Zion Tech Group

Tag: Unpacks

  • Grassley Unpacks First Week of the Trump Administration with Maria Bartiromo


    WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and former chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, joined Maria Bartiromo’s Wall Street on Fox Business to discuss energy policy, the Senate confirmation process, reconciliation and tax cuts.

    Audio and excerpts of Grassley’s remarks follow.

    VIDEO

    On Trump’s actions to unleash American energy:

    ‘I might say about all the actions [President Trump has] taken in the first 48 hours [in office] is like a tornado going through Washington, D.C. This town needs a shakeup, and I think he’s doing it.

    “For decades I’ve always said, ‘The best energy program is all of the above.’ That means all the fossil fuels we need, all the alternative energy we can have, conservation and nuclear. And I think [Trump’s] headed in that right direction. It’s going to have a very strong ripple effect through the entire economy…

    “Every service, every product that we buy has an energy component to it. When we have cheaper energy, we’re going to see cheaper prices paid for almost everything.”

    On the confirmation process:

    “If [Democrats] don’t agree to unanimous consent to bring a nomination up, you’ve got to have a separate vote to bring it up, and then you have unlimited debate. You have to have 51 votes to stop debate, and even after you have 51 votes to stop debate, then there’s 30 hours of debate possible afterwards. If people don’t yield back that time, that stretches out most nominees to a two- or three-day process…

    “This president has a popular mandate and an electoral mandate [that] he’s got to deliver [on]. The Democrats should realize that and let the cabinet people get in place, so this mandate can get underway very quickly. Until you get those cabinet people in their positions, this town doesn’t move as quickly as it otherwise would.”

    On reconciliation:

    “If we have two big, beautiful bills, [President Trump] will still use the same adjectives, only one number will change. We’re going to get the job done either way. I saw the President on Fox News [with Sean Hannity], and he did make clear that he likes one bill, but he says — ‘One bill or two bills, as long as we get the job done, i’s ok with him’… Our meeting at the White House with the House and Senate Republican leadership [this week] was a very productive meeting, and helps move things along very well. And so I’m very hopeful that we’re going to be able to get this mandate delivered very quickly.”

    On renewing the 2017 Trump tax cuts:

    “I think the tax extensions will take a little longer. Of course, we in the Senate have to wait until the House passes a bill, that’s the way the Constitution [approaches] tax legislation. But we’re not going to sit around and wait for the House. Going way back to September, anticipating a big Trump victory, we set up six working groups within the Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, and we’re well along on the goals that we want to accomplish in the Senate bill.”

    -30-





    Senator Grassley sat down with Maria Bartiromo to discuss his thoughts on the first week of the Trump administration. In their interview, Grassley unpacked the key actions taken by the new administration and shared his insights on what lies ahead for the country. From executive orders to cabinet appointments, Grassley provided a comprehensive analysis of the developments in Washington. Stay tuned for more updates on this important conversation. #Grassley #TrumpAdministration #MariaBartiromo #WashingtonUpdates

    Tags:

    Grassley Trump Administration, Grassley Maria Bartiromo, Grassley First Week, Grassley Administration Review, Grassley Trump Policies

    #Grassley #Unpacks #Week #Trump #Administration #Maria #Bartiromo

  • Sen. Tammy Duckworth unpacks her strategy for questioning Pete Hegseth


    Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee this week for a high-stakes and at many times contentious confirmation hearing

    Many Democrats focused on Hegseth’s personal controversies and past allegations of misconduct, which he vigorously denied, or his past comments opposing women serving in combat, which he backtracked on. 

    But some of the most striking and revealing exchanges were with Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, an Iraq War veteran who served in combat as a helicopter pilot. When asked by Duckworth to name one of the agreements the secretary of defense personally negotiates, he couldn’t name one. He also couldn’t name a country in ASEAN, an intergovernmental association of 10 Southeast Asian countries that includes key U.S. military allies. 

    “He also talked at length about not lowering the standards for anybody else. And yet, as far as I could tell, that hearing was all about him asking us to lower the standards for him,” Duckworth said in an interview with The 19th. 

    Many criticisms of Hegseth have surrounded a confidential settlement he paid to a woman who accused him of raping her in 2017 and past accusations of mismanagement of a veterans’ nonprofit. At the hearing, Hegseth said he was falsely accused of assault in an encounter he said was consensual and dismissed other allegations as “anonymous smears.”  

