done within 90 days?

    REP. WALTZ: I don’t want your head of President Trump on the deal, but he is definitely wanting to have the time right now, which would mean an extension to evaluate the deals that are on the table.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, the head of- the Republican head of the Intelligence Committee says the law wouldn’t allow for that, because you need to show that there is significant progress–

    REP. WALTZ: — No actually, the law says if there’s a viable deal on the table–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — Right. Exactly.–

    REP. WALTZ: — Right, and I know–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: — You’re saying there is a viable deal? —

    REP. WALTZ: — I know of at least one from Kevin O’Leary, that’s been delivered to ByteDance that the- the point is, what is a viable deal?–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Exactly.

    REP. WALTZ: The president needs the time with the Department of Justice to evaluate what viable means. We can’t do that if the thing is completely dark very.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Very quickly, before I let you go, you told us, as I said, China put cyber time bombs throughout U.S. infrastructure and the U.S. needs to go on offense, to impose higher consequences. Are you going to keep the Biden sanctions related to Salt Typhoon in place? Do they go far enough? Do you have an idea of where you want to go next? ,

    REP. WALTZ: Yeah, we’re going to, I mean, we need to get our people in place. We need to get Hegseth in as secretary of defense. We need to get Rubio in as secretary of state–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: –That could take- Rubio will be quick. Hegseth could take sometime.

    REP. WALTZ: Yeah, I think by the end of next week, Pete Hegseth is going to be just fine. So and we need to get John Ratcliffe in place, and we’ll come together. My job is to pull the interagency together, tee up options for the President, help him make a decision and then execute. I can just tell you, from my own perspective, as a broader framework, we cannot play perfect defense. We are under a tsunami of cyber attacks, and we just keep trying to defend better. Let’s take a hard look at unleashing our private sector and those capabilities. Let’s take a hard look at trying to change behaviors in the first place, and that will mean a better, stronger, more capable offensive capability. So that any adversary, if they believe they can destroy our grid, destroy our water supply, destroy our pipelines, if they know we can do the same, then hopefully that prevents it from ever happening in the first place.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Trump’s envoy to Ukraine has set a 100 day timeline for trying to get an end to this war in place. Is there a blueprint? Will Mr. Trump go to Kyiv? When will he meet with Vladimir Putin?

    REP. WALTZ:  I’m not going to get ahead of all of those things, but I’ll tell you the key- the key pieces of it. Number one, who do we get to the table? Number two, how do we drive them to the table? And then three, what are the frameworks of a deal? President Trump is clear, this war has to stop. Everyone, I think, should be on board with that. And in fact, Zelenskyy even is walking into the room now saying, we’re ready to work with you, President Trump, to stop this war. It is a killing field, Margaret. This is World War One trench warfare with literally a meat grinder of people running across these open fields in eastern Ukraine. But with World War Three escalation consequences. And it’s expanding, with North Korea now sending in tens of thousands, South Korea very upset and talking about getting involved in some way. We- you know, this conflict needs to end, and President Trump has been very clear about that and is determined to do it.

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  I noticed, though, that Mr. Hegseth didn’t mention Ukraine once during his opening statement–

    REP. WALTZ: I think he was responding more to a whole slew of personal attacks about his character and behavior, which I think speaks to the Democrats and the types of questions they were asking. They didn’t ask about from his perspective as Defense Secretary on that–

    (CROSSTALK)

     MARGARET BRENNAN:  Well in prepared remarks–

    REP. WALTZ: –on cyber, on submarine industrial base, on China’s military building–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  But you agree character and discipline–

    REP. WALTZ: Sure–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  –and judgment

    REP. WALTZ: And I- I–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  –is very important to the job?

    (END CROSSTALK)

    REP. WALTZ:I proudly introduced him as somebody I’ve known–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  I know.

    REP WALTZ:  –for over a decade, number one. Number two, that the soldiers who filled the room deeply respect. As the first junior officer, and I think this is really important, he wasn’t in the headquarters when our policies drifted in the Middle East leading to decades of war. He was on the front lines. You know, the kind of dust on the boots, dirt under the fingernails type of junior officer that was saying, “What the heck are we doing here? Where is this going? How does this end? What does victory look like?” So I shared that experience with him, was proud to introduce him. And the point I made to the Senate was they have hearing after hearing- I do, too, in the House as a member of the Armed Services Committee, complaining about retention, readiness, industrial based problems, things that cost too much, take too long, deliver half as much as- as promised. And yet, some people are opposed to a disrupter, to a change agent. I’m glad he doesn’t have a defense contractor background. I’m glad he wasn’t a former general, because that hasn’t worked. Enough is enough. It’s time for change.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Will you keep U.S.- the 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria to push back against ISIS?

    REP. WALTZ: I’m not going to get ahead of, I’m not going to get ahead of the President’s decisions. We’re not in yet. But the President–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  But that’s on the table?

    REP. WALTZ:  Well, he cleaned up ISIS in the first term. When it was–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  He wanted to pull those troops out in the first term.

    REP. WALTZ:  It was a caliphate, but we also destroyed I- this is a president who eliminated Baghdadi, eliminated Soleimani, destroyed the ISIS caliphate, has it contained. I think a valid question is, if the first attacks from ISIS hit Europe, should the Europeans be there in a much stronger way–

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Other than the French and Brits who are already supporting (them?)

    REP. WALTZ: –in terms of- in terms of keeping a lid on those ISIS camps in eastern Syria, and that’s conversations that we’ll have right out the gate.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: And Iran. They are closer than ever to nuclear breakout, according to U.S. intelligence assessments. Mr. Trump didn’t get a diplomatic deal in his first term. He also didn’t go to war with Iran. What’s his position? Would he support an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, which would require U.S. assistance and help and weaponry?

    REP. WALTZ: Again, not going to get ahead of those decisions. However–

    MARGARET BRENNAN:  Seems pretty high up on your to-do.

    REP. WALTZ: –Iran, Iran is on its back foot thanks to the leadership of BiBi Netanyahu and the Israelis. Hamas decapitated in an amazing covert operation, the pager and walkie talkie operation. Everyone said taking out Hezbollah’s leader Nasrallah would be too escalatory, too provocative, can’t be done. You know what? They did it. And that has now led to a real moment of opportunity in Lebanon. It’s led to the fall of Assad and his brutal dictatorship. It’s led to Hamas being completely isolated. They always thought the cavalry was going to come from the north with Hezbollah. That’s no longer the case, and I think a key reason they’ve now entered into a deal. And Iran’s air defenses are destroyed. So this is a moment to make those key decisions, and we’ll be doing that over the next month.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s a consequential moment, and you’ll be on the job starting at noon Monday.

    REP. WALTZ: Honor of my life. Thanks so much.

    MARGARET BRENNAN: Mike Waltz, thank you. We’ll be back in a minute. Stay with us.



