Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Vaccinations
The Quiet Way RFK Jr. Could Curtail Vaccinations
For more than 60 years, vaccination in the United States has been largely shaped by an obscure committee tasked with advising the federal government. In almost every case, the nation’s leaders have accepted in full the group’s advice on who should get vaccines and when. Experts I asked could recall only two exceptions. Following 9/11, the Bush administration expanded the group who’d be given smallpox vaccinations in preparation for the possibility of a bioterrorism attack, and at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, in 2021, the Biden administration added high-risk workers to the groups urged to receive a booster shot. Otherwise, what the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended has effectively become the country’s unified vaccination policy.
This might soon change. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., one of the nation’s most prominent anti-vaccine activists and the likely next secretary of Health and Human Services, has said that he would not “take away” any vaccines. But Kennedy, if confirmed, would have the power to entirely remake ACIP, and he has made clear that he wants to reshape how America approaches immunity. Gregory Poland, the president of the Atria Academy of Science and Medicine and a former ACIP member, told me that if he were out to do just that, one of the first things he’d do is “get rid of or substantially change” the committee.
Over the years, the anti-vaccine movement has vehemently criticized ACIP’s recommendations and accused its members of conflicts of interest. NBC News has reported that, in a 2017 address, Kennedy himself said, “The people who are on ACIP are not public-health advocates … They work for the vaccine industry.” Kennedy has not publicly laid out explicit plans to reshuffle the makeup or charter of ACIP, and his press team did not return a request for comment. But should he repopulate ACIP with members whose views hew closer to his own, those alterations will be a bellwether for this country’s future preparedness—or lack thereof—against the world’s greatest infectious threats.
Before ACIP existed, the task of urging the public to get vaccinated was largely left to professional organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, or ad hoc groups that evaluated one immunization at a time. By the 1960s, though, so many new vaccines had become available that the federal government saw the benefit of establishing a permanent advisory group. Today, the committee includes up to 19 voting members who are experts drawn from fields such as vaccinology, pediatrics, virology, and public health, serving four-year terms. The CDC solicits nominations for new members, but the HHS secretary, who oversees the CDC and numerous other health-related agencies, ultimately selects the committee; the secretary can also remove members at their discretion. The committee “is intended to be a scientific body, not a political body,” Grace Lee, who chaired ACIP through the end of 2023, told me. ACIP’s charter explicitly states that committee members cannot be employed by vaccine manufacturers, and must disclose real and perceived conflicts of interest.
HHS Secretaries typically do not meddle extensively with ACIP membership or its necessarily nerdy deliberations, Jason Schwartz, a vaccine-policy expert at Yale, told me. The committee’s job is to rigorously evaluate vaccine performance and safety, in public view, then use that information to help the CDC make recommendations for how those immunizations should be used. Functionally, that means meeting for hours at a time to pore over bar graphs and pie charts and debate the minutiae of immunization efficacy. Those decisions, though, have major implications for the country’s defense against disease. ACIP is the primary reason the United States has, since the 1990s, had an immunization schedule that physicians across the country treat as a playbook for maintaining the health of both adults and kids, and that states use to guide school vaccine mandates.
The committee’s decisions have, over the years, turned the tide against a slew of diseases. ACIP steered the U.S. toward giving a second dose of the MMR vaccine to children before elementary school, rather than delaying it until early adolescence, in order to optimally protect kids from a trifecta of debilitating viruses. (Measles was declared eliminated in the U.S. in 2000.) The committee spurred the CDC’s recommendation for a Tdap booster during the third trimester of pregnancy, which has guarded newborn babies against whooping cough. It pushed the country to switch to an inactivated polio vaccine at the turn of the millennium, helping to prevent the virus from reestablishing itself in the country.
I reached out to both current ACIP members and the Department of Health and Human Services to ask about Kenndy’s pending influence over the committee. ACIP Chair Helen K. Talbot and other current ACIP members emphasized the group’s importance to keeping the U.S. vaccinated, but declined to comment about politically motivated changes to its membership. The Department of Health and Human Services did not return a request for comment.
