Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Transgender
Texas school official resigns following undercover video on transgender athlete policy – Straight Arrow News
In a recent turn of events, a Texas school official has resigned following the release of an undercover video exposing the school’s controversial transgender athlete policy. The video, which was secretly recorded by a concerned parent, shows school officials discussing their discriminatory guidelines for transgender students participating in sports.The official, who has not been named publicly, was caught on camera making derogatory remarks about transgender athletes and outlining a strict policy that would prevent them from competing in sports based on their gender identity. The video has sparked outrage among the community and has led to calls for the official’s resignation.
In a statement released by the school district, they have condemned the official’s actions and have announced that they will be conducting a thorough investigation into the matter. They have also stated that they are committed to creating a safe and inclusive environment for all students, regardless of their gender identity.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the challenges that transgender individuals face in our society, particularly in the realm of sports. It is crucial that we continue to advocate for equality and acceptance for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.
As more details emerge from this investigation, it is clear that there is still much work to be done to ensure that all students feel safe and supported in their schools. We must continue to fight against discrimination and prejudice in all its forms, and strive to create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for everyone.
Tags:
Texas school official resigns, transgender athlete policy, undercover video, Texas school, resigns, transgender policy, Straight Arrow News
#Texas #school #official #resigns #undercover #video #transgender #athlete #policy #Straight #Arrow #NewsLiving to Serve, Living as Myself: A Transgender Service Member’s Perspective
I grew up in a religious and conservative house. I was homeschooled all but 2 years of my K-12 education. I considered myself a conservative until 2016. I’m still religious today.
I come from a family of service. My cousin is Ret. Admiral James O. Ellis Jr., former commander of United States Strategic Command who is now a fellow at the Hoover Institution. My great uncle served in the Army during WW2 in the Battle of the Bulge as a forward artillery observer. My grandfather served in the Navy during WW2 hunting submarines. My older brother served in the Army as an M1 Abrams tank operator in Iraq in 2003. Service is in my blood.
I joined the Virginia Army National Guard in 2009 as a 15G helicopter mechanic. I deployed to Iraq for Operation New Dawn in 2011 and earned the Air Medal for serving as a helicopter door gunner. I served in reserve operations in Guatemala in 2014 for Operation Beyond the Horizon, deployed to Kuwait in 2016 for Operation Inherent Resolve, and completed my BA in International Relations while deployed to Kuwait.
I’ve had symptoms of what I now know to be “Gender Dysphoria” since I was 5 years old. I learned early to hide these symptoms from my family because I thought they meant I was a bad person. This led to healthy and not-so-healthy coping mechanisms. I thought that if I could just be more religious, more successful, more manly… that I would cure my condition.
I got married, bought a house, helped raise a stepdaughter, played drums in the church band, and adopted a dog. All the things I believed a good man should do. And I really wanted to do those things, but I also secretly hoped it would fix me. It didn’t work.
In 2020, as a Staff Sergeant, I applied and was accepted into the Army’s Warrant Officer Flight Training program. I completed Warrant Officer Candidate School, SERE School (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape), and the UH60 Black Hawk helicopter course. During the Pandemic and flight training, I realized that I had repressed my gender dysphoria symptoms and was finally at a point in my life and career where I could face them. I sought therapy and learned what options were available. I returned home from flight school and flew with my unit for a year before taking next steps. After much counseling and discussion with my spouse, we agreed that for my health I needed to take steps towards transition.
In 2023 I sent an email to my command giving them notice that I intended to start transition under the current in-service transition policy. My commander called me immediately after receiving the email and offered his support. I was met with overwhelming support from my entire command team and it would be kept confidential until I was ready to officially change genders. During this time, I started hormone treatment and started slowly presenting female in private or on vacations. I was medically stable and deployable 2 months later. Not every transgender person needs or wants gender reassignment surgery.
In 2024 I came out to my unit and started presenting publicly as a woman. Once again, I was met with overwhelming support from my unit at large. For obvious reasons, I was nervous I’d be unwelcome or make other females feel uncomfortable with my presence in the barracks, restrooms, etc. Many female soldiers in my unit offered their support. Some even went out of their way to make me feel comfortable in their space.
I’ve paid out of pocket for all my trans-related care. The military hasn’t covered any of it. I recently underwent facial feminization surgery and was non-deployable for 6 weeks. This was considered an elective surgery and not deemed medically necessary for transition. Similar to anyone who gets a nose job or face lift.
Since I’m part time military, I’ve also had to balance military obligations while working full time in the private sector. When I’m called up for service or training, I make less money than I do in the private sector. I say this to stress that this is coming from a servant heart and not motivated by finances or promises of medical care.
I’ve served in the same unit for 15 years. I want to serve at least 15 more. I love my state and I love my country.