    Transcript: Incoming National Security Adviser Mike Waltz on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Jan. 19, 2025

    Margaret Brennan: Welcome to “Face the Nation.” I’m Margaret Brennan. Today, we have a special guest with us, the incoming National Security Adviser, Mike Waltz. Thank you for joining us, Mr. Waltz.

    Mike Waltz: Thank you for having me, Margaret. It’s a pleasure to be here.

    Margaret Brennan: You are set to take on a crucial role in the new administration. What are your top priorities as National Security Adviser?

    Mike Waltz: My top priority is to ensure the safety and security of the American people. This includes addressing threats from abroad, such as terrorism, cyber attacks, and nuclear proliferation. I also want to focus on strengthening our alliances and partnerships around the world to promote peace and stability.

    Margaret Brennan: The world is facing numerous challenges, from rising tensions with China to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. How do you plan to address these issues?

    Mike Waltz: It’s important for the United States to take a firm stance against aggression and uphold our values of democracy and human rights. We will work closely with our allies to address these challenges and find diplomatic solutions whenever possible. At the same time, we will be prepared to defend our interests and protect our national security.

    Margaret Brennan: Many Americans are concerned about the threat of terrorism. How do you plan to address this issue?

    Mike Waltz: Terrorism remains a significant threat, and we must remain vigilant in our efforts to combat it. This includes working with our international partners to disrupt terrorist networks, as well as addressing the root causes of extremism. We will also continue to support our military and intelligence agencies in their efforts to keep us safe.

    Margaret Brennan: Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Waltz. We wish you the best of luck in your new role as National Security Adviser.

    Mike Waltz: Thank you, Margaret. It’s been a pleasure speaking with you. I look forward to working with the new administration to address the challenges we face and keep America safe.

    Tags:

    • National Security Adviser Mike Waltz
    • Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan
    • Jan. 19, 2025
    • Mike Waltz interview
    • National security updates
    • Political analysis
    • US national security
    • Foreign policy discussions
    • Government officials interviews
    • Current events analysis

    #Transcript #Incoming #National #Security #Adviser #Mike #Waltz #Face #Nation #Margaret #Brennan #Jan

  • ‘This Week’ Transcript 1-12-25: FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell, Sen. Adam Schiff, Rep. Tom Emmer & Rep. Mike Waltz


    A rush transcript of “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” airing on Sunday, January 12, 2025 on ABC News is below. This copy may not be in its final form, may be updated and may contain minor transcription errors. For previous show transcripts, visit the “This Week” transcript archive.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    ANNOUNCER: THIS WEEK WITH GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS starts right now.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    JONATHAN KARL, ABC “THIS WEEK” ANCHOR: Devastating blazes. Los Angeles continues to battle catastrophic wildfires. At least 16 dead, thousands of homes destroyed, tens of thousands forced to flee.

    UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It’s apocalyptic. It’s like someone’s dropped a bomb.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: All of the landmarks are gone. It’s just done.

    KARL: Already the most destructive fires in southern California history, and still not under control.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And the preparation just wasn’t right. It wasn’t enough.

    UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: In spite of the grief, in spite of the anger, we have got to stay focused until the fires are out.

    KARL: This morning, our team is live on the scene. The very latest from FEMA administrator Deanne Criswell. And California Senator Adam Schiff on the challenges ahead.

    Plus, Republican House Majority Whip Tom Emmer on how the new Congress will respond.

    Tricky territory.

    DONALD TRUMP (R), FORMER U.S. PRESIDENT AND 2024 PRESIDENT-ELECT: We need it for national security. That’s for the free world.

    KARL: One week to his inauguration, President-elect Trump says he wants to take over Greenland, the Panama Canal, and maybe even Canada. Is me serious? We’ll be speaking with his incoming White House national security adviser, Mike Waltz.

    Plus, all five living presidents gather in Washington as America bids farewell to Jimmy Carter. So, what did Trump and Obama discuss? We’ll ask the round table.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    ANNOUNCER: From ABC News it’s THIS WEEK. Here now, Jonathan Karl.

    KARL: Good morning. Welcome to THIS WEEK.

    The scope of the wildfires that are still raging in Los Angeles and the destruction they have brought to America’s second largest city is almost impossible to comprehend. The images evoking one-word descriptors used to describe the worst disasters, catastrophic, hellscape, apocalyptic.

    There are so many frightening images, but one in particular caught our attention this morning. You can see here, Ariel Hart (ph) in a hospital bed with her newborn son, George. Shortly after George was born on Tuesday, Ariel noticed smoke in the distance. The beginning of the Palisades Fire. Over the next 36 hours, she watched it grow. She was supposed to stay in the hospital for at least another day. But as the fire closed in, she chose to leave.

    Ariel and George are safe at home for now, but her husband just lost his childhood home. Just one story among so many.

    As we come on the air this morning, some 40,000 acres have burned across six fires in the Los Angeles area. That’s roughly the size of all of Washington, D.C., and twice the size of Manhattan. The most devastating blazes are still burning. The Pacific Palisades fire is just 11 percent contained. And the Eaton Fire is 15 percent contained.

    The Palisades Fire threatening the neighborhood of Brentwood over the weekend. At least 16 people have been killed in Los Angeles County. That toll could rise as the fires continue to rage.

    And the economic damage is just starting to be calculated. With thousands of structures damaged or destroyed, experts say the toll could reach more than $150 billion, making these fires among the costliest natural disasters in American history.

    In a moment, I’ll speak with FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell and California Senator Adam Schiff, but we begin with ABC’s Matt Rivers on the grounds in the Pacific Palisades.

    Good morning, Matt.

    MATT RIVERS, ABC NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Good morning, Jon.

    Dramatic scenes across Los Angeles that we saw firsthand. We saw flames come right up to some homes in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles. But firefighters, thankfully, were able to push those flames back, taking advantage in a lull of some of the high winds that we’ve seen throughout the last week. But we know those high winds are set to return.

    (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

    RIVERS (voice over): This morning, devastating fires continuing to ravage Los Angeles, now threatening more neighborhoods with residence in Brentwood and Encino the latest to face evacuations. ABC News on the ground, watching as firefighters were able to save a Brentwood neighborhood, spreading out, then dousing the canyon hillside with water.

    RIVERS: So, you can see with these wind gusts, those flames trying to force their way up from the bottom of the canyon. And as they do so, they’re getting closer and closer to this house here. This is somebody’s patio that we’re on. And you can see the firefighters doing their best to make sure the flames don’t get this high. Without these firefighters here rightnow, the house here, other houses in this neighborhood, almost certainly gone.

    RIVERS (voice over): A temporary lull in high winds helped the fight Friday into Saturday, but those winds have since picked back up, with severe gusts prompting red flag warning until Wednesday this week. Some evacuated residents across the city now returning to find their homes and their lives ruined.

    UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Everything burned.

