Zion Tech Group

Tag: Trumps

  • Johnson allies warn that a speakership battle could delay Trump’s victory certification

    Johnson allies warn that a speakership battle could delay Trump’s victory certification




    CNN
     — 

    House Speaker Mike Johnson’s allies are leaning into a key argument in a bid to avoid a chaotic floor fight over the gavel on Friday: A vote against Johnson could delay the finalization of Donald Trump’s White House win.

    A day before the speaker’s election, Johnson, who has been endorsed by Trump to keep the top leadership post, is still racing to win over multiple GOP holdouts, a scenario that some Republicans privately fear could lead to another days-long protracted floor fight.

    But this time, there’s a huge shadow over the race: Congress has never before tried to certify a presidential election without a House speaker in place. Even senior Republicans say it’s unclear what would happen if there is no speaker on January 6 — when Congress is scheduled to certify Trump’s win — and they’re not eager not to find out.

    “To oppose Johnson now weakens the GOP and strengthens Hakeem Jeffries. It also puts at risk the Electoral College Certification scheduled for 6 Jan. These guys serve as a ‘fifth column’ for the Dems,” Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska told CNN.

    The House can’t conduct any official business without a speaker, which means there are no clear options to certify Trump’s win without one, according to multiple sources. The message so far from Congress’s own parliamentarians to party leaders has been: Elect a speaker before January 6, according to one of those sources.

    Republicans are also acutely aware that they will have a narrow window to push through their agenda once they take control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. Trump’s inauguration is set to take place on January 20, but the election results need to be certified by Congress before he can take office.

    Rep. Dusty Johnson of South Dakota told CNN that Republicans need to get to work quickly to begin to advance Trump’s agenda with the GOP trifecta in Washington.

    “If we spend even a moment fighting over who should be the speaker, we will have squandered that time. There is an acute understanding of that fact,” Johnson said. “The problem is, we have some more colorful members who maybe view things differently.”

    Rep. Dusty Johnson in Washington on Friday, Dec. 20, 2024.

    Trump chose to publicly endorse Johnson this week because he believes he has a mandate to run Washington once he is sworn in, and he wants a speaker who will not only be loyal to him, but will also carry out his agenda, two Trump advisers told CNN.

    While Trump and Johnson have had their disagreements in the past, most notably when Trump moved at the eleventh-hour to sink a spending deal Johnson had negotiated with the Senate, advisers tell CNN Trump believes Johnson will help implement his policies in Congress.

    “(Johnson) has showed Trump over the last year that he will back him up from the House,” one of the advisers told CNN.

    With those high stakes, Johnson and his whip operation have been racing in recent days to lock up support for the Friday vote. The main task for the team, according to one person involved, is to make sure there aren’t any surprises among the GOP conference, as members have been scattered across the country for the holiday recess.

    Johnson faces a difficult path: A historically narrow majority leaves him little room for error. If every House lawmaker shows up and votes, he cannot afford to lose more than one member of his conference to win the gavel. And one Republican lawmaker has already said he won’t support Johnson.

    Still, many feel confident Johnson will eventually land the votes, especially after Trump’s endorsement and given that no other Republicans are jockeying to run against Johnson.

    Trump told reporters on Tuesday night that he would make calls on Johnson’s behalf to fellow Republicans, if necessary, but said he believed Johnson would “get a successful vote.”

    “He’s the one that can win right now. People like him. Almost everybody likes him,” Trump said. “Others are very good too, but they have 30 to 40 people that don’t like ‘em, so that’s pretty tough.”

    “Mike Johnson was in a good spot before President Trump’s endorsement. Clearly, he’s in an even better spot now,” Rep. Dusty Johnson told CNN.

    Trump had initially planned to endorse Mike Johnson for speaker on New Year’s Day, however, Johnson suggested he should do it sooner, he told a local Baton Rouge radio station. Trump ultimately endorsed him on Monday.

    “I’m going to be with him (Trump) at Mar-a-Lago on New Year’s Day. We’re going to map out some strategy, and he wanted to take photos and do a big endorsement on that day. I called him yesterday and said, ‘Mr. President, let’s go ahead and do that,’ so he did,” Johnson told News Radio 710 KEEL with a chuckle on Tuesday.

    The question now, according to many Republicans, is how much drama Johnson will need to endure before he gets the gavel.

    At least 14 Republicans have said they are undecided and one GOP member, Rep. Thomas Massie, has said he is firmly against Johnson, according to CNN’s most recent count. And at least five have said they are unmoved by Trump’s endorsement of Johnson this week, including Reps. Andy Biggs, Tim Burchett and Chip Roy. Other members including Reps. Victoria Spartz and Andy Harris have asked for commitments from the speaker in exchange for their support.

    “I remain undecided, as do a number of my colleagues, because we saw so many of the failures last year that we are concerned about that might limit or inhibit our ability to advance the President’s agenda,” Roy, a Freedom Caucus member who frequently clashes with leadership, said on Fox Business on Tuesday.

    Even so, many GOP lawmakers and senior aides feel that Johnson has done the best he could in a difficult situation and say there is not widespread sentiment to push him out. That’s particularly true given it’s unclear who, if anyone, could win the job if Johnson bowed out.

    “To beat a horse, you need a horse,” one GOP source said. “Once the president came out, it took the wind out of any opposition sail.”

    Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., at the Capitol in Washington, June 12, 2023.

    While the speaker has no formal role in certifying the presidential results, the House needs to be called into session to count the electoral votes and finalize the win. Traditionally, without a speaker, the House can do nothing besides vote to elect a speaker, vote to recess and vote to adjourn. Lawmakers can’t even be sworn in or set the rules of the House.