Jo has served 15 years in the Virginia Army National Guard. Her current rank and job title is Chief Warrant Officer 2 (CW2) – UH60 Black Hawk Pilot. She has served in combat zones in Iraq and other operations overseas. She is a transgender woman and recently transitioned while serving in the military. When not serving her country, she works as an IT Engineer in the private sector and previously worked as the Digital Media Manager for Smerconish.com. She enjoys flying airplanes, racing cars, playing musical instruments, and skateboarding. The views and opinions presented are those of Jo Ellis and do not necessarily represent the views of DoD or the Army.
Living to Serve, Living as Myself: A Transgender Service Member’s PerspectiveAs a transgender individual serving in the military, my journey has been one of self-discovery, acceptance, and resilience. Being able to serve my country while also living authentically as my true self has been a transformative experience, one that has allowed me to fully embrace my identity and purpose.
For many years, I struggled with my gender identity, feeling like I had to hide who I truly was in order to fit in and conform to societal norms. However, the military has provided me with a supportive and inclusive environment where I can be myself without fear of judgment or discrimination.
Being able to serve alongside my fellow service members, who have shown me nothing but acceptance and respect, has been incredibly empowering. I have been able to fully embrace my identity and live authentically, knowing that I am valued for who I am as a person and not judged based on my gender identity.
I believe that my experiences as a transgender service member have only strengthened my commitment to serving my country. I am proud to be able to contribute to the defense of our nation while also advocating for greater inclusivity and acceptance within the military.
I hope that by sharing my story, I can inspire others to live authentically and unapologetically, regardless of their gender identity. We all deserve to be seen, heard, and respected for who we are, and I am grateful to have found that acceptance within the military.
I am living to serve, and I am living as myself – a proud transgender service member.
Tags:
transgender service member, LGBTQ+ perspective, serving in the military, gender identity, transgender rights, military service, transgender activism, personal journey, living authentically, breaking barriers
#Living #Serve #Living #Transgender #Service #Members #PerspectiveSinger will fund transgender surgeries in response to Trump executive order
Folk singer Lucy Dacus is taking a stand against one of Donald Trump’s many executive orders he signed on his first day in office.
Dacus, who’s known as a solo artist and as a member of the Grammy-winning group boygenius, posted on X Wednesday, Jan. 22 that she is donating money to transgender-related surgeries.
“If trans people wanna comment surgery gofundmes, I’m gonna give away 10k in $500 increments until it’s gone, & if other people wanna scroll through and make donations, please do,” Dacus wrote. “The government will never be the source of our validation or protection, we have to do it ourselves.”
The post has gotten more than 700 comments, 10,000 reposts and 1 million views since being shared Wednesday at 8:42 a.m.
Dacus’ offer appears to have been in response to Trump’s executive order that officially recognizes only two sexes (male and female), which would be defined based on the reproduction cells at conception.
“It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” the order reads. “These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality.”
The president directed agencies to issue government documents showing people’s sex at conception, stop using gender identity or preferred pronouns, and maintain women-only spaces in prisons and shelters.
The measure directs the attorney general to write new policies concerning the 2020 Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, which found sex discrimination in employment includes gender identity and sexual orientation. It also directs the Bureau of Prisons to “ensure that no Federal funds are expended for any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.”
The action could prompt the Education Department to punish schools that recognize gender identity, for instance by allowing transgender girls access to girls’ bathrooms, locker rooms or sports teams. It also could affect teachers who, in some districts, are told to use students’ preferred names and pronouns.
Dacus announced her first solo album since 2021, “Forever Is a Feeling,” and has released a first single and video, “Ankles” which she recently performed on “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon.”
The “Night Shift” musician is set to play iconic venues like NYC’s Radio City Music Hall and MGM Music Hall at Boston’s Fenway Park. She’s also partnering with Plus1’s L.A. Fires Fund to donate $1 per ticket toward wildfire relief efforts in Los Angeles. Fans looking to shop for tickets can use reliable third-party ticket sellers like StubHub, VividSeats and SeatGeek.
Here are the dates for her upcoming tour:
- April 16 — Philadelphia, PA — The Met
- April 18 — Washington, D.C. —The Anthem
- April 21 — Boston, MA — MGM Music Hall
- April 23 — New York, NY — Radio City Music Hall
- April 25 — Toronto, Ontario — Massey Hall
- April 29 — Nashville, TN — Ryman Auditorium
- May 1 — Chicago, IL — Chicago Theatre
- May 5 — Saint Paul, MN — Palace Theatre
- May 7 — Kansas City, MO — Midland
- May 9 — Dallas, TX — Winspear Opera House
- May 10 — Austin, TX — Moody Amphitheater
- May 12 — Morrison, CO — Red Rocks Amphitheatre
- May 14 — Los Angeles, CA — The Greek Theatre
“Renowned Singer to Fund Transgender Surgeries in Defiance of Trump Executive Order”In a bold and empowering move, the beloved singer has announced that they will be funding transgender surgeries for individuals in need, in direct response to the recent executive order by President Trump targeting transgender rights.
The singer, known for their advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, made the announcement on social media, stating that they refuse to sit idly by while the rights of transgender individuals are threatened and undermined.