Should ACIP end up stacked with experts whose views mirror Kennedy’s, “it’s hard not to imagine our vaccination schedules looking different over the next few years,” Schwartz told me. Altered recommendations might make health-care providers more willing to administer shots to children on a delayed schedule, or hesitate to offer certain shots to families at all. Changes to ACIP could also have consequences for vaccine availability. Pharmaceutical companies might be less motivated to manufacture new shots for diseases that jurisdictions or health-care providers are no longer as eager to vaccinate against. Children on Medicaid receive free vaccines based on an ACIP-generated list, and taking a particular shot off that roster might mean that those kids will no longer receive that immunization at all.
At one extreme, the new administration could, in theory, simply disband the committee altogether, Schwartz told me, and have the government unilaterally lay down the country’s vaccination policies. At another, the CDC director, who has never been beholden to the committee’s advice, could begin ignoring it more often. (Trump’s choice to lead the CDC, the physician and former Florida congressman Dave Weldon, has been a critic of the agency and its vaccine program.) Most likely, though, the nation’s new health leaders will choose to reshape the committee into one whose viewpoints would seem to legitimize their own. The effects of these choices might not be obvious at first, but a committee that has less academic expertise, spends less time digging into scientific data, and is less inclined to recommend any vaccines could, over time, erode America’s defenses—inviting more disease, and more death, all of it preventable.
The Quiet Way RFK Jr. Could Curtail VaccinationsRobert F. Kennedy Jr. is a prominent figure in the anti-vaccination movement, advocating against mandatory vaccines and promoting the idea that vaccines are harmful. While his vocal activism has garnered attention and support from some, there may be a quieter, more subtle way for RFK Jr. to curtail vaccinations.
Instead of spreading misinformation and fear about vaccines, RFK Jr. could use his platform and influence to promote education and awareness about vaccine safety and efficacy. By encouraging open and honest discussions about the benefits of vaccinations and addressing any concerns or doubts people may have, he could help alleviate some of the distrust and skepticism surrounding vaccines.
RFK Jr. could also work to promote the importance of herd immunity and the role that vaccines play in protecting not only individuals, but entire communities from preventable diseases. By emphasizing the collective responsibility we all have to protect the most vulnerable members of society, he could help shift the conversation away from individual rights and towards the greater good.
While RFK Jr. may never fully embrace vaccinations, there are ways he can still make a positive impact on public health by promoting understanding and cooperation rather than fear and division. By taking a quieter, more thoughtful approach, he could help curtail the anti-vaccination movement in a way that is both effective and respectful of differing beliefs.
Tags:
- RFK Jr. vaccination controversy
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. anti-vaxx movement
- Vaccine skepticism in the RFK Jr. community
- RFK Jr. vaccine activism
- The impact of RFK Jr.’s views on vaccinations
- RFK Jr. and public health debate
- RFK Jr. vaccine misinformation
- RFK Jr. and the anti-vaccine movement
- RFK Jr. potential role in vaccination policies
- RFK Jr. vaccination advocacy
#Quiet #RFK #Curtail #Vaccinations
RFK Jr. Sought to Stop Covid Vaccinations 6 Months After Rollout
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to lead the nation’s health agencies, formally asked the Food and Drug Administration to revoke the authorization of all Covid vaccines during a deadly phase of the pandemic when thousands of Americans were still dying every week.
Mr. Kennedy filed a petition with the F.D.A. in May 2021 demanding that officials rescind authorization for the shots and refrain from approving any Covid vaccine in the future.
Just six months earlier, Mr. Trump had declared the Covid vaccines a miracle. At the time Mr. Kennedy filed the petition, half of American adults were receiving their shots. Schools were reopening and churches were filling.
Estimates had begun to show that the rapid rollout of Covid vaccines had already saved about 140,000 lives in the United States.
The petition was filed on behalf of the nonprofit that Mr. Kennedy founded and led, Children’s Health Defense. It claimed that the risks of the vaccines outweighed the benefits and that the vaccines weren’t necessary because good treatments were available, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which had already been deemed ineffective against the virus.
The petition received little notice when it was filed. Mr. Kennedy was then on the fringes of the public health establishment, and the agency denied it within months. Public health experts told about the filing said it was shocking.
John Moore, a professor of immunology at Weill Cornell Medical College, called Mr. Kennedy’s request to the F.D.A. “an appalling error of judgment.” Gregg Gonsalves, an epidemiologist at the Yale School of Public Health, likened having Mr. Kennedy lead the federal health agencies to “putting a flat earther in charge of NASA.”