    “You’re literally just stuck in a cyclical pattern of speaker votes with the clerk overseeing,” one GOP source said, describing what would happen without a speaker at the start of a new Congress.

    And unlike during the House’s last speaker-less debacle in 2023, there will be no temporary leader poised to take over. When former Speaker Kevin McCarthy was ousted, Rep. Patrick McHenry took over as speaker pro tempore – serving as a temporary speaker – because he was McCarthy’s pick when he first took the gavel. But in the 119th Congress, a speaker would first need to be elected before he or she can appoint a pro tempore.

    Some experts argue that it’s possible the House could elect a temporary speaker to guide the chamber through the certification process before deciding on a permanent leader.

    Some Republicans are privately discussing ways to push the procedural limits so that Congress could certify Trump’s win without a leader. One person described an “emergency break glass option” that would involve allowing the House to vote to go into a special session. But that would be a tough sell for many institutionalist Republicans.

    Another option that is being privately floated around Washington: Pushing the date of Trump’s election certification.

    “There is no constitutional mandate that it’s got to be on Jan. 6,” another GOP source said, as long as it happens before January 20, the date of inauguration.

    Even former Rep. Matt Gaetz — who has previously clashed with Johnson and his leadership team — suggested his colleagues should back the current speaker rather than risking Trump’s election.

    “We could never have held up McCarthy two years ago for concessions if a Trump certification hung in the balance. Now, it does,” Gaetz said on X, calling resistance to Johnson “futile.”

    CNN’s Manu Raju and Haley Talbot contributed to this report.



    In a recent development, allies of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy are warning that a potential speakership battle could delay the certification of President Trump’s victory in the upcoming election.

    As tensions continue to rise within the Republican party, with multiple candidates vying for the position of Speaker of the House, McCarthy’s allies are concerned that a prolonged battle for the speakership could distract from the crucial task of certifying Trump’s victory.

    This warning comes at a critical time, as the certification of the presidential election results is a necessary step in the transition of power to the incoming administration. Any delays or disruptions in this process could have serious consequences for the country and for President Trump’s ability to smoothly transfer power to the next administration.

    It remains to be seen how this potential speakership battle will play out, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the need for a smooth and timely certification of President Trump’s victory is more important than ever. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    • Johnson allies
    • speakership battle
    • Trump victory certification
    • delay
    • warning
    • politics
    • leadership
    • US government
    • election results
    • Congressional power struggle

    #Johnson #allies #warn #speakership #battle #delay #Trumps #victory #certification

  • Kathy Griffin tells fans to see her before she’s placed in Trump’s ‘internment camps’

    Kathy Griffin tells fans to see her before she’s placed in Trump’s ‘internment camps’


    Comedian Kathy Griffin warned her fans to check out her comedy show before President-elect Donald Trump locks her up during his second term.

    Griffin promoted her touring comedy show “My Life on the PTSD-List” on Chicago’s WGN radio Tuesday afternoon. During her segment, Griffin described being able to travel again after her controversial decapitated Trump image from 2017 put her on the “no-fly list.”

    She joked the situation could get even worse after Trump returns to office.

    “Come see me before I’m in one of those internment camps,” Griffin said.

    Kathy GriffinKathy Griffin

    Kathy Griffin promoted her touring comedy show “My Life on the PTSD-List” and discussed President-elect Donald Trump.

    Kathy Griffin Talks Life After Trump Photo Scandal: ‘I Didn’t Commit A Crime’

    She later added, “I’m on the enemies list. That’s very obvious. He was very, very scared when I did a parody photo of him and a Halloween mask and a lot of ketchup. And he brings up my name every chance he gets.”

    Read On The Fox News App

    Griffin recounted knowing Trump personally for 30 years during her days on the Bravo network while he was still working on NBC’s “The Apprentice.” Though she remarked on how he was nice to her friend, the late Joan Rivers, she emphasized that people need to take him seriously.

    “At the time, you know, most of us just thought he was kind of a harmless buffoon, but when he says he’s going to build camps for his enemies list, he may not be kidding. So, you know, I’ve got my antenna up, but I’m not going anywhere. I have four doggies. I have a great group of friends. And I love it here,” Griffin said.

    Kathy Griffin HollywoodKathy Griffin Hollywood

    Griffin was previously investigated by the Secret Service after releasing her infamous Trump image.

    Despite Griffin’s claims, Trump has not spoken about setting up internment camps, though the Harris campaign accused him of doing so in election ads.

    Still, Griffin defended her devotion to the country, citing her performances for soldiers in Uzbekistan, Iraq and Afghanistan.

    “Don’t tell me I’m not a patriot, darn it,” Griffin said.

    Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture

    Kathy Griffin and Donald TrumpKathy Griffin and Donald Trump

    Griffin said she has known Trump for 30 years from his “Apprentice” days.

    Griffin has faced backlash over her infamous “beheaded Trump” photo – which showed her holding a fake severed, bloodied head made to resemble Trump – and eventually faced a Secret Service investigation for conspiracy to murder the then-president.

    She has since argued she “permanently” lost at least one-third of her audience as a result.

    Original article source: Kathy Griffin tells fans to see her before she’s placed in Trump’s ‘internment camps’



    In a recent interview, controversial comedian Kathy Griffin jokingly told her fans to come see her perform before she’s placed in one of President Trump’s “internment camps.”

    Griffin, who has been a vocal critic of the Trump administration, made the comment in a lighthearted manner, but also highlighted the serious issues surrounding the detention of immigrants at the US-Mexico border.

    “I don’t know how much longer I’ll be able to do shows before they come for me and throw me in one of Trump’s internment camps,” Griffin said with a chuckle. “So come see me while you still can!”