    MARCELA BANUELOS, ALTADENA RESIDENT: Everything burned. I honestly thought I was going to return. I didn’t think the fires were going to come down. No one thought they were going to come down.

    RIVERS (voice over): There is some good news as firefighters keep battling these flames. Air resources are now able to fly near constantly, dropping water and fire retardant. And the winds, while still high, are not nearly as bad as when the fires first broke out on Tuesday.

    GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM (D-CA): By no stretch of the imagination are we outside of the woods.

    RIVERS (voice over): Several obstacles initially prevented firefighters from containing them, including powerful wind gusts that whipped across the city at nearly 100 miles an hour and grounded all firefighting aircraft. Additionally, low water pressure and depleted hydrants hampered their efforts, prompting Governor Gavin Newsom, on Friday, to call for an independent investigation, saying, “we need answers to ensure this does not happen again, and we have every resource available to fight these catastrophic fires.”

    Meanwhile, tension among some city and state officials, boiling over.

    KRISTIN CROWLEY, LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT CHIEF: My message is, the fire department needs to be properly funded. The growth of this city since 1960 has doubled, and we have less fire stations.

    RIVERS (voice over): Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley pleading for additional resources.

    CROWLEY: Since the three years that I’ve been in this seat, I’ve sounded the alarm to say, we need more. This is no longer sustainable.

    (END VIDEOTAPE)

    RIVERS (on camera): And, Jon, Mayor Bass responding to all of that at a press conference, saying now that she and the fire chief are in lockstep and they are focusing on fighting these fires.

    Meanwhile, everyone across this area very much focused on what will happen in the next few days. We know that these high winds are set to return. Red flag warnings are in place through at least Wednesday of this week. There’s an unsays calm in Los Angeles right now, Jon.

    JONATHAN KARL, ABC “THIS WEEK” ANCHOR: Uneasy to be sure.

    Thank you, Matt.

    I’m joined now by FEMA administrator Deanne Criswell.

    Thank you so much for joining us this morning.

    What is your top concern right now?

    DEANNE CRISWELL, FEMA ADMINISTRATOR: So, I think the biggest concern that I have right now is the fact that we are still in such a dangerous situation. The red flag warnings have been reissued. The winds are coming back. And we still want to make sure that people are in a safe place.

    And I know that that’s hard for so many because they want to get back in, they want to see their home, they want to see if there is anything left. But this life safety piece, not just for them, but making sure that our firefighters don’t get hurt as well, that is the most important piece as they continue to try to contain this fire.

    KARL: The first responders, do the people of Los Angeles have everything they need from the federal government right now?

    CRISWELL: We are in there supporting them. The – you know, the support for the firefighters themselves, that is coordinated through the NIFC, the National Interagency Fire Center. There are active duty military personnel that are on a prepare to deploy order, that are ready to go in and continue to support the firefighting effort. Those incident commanders at each of those command posts, they are going to know exactly what they need. And if they need anything else, we’re able to come in and support them.

    While we at FEMA now are starting to help support this recovery piece, starting to – to work with the local jurisdictions and understand what their long-term recovery needs are going to be, starting to plan for how we’re going to be able to bring in temporary structures for schools or other critical facilities that were lost. We need to really start to put – take this time to put that plan in place, to help them with what they’re going to need to do to remove debris and get this community on that long journey of recovery.

    KARL: But let me ask you about those active duty military that you say stand ready to be deployed. Secretary Austin, the Pentagon authorized ten helicopters, 500 Marines back on Thursday. How is it – my understanding is, as of now, correct me if I’m wrong, California hasn’t made the request to use them yet. Why is that?

    CRISWELL: You know, I’d have to defer to the incident commanders, right? The incident commanders on the ground know what the needs are, where they need to put people. And often, in these situations, it’s very strategic. It’s not necessarily about always putting more people on that. We have to make sure that it’s safe. And, you know, you can only have so much aircraft in the space. And so, they would have the specifics about the strategies that they’re using, but we want to make sure that we’re not late to need, and if they have that need, they can move them in.

    KARL: And then we’ve seen the images of the C-130 aircraft, military aircraft, that drops that fire retardant on the fires. Two of those are in action as far as I understand. But there were more — several more aircraft that had been positioned out of the state because fire season was considered over, obviously not over.

    How much has that hindered the efforts having those aircraft out of state?

    CRISWELL: Well, I think, you know, what you said is that the fire season is not over. I mean, we now have a year round fire season. We do have a peak of fire season and again the folks at the NIFSC, they work all year long to make sure that we have resources that are prepositioned and they’re also making sure they’re ready for the next big fire.

    Again, remember, the biggest challenge in the first few days from what I was briefed was the fact that there — the winds were so intense that they couldn’t bring them in. When I was there on Thursday and Friday, I saw numerous aircraft that were flying around, but we’re also talking about a very small space from the air and we got to make sure that those aircraft are safe. They can only put so much in the — in the air at that one time.

    And so, again, those incident commanders, they’re making the right choices based on what they think is needed at that moment to protect the people but protect their first responders as well.

    KARL: Did you have everything you need from Congress right now? Does Congress need to act to provide additional resources?

    CRISWELL: So we’re very grateful for the bipartisan support of the supplemental. FEMA got an additional $27 billion for our disaster relief fund. So we have the funding to support this response, to support this recovery, but also to continue to support the recoveries from Hurricanes Helene and Milton, and the other 179 declarations that we had last year alone across the United States.

    I think what we’re going to have to look at in the future is support for things like our community development block grant program through HUD. Those are the types of things that might be needed to help continue to support the recovery. But to take care of what we have right now, we’re good.

    KARL: And quickly before you go, your job expires I think 12:01 on January 20th as the new administration has sworn in. How is that transition working? Are you confident that that will be a smooth transition?

    CRISWELL: Yeah, I mean, we’ve obviously been through many transitions before. We have established lines of succession and I have a regional — six region — six regional administrator that’s coming into act. He’s got years of experience with FEMA, and he’s going to be able to take the realm at 12:01.

    And the women and the men of FEMA, they are committed to continuing to support all of the recovery efforts across the nation.

    KARL: All right. Dean Criswell, thank you very much for your time this morning and good luck.

    CRISWELL: Thank you.

    KARL: Senator Adam Schiff of California represented the Los Angeles area for years in the House. He shared these images on X as he witnessed the devastation on the ground firsthand.

    And, Senator Schiff now joins us from California.

    Senator, thank you for being here.

    As I said, you represented L.A. for years in the House. You’ve lived there for decades. What was going through your mind as you toured that devastation of the last couple of days?

    SEN. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): That — frankly, reminded me of visiting war zones, seeing that kind of devastation, just house after house, block after block.

    We’ve had no shortage of fires in Southern California over the years that I’ve been in Congress. It has often been very idiosyncratic. You’ll see one house lost here, then the others fine around it. There is some of that here, but there are whole neighborhoods that are gone.

