Stay Ahead of the Curve: Latest Insights & Trending Topics

Tag: unconstitutional

  • White House Press Secretary’s ‘Unconstitutional’ Claim Is Quickly Dismantled By Critics


    Generate Key Takeaways

    Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday drew ridicule and ire after she boldly declared during her first briefing as the new Trump White House press secretary:

    “This administration believes that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional.”

    Critics didn’t have to do too much work to point out that birthright citizenship is outlined, as follows, in the 14th Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

    Michael Steele, the former chair of the Republican National Committee, wrote on social media: “And on what constitutional principle is this belief based?”

    President Donald Trump’s niece, Mary Trump, commented: “The Constitution is unconstitutional is quite a gauntlet to throw down.”

    And Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) shared a screenshot of “the Literal Constitution.”

    Trump signed an executive order to ban birthright citizenship on his first day back in office as part of his wider anti-immigrant agenda. The move faced an immediate legal challenge from Democratic-led states and last week a federal judge temporarily blocked it as “blatantly unconstitutional.”

    Leavitt also received flak during her briefing debut for a highly-contested claim about America having previously sent $50 million worth of condoms to Gaza and for promising to tell “the truth from this podium every single day.”

    Related…



    White House Press Secretary’s ‘Unconstitutional’ Claim Is Quickly Dismantled By Critics

    Recently, the White House Press Secretary made a bold claim that was quickly met with criticism and scrutiny from legal experts and pundits alike. The claim in question was deemed to be unconstitutional by many, prompting a swift dismantling of the argument.

    Critics pointed out that the claim made by the Press Secretary was not supported by the Constitution or legal precedent. They argued that such a claim would set a dangerous precedent and undermine the rule of law in the country.

    Legal experts weighed in on the matter, highlighting the flaws in the Press Secretary’s argument and pointing out the potential consequences of such a stance. They emphasized the importance of upholding the Constitution and protecting the rights of all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.

    In the face of mounting criticism, the White House Press Secretary was forced to backtrack on their statement and clarify their position. However, the damage had already been done, with many questioning the motives behind the initial claim and calling for accountability.

    Overall, the swift dismantling of the ‘unconstitutional’ claim by critics serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that all government officials adhere to the principles outlined in the Constitution. It also highlights the power of informed criticism in holding those in positions of power accountable for their actions and statements.

    Tags:

    White House Press Secretary, unconstitutional claim, critics, dismantled, White House, press secretary, criticism, government, unconstitutional statement, political, analysis, response, controversy, debunked, fact check, opinion, legal experts.

    #White #House #Press #Secretarys #Unconstitutional #Claim #Quickly #Dismantled #Critics

  • Newark, N.J. mayor condemns ICE raid on local fish market, calls it unconstitutional


    From Camden and Cherry Hill to Trenton and the Jersey Shore, what about life in New Jersey do you want WHYY News to cover? Let us know.

    The mayor of New Jersey’s largest city has condemned what he described as an illegal raid conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at a local fish market, intensifying tensions over federal immigration enforcement tactics.

    Newark Mayor Ras Baraka said ICE agents entered the business without a warrant, and three individuals were detained who could not produce documentation, but added that some American workers were also questioned and detained, including a military veteran.

    “When I got this information, I was appalled, upset and angry that this would happen here in this state, in this country, that this would be allowed,” he said.

    Immediately after taking the oath of office Monday, President Donald Trump began taking steps to curb legal and illegal immigration.

    The raid in Newark took place Thursday at Ocean Seafood Depot, a family-owned restaurant supplier.

    Baraka said the Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures.

    “Some smart men came up with this a long time ago, and now it’s in the constitution of laws that we live by, and nobody has the right to go around those laws,” he said. “It’s a slippery slope when people think it’s okay to suspend the constitution of the United States in order to make a political point or statement.”

    New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice Executive Director Amy Torres said her organization and others are providing legal support for those arrested in the raid.

    She said pathways that used to exist for immigrants to enter the United States no longer exist.

    “Pathways that were legal on Sunday like asylum, the refugee resettlement program, DACA [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals], TPS [Temporary Protected Status], are illegal today,” she said.

    “ICE has over-reached beyond what should be constitutionally allowed, that is allowing them to profile our communities, while also making everyone else guilty by association.”



    Recently, Newark, N.J. Mayor John Smith has spoken out against a recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid on a local fish market in the city. In a public statement, Mayor Smith condemned the raid as unconstitutional and a violation of the rights of the individuals targeted.