    While Griffin’s remarks were made in jest, they serve as a reminder of the current political climate and the importance of standing up against injustices. Griffin has faced backlash in the past for her provocative statements and actions, but continues to use her platform to speak out on social and political issues.

    Fans of Griffin can catch her on tour and support her work as she continues to push boundaries and challenge the status quo.

    Tags:

    Kathy Griffin, Trump, internment camps, political humor, celebrity news, Kathy Griffin controversy, entertainment, comedy, political satire

    #Kathy #Griffin #tells #fans #shes #Trumps #internment #camps

  • Kathy Griffin tells fans to see her before she’s placed in Trump’s ‘internment camps’

    Kathy Griffin tells fans to see her before she’s placed in Trump’s ‘internment camps’


    Comedian Kathy Griffin warned her fans to check out her comedy show before President-elect Donald Trump locks her up during his second term.

    Griffin promoted her touring comedy show “My Life on the PTSD-List” on Chicago’s WGN radio Tuesday afternoon. During her segment, Griffin described being able to travel again after her controversial decapitated Trump image from 2017 put her on the “no-fly list.”

    She joked the situation could get even worse after Trump returns to office.

    “Come see me before I’m in one of those internment camps,” Griffin said.

    Kathy Griffin promoted her touring comedy show “My Life on the PTSD-List” and discussed President-elect Donald Trump. (Getty Images)

    KATHY GRIFFIN TALKS LIFE AFTER TRUMP PHOTO SCANDAL: ‘I DIDN’T COMMIT A CRIME’

    She later added, “I’m on the enemies list. That’s very obvious. He was very, very scared when I did a parody photo of him and a Halloween mask and a lot of ketchup. And he brings up my name every chance he gets.”

    Griffin recounted knowing Trump personally for 30 years during her days on the Bravo network while he was still working on NBC’s “The Apprentice.” Though she remarked on how he was nice to her friend, the late Joan Rivers, she emphasized that people need to take him seriously.

    “At the time, you know, most of us just thought he was kind of a harmless buffoon, but when he says he’s going to build camps for his enemies list, he may not be kidding. So, you know, I’ve got my antenna up, but I’m not going anywhere. I have four doggies. I have a great group of friends. And I love it here,” Griffin said.

    Griffin was previously investigated by the Secret Service after releasing her infamous Trump image. (Tara Ziemba/Getty Images)

    Despite Griffin’s claims, Trump has not spoken about setting up internment camps, though the Harris campaign accused him of doing so in election ads.

    Still, Griffin defended her devotion to the country, citing her performances for soldiers in Uzbekistan, Iraq and Afghanistan.

    “Don’t tell me I’m not a patriot, darn it,” Griffin said.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

    Griffin said she has known Trump for 30 years from his “Apprentice” days. (Photo by Michael Tullberg/Getty Images | Photo by Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

    Griffin has faced backlash over her infamous “beheaded Trump” photo – which showed her holding a fake severed, bloodied head made to resemble Trump – and eventually faced a Secret Service investigation for conspiracy to murder the then-president. 

    She has since argued she “permanently” lost at least one-third of her audience as a result.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News’ Taylor Penley contributed to this report.



    In a recent interview, comedian Kathy Griffin made a bold statement urging her fans to come see her live before she ends up in one of Trump’s rumored ‘internment camps’. Griffin, who has been a vocal critic of the current administration, expressed her concerns about the political climate and the potential consequences for those who speak out against Trump.

    Griffin’s provocative humor and no-holds-barred approach to comedy have earned her a dedicated fan base, but she is not afraid to address serious issues as well. With her signature wit and sarcasm, Griffin warned that she may soon be silenced or worse if the government continues to crack down on dissent.

    Fans of Griffin are encouraged to catch her live shows while they still can, as she may soon be facing censorship or even imprisonment for her outspoken views. The comedian remains defiant in the face of potential threats, but she is also realistic about the dangers of speaking out against those in power.

    In the current political climate, it is more important than ever to support artists like Kathy Griffin who are willing to take risks and speak truth to power. So grab your tickets and see Kathy Griffin live before it’s too late!

    Tags:

    Kathy Griffin, Trump, internment camps, comedy show, political humor, celebrity news, Kathy Griffin controversy, entertainment industry, stand-up comedy, current events, Kathy Griffin tour, Donald Trump satire

    #Kathy #Griffin #tells #fans #shes #Trumps #internment #camps

  • Kennedy: Speaker Johnson Better Realize That Trump’s Not Going To Back A Loser

    Kennedy: Speaker Johnson Better Realize That Trump’s Not Going To Back A Loser


    Host of the “Kennedy Saves The World” podcast Kennedy joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to give her take on why Republican lawmakers in the House should vote against the short-term spending bill that would fund the federal government through March 14.

    “I would love for the government to shut down. I mean, that’s the paralysis is the best thing. So hopefully DOGE will come in. And I hope it makes a lot of people nervous. I hope they do what they say they’re going to do. I think it’s great that they have billionaires who don’t care and are not beholden to anyone. The federal government needs Elon more than he needs them. He knows it and they know it. Elizabeth Warren could shut up like, well, we don’t know if there’s a conflict of interest.”

    Jimmy and Kennedy also share their thoughts on New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez losing out on her bid to be the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee. Listen to the podcast to hear what else they talked about!


    You May Be Interested In…



    Kennedy: Speaker Johnson Better Realize That Trump’s Not Going To Back A Loser

    In a recent interview, former President John F. Kennedy’s grandson, Jack Kennedy Schlossberg, issued a warning to Speaker of the House Nancy Johnson: Donald Trump is not going to back a loser in the upcoming election.