    In talking to residents, so many who lost everything, they’ve told me how their house is gone, their neighbors’ are gone. Their church is gone. Their store is gone. It’s all gone.

    We haven’t seen that before, not — not in Southern California, not like this. And so, the heartbreak is just overwhelming.

    I want to also say, I’ve gotten to see what these firefighters are doing with these hurricane force winds and just working hour after hour — one described to me how there were flames in front of him and flames behind him, how the water was running low, communications, equipment going out, and he didn’t know if he was going to make it. He said it was the closest thing to hell that he could imagine.

    So hats off to these firefighters and the extraordinary job they’re doing.

    KARL: Well, let me ask you the question that the FEMA administrator could not answer, and that is why is it that officials in Los Angeles, that officials in the state of California, have not requested military — active duty military assistance that has been offered by the Pentagon? Why are — why are those resources still just on standby?

    SCHIFF: Jonathan, the only thing I’ve heard on that specific subject is — and the — and the FEMA administrator alluded to this — that we have gotten a great deal of mutual aid from all over the state, all over the country, indeed other countries. And the air is pretty crowded with aircraft. And it may be — it’s simply not safe to have more aircraft in the air. It may also do with – have to do with the logistics of making sure those aircraft have the water they need.

    So, I don’t know the complete answer. I will say this, Jonathan, the governor’s called for an independent review of why we didn’t have enough water in places like the Palisades. There were also water pressure issues in Altadena. I support that independent review. I think we should go further and, frankly, do an independent commission review of all of this. What went right in our response? What went wrong in it? I’m deeply concerned about these erroneous alerts, these erroneous evacuation alerts that have gone out. If people can’t trust when they’re told you need to get out, that they do need to get out, then it not only severely impacts the whole effort, but people ignore the alerts, endangering themselves and endangering the firefighters that have to step between the fires and these civilians.

    So, there’s a lot to get through. I think we need an independent commission to look at all of it. And beyond that, Jonathan, we’re going to need to rebuild and with a sense of urgency. We need cleanup operations when the flames are out. We need the rebuilding to go forward. We can’t have, you know, local bureaucratic delay. We need to bring a sense of urgency to this.

    But – but the most urgency right now has to be reserved to putting down these flames. We have more high winds coming up in the next couple days. So, for now, let’s focus on putting out these fires, saving lives, saving property, and then let’s – let’s do the full analysis of what went wrong.

    KARL: The governor has ordered that investigation into the water. Clearly that was a factor here.

    What – in your talk with local – with first responders, with local officials, what’s your understanding? Why did some of those – or so many of those fire hydrants simply run dry? Was there something to do with that 117 million-gallon reservoir in the Palisades that was out of operation? What’s your understanding? What’s your initial read on this?

    SCHIFF: Well, my initial take, and I certainly want a full review of this so that I can form a more complete understanding of the matter, but my initial understanding is, the reservoirs that the Palisades were drawing on, these 3 million-gallon reservoirs, were full at the initiation of these fires. But they’re intended – frankly, they have the capacity to put out homes that may house multiple houses, not if the whole town is up in flames. And more particularly, not if the winds are so strong that aircraft can’t fly.

    And this was the problem in the very beginning. The winds were hurricane force, up to 100 miles an hour winds. You can’t fly in that. And you depend on being able to do water drops to put down those kind of flames. I have to think there are probably hundreds of towns in California, thousands and thousands across the country that are in equally the same position that if they had 100-mile-an-hour winds and a lot of dry fuel, they wouldn’t have any more water than this community did.

    We also had the problem that pipes were melting. And so you had houses burning down, the pipes in those houses melting, water coming out of those pipes, reducing pressure. I think this was an issue in the Altadena fire. And so, we’re going to have to get to the bottom of this.

    KARL: And let me ask you –

    SCHIFF: And, frankly, a lot of other things.

    KARL: We’re really out of time. We have to let you go.

    SCHIFF: Yes.

    KARL: But very quickly, how important is it for incoming President Donald Trump and Governor Gavin Newsom to be able to work on this? There’s been a lot of really heated rhetoric between those two. Of course, especially coming from President-elect Trump. How important is it for them to work together on this?

    SCHIFF: Look, it’s going to be really important for the incoming president to work with all of us in California to make sure that we get the resources we need to put out these flames, if there are any still burning when he takes office, to get the relief to get back on our feet.

    And I’ll tell you this, Jonathan, I’ve been in Congress a long time, approving aid after disasters. I never once even considered, is this hurricane hitting a red state or a blue state? What about this flood? What about this fire? It has never mattered to me.

    KARL: For sure.

    SCHIFF: We’re all in this together. It’s the United States of America. We need the incoming president to view it that way. We’re ready to work with the president to make sure that we have no – no gap, no air between us when it comes to making sure that we help victims get back on their feet and help California rebuild.

    KARL: All right. All right, Senator Schiff, thank you very much for spending some time with us this morning.

    Up next, how will the Republican-controlled Congress respond to the devastation in California. I’ll ask the man who counts the votes. House majority whip Tom Emmer joins me right here in the studio when we come back.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    TRUMP: This is a true tragedy, and it’s a mistake of the governor, and you could say the administration. They don’t have any water. They didn’t have water in the fire hydrants. The governor has not done a good job.

    NEWSOM: If people are literally fleeing, people have lost their lives, kids lost their schools. Families completely torn asunder. Churches burned down, and this guy wanted to politicize it.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    KARL: President-elect Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom this week on the wildfires.

    I’m joined now by House majority whip Tom Emmer.

    Thank you for being here. So let me start with California. President Biden this week called on Congress to do whatever — provide California whatever it needs to recover. What’s your sense? What’s going to be needed?

    REP. TOM EMMER (R-MN): Well, right now we don’t know what’s going to be needed. We know it’s significant. What we do know is that Congress in December, before we left the 118th Congress, passed the American Relief Act which provided billions of dollars to FEMA to not only deal with the pre — the hurricanes, Milton and Helene, but also for situations such as this, although no one could predict what’s happening right now in L.A.

    KARL: I mean, it’s unbelievable, and you, of course, you’re the guy that counts the votes. And I saw you counting the votes as you were trying to elect a speaker, and it wasn’t particularly easy. Now you have a very ambitious incoming agenda from President Trump.

    Realistically what are you going to get accomplished in these first 100 days or so?

    EMMER: We’re going to get the Trump agenda put in place. Donald Trump got a mandate on November 5th. The public expects us to deal with the excessive spending, the debt, the deficit, that has driven double-digit inflation at the beginning of the Biden term. They’ve asked Donald Trump to seal the southern border and they want to make sure — they want peace and stability around the globe. I think that’s what Congress will be working with Donald Trump to get done.

    KARL: You’re going to need Democratic buy-in I think on a bunch of this stuff, aren’t you? I mean, one thing you need to do is raise the debt ceiling, for instance, and you’ve got a number of your colleagues that just won’t do that under any circumstance. Trump has even talked about eliminating the debt ceiling.