“I believe that everyone deserves the right to be their true selves, and if this administration won’t support that, then I will,” the singer wrote in their post. “Transgender individuals should not have to live in fear or be denied access to life-saving surgeries. I will do whatever it takes to support and uplift my transgender siblings.”
This act of generosity and solidarity has been met with overwhelming support and gratitude from the transgender community and allies alike. It serves as a powerful reminder that even in the face of discrimination and adversity, there are those who will stand up and fight for equality and justice.
As the singer’s announcement continues to gain traction, many are hopeful that it will inspire others to take action and support the transgender community in any way they can.
In a time of uncertainty and division, this act of compassion and solidarity shines as a beacon of hope and resilience. The singer’s commitment to funding transgender surgeries is a powerful statement that love and acceptance will always prevail over hate and discrimination.
Tags:
- Transgender surgeries funding
- Singer supports transgender community
- Trump executive order response
- LGBTQ+ rights advocacy
- Celebrities supporting transgender rights
- Transgender healthcare funding
- Singer donation for transgender surgeries
- LGBTQ+ activism in response to Trump
- Singer’s philanthropic efforts for transgender community
- Impact of Trump’s executive order on transgender rights
#Singer #fund #transgender #surgeries #response #Trump #executive #order
Sarah McBride, Congress’s First Transgender Member, Faces the Trump Era
Representative Sarah McBride, Democrat of Delaware and the first openly transgender member of Congress, realized shortly after she won her race that going to the bathroom on Capitol Hill was going to pose a problem in her new job.
“The more I thought about it, I realized that it would not be safe for me to use the restrooms,” she said Monday over coffee, after attending President Trump’s inauguration.
That morning, she sat on her hands in the Capitol Rotunda as Mr. Trump received a standing ovation for stating that “there are only two genders: male and female.” On her way out, Ms. McBride ended up walking next to Pete Hegseth, the embattled defense secretary nominee who has railed against diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in the military.
“Surreal,” was all she had to say about that.
But such awkward interactions are a reminder of the complicated position Ms. McBride occupies in Washington. She has entered Congress as a barrier-breaking representative of a small and vulnerable population at a time when L.G.B.T.Q. rights are under assault and Republicans, who now hold a governing trifecta, see political gains to be made in rolling back the rights of transgender people in particular.
It has already given Ms. McBride more of a spotlight than the average freshman lawmaker in the minority — and prompted her to be very careful about when and how she uses her singular position.
Two months ago, when Ms. McBride came to Washington to attend congressional orientation and had yet to be sworn in, Representative Nancy Mace, a South Carolina Republican, saw an opening and marked her arrival by introducing a measure to bar transgender individuals from using women’s restrooms and changing rooms in the Capitol complex.
(Ms. Mace has since tried to keep the issue and herself in the news, attacking Ms. McBride on social media and traveling to Wilmington, where Ms. McBride lives, to accuse transgender individuals of trampling on women’s rights.)
The bathroom gambit was not a particularly novel move; such bans are already in place in 13 states under Republican control. Still, it was a notable way to welcome Ms. McBride to Congress.
Ban or no ban, Ms. McBride said she was never going to use the public restrooms in the Capitol, because she realized long ago that “there would be a bounty on my head.”
The move against her may have come faster than she anticipated, “but it was hardly a surprise,” she said. “This was an attempt to gain attention at the expense of a brand-new member of Congress.”
On Monday, Mr. Trump signed an executive order making good on his promise that the federal government would only recognize two sexes and that they were not changeable. One of the first bills that House Republicans brought to the floor in the opening days of the new Congress was to bar transgender women from participating in school athletic programs designated for female students.
Those issues hit close to home but had little to do with why Ms. McBride ran for Congress. During her campaign, she focused on paid family and medical leave, reduced child care costs and a higher minimum wage. She barely spoke about her identity and would like to continue the same approach in Congress, if possible.
Ms. McBride chose not to speak on the floor about the bill targeting transgender individuals in sports.
“I want my first speech to be about the issues I campaigned on: the economic issues this country is facing,” she said.
Over coffee, Ms. McBride said that “there are absolutely legitimate questions that need to be answered around what are the rules of the road for participation in different athletic programs.”
It’s just not an issue for Congress, she argued. The groups that should be making those decisions, she said, are athletic associations, not federal lawmakers lumping together every sport and every athlete, from kindergarten through college.
Ms. McBride came out in 2012, after her junior year at American University, when she wrote an opinion piece in the student newspaper divulging what she called “my deepest secret: I’m transgender.”
Back then, Ms. McBride was a political wonk, the president of the student body and — much in the mold of Pete Buttigieg, the former transportation secretary and onetime presidential candidate — someone who had been watching “Meet The Press” since she could talk and forever planning a career in government and politics. Before she came out, Ms. McBride thought she would have to sacrifice that; it didn’t seem possible to her that someone like her could have a future in public life.