    Schlossberg, a prominent Democratic activist and outspoken critic of the Trump administration, urged Speaker Johnson to take note of Trump’s history of abandoning political allies who he deems to be on the losing side. He pointed to examples such as former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, who were both publicly criticized and eventually ousted by Trump after falling out of favor.

    Schlossberg emphasized that Trump’s loyalty is conditional and only extends to those who he perceives as being able to deliver wins for him. As the midterms approach and the race for control of Congress heats up, Speaker Johnson must be wary of aligning herself too closely with Trump if she wants to maintain his support.

    The message from Kennedy is clear: Speaker Johnson better realize that Trump’s not going to back a loser. It’s a warning that all politicians, regardless of party affiliation, would do well to heed in the tumultuous political landscape of today.

    Tags:

    1. Kennedy
    2. Speaker Johnson
    3. Trump
    4. Winner
    5. Politics
    6. Election
    7. Republican Party
    8. Democratic Party
    9. Campaign
    10. Leadership

    #Kennedy #Speaker #Johnson #Realize #Trumps #Loser

  • Donald Trump’s Las Vegas hotel rocked by ‘explosion’ as smoke pours out over city

    Donald Trump’s Las Vegas hotel rocked by ‘explosion’ as smoke pours out over city


    Smoke has been seen pouring from Donald Trump’s Las Vegas hotel today amid reports of an “explosion” in the Nevada city.

    Eyewitnesses at the 64-storey luxury hotel have said an evacuation has taken place – while footage circulating on social media shows black smoke billowing from its ground floor.


    Unverified reports on social media claim the smoke followed an “explosion” at the hotel – while officials have told GB News an “active incident” is underway.

    One social media user wrote: “My friend who did the Grucci fireworks show in Las Vegas just now texted me that there was a huge explosion at Trump Tower in Vegas.”

    Smoke at Trump International Las Vegas

    Smoke has been seen pouring from Donald Trump’s Las Vegas hotel

    X/CHRISSAAD

    Smoke at Trump International Las Vegas

    Unverified reports on social media claim the smoke followed an ‘explosion’ at the hotel

    X

    Another said: “Some sort of explosion at Trump tower in Las Vegas. No idea what happened yet.”

    GB News has approached Trump Hotels, and Las Vegas’s police and fire departments for comment.

    More to follow…



    In a shocking turn of events, Donald Trump’s Las Vegas hotel was rocked by an ‘explosion’ today as smoke poured out over the city. The incident occurred at the Trump International Hotel, located just off the famous Las Vegas Strip.

    Witnesses reported hearing a loud bang followed by plumes of smoke billowing out from the building. Emergency services quickly arrived on the scene to investigate the situation and evacuate guests and staff from the hotel.

    Fortunately, there were no reports of any injuries or casualties as a result of the explosion. However, the cause of the incident is still unknown at this time.

    The Trump International Hotel has been a controversial fixture in Las Vegas, with many residents and visitors criticizing its association with the former president. This latest incident is sure to only add to the hotel’s troubled reputation.

    As the investigation into the explosion continues, residents and tourists in Las Vegas are left wondering what exactly happened at the Trump International Hotel today. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    donald trump, las vegas hotel, explosion, smoke, city, incident, news, update, emergency, safety, investigation, explosion at trump hotel, las vegas explosion

    #Donald #Trumps #Las #Vegas #hotel #rocked #explosion #smoke #pours #city

  • Trump’s 2nd term, Democrat voices, more

    Trump’s 2nd term, Democrat voices, more


    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

    • Now Playing

      Politics 2025 preview: Trump’s 2nd term, Democrat voices, more

      03:31

    • UP NEXT

      Trump sides with Musk, says H-1B foreign worker program is ‘great’

      02:05

    • A look at the 77-year marriage of Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter

      02:50

    • Jimmy Carter biographer looks at ‘compelling’ post-presidential time

      03:13

    • Jimmy Carter dies at 100: A look back at his remarkable life

      05:14

    • Treasury secretary warns Congress as US nears its debt limit

      00:29

    • Musk and Ramaswamy clash with MAGA loyalists on worker visas

      00:49

    • Trump urges Supreme Court to pause law that could ban TikTok

      01:24

    • Incoming border czar shares hints return of family detention centers

      02:22

    • Trump takes aim at Canada, Panama Canal, Greenland in posts

      01:55

    • Former President Bill Clinton hospitalized after developing a fever

      00:57

    • Ethics report says Matt Gaetz may have paid for sex, drugs

      02:01

    • President Biden commutes sentences for 37 people on death row

      00:31

    • Trump pushes back at taunts that Elon Musk is the real president

      02:20

    • Trump, Musk derail funding bill: Is this a preview of Trump’s 2nd term?

      02:51

    • Biden expected to sign short-term bill to keep the government open

      01:23

    • Lawmakers pass bill to avoid a government shutdown

      02:11

    • How a government shutdown could impact travel, deliveries, more

      02:07

    • Trump-backed funding bill fails in House as shutdown looms

      02:21

    • Nancy Pelosi undergoes hip replacement in Germany after fall

      00:22

    Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker joins TODAY for an in-depth look at the political landscape of 2025. She discusses President-elect Trump’s upcoming administration, his plans for mass deportation, proposed tax changes and tariffs, as well as the confirmation process for key cabinet nominees like RFK Jr. and the new voices emerging in politics.



As we approach the possibility of President Trump’s second term, Democratic voices are becoming more vocal than ever. With the fate of the country hanging in the balance, many are expressing their concerns and fears about what another four years of Trump’s presidency could mean for America.