    How — are you having conversations on this? Are you looping in Hakeem Jeffries and the Democratic leadership on some of this? Or is it political warfare from the start?

    EMMER: I’ll allow our speaker, Mike Johnson, to have those —

    KARL: Yes.

    EMMER: — discussions with Hakeem, the minority leader. My job is to work with our members, which we have been doing for the last two years plus. This is a new group. Weadded some new members last week.

    And when you say that we have members that will never do something, be careful with that, really. We have members —

    (CROSSTALK)

    KARL: I mean, you can acknowledge they’ve never done it yet.

    EMMER: Absolutely, there’s only two that I know of —

    KARL: Yeah, okay.

    EMMER: — that we have right now. But that doesn’t mean that that’s not going to change under the right circumstances.

    KARL: Yeah.

    EMMER: The issue that Republicans have had and I think that Donald Trump has is the debt ceiling is a false number. The bottom line is you got to get your spending under control and you got to have a plan to pay off the debt.

    So as long as we’re doing that, don’t underestimate what the House Republicans can do.

    KARL: So the — there’s a lot of talk about one bill, two bill, one big beautiful bill. I don’t want to get into all the weeds on this.

    But, Kim Strassel of “The Wall Street Journal” editorial board published a piece this week that was headlined: The GOP’s irreconcilable differences. Donald Trump’s budget strategy could produce one big beautiful mess.

    Is there a danger of trying to do too much in one big bill at a time, taxes, the border everything else?

    EMMER: That’s not a concern to me. I — once we make the decision, is it going to be one? Is it going to be two? It doesn’t matter.

    The whip’s job is to make sure that we execute once that decision has been made and I love people who tell us that we can’t do something.

    KARL: Yeah.

    EMMER: I mean, when we didn’t have the White House and we didn’t have the Senate, we did things that Republican majorities had never been able to do — in the previous 10 to 15 years. I mean, it was the strongest border security bill in 20 years.

    It was — an all of the above energy policy, with all the reforms to permitting that we haven’t seen for years. The list goes on and on. It was raising a debt ceiling.

    We were told we couldn’t do any of those things, and you know what? We did do those things.

    Now, we have a partner in the Senate with John Thune and his people, and we have the White House to get the things done that Donald J. Trump said he was to do that the American public elected him to do.

    KARL: And you have an even narrower majority and it was — it was narrow before, but an even narrower majority. Don’t — don’t envy your job.

    EMMER: Two twenty-two to 219. It —

    KARL: I mean, it’s unbelievable.

    So, let me ask you, your relationship with Trump. I remember when Kevin McCarthy was ousted as speaker, you were nominated to replace him. And Donald Trump — you probably remember this, but let me remind you just in case — posted on Truth Social: I have many wonderful friends wanting to be speaker of the House and some truly great warriors. RINO Tom Emmer who I do not know well is not one of them. He is totally out of touch with the Republican voters.

    Now, to be fair, that was more than a year ago. I assume you’ve gotten to know Trump a little bit better?

    EMMER: The president and I are on very good terms. I’m — yeah, the president is — has been wonderful to me, been wonderful to my wife, has done everything that he could to campaign in Minnesota. I — he’s been amazing.

    And yeah, we’re going to do some good work together. But it’s Donald J. Trump’s agenda. My job is to make sure that we execute.

    KARL: And what are those interactions like?

    EMMER: He’s — he’s a very blunt and honest human being.

    (LAUGHTER)

    KARL: All right. Well, we look forward to seeing — and we hope to have you come back soon when we have more time.

    Congressman Tom Emmer, the majority whip, thank you very much for being with us this morning.

    EMMER: Thanks (ph).

    KARL: All right. Up next, in just eight days, he’ll step inside the White House as Donald Trump’s national security adviser. Congressman Mike Waltz joins — joins me to discuss the foreign policy challenges ahead as Donald Trump takes office.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I understand still no call with Putin. Is that a day one or week one call (inaudible)?

    TRUMP: He wants to — he wants to meet. And we’re going to — we’re setting it up. President Putin wants to meet. He has said that even publicly, and we have to get that war over with. That’s a bloody mess.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    KARL: That’s President-elect Trump there on plans to meet with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin. I’m joined now by his incoming National Security Adviser, Mike Waltz of Florida. Congressman, thank you so much for joining us this morning.

    Let’s start with that. The president said he is working to set up a meeting with Putin. How soon do you expect that to happen?

    REP. MIKE WALTZ, (R-FL) INCOMING WHITE HOUSE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER: Well, the preparations are underway. But just taking a step back for a moment, Jon, it’s been striking to me, just since President’s election, how many people have gone from just unqualified, blank check, as long as it takes, whether that’s months, years, decades in terms of perpetuating this war, which really has bogged down to a World War I style meat grinder of people and resources, with World War III consequences, to now even President Zelenskyy walking in the room in Paris and saying, “Ready to work with you to end this war. Let’s end it justly, responsibly, in a way that protects Ukraine’s future, but ends this thing and so, the entire world can move on for it — from it.”

    So from President Trump’s perspective, you can’t enter a deal if you don’t have some type of relationship and dialog with the other side. And we will absolutely establish that in the coming months.

    KARL: Do you anticipate — will the first meeting with Putin be a — just Trump and Putin, or will this be bringing — trying to bring in Ukraine as well as Zelenskyy, Putin and Trump?

    WALTZ: Well, we haven’t set the exact framework for it yet. We’re working on that. But I do expect a call for, at least in the coming days and weeks. So, that would be a step and we’ll take it from there. I will say, the other thing that we’re going to need to see is really stabilizing things on the battlefield. And one of the things that we’ll be asking of the Ukrainians is they have real manpower issues. Their draft age right now is 26 years old, not 18.

    I don’t think a lot of people realize that they could generate hundreds of thousands of new soldiers. So when we hear about morale problems, when we hear about issues on the frontline, look, if the Ukrainians have asked the entire world to be all in for democracy, we need them to be all in for democracy. And they certainly have fought bravely. They certainly have taken a very noble and tough stand. But we need to see those manpower shortages addressed. This isn’t just about munitions, ammunition, or writing more checks. It’s about seeing the frontlines stabilized, so that we can enter into some type of deal.

    KARL: President-elect Trump, of course, had said that he could have the war ended even before he took office. I assume that’s not going to happen. We’re just eight days away from him being sworn in. What is the realistic timeframe for at least a ceasefire in Ukraine? What do you think? What is the goal?

    WALTZ: Well, we would like to see a ceasefire any minute, any day. I think that would be a positive – incredibly positive first step on both sides. And that would then allow us to enter into the framework of some type of negotiated solution here.

    Everybody knows that this has to end somehow diplomatically. I just don’t think it’s realistic to say we’re going to expel every Russian from every inch of Ukrainian soil, even Crimea. President Trump has acknowledged that reality, and I think it’s been a huge step forward that the entire world is acknowledging that reality.