“I thought, ‘If I can do as much good as I can in my life, it will make it OK for me to not come out,’” she said of her thinking at the time. “I had told myself for a while that a professionally and civically fulfilling life would compensate for a life in the closet.”
But it didn’t work that way. When she declared that she was transgender, she said: “I mourned the loss of any kind of future political career. But the pain was too much to not.”
Today, she considers herself lucky to have what she describes as an “authentic” and a “fulfilling” life as an openly transgender lawmaker.
“The only references I had as a young person were dead bodies in a drama or punchlines in a comedy,” she said. “I know how much it would have meant to me as a young person.”
Then she corrected herself: “Honestly, I don’t know how much it would have meant to me. It was incomprehensible to me.”
Behind the scenes, Republicans have not exactly apologized for the antics of Ms. Mace and other hard-right lawmakers who have made her a target. But, she said, “there has been clear intentionality about when they say ‘Welcome to Congress, looking forward to serving with you.’”
“Honestly, every Republican I’ve interacted with has been warm and welcoming, save for a couple,” she added.
In the elevators, Ms. McBride regularly introduces herself to interns as “Sarah” and asks them where they are from. Many of them seem to have no idea who this overly enthusiastic stranger is, and she’s fine with that.
“There’s a weird line between members and staff that feels overly distant,” she said as she made her way to the Dunkin’ Donuts in the basement of the Longworth House Office Building for coffee on Tuesday. “We’re all colleagues — let’s get to know each other!”
Ms. McBride is bubbly and in her element, eager to talk shop or discuss her current favorite television show, the reality game show “Traitors,” with anyone she can convince to watch it. (So far, that’s none of her staff.) Mostly, she’s eager to win back the majority in two years and thinks Democrats must grapple with how to appeal to voters amid a broader shift to the right that is happening around the world.
“No one runs for Congress to be in the minority,” she said. “In retrospect, you look at the global political dynamics, and it was naïve to think that the United States would be different. We have to see people’s pain.”
Ms. McBride loves Delaware almost as much as former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. does. She is close with Mr. Biden because of her onetime bond with his son Beau Biden, the former state attorney general who died of brain cancer in 2015 and whose campaigns she worked for.
“One of the last conversations Beau and I had, he was trying to decide whether to run for governor,” she said.
Unsurprisingly, given her connection to the Bidens, Ms. McBride defended Mr. Biden’s decision to pardon his family members in his final hours in office.
“It’s incredibly sad that we have a politics where elected officials seem more focused on punishing the family members of their political foes,” she said. “It’s a sad indictment of our politics that it is an understandable fear.”
As for Ms. Mace, the two have not yet interacted with each other in person, but Ms. McBride is willing to extend her colleague some grace.
“No one is their worst action — everyone is trying to figure things out,” she said. “That doesn’t excuse what they are doing. But everyone has a story, and experiences that impact their decision-making.”
Sarah McBride made history in November 2020 when she was elected as the first openly transgender member of Congress. As a trailblazer for the LGBTQ+ community, McBride’s victory was a significant milestone in the fight for equality and representation in government.However, with the Trump era coming to an end, McBride faces new challenges and obstacles as she prepares to take her seat in Congress. Throughout his presidency, Donald Trump and his administration have rolled back protections for transgender individuals, attempted to ban transgender individuals from serving in the military, and promoted discriminatory policies that have targeted the LGBTQ+ community.
As a vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, McBride is sure to clash with the remnants of Trump’s agenda and work tirelessly to undo the harm caused by his administration. Her presence in Congress will be a beacon of hope for transgender individuals across the country, showing that representation matters and that their voices deserve to be heard.
Despite the challenges ahead, McBride remains determined and dedicated to fighting for equality and justice for all. As Congress’s first transgender member, she is poised to be a powerful force for change and a fierce defender of the rights of marginalized communities.
Tags:
Sarah McBride, transgender politician, LGBTQ+ advocate, Trump administration, political representation, transgender rights, LGBTQ+ community, US Congress, political activism, social justice, LGBTQ+ visibility, transgender representation
#Sarah #McBride #Congresss #Transgender #Member #Faces #Trump #EraAI safeguards, legacy admissions and transgender health care
With the new year comes an array of new laws slated to take effect across the country throughout 2025 on issues like artificial intelligence, legacy college admissions and surgical care for transgender youth.
More than half a dozen states will have new data privacy and consumer protections, while federal regulations will require air travelers to present compliant licenses or identification cards to fly domestically.
After a busy election cycle, state legislatures are ready to tackle yet another year of hot-button political issues, soon under a Trump administration. Here are some of the laws that will ring in 2025:
Guardrails against AI
Two states will begin to regulate uses of AI with the aim of mitigating the potential harms of the rapidly growing technology.
In Illinois, it will become illegal to knowingly distribute audio- or visual-based digital replicas of individuals created through generative AI without their consent. The act also applies a 50-year prohibition on the use of a digital replica of an individual after their death if they did not previously consent to such use.