    After the hearing, Republican Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, who has worked to combat sexual assault in the military and a closely watched vote on Hegseth, came out for his confirmation. Republicans control the Senate, and the Armed Services Committee plans to vote Monday on Hegseth’s confirmation, setting him up to become defense secretary as soon as the middle of next week.  

    Duckworth said she went into the hearing perhaps most concerned about Hegseth’s qualifications and knowledge base. She said in a floor speech Thursday that she doesn’t oppose his nomination on partisan grounds: she supported past Trump picks to lead the Pentagon, including Gen. James Mattis and Mark Esper, because she believed they were qualified. 

    Hegseth lacks the traditional management experience of past Defense Department leaders, a job that entails overseeing a roughly $850 billion budget and 3.4 million personnel. Hegseth, who served in the U.S. Army National Guard, has most recently been a co-host on “Fox & Friends” weekends. At Tuesday’s hearing, Hegseth pitched himself as an outsider and a force for much-needed change, ready to shake things up. In his opening statement, Hegseth said that he would “bring the warrior culture” back to the Pentagon and would make up for his lack of experience by hiring “people smarter and more capable than me” to work under him. 

    “As this is going along, I’m thinking, ‘Why don’t we just hire some guy who’s smarter than you to do the job at all? If you’re going to have to hire all these other people smarter than you to help you do the job, let’s just cut the middle man,” Duckworth said. 

    Duckworth asked Hegseth about things the secretary of defense can’t delegate to someone else and has to personally negotiate and sign off on: status of forces agreements, acquisition and cross-serving agreements, and defense trade cooperation treaties. She’s traditionally led the congressional delegation to the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual Asia-Pacific defense summit, and seen other secretaries negotiate in real time.

    “I’ve watched Mattis, and I’ve watched [current Secretary of Defense Lloyd] Austin, and I’ve watched Esper go toe-to-toe with the Chinese defense secretary at these international forums,” she said. “And I was like, ‘This man can’t go toe-to-toe with the communist Chinese defense secretary, he’ll be eaten alive.’”

    Duckworth asked Hegseth about the highest level of international security negotiation he’d been involved in, and he responded that he hadn’t been in government since his military service. She then asked him to name one of the three main types of such agreements. 

    “If you’re talking about defense arrangements, NATO might be one,” he said. 

    “Status of forces agreement would be one of them,” she said. 

    “I’ve been a part of teaching about status of forces agreements in Afghanistan,” he said.

    “But you don’t think to mention it?” she replied. “You’re not qualified, Mr. Hegseth.”

    “This is basic, 101 stuff for someone who wants to be secretary of defense, and he couldn’t answer any of them,” Duckworth said later. “So that’s how I got to my line of questioning. It wasn’t actually anything that I was planning ahead of time. It was just really being prompted by his answers and his statements.” 

    Her question on ASEAN also came from Hegseth’s own statements in the hearing. He referenced the 2018 National Defense Strategy, which emphasizes the importance of ASEAN to Trump’s first-term strategy for the Indo-Pacific region, a key sphere of influence for the United States in countering China and a subject Duckworth had hoped to discuss in her allotted seven minutes of questioning. 

    So she asked Hegseth to “name the importance of at least the nations in ASEAN and what type of agreement the U.S. has with them” and how many nations are in ASEAN.

    “I couldn’t tell you the exact number,” Hegseth said, instead listing other key U.S. military allies like South Korea and Japan and the AUKUS agreement the United States has with the United Kingdom and Australia.

    “Mr. Hegseth, none of those three countries that you mentioned are in ASEAN,” she said. “I suggest you do a little bit of homework before you prepare for these types of negotiations.”

    Clips of Duckworth’s exchanges with Hegseth gained traction online following the hearing. Her questions weren’t meant to create a viral or a “gotcha,” moment, she said, but to press Hegseth on basic but crucial aspects of the job. 

    “I think that’s why it resonated because it became very clear that this man is not qualified to do the job,” she said. “And it became very, very clear around the world that this man is not qualified to do the job. When you can’t name a major treaty ally, like the Philippines, where we’ve had base agreements on and off; when you can’t name Thailand, our oldest treaty ally of 190 years; when you can’t name Singapore where we have an air base, are you kidding me?”  