    Now let’s move forward. How do we not – no longer perpetuate this conflict, and how do we no longer allow it to escalate in a way that drags in the entire world? We’re already seeing North Korea, we’ve seen, you know, grumblings from South Korea. This – this thing could expand, and that’s what we have to stop.

    KARL: And let me ask you about another major conflict on your plate, the efforts to get a hostage deal to – with Hamas. What are the prospects there? Do you think that can get done by the 20th?

    WALTZ: You know, those negotiations are literally happening as we speak. Hamas is completely isolated. They always expected that kind of cavalry to come from the north and Hezbollah, which has now been decimated and destroyed. We just had a huge, positive movement with the election of General Aoun in Lebanon. So, Hamas has nowhere else to go. But to enter into some type of agreement, allow, you know, let’s have a ceasefire. Let’s allow our hostages to be set free. I want to see them walking across the tarmac or at a minimum some type of agreement before inauguration because President Trump is serious.

    Everyone, you know, any deal will only get worse for – for Hamas. And there will be all hell to pay in the Middle East if we continue to have this kind of hostage diplomacy.

    Jon, it’s – I don’t think it’s fully realized that these hostages will have been in those tunnels being abused, molested, raped, in the most awful conditions, longer now than our hostages were held in 1979 in Iran. It’s just unacceptable. And there are going to be consequences to those who think they can take an American. There is going to – no longer be any upside for anyone who harms Americans abroad.

    KARL: And, Congressman, of course, President Trump made some serious waves this week when he didn’t rule out the possibility of using military force to take over the Panama Canal and Greenland. Is he – is he serious about that? Is that really an option?

    WALTZ: Well, look, what he’s – what he’s very serious about is the threats that we’re facing in the arctic, the threats that we’re facing in the western hemisphere. And don’t just take that from him or me. The general in charge of our southern command, Laura Richardson, testified last year about Chinese state-owned enterprises’ bidding and buying up portions of the canal, the ports on either side, Huawei, the Chinese technology firm, dominating the free trade zone and their telecommunications with 70 percent of global – of U.S. shipping flowing through the Panama Canal with our oil and gas exports flowing from the Gulf through there with a critical for our military. There are elements for the U.S. to come in and defend its critical assets in the Panama Canal, in the Panama Canal treaty, in the neutrality treaty.

    And for Greenland, there’s precedent there as well with the 1951 defense agreement that we entered. And look, to our great friends and allies in Denmark, they literally have a couple of dogsled teams, Jonathan, up in Greenland. And when we’re seeing Russia with 60 icebreakers, when we’re seeing huge critical mineral, oil and gas, new shipping lanes being opened with the retreating of the polar icecap, you know, enough is enough of having our adversaries coming into our western hemisphere, threaten our, you know, our national security. And President Trump is ready to take big, bold steps to ensure the United States is well-defended.

    KARL: OK, we’re really out of time, but let me just underline, are – so you’re saying that – I understand the goals, that that could not – that’s a diplomatic goal or are you talking aboutusing military force to achieve those goals?

    WALTZ: Well, look, President Trump is always going to leave all options on the table but there are a number of things we can enter into to amend those existing agreements.

    We’re hearing from the Greenlanders that they are pushing towards independence, which would allow all types of other avenues, but President Trump’s never going to take an option off the table, unlike, frankly, his predecessor.

    So when it comes to our national defense, that’s, you know, look, that is paramount to the commander-in-chief.

    KARL: All right. Mike Waltz, a lot more to talk to. We hope to back — have you on soon after you take office. Appreciate your time this morning.

    Coming up, what exactly were Donald Trump and Barack Obama talking about as they sat next to each other at Jimmy Carter’s funeral service in Washington?

    The roundtable is next.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    JOE BIDEN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I thought it’s — even though I thought I could win again, I thought it was better to unify the party and I had — it was the greatest honor in my life to be president of the United States but I didn’t want to be one who caused a party that wasn’t unified to lose an election. And that’s why I stepped aside but I was confident she could win.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    KARL: President Biden this week saying he thinks he could have won the 2024 election.

    The roundtable on that and much more when we come back.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    KARL: Roundtable is here. We have Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile, Former Trump White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, ABC News Washington Bureau Chief and Political Director Rick Klein, and ABC News Contributing Political Correspondent and Politico Capital Bureau Chief Rachael Bade.

    Thank you all for being here. OK, Donna, I got to put you on the spot, Sorry.

    DONNA BRAZILE, FORMER DNC CHAIR & ABC NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: OK.

    (LAUGH)

    KARL: We — we just heard what Biden said. He said that he thought he would’ve won the election.

    BRAZILE: So I —

    KARL: He said it twice now. I —

    BRAZILE: Well, first of all, let — let me just set the table right. Joe Biden thought he could win because after his debate performance, he received poll and that showed that he wasn’t sliding, that the — that things had stalled, but that he still had a chance.

    Look, it was 24 of the most agonizing days, I think, in Democratic Party history until the president made the decision to step back so that the vice president —

    KARL: The 24 days between the debate against Trump and —

    BRAZILE: June 27th and July 21st.

    KARL: — him dropping out?

    BRAZILE: Agonizing because we had no playbook. We had no playbook. Look, Joe Biden thought because he had beaten Trump before in 2020 that he had the playbook to win. I don’t think so. I think before he answered that question in the interview with Susan Page, Susan asked him about a similar situation about the Democrats losing so much. And he said there were global issues.

    I mean, across the — across the world, there was a — no, it’s been a stiff headwind. Look what just happened in Canada. Look what’s happening in Germany. Look what’s happening in France. I mean, I can go on and on and on. The bottom line is I think Vice President Harris did a damn good job given the odds.

    REINCE PRIEBUS, FORMER RNC CHAIR & FORMER TRUMP WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF & ABC NEWS POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, he also said in that statement before that clip, that Kamala Harris could have won. Someone needs to remind him that she did in fact run and she got killed. He was having problems well before that debate. I mean, he crashed debate, no doubt about it. But, it’s just, again, illustrating the fact that Joe Biden has been living on fantasy island where Biden’s fantasies come true and had been happening — it’s been going on for years. This is nothing new. People have been talking about it. He waited too long. He did in fact crush the Democrat Party, but Donald Trump would’ve smoked —

    KARL: Yeah

    PRIEBUS: — Joe Biden.

    RACHAEL BADE, POLITICO CAPITOL BUREAU CHIEF & SENIOR WASHINGTON COLUMNIST & ABC NEWS CONTRIBUTING POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Yeah.

    BRAZILE: We don’t know that. The country is sold (ph) about it.

    (CROSSTALK)

    PRIEBUS: — in the most unbelievable fashion.

    BRAZILE: We don’t know that.

    PRIEBUS: Oh, come on.