There are still certain instances to which the act does not apply, such as parody, or when there is a political, public interest, educational or newsworthy value to the digital replica — as long as it is not falsely presented as authentic.
The Recording Academy was a vocal proponent of the law since its introduction in February, championing its passage as a victory in protecting artists and creators against AI. Illinois state Rep. Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz, who introduced the bill, said the motivation for the legislation came from cases of the unauthorized use of artists’ identities in AI-generated music.
“I have seen increasing concern from lawmakers, really spurred by concern by our constituents, about the dangers posed by AI, the availability of AI as a tool, both in positive ways, but also in ways that can infringe on somebody’s right to privacy, or in fact, to really steal their identity,” Gong-Gershowitz said.
Another law in Illinois addresses AI-generated child pornography, prohibiting the use of the technology to create obscene material of a real or purported child. The law also separately forbids the nonconsensual dissemination of sexually explicit digitized depictions, which is a Class 4 felony.
“What we wanted to do was to ensure that law enforcement could prosecute cases of child pornography without the necessity of proving that the image is of an actual child,” Gong-Gershowitz said. “The goal here is to ensure that we don’t normalize violence against children.”
Meanwhile, California is tackling the use of AI in Hollywood. One law will require informed consent by performers in the entertainment industry to replicate their voice or likeness with AI, while a second law will extend the protection to digital replicas produced within 70 years of a personality’s death, with a few exceptions.
States are taking the lead in filling gaps from the lack of federal legislation on AI, Gong-Gershowitz said. She emphasized the need for balance between supporting innovation in the United States and ensuring “new technologies like next-generation AI continue to serve humanity’s interest.”
Data privacy and consumer protections
Eight states will have privacy laws take effect this year: Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Maryland, Minnesota and Tennessee.
The laws impose stricter obligations on businesses handling personal data and grant consumers the right to more transparency on how their data is collected, used and shared, according to Michelle Hon Donovan, a partner at the law firm Duane Morris LLP. Not all companies will be required to comply, as each state has its own requirements and thresholds, such as Nebraska, which exempts small businesses.
Maryland’s is the most restrictive of the new laws, including a clause that limits businesses to collecting personal data only when it is “reasonably necessary” to perform a service or provide a good. The law also outright prohibits the sale of sensitive data.
Donovan — who specializes in privacy and data security — said that before 2020, there were few laws across the country addressing privacy except for online privacy laws in a handful of states. Federal laws mostly focus on certain industries, she added, like the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
But now, the eight states with laws taking effect in 2025 join a growing list of 19 total states that have passed comprehensive privacy laws.
“We expect more laws to be passed next year, so this is probably only the beginning,” Donovan said.
California to bar legacy admissions
Legacy applicants in California will no longer get a leg up in the college admissions process after September 2025.
A law in the state will ban legacy and donor preferences at private, nonprofit institutions, eliminating favoritism given to applicants with familial or monetary connections to the schools. The University of California system eliminated legacy admissions in 1998.
Signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October, the law requires all private colleges and universities in California to submit an annual report to disclose compliance. Its passage came after the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action admissions policies in 2023 and an FBI investigation uncovered a college entrance exam cheating scheme in 2019 involving dozens of wealthy parents, including Hollywood actors.
“It’s all about fairness,” then-Assembly member Phil Ting previously told NBC News. “You want people to work hard and achieve access to education because they’ve worked hard and they’re really the most qualified students, not because they have wealthy parents or wealthy families who are donors. This is about making sure we’re leveling the playing field.”
The law will not be reflected in incoming classes until fall 2026.
New Hampshire’s ban on gender-transition surgeries for minors
A new law in New Hampshire will prevent transgender minors from receiving transition-related surgery and prohibit physicians from referring patients for out-of-state procedures.
The law does not affect other forms of gender-affirming care, such as puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy. New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu signed the health care measure in July alongside a separate bill barring some transgender students from competing on school sports teams, although a federal judge partially blocked its enforcement.
Sununu said in a statement that the law will protect the health and safety of children in the state by ensuring they do not undergo “life altering, irreversible surgeries.” Chris Erchull, a senior staff attorney at the New England-based GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, or GLAD, said decisions surrounding medical treatments are “very heavy and serious” but belong between doctors, patients and, in the case of minors, parents.
“The legislature is opening a door into regulating medical care for transgender people, singling them out for a different standard than for other people to target a procedure that doesn’t even happen in New Hampshire that, of course, is very, very rare,” Erchull said.
Research from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health has suggested that gender-affirming surgeries are rarely performed on transgender youth. Erchull raised particular concern about the law forbidding referrals, which he said “deprives families of the opportunities to even consult with other people to get information that they need to make the appropriate decisions for their families.”
New Hampshire is one of 26 states limiting or banning surgical care for transgender youth, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ rights think tank. Erchull said New Hampshire, a state in which Republicans control the governorship and both houses of the legislature, in the past five years had mostly resisted legislative efforts targeting LGBTQ+ people until now.