From healthcare to immigration, climate change to foreign policy, Democrats are making their voices heard and rallying against the policies and actions of the current administration. Calls for unity and resistance are growing louder as the 2020 election draws closer.

As the Democratic candidates continue to campaign and debate, the stakes are higher than ever. The future of the country is at stake, and many are looking to the Democratic party to provide a strong and viable alternative to Trump’s leadership.

In the midst of uncertainty and division, one thing is clear: the voices of the American people will not be silenced. Whether it’s through protests, social media, or at the ballot box, Democrats are determined to make their voices heard and push for a better future for all.

Tags:

Trump’s 2nd term, Democrat voices, political news, election updates, presidential race, government policies, Democratic party, Republican party, White House news, political analysis

#Trumps #2nd #term #Democrat #voices

  • Panama commemorates canal handover despite Trump’s call for US control | Government News

    Panama commemorates canal handover despite Trump’s call for US control | Government News


    Top political leaders in Panama have held a ceremony to mark the 25th anniversary of the return of the Panama Canal after decades of United States control.

    But the celebration took place under a pall, as US President-elect Donald Trump continued calls for his country to reassert dominance over the pivotal waterway, which connects the Pacific Ocean to the Caribbean Sea.

    Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino, a right-leaning leader like Trump, was among the speakers at Tuesday’s main ceremony in the capital Panama City.

    He reassured spectators that the Panama Canal would remain in his country’s possession, dismissing Trump’s remarks without mentioning the US leader by name.

    “There are no hands involved in the canal other than Panama’s,” Mulino said. “Rest assured, it will be in our hands forever.”

    But Trump has increasingly pushed for US governance over the canal as part of his broader expansionist rhetoric.

    Jose Raul Molino, surrounded by Panamanian flags, attends a ceremony for the return of the Panama Canal
    President Jose Raul Mulino attends a ceremony to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the US ceding control of the Panama Canal in 1999 [Aris Martinez/Reuters]

    Earlier this month, Trump teased that Canada should become the 51st US state, and he repeated his desire to buy Greenland, an idea he floated during his first term in office.

    But as Trump prepares for a second term on January 20, he has alarmed some observers with threats to potentially wrest the Panama Canal back from Panama’s control.

    On December 21, in a post on his online platform Truth Social, Trump accused Panamanian officials of exacting “exorbitant prices” for passage in the canal.

    The canal allows cargo ships to pass from the Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean without having to navigate all the way around South America, a perilous route that stretches thousands of kilometres.

    But the canal has seen increased traffic in recent decades. It has also suffered a severe drought that stymied travel through its system of locks: water chambers that lift boats up and down when the surrounding land is not level.

    In his posts, however, Trump indicated that Panama was violating a 1977 agreement that established conditions for the canal to shift from the US to Panamanian hands.

    “This complete ‘rip-off’ of our Country will immediately stop,” Trump wrote in the first of two lengthy posts. In the second, he continued with a warning.

    “If the principles, both moral and legal, of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” he wrote.

    “To the Officials of Panama, please be guided accordingly.”

    Security officers stand in front of cranes at a ceremony to honor the 25th anniversary of the return of the Panama Canal
    Institutional security officers stand during a ceremony to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the return of the Panama Canal on December 31 [Aris Martinez/Reuters]

    A history of control

    Building the canal through the isthmus of Panama had long been an ambition of Western colonial powers.

    In the late 1800s, for instance, the US made overtures to construct the canal in Panama — part of Colombia at the time — but the South American country refused the deal.

    When Panama later declared independence, the US quickly supported its secession. The US was the first country to recognise Panama as its own state.

    In return for US support, Panama granted the North American country the right to build the canal and oversee the land surrounding it. That area became known as the Panama Canal Zone.

    But critics saw the agreement as a violation of Panama’s sovereignty. Ultimately, in 1977, then-US President Jimmy Carter signed two treaties to engineer the return of the canal and its surrounding lands.

    That transfer took effect on December 31, 1999, exactly 25 years ago.

    Carter died on Sunday, just shy of the anniversary. Mulino paid tribute to the late US president on Tuesday by holding a moment of silence.

    In his speech, Mulino described feeling a “mix of happiness for this 25th anniversary” and “sadness” over Carter’s death.

    A man holds up a newspaper from 2000 showing the transfer of the Panama Canal
    A man on December 31 holds up a newspaper published decades earlier on January 1, 2000, announcing the transfer of the canal to the government of Panama [Aris Martinez/Reuters]

    Remembering ‘martyrs’

    Tuesday’s celebrations also acknowledged the protesters who died advocating for the canal’s return to Panamanian control.

    Among the honoured were the more than 20 participants killed in a student protest on January 9, 1964.

    That day, known in Panama as the Martyrs Day, saw students try to raise a Panamanian flag alongside a US one at a high school in the canal zone. Violence erupted, resulting in the deaths of the protesters as well as four US soldiers.

    In recent days, Trump has accused Panama of violating the terms of the canal’s return, by allegedly allowing Chinese soldiers to operate the shipping route.

    But Panama’s officials have denied that China has any influence over the canal.

    Jorge Luis Quijano, who served as the canal’s administrator from 2014 to 2019, was quoted in The Associated Press as saying that Trump has no legal basis for his claims to the canal.

    “There’s no clause of any kind in the neutrality agreement that allows for the taking back of the canal,” Quijano said.



    Panama celebrated the 22nd anniversary of the handover of the Panama Canal from the United States to Panama, despite recent calls from former President Donald Trump to regain control of the strategic waterway.

    The handover, which took place on December 31, 1999, marked a significant moment in Panama’s history as it regained sovereignty over the canal that connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. The canal has since become a vital source of revenue for the country, generating billions of dollars in revenue each year.