    Her questioning received plaudits across the board. Alyssa Farah Griffin, a former Trump White House official turned Trump critic and current co-host of ABC’s “The View,” said she believed Duckworth had the best approach out of all the Democrats on the panel. 

    “I thought that Tammy Duckworth was the most effective because she challenged him on the facts and duties of the job, and he came up short,” Griffin said on the show Wednesday. “I have been to the ASEAN summit, I can name the countries that are in it, and I am woefully unqualified to be the secretary of defense.” 

    In her floor speech on Thursday and in the hearing, Duckworth spoke in front of a copy of the Soldier’s Creed, which she said hangs over her desk in the Senate and hung over her desk at Walter Reed Medical Center when she was treated for injuries she sustained in combat, including the loss of both of her legs and some mobility in her right arm after Iraqi insurgents hit her Black Hawk helicopter with a grenade in 2004.

    “Part of being a leader is knowing when you’re not competent enough to do the job,” she said on the floor. “Well, Mr. Hegseth, you are not technically proficient. You are not tactically proficient. And your nomination is an insult to those brave enough to be serving our nation. So you, sir, are a no-go at this station.”



    Senator Tammy Duckworth recently sat down to discuss her strategy for questioning Fox News personality Pete Hegseth during a recent Senate hearing. Duckworth, a veteran and Purple Heart recipient, has been a vocal critic of Hegseth’s controversial statements on military matters.

    In the interview, Duckworth revealed that she had carefully prepared questions for Hegseth, focusing on his past comments about veterans and the military. She emphasized the importance of holding individuals accountable for their words and actions, especially when they have a platform as influential as Hegseth’s.

    Duckworth also spoke about the need to challenge misinformation and harmful rhetoric, particularly when it comes to matters as sensitive as military service. She stressed the importance of standing up for veterans and ensuring that their sacrifices are respected and honored.

    Overall, Senator Duckworth’s approach to questioning Pete Hegseth reflects her dedication to advocating for veterans and holding those in positions of power accountable. Her thoughtful and strategic approach serves as a reminder of the importance of speaking out against harmful narratives and standing up for those who have served our country.

    Tags:

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth, Pete Hegseth, questioning strategy, Senate, politics, interview, Fox News, strategy analysis, political tactics, Senate hearing, political debate, veteran issues, military service, political commentary

    #Sen #Tammy #Duckworth #unpacks #strategy #questioning #Pete #Hegseth

  • ‘Squid Game 2’ Villain Unpacks the Front Man Ahead of Season 3

    ‘Squid Game 2’ Villain Unpacks the Front Man Ahead of Season 3


    [This story contains major spoilers through the season two finale of Squid Game.]

    Lee Byung-hun spent the original Squid Game almost entirely masked as the mysterious Front Man. For season two, he drops that guise by and large, but picks up another mask — and identity — entirely.

    Squid Game 2 sees the South Korean star significantly stepping up his screen time from season one, as the main antagonist plaguing heroic Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae). The Front Man wages a philosophical war with Gi-hun by helping him in his literal war against the Games, posing as a fellow participant named Young-il. As “Young-il,” the Front Man helps Gi-hun rally several others to work together, all while secretly sabotaging those very same efforts. 

    It’s a constant guessing game of the character’s true motives right up until the very last scene of the season, in which it becomes very clear that the Front Man is, at the end of the day, still gonna Front Man. The seventh and final Squid Game 2 outing ends with the Front Man shooting and killing Jung-bae, Gi-hun’s oldest friend, signifying a huge win for the bad guys heading into the third and final season.

    In the chat below, The Hollywood Reporter speaks with Lee through a translator about bringing the Front Man to life, whether he believes there’s any redemption for the character left at all and what’s to come.

    ***

    You have a lot to do here in season two. What was you first reaction to finding out about the expanded role?

    When I first received the script, I felt like, “Okay, I’m going to be busy.” I’m playing three characters: the Front Man, In-ho [his real name] and Young-il, who he’s acting as when he’s in the games. Keeping all those personalities straight is one of those really exciting opportunities as an actor. I was really looking forward to taking it on. 

    Were you surprised by what you learned about the Front Man this season?