“It does mark a significant shift in what’s happening on the ground in New Hampshire,” Erchull said. “I’m hearing from families who are talking about leaving the state. I’m hearing from families who are scared about sending their kids to school because a lot of people are questioning whether transgender people are safe any longer in the state of New Hampshire.”
The Supreme Court is currently considering a challenge to a Tennessee law that restricts gender transition treatments for minors, although the surgical ban is not an issue before the justices. The conservative-majority court seems poised to uphold the law, which will have sweeping implications for youth access to puberty blockers and hormone therapy across the country.
National ID regulations
Beginning May 7, 2025, anyone age 18 or older will need to carry a Real ID-compliant driver’s license or identification card to fly domestically and access certain federal facilities.
Air travelers will be turned away at airport security checkpoints if they fail to present either identification that meets the Real ID Act’s enhanced standards or another acceptable alternative, such as a passport.
The Department of Homeland Security has delayed the deadline for Real ID enforcement multiple times due to a lack of full state compliance and the Covid-19 pandemic, which made it more difficult for people to get the new IDs at their state motor vehicle departments.
Congress passed the Real ID Act in 2005 based on a recommendation from the 9/11 Commission. Under the act, state-issued licenses or identification cards must also feature anti-counterfeiting technology and require record checks for issuance.
All Real ID-compliant cards will have a star marking on the upper portion of the ID.
In recent years, there have been significant debates and discussions surrounding various topics, including AI safeguards, legacy admissions, and transgender health care. Each of these areas presents unique challenges and opportunities for progress.AI safeguards have become increasingly important as artificial intelligence technology continues to advance at a rapid pace. With AI systems being used in a wide range of industries, from healthcare to finance to transportation, it is crucial to ensure that these systems are safe, reliable, and ethical. This includes implementing safeguards to protect against bias, privacy violations, and other potential risks. As AI becomes more integrated into our daily lives, it is essential to prioritize the development and implementation of robust safeguards to protect individuals and ensure the responsible use of this powerful technology.
Legacy admissions, which refer to the practice of giving preferential treatment to the children of alumni or donors in the college admissions process, have also come under scrutiny in recent years. Critics argue that legacy admissions perpetuate inequality and disadvantage students who do not have privileged backgrounds. Advocates for legacy admissions, however, argue that they help foster a sense of community and loyalty among alumni and donors. As colleges and universities continue to grapple with issues of diversity and equity, the debate over legacy admissions is likely to remain contentious.
Transgender health care is another area that has sparked debate and controversy in recent years. Transgender individuals often face significant barriers to accessing quality, affirming health care, including discrimination from providers, lack of insurance coverage, and limited access to gender-affirming treatments. Advocates for transgender health care argue that all individuals deserve access to safe, respectful, and affirming care, regardless of their gender identity. As awareness and understanding of transgender health care continue to grow, it is crucial for policymakers, healthcare providers, and individuals to work together to ensure that transgender individuals have access to the care they need and deserve.
In conclusion, AI safeguards, legacy admissions, and transgender health care are all complex and important issues that require thoughtful consideration and action. By prioritizing the development of robust safeguards for AI systems, reevaluating legacy admissions practices, and advocating for improved access to transgender health care, we can work towards a more just and equitable society for all.
Tags:
- AI safeguards
- Legacy admissions
- Transgender health care
- Artificial intelligence safeguards
- University legacy admissions
- LGBTQ+ health care
- Technology safeguards
- Higher education admissions
- Gender-affirming health care
- Data privacy protections
#safeguards #legacy #admissions #transgender #health #care
White House starts scrapping pending regulations on transgender athletes and student debt
WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden is abandoning his efforts to provide some protections for transgender student athletes and cancel student loans for more than 38 million Americans, the first steps in an administration-wide plan to jettison pending regulations to prevent President-elect Donald Trump from retooling them to achieve his own aims.
The White House expects to pull back unfinished rules across several agencies if there isn’t enough time to finalize them before Trump takes office. If the proposed regulations were left in their current state, the next administration would be able to rewrite them and advance its agenda more quickly.
Even as the Biden administration moves to pull back the rules, it pushed ahead with cancellation through other avenues on Friday. The Education Department said it was clearing loans for another 55,000 borrowers who reached eligibility through a program known as Public Service Loan Forgiveness, which was created by Congress in 2007 and expanded by the Biden administration.
As the pending Biden regulations are withdrawn, nothing prevents Trump from pursuing his own regulations on the same issues when he returns to the White House, but he would have to start from scratch in a process that can take months or even years.
“This isn’t the way I wanted it to end,” said Melissa Byrne, an activist who has pushed for student debt cancellation. “Unfortunately, this is the most prudent action to take right now.”
She blamed Republicans for putting the Biden administration in this position. “It’s a bummer that we have a GOP that is committed to keeping working-class Americans in debt,” Byrne said.
The withdrawals are beginning as Washington braces for a potential government shutdown that could further complicate efforts by the Biden administration to tie up loose ends.