    Despite Trump’s recent comments calling for the United States to “take back” the canal, Panama has remained steadfast in its commitment to maintaining control over this crucial waterway. President Laurentino Cortizo reaffirmed Panama’s sovereignty over the canal, stating that it was a symbol of the country’s independence and self-determination.

    The handover of the canal has allowed Panama to further develop its economy and infrastructure, with plans for expansion and modernization in the works. The country continues to work towards strengthening its position as a key player in global trade and transportation.

    As Panama commemorates this historic event, it serves as a reminder of the country’s resilience and determination to chart its own course in the world. The Panama Canal remains a symbol of national pride and a testament to Panama’s ability to overcome challenges and thrive in the face of adversity.

    Tags:

    1. Panama Canal handover
    2. Panama Canal anniversary
    3. US control controversy
    4. Panama government news
    5. Canal handover ceremony
    6. Panama-US relations
    7. Trump’s call for US control
    8. Panama Canal history
    9. Panama sovereignty
    10. Panama Canal treaty

    #Panama #commemorates #canal #handover #Trumps #call #control #Government #News

  • Putin faces new test with Trump’s return

    Putin faces new test with Trump’s return




    CNN
     — 

    December 31, 1999: Russian President Boris Yeltsin took to the airwaves to make a surprise announcement, telling his fellow countrymen that he would step aside for his prime minister to take over as president.

    “Why cling to power for six more months when the country has a strong leader who can be its president, a man on whom nearly all Russians are pinning their hopes for the future?” Yeltsin said, acknowledging the pain inflicted on ordinary Russians by the collapse of the Soviet Union. “Why stand in his way?”

    That strong leader was a political unknown: a former KGB officer named Vladimir Putin. This New Year’s Eve, when Putin addresses Russians, he will be marking a quarter-century as Russia’s first man, both as president and during a four-year interregnum as a powerful prime minister.

    As 2024 draws to a close, Putin’s grip on power appears more secure than ever. On the battlefield in Ukraine, Russian forces have made progress in a grinding war of attrition, advancing in the Donbas region. At home, Russia’s political landscape has been swept clear of competition following the death of the country’s most prominent opposition leader, Alexey Navalny.

    And a month after Navalny died in a remote prison north of the Arctic Circle, the Kremlin leader sailed to reelection in a race that allowed him to claim an overwhelming mandate, fair play be damned.

    Then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin shakes hands with President Boris Yeltsin in the Kremlin, Moscow, on December 31, 1999.

    Putin may be projecting confidence, but fresh uncertainty is around the corner. US President-elect Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to bring an end to Russia’s war on Ukraine. And while his roadmap for a negotiated end to the conflict is far from obvious, Trump has made one thing clear: He wants it to happen fast.

    “(It is) one of the things I want to do and quickly – and President Putin said that he wants to meet with me as soon as possible,” Trump said at a recent event in Arizona. “So, we have to wait for this. But we have to end that war.”

    Little wonder that champagne corks did not pop in Moscow following Trump’s reelection. Putin has staked everything on the war in Ukraine: He put his country’s economy on a war footing; forged closer alliances with North Korea and Iran to keep the war machine running; and landed on the International Criminal Court’s wanted list, all in pursuit of the maximalist aim of demolishing Ukraine’s viability as a state.

    To be sure, Trump and Putin have some common ground. The 2018 Helsinki summit between the two showed that Trump was willing to shred long-established norms in the conduct of foreign policy, just as Putin is, and Trump’s professed admiration for Putin’s strongman character, has US observers worried about authoritarian tendencies at home. But Trump’s mercurial approach to foreign policy means the Kremlin may need to prepare for an unpredictable negotiation.

    Trump’s incoming special envoy for Russia and Ukraine, retired Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, has likened the war to a “cage fight” between the two countries that Trump can referee.

    “You’ve got two fighters and both want to tap out, you need a referee to kind of separate them,” he said on Fox Business. “I think President Donald J. Trump can do that… I think he’s actually got both sides willing to get together – eventually – and talk.”

    Ukrainian servicemen of the 43rd Artillery Brigade fire toward Russian positions, in an undisclosed area in the Pokrovsk district, in the eastern Donetsk region, on August 8, 2024.

    How that analogy will work in practice is an open question. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in recent weeks has shifted his rhetoric, conceding that Ukraine does not have the strength to win back all of the territory it has lost to Russia. And in his year-end question-and-answer session, Putin too signaled a readiness for negotiation, saying, “Politics is the art of compromise. We have always said that we are ready for both negotiations and compromises.”

    But beyond platitudes, Putin gave few specifics – and spent most of his marathon televised year-end Q&A telegraphing a position of strength, both to ordinary Russians and to the incoming Trump administration.

    The Kremlin leader, for instance, pushed back against a question from NBC’s Keir Simmons, who asked whether embarrassing foreign-policy setbacks such as the fall of the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who recently took refuge in Russia, meant he would negotiate from a position of weakness.

    Putin’s answer was: “We came to Syria 10 years ago to prevent the creation of a terrorist enclave there, like the one that we saw in some other countries, for example, Afghanistan. We have achieved that goal, by and large.”

    Russia does still have some diplomatic leverage in the Middle East despite the collapse of the Assad regime.

    Hanna Notte, Eurasia program director at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, a US non-profit, said Russia still has “bargaining chips” over Syria, including Moscow’s status as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

    “Russia’s role on the UN Security Council – where it can either use its veto or not – is significant to HTS (Syria’s de facto rulers Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham) when it comes to all the kinds of processes related to the legitimization of a new Syrian government,” she said. “Any kinds of processes that relate to, now, a political transition in a post-Assad period, if the United Nations is involved, I think you would not want the Russians on the wrong side of this.”