Dr. Robert Califf, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, described Mr. Kennedy’s effort to halt the use of Covid vaccines as a “massive error.”
Mr. Kennedy’s transition spokeswoman did not respond to requests for comment, but has said recently that he does not want to take vaccines away.
Asked in November by an NBC reporter about his general opposition to Covid vaccines — and whether he would have stopped authorization — Mr. Kennedy said he was concerned that the vaccines did not prevent transmission of the virus.
“I wouldn’t have directly blocked it,” he said. “I would have made sure that we had the best science, and there was no effort to do that at that time.”
Mr. Kennedy’s early opposition to Covid vaccines has alarmed public health experts, many of whom contend that it should disqualify him from overseeing health agencies with the power to authorize, monitor and allocate funding for millions of vaccines each year.
They are also concerned about how he might handle a possible bird flu pandemic, which could necessitate a rapid deployment of vaccines.
As Mr. Kennedy prepares for his confirmation hearings before two Senate committees, he and his allies have insisted that he is not anti-vaccine.
In fact, in mid-2023, he told a House panel that he had taken all recommended vaccines — except for the Covid immunization.
At his confirmation hearings, he’ll most likely face scrutiny of his broader statements on vaccines, including that the polio vaccine cost more lives than it saved.
Mr. Trump has stepped forward in recent weeks to defend Mr. Kennedy after The New York Times reported that one of Mr. Kennedy’s lawyers had previously petitioned the F.D.A. to revoke approval or pause distribution of several polio vaccines over safety concerns.
“I think he’s going to be much less radical than you would think,” Mr. Trump said last month.
After the Times report, Mr. Trump and Mr. Kennedy expressed their support for the polio vaccine.
If confirmed by the Senate as secretary of the Health and Human Services Department, Mr. Kennedy would assume oversight of $8 billion in funding for the Vaccines for Children program and would have the authority to appoint new members to a panel that makes influential vaccine recommendations to states.
At the time Mr. Kennedy challenged the Covid vaccines, some of his objections touched on wider concerns about their rapid development. Emergency-use authorization — a preliminary form of approval — for immunizations was unusual. Others argued that a public health emergency dictated a speedier rollout.
Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health, said it would be reasonable to debate whether Covid vaccines should have been subject to additional study.
But she profoundly disagreed with Mr. Kennedy’s views, saying that “the idea that in early 2021 that you could be saying that people over the age of 65 don’t need Covid vaccines — that’s just nuts.”
Vaccines have rare side effects, and there have been cases of injury from the Covid shots. Government officials weigh the harms against the potential to save lives. An estimate released in early 2024 found that the Covid vaccines and mitigation measures saved about 800,000 lives in the United States.
Another study found that in late 2021 and 2022, Covid death rates among unvaccinated people were 14 times the rates of those who had received a Covid booster shot. Researchers also estimated that from May 2021 through September 2022, more than 230,000 deaths could have been prevented among people who declined initial Covid inoculations.
From the start of the Covid vaccine campaign, Mr. Kennedy’s view that the Covid vaccines were dangerous put him at odds with Mr. Trump, whose Operation Warp Speed to develop the vaccines was one of his policy triumphs. And Mr. Kennedy went on a concerted campaign against the vaccine.
Mr. Kennedy told Louisiana lawmakers in late 2021 that the Covid vaccine was the “deadliest vaccine ever made.”
He has remained a plaintiff in a lawsuit against President Biden and others, contesting efforts by government officials to limit his ability to suggest on social media that Covid vaccines were not safe.
In January 2021, Mr. Kennedy suggested on Facebook that the death of the baseball legend Hank Aaron, 86, was related to a Covid vaccine he had received 17 days earlier. It was “part of a wave of suspicious deaths” following Covid vaccines, he claimed. A doctor who was vaccinated alongside Mr. Aaron and the county medical examiner dismissed the claim.
In May, when Mr. Kennedy petitioned the F.D.A. to “immediately remove Covid vaccines from the market,” he was joined by Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory board and a physician in Maine.
Her medical license was initially suspended on an emergency basis in early 2022 for prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to patients with severe cases of Covid, including one who was intubated, Maine medical board records show.
She later sued the board, claiming that it retaliated against her for exercising her right to free speech. The case is pending.