In documents withdrawing the student loan proposals, the Education Department insisted it has the authority to cancel the debt but sought to focus on other priorities in the administration’s final weeks. It said the administration would focus on helping borrowers get back on track with payments following the coronavirus pandemic, when payments were paused.
“The department at this time intends to commit its limited operational resources to helping at-risk borrowers return to repayment successfully,” the agency wrote.
For the regulation on transgender students, the department said it was withdrawing the proposal because of ongoing litigation over how Title IX, the landmark law preventing sex discrimination, should handle issues of gender identity. In addition, the department said there were 150,000 public comments with a range of feedback, including suggestions for modifications that needed to be considered.
At this point, the department wrote, “We do not intend for a final rule to be issued.”
Karoline Leavitt, a spokesperson for Trump, accused the White House of “adding more red tape and making it more difficult for him to govern.”
“President Trump will not be deterred by their dirty tricks and will use every lever of power to reverse the damage Biden has done and implement his America First agenda,” Leavitt said.
Kate Shaw, who served in the White House counsel’s office under President Barack Obama, said it’s not unusual for administrations to speed up or slow down rulemaking. It’s more typical, she said, for the federal government to race to finalize regulations during a transition period, but that can be difficult when there’s a time crunch.
“If you haven’t started it early enough, you’re not going to be able to wrap it up,” she said.
An administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the administration still supports the goals of its regulatory proposals. However, the process can be lengthy because it requires legal reviews and collecting input from the public.
Federal agencies are now analyzing which rules to finish and which to pull back before the end of Biden’s term, the official said.
In recent years, presidents have tended to rely more on executive orders and federal regulations to sidestep gridlock in Congress. However, the rulemaking process can be less durable than legislation, leaving policies more vulnerable to shifts between administrations.
There are dozens of other pending regulations across the Education Department and other agencies, ranging from relatively trivial updates to sweeping policies that carry weighty implications for the nation’s schools and businesses.
If a rule has already gone through a public feedback process under Biden, Trump could simply replace it with his own proposal and move straight to enacting the policy, effectively bypassing the comment period.
The pair of student loan proposals expected to be withdrawn Friday represented Biden’s second attempt at widespread debt cancellation after the Supreme Court rejected his first plan.
One of them is a proposal from April that would have provided targeted debt relief to 30 million Americans. It laid out several categories of borrowers eligible for relief. Borrowers who saw their balances balloon because of interest would have had their accrued interest wiped away. Those who had been repaying loans for 20 years or more would have gotten their loans erased.
That proposal was halted by a federal judge in September after Republican-led states sued, and it remains tangled in a legal battle.
The second rule being withdrawn is a proposal from October that would have allowed the Education Department to cancel loans for people facing various kinds of hardship, including those struggling with steep medical bills or child care costs.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican, said Biden never had the authority to accomplish these plans.
“With today’s latest withdrawal, they are admitting these schemes were nothing more than a dishonest attempt to buy votes by transferring debt onto taxpayers who never went to college or worked to pay off their loans,” he said in a statement.
Although Biden did not achieve the sweeping loan cancellations that he initially promised, his administration has forgiven an unprecedented $180 billion in federal student loans through existing programs.
“Because of our actions, millions of people across the country now have the breathing room to start businesses, save for retirement, and pursue life plans they had to put on hold because of the burden of student loan debt,” Biden said in a statement.
On Friday, officials announced they were erasing debt for another 55,000 workers — including teachers, nurses and law enforcement officials — through Public Service Loan Forgiveness. The program promises to cancel loans for borrowers who spend 10 years in government or nonprofit jobs.
The $4.28 billion in relief is expected to be the final round of public service loan forgiveness before Biden leaves office in January.
Biden’s rule on transgender sports was proposed in 2023 but was delayed multiple times. It was supposed to be a follow-up to his broader rule that extended civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ students under Title IX.
The sports rule would have prevented schools from banning transgender athletes outright while allowing limits for certain reasons — for example, if it was a matter of “fairness” in competition or to reduce injury risks.
Biden’s proposal left both sides of the issue asking for more. Advocates for transgender athletes said it didn’t go far enough in protecting transgender students from school policies that could unfairly exclude them. Opponents said it fell short of protecting girls and ensuring fairness.
The regulation sat on the back burner through the presidential campaign as the issue became a subject of Republican outrage. Trump campaigned on a promise to ban transgender athletes, with a promise to “keep men out of women’s sports.”
Had Biden’s proposal been finalized, it was certain to face legal challenges from conservatives who said Biden overstepped his authority. Biden’s broader policy on Title IX, which was finalized in April, faced a barrage of legal challenges that prevented it from taking effect in 26 states.
The White House has announced that they will begin scrapping pending regulations related to transgender athletes and student debt. The decision comes as part of the Biden administration’s efforts to roll back policies put in place by the previous administration.The regulations in question were aimed at restricting transgender athletes from competing in sports that align with their gender identity, as well as making it more difficult for students to discharge their student loan debt. These policies have been widely criticized for being discriminatory and harmful to marginalized communities.