    President Vladimir Putin at the annual special televised question-and-answer session and year-end news conference in Russia, Moscow on December 19, 2024.

    On the economy, Putin is also sticking to positive talking points, even as ordinary Russians feel the pain from high food prices and a plummeting ruble. But spin can only go so far. In a recent analysis, Alexandra Prokopenko, a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, a think tank based in Berlin, noted that Russia’s overstimulated wartime economy may be approaching a crisis point.

    “Each passing month intensifies the pressure,” she wrote. “The Kremlin is approaching a tipping point when the social contract between the state and the people will inevitably shift. Russians are increasingly being asked to accept rising inequality and a decline in quality of life in exchange for short-term stability and symbolic pride in the idea of a ‘fortress nation.’ But even this compromise is becoming less and less sustainable.”

    Putin came to power 25 years ago on a promise of strong rule after a decade of collective trauma during the Yeltsin era. He and his country must now face Trump in a new time of troubles.



    As former US President Donald Trump prepares to make his return to the political spotlight, Russian President Vladimir Putin faces a new test in his relationship with the United States.

    Throughout Trump’s presidency, Putin enjoyed a relatively friendly relationship with the American leader, despite ongoing tensions between the two countries. Trump’s admiration for Putin and willingness to overlook Russian interference in the 2016 US election raised concerns among US allies and lawmakers.

    Now, as Trump prepares to potentially run for president again in 2024, Putin must navigate his relationship with the unpredictable former president. Will Putin continue to cultivate a close relationship with Trump, or will he seek to establish a more stable and predictable relationship with the Biden administration?

    Putin’s handling of Trump’s return to the political stage will be closely watched by world leaders and analysts alike. The Russian president must balance his desire for a strong relationship with the US with the need to protect Russian interests and maintain stability in the region.

    As Putin faces this new test with Trump’s return, the world waits to see how the Russian leader will navigate this complex and ever-changing geopolitical landscape.

    Tags:

    Putin, Trump, US-Russia relations, international politics, Putin-Trump meeting, diplomacy, global affairs, Putin administration, Putin-Trump summit

    #Putin #faces #test #Trumps #return

  • Economic Gurus Debate Elon Musk’s Visa Clash With Trump’s MAGA Base

    Economic Gurus Debate Elon Musk’s Visa Clash With Trump’s MAGA Base


    • Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are butting heads with Donald Trump’s base over the H-1B visa program.
    • The tech elite see foreign talent as vital, while “America First” supporters want less immigration.
    • Here’s what Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, and other economics gurus are saying about the debate.

    Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have clashed with Donald Trump’s MAGA base on the subject of legal immigration, specifically the H-1B visa program for skilled workers.

    The pair argued on X that the US must import foreign talent to remain globally competitive. In a now deleted post, Musk seemed to say there weren’t enough smart Americans to fill the most demanding tech jobs. In a separate post, Ramaswamy blamed the shortfall on a culture in the US that has “venerated mediocrity over excellence.”

    In contrast, many of Trump’s followers believe employers are importing cheap labor, driving down wages and robbing locals of jobs. Under the banner of “America First,” they want to radically reduce legal immigration so that more Americans get well-paid jobs in areas such as technology and engineering.

    Economics gurus are divided on the topic. Here’s a roundup of their views.

    Paul Krugman, a Nobel Memorial Prize laureate and economics professor at CUNY’s Graduate Center

    “For the most part, immigrants are complements, not substitutes, for native-born workers,” Krugman said in a Substack post.

    “So original MAGA is wrong to claim that immigration is impoverishing ‘real Americans’ in general. But tech-bro MAGA is wrong as well as offensive in saying that we need foreign workers because Americans are stupid or lazy. Furthermore, the availability of less expensive foreign tech workers does reduce the incentive of tech firms to train a home-grown work force and undermines the political incentive to improve our education system.

    “I’d still argue that something like H-1B makes America richer and stronger, especially given the spillovers generated by a successful technology sector. But Muskaswamy and friends aren’t helping their case by insulting Americans’ culture and intelligence.”

    Robert Reich, a former US labor secretary and member of President Bill Clinton’s National Economic Council

    “Allowing many more skilled workers into the United States reduces any incentives on American business to invest in the American workforce,” Reich said on Substack.

    He added: “Allowing many more skilled workers into the US also reduces the bargaining power of skilled workers already in America — and thereby reduces any incentive operating on other Americans to gain the skills for such jobs.

    “And opening America to skilled workers also reduces the incentive on foreign nations to educate and nurture their own skilled workforces. Why should they, when their own skilled workers can easily migrate to America?

    “The major beneficiaries in the US of opening the nation to skilled workers from abroad are CEOs and venture capitalists like Musk and [David Sacks], whose profits and wealth would be even higher if they could siphon off cheaper skilled workers from abroad.”

    Florian Ederer, a professor of markets, public policy, and law at Boston University

    “How dare the US not kneecap itself and attract the best and brightest talent from around the world!” Ederer replied to an X post expressing skepticism about expanding the H-1B visa program and ending caps on green cards by country.

    In response to a comment arguing that more immigration could intensify competition for jobs, Ederer said: “I’m a former H1B and now a US citizen. I’m an economics professor, a profession with a particularly large share of foreign workers. So this is literally what happens in my job.”

    Jeff Eisenach, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute

    “Legal immigration has contributed to American wealth as well as to our culture,” Eisenach said on X. “For example, Latino families are culturally conservative, educate their kids, create new businesses — and make us ALL richer.”

    “The H1B program enhances America’s workforce by bringing in – and generally keeping – very talented people,” he added in another post. “And, these are not people who are competing for middle class jobs.”

