Ann Harvey Y2K Open Front Crochet Cardi Jacket Size U.K. 20 Beige Beaded Top
Price : 12.47
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Looking for a stunning statement piece to add to your wardrobe? Look no further than the Ann Harvey Y2K Open Front Crochet Cardi Jacket in a Size U.K. 20. This beige beaded top features intricate crochet detailing and a flattering open front design, making it the perfect layering piece for any occasion.
Whether you’re dressing up a casual ensemble or adding a touch of elegance to a formal outfit, this jacket is sure to turn heads. The neutral beige color makes it easy to pair with a variety of bottoms, while the beaded embellishments add a touch of sparkle and sophistication.
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to add this unique and stylish piece to your collection. Shop the Ann Harvey Y2K Open Front Crochet Cardi Jacket in Size U.K. 20 today!
#Ann #Harvey #Y2K #Open #Front #Crochet #Cardi #Jacket #Size #U.K #Beige #Beaded #Top,ann
The teenager who killed three young girls and wounded 10 other people in a knife attack on a children’s dance class in Southport, England, last summer was sentenced on Thursday to life in prison, with a minimum term of 52 years.
The attacker, Axel Rudakubana, 18, pleaded guilty to his crimes earlier this week. He refused to attend the sentencing after a number of outbursts earlier in the day prompted the judge to order him removed from court.
“The harm that Rudakubana has caused to each family, to each child, to the community has been profound and permanent,” said Judge Julian Goose, who presided over the case. “It was such extreme violence of the utmost and exceptionally high seriousness that it is difficult to comprehend why it was done.”
The judge was not able to sentence him to a whole life order — a life sentence with the stipulation that the perpetrator should never be released from prison on parole — because he was just 17 at the time of the deadly attack. But Mr. Rudakubana must serve a minimum term of 52 years, according to the sentence, before he could possibly be paroled, with the judge adding that it is unlikely that he will ever be released.
Judge Goose noted that Mr. Rudakubana had been “determined to disrupt the hearing” so that he would not have to face his victims’ families.
Mr. Rudakubana had appeared in Liverpool Crown Court wearing a gray sweatsuit on Thursday morning, with a blue medical mask covering his mouth and nose. As prosecutors began reading out the details of the case, Mr. Rudakubana screamed, “I need to speak to a paramedic because I feel ill.”
The judge noted that medical specialists had examined Mr. Rudakubana that morning and determined him fit to attend the hearing. He continued to yell for several minutes.
Judge Goose said: “These proceedings are being conducted under my control, not yours, Mr. Rudakubana. Do you understand?” He then ordered Mr. Rudakubana removed from the court, saying, “I won’t have him disrupting.”
Prosecutors proceeded to read out the details of their case against him, revealing the harrowing nature of the attack on July 29. Deanna Heer, a lawyer for the prosecution, said he “targeted the youngest, most vulnerable in order to spread the greatest level of fear and outrage, which he succeeded in doing.”
She told the courtroom that while Mr. Rudakubana was under arrest at the police station after the attack, he was heard to say, “It’s a good thing those children are dead” and “I’m so glad.”
Ms. Heer recounted how he had traveled by taxi to Hart Space, where a sold-out Taylor Swift-themed dance class for children ages 6 to 11 was underway during the summer break from school.
Visual evidence shown in court, taken from CCTV footage and police-worn body cameras, showed Mr. Rudakubana arriving outside the dance studio that was crowded with 26 children.
He entered the building and rampaged through the room, stabbing several children as well as Leanne Lucas, who had organized the class. Moments later, screams could be heard on outdoor CCTV footage, before children began running from the building.
Some were covered in blood and collapsed before bystanders helped them.
Several people wept in the courtroom as the footage was shown, and some chose to leave, overcome by emotion.
The injuries suffered by Bebe King, 6, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, were so severe that they died inside the building, the police said. Alice da Silva Aguiar, 9, ran outside with the other children but soon collapsed. She was taken to the hospital and died the next day. Eight other children and two adults were wounded in the attack.
But amid the horror, there was also heroism. The court heard how after Ms. Lucas was stabbed in the back, she still managed to usher the children out the door and urge them to run for safety, even as she bled from a severe wound.
Another teacher in the dance studio at the time of the attack, Heidi Liddle, also encouraged children to flee, before one girl ran toward the bathroom. Ms. Liddle followed her inside, locked the door and braced her foot against it to protect them. She told the girl not to make a sound. The police later rescued them.
Two window cleaners working nearby, Marcin Tyjon and Joel Verite, heard the commotion and rushed to the scene. Mr. Verite followed the police into the building, picked up Bebe and carried her out of the building, screaming as he did so because of the severity of her injuries. Mr. Tyjon gave CPR to Alice in a parking lot outside.