    Yes; even compared to when I first read the script, I learned so much about him as I was shooting it. I’m pretending to be Young-il, on a team with Gi-hun, but observing Gi-hun, and almost seeing a past version of himself through Gi-hun. By the end of the season, In-ho does think he’s right; that his world view is correct. However, he has a very small inkling of hope that still exists for humanity, for the world. That was the biggest shift in my understanding of my own character between reading the scripts and shooting. While we were doing it, I kept wondering, maybe there’s a small shift in his perspective…

    Lee Byung-hun as the Front Man in season two.

    Netflix

    It was a big question for me, watching you across the season and wondering where your true loyalties lie. Were there moments you were wondering the same thing?

    Yeah, I did feel that. I did feel these moments where he’s faltering. He really wants to break down Gi-hun’s worldview, but as In-ho’s working with him and working with the other characters, he feels excited, he feels joy, he feels angry all alongside them. I do think there are moments where he’s actually enjoying the Games. I do think he forms some attachments to the other participants, but ultimately you see him kill Jung-bae very relentlessly. I think that’s because he has this ultimate goal of making Gi-hun realize his belief in the world is misplaced.

    Why do you think he entered the game?

    When In-ho played the game previously, he had already lost all of his hope. His life was very bare bones. When he entered the game previously, it was even more desperate. Seeing the pit of humanity… I think that even though In-ho’s body is alive, his soul died a long time ago. Because of that, life and death don’t have a lot of meaning for him. 

    The biggest reason for him entering the games again is so he can break Gi-hun’s spirit. At first when Gi-hun returned, he was just going to observe him and see what he does. But then he realizes Gi-hun’s telling the other participants the rules of the game. He’s raising them up, collecting them and giving them power. That’s when he realizes he needs to step up as well.

    Seong Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae) with Park Jung-bae (Lee Seo-hwan) in season two.

    Netflix

    What did you make of the scene where Jung-bae watches In-ho break a fellow player’s neck? Something seriously shifts in the dynamic here.

    When I first received the script, I knew that scene was extremely important and pivotal for my character. Of course, I felt a very complicated set of emotions playing these three characters — the Front Man, In-ho, Young-il — you see moments where all three of these aspects come together. I wanted to express that with the gaze, the gleam in his eye. When Jung-bae sees me commit this murder, he begins to wonder, “Is he really on our team? Is he the guy I’ve been playing with all along?” I think he starts to feel a very strange set of emotions as well. It makes the whole scene so complex. 

    Heading into season three, do you think there’s a chance for some redemption for the Front Man?

    I’m not just saying this because I don’t want to spoil season three. I really mean it: In-ho’s interiority is really hard to know, even as season three progresses. What I’ve taken away in embodying and acting as him in season three, that possibility for change within him always exists.

    ***

    Squid Game season two is now streaming on NetflixRead THR‘s in-depth cover story on the hit show’s return and creator Hwang Dong-hyuk unpacking the season finale. 



    After the explosive success of Squid Game season 1, fans around the world have been eagerly awaiting news of a potential season 2. And while details are still scarce, a recent interview with the rumored villain of Squid Game 2 has shed some light on what we can expect in the upcoming season.

    In the interview, the enigmatic new character, known only as “The Puppet Master,” delves deep into the backstory of the mysterious Front Man from season 1. According to The Puppet Master, the Front Man’s true motives and dark past will be revealed in season 2, as he is forced to confront his own demons and make difficult choices that will have far-reaching consequences.

    “The Front Man is a complex character with a troubled history,” The Puppet Master explains. “In season 2, we will see him grapple with his past actions and the toll they have taken on his soul. As the new mastermind behind the deadly games, he will be forced to confront his own morality and face the consequences of his actions.”

    Fans of Squid Game are sure to be intrigued by this tantalizing glimpse into the upcoming season. With the promise of even more twists, turns, and heart-pounding action, Squid Game 2 is shaping up to be a must-watch event for fans of the hit series. Stay tuned for more updates as we eagerly await the premiere of season 2.

    Tags:

    Squid Game 2, Squid Game Season 3, Squid Game Villain, Squid Game Front Man, Squid Game character analysis, Squid Game theories, Squid Game plot, Squid Game fan theories

    #Squid #Game #Villain #Unpacks #Front #Man #Ahead #Season

  • Whitney Sudler-Smith Unpacks Decision to Cast Ashley Jacobs for “Riveting Television”

    Whitney Sudler-Smith Unpacks Decision to Cast Ashley Jacobs for “Riveting Television”


    Whitney Sudler-Smith has been part of Southern Charm since the very beginning — and he’s actually one of the main reasons why the show exists.