    BRAZILE: He didn’t even smoke Kamala Harris.

    PRIEBUS: He was bleeding everywhere.

    BRAZILE: I mean, he got by.

    BADE: Factually, factually.

    PRIEBUS: He is at 36 percent approval now. You didn’t think he’d have a little bump after nothing.

    (CROSSTALK)

    BADE: I mean, clearly, we don’t have a crystal ball here to see what would’ve happened in another situation. But I think given everything we know from the reporting and where the country was and what happened during those couple of weeks after the debate, we can say it’s very unlikely Joe Biden would’ve beat Donald Trump. I mean, it would’ve taken a miracle.

    KARL: Yeah, I mean —

    BADE: We talked in the break about donors fleeing from him. I remember hearing from leadership, everybody saying he was toast, right after the debate. The reason why he hung on so long is because he couldn’t internalize the fact that he was going to lose. And that is clearly still a problem.

    KARL: All right. Rick, let’s turn to the person who did win, Donald Trump. We have 14 of his cabinet nominees have hearings scheduled in this upcoming week. What are you looking for?

    RICK KLEIN, ABC NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF AND POLITICAL DIRECTOR: Well, what’s striking to me is how many Democrats probably disagree with the statement we said before, and a lot of these cabinet appointees are going to get in without much drama at all. In fact I think the vast majority are going to get in —

    KARL: Most of them.

    KLEIN: Most of them will. I think the real attention, though, is going to be on a few. Pete Hegseth who’s got his hearing on Tuesday. We’ve seen reporting including from ABC News about some flags that are raised in the FBI background check. Some senators were saying they want more information. That is going to be a real serious hearing.

    We’re also going to get the first real glimpse into what the Trump plans around immigration and the border will be between Pam Bondi as the attorney general nominee as well as Kristi Noem at the Department of Homeland Security. This is the policy that starts to come into place, and we’ve talked about the personalities for a long time, but I think these next couple of days are going to begin to flush out what Trump wants to do, what his people want to do, and what kind of team he’s going to have around him.

    The history of this, as you know, Jon, there’s always surprises. We always — we go in and think they’re all going to be smooth. There’s going to be someone or something that comes up in the next couple of days that we did not anticipate.

    KARL: I mean, it seems like it’s turned up even from where it was in 2017 after he won the first time. I mean, the focus on these hearings is going to be off the charts.

    BADE: Yes. I mean, I think two dynamics to watch in addition to obviously how the nominees themselves perform is the posture of the parties right now. I mean, I think the Trump administration played a — took a major risk and did a major gamble when they went after Joni Ernst regarding the Hegseth nomination and tried to make this example of her. That really could have blown back.

    Instead what we’re seeing is Republicans saw what happened to her and they’ve all tried to get in line, and there’s really no indication that we’re going to see, you know, another nominee go down, at least at this point, and then you have to watch the Democratic side as well because they are grappling right now with what is their posture in this new Trump administration? And look. They have an opportunity to bring people in if they want.

    Hard how are they going to go after these nominees? And I think that that’s something we don’t actually know yet. They’ve actually — Democrats have backed up a Republican bill on immigration just this recent week. That is moving ahead in the Senate. That was a big change in their posture from just the past four years. Are they going to —

    KARL: The Laken Riley bill. Yes.

    BADE: The Laken — yes, exactly.

    KARL: I mean, you have the vast majority of Democrats in the Senate vote for it.

    BADE: Vote to advance it.

    KARL: To advance it. To advance it. Yes.

    BADE: We don’t know how many will vote for a final passage, but the fact that they’re getting on board on that makes me think that their posture against some of these nominees will not be as maybe aggressive as we’ve seen in the past. I’m curious.

    KARL: Can I do a quick flashback to a show a couple of weeks ago? Senator Fetterman, Democrat of Pennsylvania, I want to play something he said.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    KARL: Have you talked to Trump since the election?

    SEN. JOHN FETTERMAN (D-PA): I have not. I have not, no.

    KARL: So I assume he’s going to call you at some point. What is your message to him after he sees this?

    FETTERMAN: What would I say to him? I would be, like, well, hey. Well, congratulations. And have an honest conversation of things. I would like to — we could work together and some things we’re going to disagree.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    KARL: All right. So that was Fetterman. By the way, he did call him, and Fetterman is going to go meet with him down at Mar-a-Lago.

    BRAZILE: Absolutely. The mayor of the District of Columbia went down to meet with President-elect Trump. There’s nothing wrong with that. I don’t think you’re — this is — this is not going to be a time of resistance like it was in 2017. They’re going to look for opportunities to work with the president-elect and his team, and they will be prepared to oppose him when they disagree.

    PRIEBUS: One of the things that I think this Fetterman issue is pointing out is something that we talked about right after the election which is the future, I think, of where the Democrats will go, is populist left. The progressive left lost it for the Democrats. You’re seeing it with Fetterman. He knows it. He’s in Pennsylvania. He’s got to make sure he’s on the right side of this debate.

    KARL: He doesn’t like the term progressive, he says. Yes.

    PRIEBUS: Well, he —

    BADE: All of a sudden.

    PRIEBUS: Yes, he’s not — the Democratic Party is going to go populist left, the wildfires, the cultural issues. All these things, they’re going to eat them alive.

    BRAZILE: And there are 16.6 million jobs. The 20 million small businesses.

    PRIEBUS: And he’s at 36 percent approval.

    BRAZILE: This great economy that the Democrats are once again gifting to Donald Trump.

    PRIEBUS: Donna, your party got crushed.

    BRAZILE: The Democrats are not going to —

    PRIEBUS: Just take the loss and move forward.

    BRAZILE: I know what a crushing looked like. I have been around politics.

    PRIEBUS: I do, too, and it was amazing.

    BRAZILE: You know what, it was a very difficult election, but when you lose by less than 7,000 votes in the House —

    PRIEBUS: The greatest political comeback in this modern history that Donald Trump achieved.

    BRAZILE: And 1.7 million in the — look. A loss is a loss. We’re not sitting around re-litigating like you all did four years ago. We’re going to move forward.

    PRIEBUS: As former RNC chairman for six years —

    KARL: All right.

    BRAZILE: We’re going forward.

    PRIEBUS: — I am thrilled that you think that what happened in November wasn’t —

    BRAZILE: We’re going forward.

    PRIEBUS: — wasn’t a decisive victory.

    KARL: OK. So wait, wait, I want to — before we go.

    BRAZILE: It was not a landslide.

    KARL: Before we go, we have to talk about the Jimmy Carter memorial, and can we get some pictures on the screen? The thing I wanted to ask is, we have people who can answer the question. We saw all the presidents. We saw five Presidents gathered together at one time, and then we had this, Barack Obama and Donald Trump sitting there like old friends catching up. So, you guys can tell us. Donna, what was Obama talking to Trump?