Ms. Lucas, in a statement read out in court, said that her injuries had affected her physically and mentally.
“I, as do the girls, have scars we cannot unsee, scars we cannot move on from,” she said, adding, “To discover that he had always set out to hurt the vulnerable is beyond comprehensible. For Alice, Elsie, Bebe, Heidi and the surviving girls, I’m surviving for you.”
Since Mr. Rudakubana pleaded guilty, a portrait of a deeply troubled young man obsessed with violence has emerged, as has the fact that he was on the radar of the local authorities for years before the attack in Southport, a town north of Liverpool.
After the attack, a series of anti-immigrant riots broke out in Britain after disinformation about the perpetrator’s identity swirled on social media and messaging apps. False claims that he was an undocumented immigrant or newly arrived asylum seeker were amplified by far-right agitators. Mr. Rudakubana is a British citizen who was born in Wales to parents originally from Rwanda.
At age 13 and 14, he was referred three times to Prevent, a British counterterrorism program. The first time was for researching school shootings during class, in 2019. Then in 2021, he was referred for uploading images of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, the Libyan dictator, to his Instagram account, and for researching the London Bridge terrorist attack. But those referrals were ultimately dropped because it was determined each time that he did not meet the threshold for intervention.
There was no evidence that he ascribed to any particular political or religious ideology, the police and prosecutors said. Content found on Mr. Rudakubana’s computer and tablets showed a longstanding fascination with violence, killing and genocide.
The material included a history of Nazi Germany, reports on violence in modern Sri Lanka, documents about war in Chechnya, a book on clan cleansing in Somalia, academic reports on the Rwandan genocide, and a paper on punishments used on enslaved people on 18th-century British plantations.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Tuesday that the attack was a sign that terrorism in the country was evolving, and that young people were being radicalized by “a tidal wave of violence freely available online.”
Speaking during the sentencing hearing, Stan Reiz, the defense lawyer for Mr. Rudakubana, said that his client showed a “total lack of empathy” but added: “There is no psychiatric evidence before the court that a mental disorder contributed to the defendant’s actions.”
Mr. Rudakubana was also convicted of producing a biological toxin, after investigators found ricin, a lethal chemical, under his bed, and of “possessing information” described as “of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism,” because he had downloaded a PDF file titled “Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The Al Qaeda Training Manual.”
The case has raised questions about how the authorities missed opportunities to stop the violence before it began. The government has said it will conduct a public inquiry into the case to better understand what happened and what needs to change. But the case has also highlighted the issue of young people fixated on extreme violence who gain access to online images and messages that drive that obsession. Still, at the end of the day, the authorities said that on the day of the sentencing, the focus should remain on the victims.
“Today is about the families,” Serena Kennedy, the chief constable of Merseyside Police, said in a statement. “It’s about the three gorgeous little girls, Elsie, Bebe and Alice, and all those victims who were injured on the day, but also traumatized, and just remembering the impact that this has had on them and will continue to have on them for the rest of their lives.”
On October 5th, 2021, a U.K. teenager who brutally murdered three young girls in Southport has been sentenced to life in prison. The 17-year-old killer, whose identity has been protected due to their age, was found guilty of the heinous crimes after a trial that shocked the nation.
The victims, aged 13, 14, and 15, were lured to a secluded area by the teenager under the guise of a party. However, once they arrived, the girls were viciously attacked and left for dead. Their bodies were discovered by a passerby the following day, sending shockwaves through the community.
The judge presiding over the case described the teenager’s actions as “evil and unforgivable” and handed down the maximum sentence of life in prison with no possibility of parole. The families of the victims expressed relief at the verdict, but also spoke of the pain and loss they continue to endure.
As the community mourns the loss of these young lives, the sentencing serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of senseless violence. May the memories of the three girls be honored and may justice be served for their untimely deaths.
Prince Harry’s lawyer announced on Wednesday that he had reached a settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers over accusations of unlawful information gathering — an abrupt end to a case that Harry had cast as a last chance to hold the tabloids to account for years of predatory behavior.
News Group Newspapers offered Harry a “full and unequivocal” apology for hacking his cellphone and intruding into his personal life, and acknowledged “unlawful” conduct by private investigators hired by one of the tabloids, The Sun.
The company also apologized for past intrusions by its journalists into the private life of Harry’s mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, who died in a car accident in Paris in 1997 while being pursued by photographers.
“We acknowledge and apologize for the distress caused to the duke, and the damage inflicted on relationships, friendships and family, and have agreed to pay him substantial damages,” the apology read, referring to Harry using his alternative title, the Duke of Sussex.