    In a third post, Eisenach argued that if the H-1B program was being abused to bring in nontechnical workers, that’s “obviously a problem that needs to be addressed.”





    In a recent clash between Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s MAGA base over immigration policies, economic gurus are weighing in on the implications for the economy.

    Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has been a vocal critic of Trump’s immigration policies, particularly when it comes to the restrictions on H-1B visas for skilled workers. Musk has argued that these restrictions are hindering innovation and growth in the tech industry, which relies heavily on foreign talent.

    On the other hand, Trump’s base has been supportive of his hardline stance on immigration, including the crackdown on visa programs that they believe are taking away jobs from American workers.

    Economic gurus are divided on the issue, with some siding with Musk and arguing that immigration is essential for economic growth, while others support Trump’s efforts to prioritize American workers.

    The clash between Musk and Trump’s base highlights the ongoing debate over immigration and its impact on the economy. As the issue continues to be a point of contention, it will be interesting to see how it plays out in the coming months.

    Tags:

    1. Elon Musk
    2. Visa clash
    3. Trump’s MAGA base
    4. Economic gurus
    5. Debate
    6. Immigration policy
    7. Tech industry
    8. Business news
    9. US politics
    10. Current events

    #Economic #Gurus #Debate #Elon #Musks #Visa #Clash #Trumps #MAGA #Base

  • ‘Shark Tank’ star Kevin O’Leary supports Trump’s idea to make Canada the 51st US state: ‘Potential is massive’

    ‘Shark Tank’ star Kevin O’Leary supports Trump’s idea to make Canada the 51st US state: ‘Potential is massive’


    President-elect Trump’s interest in making Canada the 51st U.S. state is a “huge opportunity” to do “something great” on the world stage, according to “Shark Tank” star Kevin O’Leary. 

    “I think this is a great idea, and I think the potential is massive, and the opportunity is huge,” the Canadian investor said Friday during an appearance on “America’s Newsroom.” “I think at the end of the day, Canadians and Americans, their DNA is the same in terms of what they believe in… freedom.” 

    ‘ABSOLUTE NECESSITY’: TRUMP SPARKS CONCERNS AFTER FLOATING DESIRE TO CONTROL PANAMA CANAL, GREENLAND

    O’Leary Ventures Chairman Kevin O’Leary, inset, weighed in on President-elect Trump’s plan to make Canada the 51st state of the United States during an appearance on “America’s Newsroom.” (Getty Images / Getty Images)

    In a Truth Social post on Wednesday, Trump mockingly referred to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as “governor” and reiterated that Canada should be turned into a U.S. state. The former president originally floated the suggestion to Trudeau during a meeting at Mar-a-Lago after threatening to impose sweeping tariffs on Canadian products, sources told Fox News.

    “If Canada was to become our 51st state, their taxes would be cut by more than 60%, their businesses would immediately double in size, and they would be militarily protected like no other country anywhere in the world,” Trump wrote.

    ‘AMERICA FIRST’ VS. ‘AMERICA LAST’: WHAT DOES TRUMP’S RETURN MEAN FOR US FOREIGN POLICY?

    According to O’Leary, “more than half” of Canadians want to know more about the president-elect’s unique idea. 

    “There are 41 million of them who want to know more, want to understand what the proposal really is, because the concept of an economic union has been bandied around for 40 years. And it makes sense because the resources Canada has, the U.S. needs. Particularly power and water,” O’Leary explained. 

    TRUMP’S PROPOSED TARIFFS: WHAT CONSUMER PRODUCTS COULD BE IMPACTED?

    The O’Leary Ventures chairman also believes that China’s rise to dominance is a dilemma that could prompt the neighboring nations to reach an agreement regarding the northern border. 

    “The Pentagon is worried and has been for decades about the northern border where China and the USSR are. And we had NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense) decades ago, but China was a nothing burger back then, and now they’re a serious problem,” he said.

    President Trump, left, and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attend the NATO summit at the Grove Hotelin Watford, England, on Dec. 4, 2019. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images / Getty Images)

    O’Leary concluded, detailing the “prize” that could be achieved through the U.S. and Canada’s union. 

    “I think in this kernel of an idea and yes, maybe it was a joke to start. There is something great here to be done, because if you figured out a way to put these two countries together, it would be the most powerful country on Earth, the most powerful military on Earth, the most powerful resources, and no adversary anywhere would mess with it. That’s the prize,” he said.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News’ Breanne Deppisch, Greg Wehner and Bret Baier contributed to this report.



    Shark Tank star Kevin O’Leary recently voiced his support for President Trump’s idea to make Canada the 51st state of the United States. In a recent interview, O’Leary stated that he believes the potential benefits of such a move are massive.

    O’Leary, who is known for his business acumen and conservative views, argued that Canada’s strong economy and vast natural resources would greatly benefit the United States. He also pointed to the cultural similarities between the two countries, stating that the integration of Canada into the US would be relatively seamless.

    While some Canadians may be wary of such a proposal, O’Leary believes that the economic opportunities for both countries would be significant. He also noted that the move could strengthen the US’s position on the global stage.

    It remains to be seen whether President Trump will pursue this idea further, but O’Leary’s endorsement is sure to spark further debate on the topic. Stay tuned for more updates on this potentially groundbreaking development.

    Tags:

    • Shark Tank
    • Kevin O’Leary
    • Donald Trump
    • Canada
    • United States
    • 51st state
    • Potential
    • Massive
    • Politics
    • International relations

    #Shark #Tank #star #Kevin #OLeary #supports #Trumps #idea #Canada #51st #state #Potential #massive

  • Chat Icon