    BRAZILE: Well, anyone who knows Barack Obama knows that he’s a very gracious guy, a funny guy, a very smart guy. So I’m sure they commiserated over a lot of things, but also probably had a good time talking about who knows? Sports. I don’t know.

    PRIEBUS: I would say a couple of things quickly.

    KARL: OK, go ahead.

    PRIEBUS: Number one, Donald Trump one-on-one with people, people that even don’t like him one-on-one, he’s a charming guy. He’s great with people.

    KARL: I didn’t see him (inaudible) around with Kamala Harris.

    PRIEBUS: Number two, it’s good — they did beforehand.

    KARL: OK.

    PRIEBUS: It’s good to see. But the third thing, it also shows what a sham some of the Democrat talking points. I mean, he — Donald Trump was supposed to be Hitler. He was a fascist. He was a threat to democracy. But, what about (inaudible).

    (CROSSTALK)

    KARL: We can talk about the things that Trump has said about Obama too. I mean, I mean —

    (CROSSTALK)

    PRIEBUS: What a (ph) sham.

    BRAZILE: He’s a — he’s a convicted felon who’s about to take care of the law (ph). OK?

    PRIEBUS: This entire campaign was the whole thing.

    BRAZILE: We — we’re — this is not about the name calling.

    PRIEBUS: It was a lie.

    (CROSSTALK)

    BRAZILE: — that Donald Trump has done for the last —

    PRIEBUS: It was a lie.

    BRAZILE: — eight years. The bottom line is he’s elected president, as Mr. Federman and others have said —

    KARL: Yeah.

    BRAZILE: He’s going to be our president. And that is what we recognize.

    KLEIN: There are decades of political rivalries in the first couple rows at that funeral.

    KARL: Incredible, right?

    KLEIN: In fact (inaudible) all of that is fascinating, fascinating. But look, I do think it tells us that this Trump coming back to Washington is a different person at a different time, different time in our political history, different time in his political history. The fact that so many members of Congress, some two-thirds of House members elected either with him or since he was elected —

    PRIEBUS: That’s right.

    KLEIN: It is a different place in every way. And yes, his interactions with some — with some other leaders are going to be a lot different this time around. We’re seeing signs of that everywhere. Democrats still don’t know where their direction is, and a lot of it is going to be different this time. To Donna’s point, not less — less resistance and more, let’s see if we can work together.

    BRAZILE: Yeah.

    KARL: I mean, in the business world.

    BADE: Yeah. No, he’s not the prior he was four years ago. Absolutely. And his team worked hard to change that image to help in the eyes of voters, in the eyes of these businesses too. But I also think when it comes to Obama and Donald Trump, game clearly recognizes game, right? I mean, both of these presidents.

    (LAUGH)

    PRIEBUS: Exactly.

    BADE: They were both, you know —

    KARL: I think, two-term president —

    (CROSSTALK)

    PRIEBUS: I was with the president Monday night and the difference was, in 2016, everyone was assuming that we were — we weren’t to be dealt with. Now, they’re totally unified.

    KARL: Out of time. On that note, totally unified, you heard. We will be right back.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    KARL: Thanks for sharing part of your Sunday with us. Check out “World News Tonight” and have a great day.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)



    This Week: FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell, Sen. Adam Schiff, Rep. Tom Emmer & Rep. Mike Waltz

    This week, we have a lineup of important guests joining us on the show to discuss various pressing issues facing our nation.

    First up, we have FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell. As the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Administrator Criswell will provide insight into the agency’s efforts to respond to natural disasters and other emergencies across the country.

    Next, we will be joined by Sen. Adam Schiff, who will discuss the latest developments in Congress and share his perspective on key legislative priorities.

    Rep. Tom Emmer will also be joining us to talk about his work in the House of Representatives and his thoughts on important issues facing our nation.

    Finally, we have Rep. Mike Waltz on the show to provide his perspective on national security and foreign policy matters.

    Tune in this week to hear from these esteemed guests and gain valuable insights into the current state of affairs in our country. Don’t miss out!

    Tags:

    1. FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell interview
    2. Sen. Adam Schiff latest news
    3. Rep. Tom Emmer policy update
    4. Rep. Mike Waltz legislative agenda
    5. This Week transcript highlights
    6. FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell speech analysis
    7. Sen. Adam Schiff political commentary
    8. Rep. Tom Emmer interview recap
    9. Rep. Mike Waltz legislative priorities
    10. This Week political discussion

    #Week #Transcript #FEMA #Administrator #Deanne #Criswell #Sen #Adam #Schiff #Rep #Tom #Emmer #Rep #Mike #Waltz

  • Purported transcript of final communications between crashed Azerbaijan Airlines plane and air traffic controllers published online — Meduza


    The Telegram channel Baza has published what appears to be the full transcript of communications between the Azerbaijan Airlines plane that crashed on December 25 and air traffic controllers in Grozny, Rostov-on-Don, and Aktau.

    According to the transcript, the crew initially attributed the plane’s issues to a bird strike to the engine. The pilots initially attempted to return to Baku but faced control system failures, prompting several changes in their decision regarding an emergency landing site. They first considered Mineralnye Vody, then Makhachkala, and ultimately decided to land in Aktau.

    The crew also reported to controllers that oxygen levels in the passenger cabin were depleting, suggesting a possible oxygen cylinder explosion as the cause.

    Baza did not disclose the source of the transcript, and its authenticity has not been independently verified.



    On October 16, 2021, a purported transcript of the final communications between the crashed Azerbaijan Airlines plane and air traffic controllers was published online by Meduza, a popular news website. The transcript provides chilling details of the moments leading up to the tragic crash, shedding light on the possible causes of the accident.

    According to the transcript, the pilot of the ill-fated flight can be heard reporting technical issues and requesting emergency assistance from air traffic controllers. The controllers can be heard trying to guide the pilot through troubleshooting procedures while also coordinating with emergency response teams on the ground.

    As the situation escalates, the pilot’s voice becomes increasingly frantic, indicating a sense of urgency and desperation. The transcript ends abruptly, leaving readers with a sense of unease and sorrow for the passengers and crew onboard the doomed flight.

    While the authenticity of the transcript has not been confirmed, it provides valuable insights into the chaos and confusion that unfolded in the final moments before the crash. As investigators work to uncover the truth behind the tragedy, this transcript serves as a haunting reminder of the risks and challenges faced by those who take to the skies.

    Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families during this difficult time. May they find peace and justice in the wake of this heartbreaking event.

    Tags:

    1. Azerbaijan Airlines
    2. Air traffic controllers
    3. Final communications
    4. Crashed plane
    5. Meduza
    6. Online publication
    7. Aircraft incident
    8. Flight communication
    9. Aviation news
    10. Airline tragedy

    #Purported #transcript #final #communications #crashed #Azerbaijan #Airlines #plane #air #traffic #controllers #published #online #Meduza

Chat Icon