The settlement, announced the day after the long-awaited trial was scheduled to begin, spared News Group Newspapers from weeks of damaging testimony about phone hacking and other unlawful methods it used more than a decade ago to ferret out information about Harry and other prominent figures. It also spared Harry, 40, the younger son of King Charles III, from heavy financial risk, regardless of how he had fared in court. Under English law, Harry would have been required to pay the legal costs of both sides if the court did not award him an amount commensurate with what News Group Newspapers offered him in a settlement.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
In a surprising turn of events, Prince Harry has agreed to a settlement with Rupert Murdoch’s U.K. tabloids after they offered a full apology for their invasive and damaging coverage of him and his family.
The tabloids, which have long been known for their sensationalist and often misleading stories about the royal family, issued a public apology to Prince Harry for their past actions. In response, Prince Harry has agreed to a settlement that will see the tabloids change their editorial practices and commit to more responsible reporting in the future.
This settlement marks a significant victory for Prince Harry, who has been a vocal critic of the tabloid press and its treatment of him and his wife, Meghan Markle. It also serves as a reminder of the power of holding media outlets accountable for their actions and the importance of ethical journalism.
While the details of the settlement have not been disclosed, it is clear that Prince Harry’s decision to accept the tabloids’ apology is a step towards healing and reconciliation. It remains to be seen how this will impact the future of media coverage of the royal family, but one thing is certain: Prince Harry’s willingness to stand up for himself and his family has set a powerful example for others to follow.
Cyberpunk 2020- Rough Guide to the U.K.- R. Talsorian Games
Price : 17.95
Ends on : N/A
View on eBay
Are you ready to immerse yourself in the gritty, neon-lit world of Cyberpunk 2020 in the United Kingdom? Look no further than this rough guide to navigating the cybernetic underworld of the U.K., brought to you by R. Talsorian Games.
From the bustling streets of London to the dark alleys of Manchester, this guide will help you navigate the dangers and opportunities that await you in this cyberpunk dystopia. Learn about the powerful corporations that control the country, the underground cybernetic enhancements that are available, and the shadowy factions vying for control of the city.
Whether you’re a seasoned cyberpunk veteran or a newcomer to the genre, this guide will provide you with the information you need to survive and thrive in the U.K. So grab your cyberdeck, load up on ammunition, and get ready to dive headfirst into the world of Cyberpunk 2020 in the United Kingdom. The future is waiting for you, are you ready to seize it?
#Cyberpunk #Rough #Guide #U.K #Talsorian #Games,cyberpunk balatro locations
A Tesla Cybertruck that was imported to the United Kingdom has been seized by authorities.
In comments, the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) noted that the vehicle was illegal to drive in the U.K.
The details:
The Greater Manchester Police stopped the driver of the Tesla Cybertruck in Whitefield, Bury on Thursday night.
As noted in a BBC News report, the Cybertruck was illegal to drive in the U.K. due to safety concerns.
The vehicle, which was registered and insured abroad, was confiscated by authorities.
The driver of the Cybertruck, a U.K. resident, has been reported.
The case has also been referred to Operation Wolverine, which deals with drivers operating vehicles without insurance.
The Tesla Cybertruck owner would now have to prove ownership of the vehicle, as well as proper insurance before the all-electric pickup truck could be released.
The GMP’s comments:
In a social media post, the GMP explained the reasons why the Cybertruck was confiscated.
“Whilst this may seem trivial to some, legitimate concerns exist around the safety of other road users or pedestrians if they were involved in a collision with the Cybertruck,” the Greater Manchester Police noted.
“The Tesla Cybertruck is not road-legal in the UK and does not hold a certificate of conformity,” the GMP added.
Cybertruck in the U.K.:
Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.
U.K. police confiscates Tesla Cybertruck, cites safety concerns
In a recent turn of events, U.K. police have confiscated a Tesla Cybertruck citing safety concerns. The futuristic electric vehicle designed by Elon Musk has been making headlines since its unveiling, with its unique design and impressive performance capabilities.
However, authorities in the U.K. have raised concerns about the Cybertruck’s unconventional design and its potential impact on road safety. The sharp angles and hard edges of the vehicle could pose a risk to pedestrians and other road users in the event of a collision.
The decision to confiscate the Cybertruck has sparked debate among enthusiasts and critics alike. While some argue that the vehicle should be allowed on the roads for its innovative features and eco-friendly technology, others believe that safety should be the top priority.
It remains to be seen whether Tesla will make modifications to the Cybertruck to meet U.K. safety standards and regulations. In the meantime, the confiscated vehicle will be held by authorities until further notice.
Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
Tags:
Tesla Cybertruck, U.K. police, safety concerns, confiscated vehicle, electric car, law enforcement, vehicle inspection, road safety, Tesla Inc, vehicle regulations, confiscated by police