    The South Carolina native, who is Patricia Altschul‘s only child, was the one who got the cameras rolling, and the rest, as they say, is history. In a sit-down for BravoTV.com (video at the top of the post), Whitney opened up about the evolution of the show, and how new personalities would come on the show and refresh the cast dynamic. One alum who Whitney thinks made a considerable impact was Ashley Jacobs.

    What Else Is New on Bravo:

    Southern Charm Alum Ashley Jacobs Welcomes Second Baby: “Our Family Is Complete”

    Patricia Altschul Takes You Inside a Holiday “Extravaganza” at Her House (PHOTOS)

    Craig Conover Reveals a Surprising Potential Career Move: “Paige Thinks I’m Crazy”

    “It’s amazing. We’ve been quite lucky, too. Just when you think someone’s played out, or a storyline is dead or something, something f—–g insane or somebody comes up from out of the darkness,” he said in the clip at the top of this post, while sitting alongside his mother. “Season 5, we were getting stale [and] suddenly out of nowhere comes Ashley. Riveting television.”

    Related: Whitney Sudler-Smith Gives Behind-the-Scenes Look at Southern Charm’s Origin (EXCLUSIVE)

    Ashley appeared as a friend on Season 5 of Southern Charm, and she also popped up as a guest briefly on Season 6.

    Split of Whintey Sudler Smith and Ashley Jacobs

    Split of Whintey Sudler Smith and Ashley Jacobs

    Where is Ashley Jacobs from Southern Charm now?

    The registered nurse’s life looks very different nowadays.She moved back to California after her time on Southern Charm came to an end. She met her now-husband, Mike Appel, at a rooftop party in Santa Barbara in 2019.

    Ashley and Mike got engaged in Park City, Utah in 2021, and they secretly got married that same year. The California resident announced her pregnancy in June 2021, and she gave birth to their first son, Grayson Maxwell, in August of that year.

    Fast-forward to September 2024, and Ashley confirmed her second pregnancy in a chat with People. “I’ve come a long way since my Southern Charm days!!!” Ashley told the outlet. “My husband, son and I are thrilled to announce that we are expecting baby boy #2 in FIVE WEEKS!!! We cannot wait for his arrival and to watch our boys grow up together. Grateful is an understatement!”

    Ashley confirmed the birth of her second son on Instagram in November. “One week with our boys,” she shared on November 10. “Our hearts have never been so full Our family is complete!

    She rang in her 40th birthday just a few weeks later, on December 1. “KISSING MY THIRTIES GOODBYE (But look at what my thirties gave to me!). [40] Photo cred: My wonderful husband,” she wrote in the caption of her post.

    Get the details on Ashley Jacobs’ family life now.





    Whitney Sudler-Smith, creator and star of the hit reality TV show “Southern Charm,” recently made waves with his decision to cast controversial figure Ashley Jacobs for the upcoming season. In a recent interview, Sudler-Smith unpacked his reasoning behind the choice, stating that he believes Jacobs will bring a level of drama and conflict that will make for “riveting television.”

    Sudler-Smith explained that he was drawn to Jacobs’ fiery personality and her ability to stir up emotions among the cast members. He acknowledged that Jacobs has a polarizing effect on viewers, but believes that her presence on the show will spark intense conversations and debates that will keep viewers engaged.

    While some fans may question Sudler-Smith’s decision to include Jacobs in the cast, he remains confident that her addition will elevate the show to new heights. He emphasized that “Southern Charm” is all about capturing the authentic lives and relationships of its cast members, and Jacobs’ presence will undoubtedly add a layer of complexity to the show.

    As the new season of “Southern Charm” approaches, viewers can expect to see sparks fly as Jacobs enters the mix. Whether you love her or hate her, there’s no denying that Jacobs will bring a level of drama and intrigue that will make for must-see television. Stay tuned for what promises to be a wild ride with Ashley Jacobs on “Southern Charm.”

    Tags:

    • Whitney Sudler-Smith
    • Ashley Jacobs
    • Riveting Television
    • Southern Charm
    • Reality TV
    • Bravo TV
    • Casting Decisions
    • TV Drama
    • Entertainment News
    • Celebrity Gossip

    #Whitney #SudlerSmith #Unpacks #Decision #Cast #Ashley #Jacobs #Riveting #Television

Chat Icon