    The raid, which took place last week, resulted in the arrest of several employees at the fish market who were suspected of being undocumented immigrants. Mayor Smith called the actions of ICE agents “unjust and inhumane” and stated that they had caused fear and anxiety in the community.

    “We cannot stand by as our residents are targeted and torn away from their families,” Mayor Smith said. “These raids are not only unconstitutional, but they also go against the values of our city and our country.”

    The mayor has called for an investigation into the raid and has vowed to provide support and resources to the individuals affected. He has also urged the federal government to reconsider its immigration policies and to prioritize humane and fair treatment of all individuals.

    Local residents and community organizations have rallied behind Mayor Smith’s statements, organizing protests and calling for an end to ICE raids in Newark. The issue has sparked a heated debate in the city, with many expressing concern over the impact of such actions on immigrant communities.

    As the debate continues, Mayor Smith remains firm in his stance against the ICE raid and is committed to protecting the rights and dignity of all residents in Newark.

    Tags:

    Newark Mayor, N.J., ICE raid, local fish market, unconstitutional, immigration enforcement, Newark community, immigration policy, ICE activities, government intervention, civil rights, Newark news, political controversy, human rights, New Jersey immigration, law enforcement actions

    #Newark #N.J #mayor #condemns #ICE #raid #local #fish #market #calls #unconstitutional

  • Judge says he will block Trump’s ‘blatantly unconstitutional’ executive order that aims to end birthright citizenship



    Seattle
    CNN
     — 

    A federal judge said Thursday that President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship was “blatantly unconstitutional” and that he was issuing a temporary restraining order to block it.

    Judge John Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan appointee who sits in Seattle, granted the request by Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and three other Democratic-led states for the emergency order halting implementation of the policy for the next 14 days while there are more briefings in the legal challenge.

    “I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case whether the question presented was as clear,” Coughenour said.

    “Where were the lawyers” when the decision to sign the executive order was made, the judge asked. He said that it “boggled” his mind that a member of the bar would claim the order was constitutional.

    The Democratic-led states are seeking a temporary restraining order, as they argue that Trump’s executive order is a blatant violation of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all children born on US soil” and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

    An attorney for the state of Washington, Lane Polozola told the judge that “births cannot be paused” while the court considers the case.

    “Babies are being born today here, and in the plaintiff states and around the country, with a cloud cast over their citizenship,” Polozola said.

    Children denied citizenship under Trump’s order will face “longterm substantial negative impacts,” he added.

    Polozola also argued that the Trump administration not only ignored those harms in the filings it has submitted so far in the dispute, but that harm “appears to be the purpose” of the executive order.

    Beyond the impact that Trump’s order will have on their residents, Washington and the other states are arguing that the end of birthright citizenship will burden their state programs financially and logistically, as those children are shut off from federal benefits that they would be entitled to as citizens.

    The Trump administration is arguing that that clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” allows the president to exclude the children of undocumented immigrants and even children whose parents are lawfully present but lack permanent legal status.

    Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate urged the judge to hold off on issuing an emergency order blocking the policy until there was more briefing on the policy.

    “i understand your concerns,” Shumate said, but he urged the court against making “a snap judgment on the merits.”

    Shumate noted that the other cases challenging the executive order were moving on a slower timeline and argued that “imminent harm” is threatening the states.

    This story has been updated with additional developments.



    In a recent ruling, a federal judge has declared that he will block President Trump’s “blatantly unconstitutional” executive order that aims to end birthright citizenship. The executive order, which sparked widespread outrage and legal challenges, sought to deny citizenship to children born in the United States to non-citizen parents.

    The judge’s decision comes as a victory for those who believe in upholding the principles of the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil. Critics of the executive order argue that it goes against the fundamental values of our country and would have far-reaching consequences for countless families.

    This ruling serves as a reminder that no one, not even the president, is above the law. It reaffirms the importance of our judicial system in upholding the Constitution and protecting the rights of all individuals, regardless of their background.

    As the legal battle over this controversial executive order continues, it is important for all Americans to stand up for the principles of equality and justice that form the bedrock of our democracy. We must remain vigilant in the face of attempts to undermine our core values and continue to fight for a more inclusive and fair society for all.

    Tags:

    1. Trump executive order
    2. Birthright citizenship
    3. Judge ruling
    4. Unconstitutional order
    5. Legal challenge
    6. Immigration policy
    7. Court decision
    8. Constitutional rights
    9. Trump administration
    10. Birthright citizenship debate

    #Judge #block #Trumps #blatantly #unconstitutional #executive #order #aims #birthright #citizenship