By reversing these regulations, the White House is signaling a commitment to upholding the rights and dignity of transgender individuals and easing the financial burden on students struggling with debt. Advocates have praised the move as a step in the right direction towards creating a more inclusive and equitable society.
However, opponents of the decision argue that it undermines fairness in sports and could have negative implications for the economy. The debate over these issues is likely to continue as the administration works to implement its agenda.
Tags:
- White House regulations
- Transgender athletes
- Student debt
- Pending regulations
- White House news
- LGBTQ rights
- Government policy changes
- Transgender student athletes
- Trump administration
- Education reform
#White #House #starts #scrapping #pending #regulations #transgender #athletes #student #debt
The Fighting Infantryman: The Story of Albert D. J. Cashier, Transgender Civil War Soldier
Price:$18.99– $16.91
(as of Dec 13,2024 13:38:00 UTC – Details)From the Publisher
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
37
4.8 out of 5 stars
285
4.9 out of 5 stars
100
4.7 out of 5 stars
49
3.6 out of 5 stars
78
4.5 out of 5 stars
2
Price
$14.99$14.99 $11.83$11.83 $14.15$14.15 $10.60$10.60 $13.05$13.05 $17.66$17.66
Happy Pride from Little Bee Books!
Molly wants to look her best for picture day at her school, and what looks better than a tux? In this heartwarming picture book, a big sister realizes that her little sister, Jackie, doesn’t like dresses or fairies-she likes ties and bugs! Will she and her family be able to accept that Jackie identifies more as “Jack”? Chloe’s favorite uncle is getting married, and she’s not happy about it. But after a magical day with Uncle Bobby and his boyfriend, Jamie, Chloe realizes she’s not losing an uncle, but gaining one. Discover a wonderful grandfather-granddaughter relationship, as a little girl hatches the perfect plan to get her Grandad adventuring again. And don’t miss the inspiring sequel, Grandad’s Pride, available now! Grandad and Milly are back for another adventure, this time honoring the past and celebrating the future with a pride parade. Get ready to roll with Nolan! Boys’ skate! Girls’ skate! Leave it to Nolan, who is nonbinary, to bring everyone together to sing, dance, and groove in this celebration of being yourself.Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Add to Cart
Customer Reviews
4.9 out of 5 stars
1,097
4.7 out of 5 stars
4
4.8 out of 5 stars
122
4.7 out of 5 stars
68
4.0 out of 5 stars
5
Price
$13.95$13.95 $12.22$12.22 $14.72$14.72 $15.53$15.53 $18.99$18.99
Celebrate every family and LGBTQ+ Pride with Little Bee Books!
In this modern fairy tale, a noble prince and a brave knight come together to defeat a terrible monster and in the process find true love in a most unexpected place. This powerful and triumphant picture book biography tells the story of how openly gay civil rights leader Bayard Rustin defied prejudice as he planned and organized the historic March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. An adventurous merman and kind fisherman find love and each other in this gorgeous update to the Little Mermaid story. This is the story of Jack Baker and Michael McConnell and their inspiring story becoming the first married gay couple in the US fifty years ago. Miles wakes up on his adoption day feeling excited, nervous, and even a little sad. This is a joyful and heartwarming celebration of LGBTQ families, adoption, kindness, and love.Publisher : little bee books; Illustrated edition (June 2, 2020)
Language : English
Hardcover : 48 pages
ISBN-10 : 1499809360
ISBN-13 : 978-1499809367
Reading age : 6 – 9 years
Lexile measure : 570L
Grade level : Kindergarten – 4
Item Weight : 1 pounds
Dimensions : 11 x 0.4 x 8.5 inches
Albert D. J. Cashier was born as Jennie Irene Hodgers in Ireland in 1843. At a young age, Jennie immigrated to the United States and settled in Illinois. When the Civil War broke out in 1861, Jennie was determined to serve her adopted country and enlisted in the 95th Illinois Infantry as Albert D. J. Cashier.Despite her small stature and delicate appearance, Cashier proved to be a skilled soldier. She fought in over 40 battles during the war, including the infamous Battle of Vicksburg. Cashier’s bravery and dedication to her fellow soldiers earned her the respect of her comrades, many of whom had no idea she was assigned female at birth.
After the war, Cashier continued to live as a man, working various jobs and eventually settling in Illinois. It wasn’t until 1914, when Cashier was admitted to a veterans’ home, that her assigned gender was discovered. Despite this revelation, Cashier continued to live as Albert until her death in 1915.
Cashier’s story is a testament to the resilience and courage of transgender individuals throughout history. Despite the challenges she faced, Cashier remained true to herself and her beliefs, serving her country with honor and distinction. Her legacy serves as a reminder that bravery and sacrifice know no gender, and that the fighting spirit of the infantryman transcends all boundaries.
#Fighting #Infantryman #Story #Albert #Cashier #Transgender #Civil #War #Soldier