In 2022, Mr. Kennedy and others filed a lawsuit against the F.D.A. on behalf of Children’s Health Defense and parents who said they were concerned that their children would be given Covid vaccines without their knowledge or consent. The amended lawsuit, filed in July 2022, sought a court order requesting that the agency reconsider granting authorization for Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines for children.
A Texas appeals court dismissed the case in early 2024, concurring with a lower court that the plaintiffs did not face a “concrete or imminent” risk of harm. In June, the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal.
Mr. Kennedy also sent letters to the F.D.A. threatening legal action if vaccine authorizations for children were granted.
Covid vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna for infants and children 6 months to 11 years old remain in use under emergency authorization, according to the F.D.A. Spokesmen for Pfizer and for Moderna said the companies are pursuing full approval for all ages.
Mr. Kennedy claimed in the censorship case that top Biden administration officials had coerced social media platforms to silence him, mostly during the summer of 2021. At the time, vaccine rates were stalling. People who were not vaccinated began to die at higher rates. Some who died were young; their loved ones said they were confused by conflicting messages on social media — or regretted that they had not gotten the vaccine.
Records in the lawsuit outline a briefing that summer with Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary at the time, and Dr. Vivek Murthy, the U.S. surgeon general, both of whom criticized social media companies for allowing the spread of misinformation that was influencing people against vaccination.
“And we can’t wait longer for them to take aggressive action because it’s costing people their lives,” Dr. Murthy said on July 15, 2021.
Mr. Biden expressed outrage the following day, telling reporters that social media companies that hosted vaccine misinformation were “killing people.”
In legal filings, Mr. Kennedy said that he had been named one of the “Disinformation Dozen” by a prominent advocacy group — and that he was one of the people the White House was targeting. Exhibits in the lawsuit show that White House officials leaned on social media companies to take down misinformation.
Within a month, a senior Facebook executive reported to Dr. Murthy that it had removed a number of pages or groups, including Mr. Kennedy’s, court records show.
The Supreme Court dismissed an associated case last summer, and an appeals court dismissed Mr. Kennedy’s case late last year. Lawyers representing Mr. Kennedy and others are still working on obtaining depositions of about 30 people, mostly Biden administration officials.
Sheryl Gay Stolberg and Dylan Freedman contributed reporting.
In a recent turn of events, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has reportedly sought to stop Covid vaccinations just six months after the initial rollout began. This surprising move comes as a shock to many, as Kennedy has been a vocal advocate for vaccine safety in the past.Kennedy, a prominent environmental lawyer and vaccine skeptic, has long been critical of pharmaceutical companies and government vaccine mandates. However, his latest efforts to halt Covid vaccinations have raised eyebrows and drawn criticism from health officials and experts.
While Kennedy has not provided specific details on his reasoning for wanting to stop Covid vaccinations, his track record of questioning vaccine safety and efficacy has led many to speculate on his motives. Some believe that his opposition to Covid vaccines may be driven by unfounded conspiracy theories or a desire to push alternative treatments.
Regardless of his reasons, Kennedy’s latest stance on Covid vaccinations has reignited the debate over vaccine hesitancy and public health measures. With the Delta variant spreading rapidly and cases on the rise, the importance of vaccination as a tool to combat the virus cannot be understated.
As the world continues to grapple with the ongoing pandemic, it is crucial for individuals to rely on trusted sources of information and follow the guidance of healthcare professionals. In the face of misinformation and skepticism, it is more important than ever to prioritize public health and safety.
Tags:
- RFK Jr.
- Covid vaccinations
- Covid-19 vaccine
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
- Stop Covid vaccinations
- Vaccine rollout
- Public health
- Health news
- Vaccination controversy
- Vaccine misinformation
#RFK #Sought #Stop #Covid #Vaccinations #Months #Rollout
Dog Grooming Client Record Book: A Notebook for Organizing Contact Information, Pet Details, Allergies, Vaccinations, and More – Perfect for Pet Groomers and Pet Care Businesses
Price: $6.89
(as of Dec 04,2024 08:49:40 UTC – Details)From the Publisher
ASIN : B0CMPFN7VB
Publisher : Independently published (November 2, 2023)
Language : English
Paperback : 110 pages
Item Weight : 12.2 ounces
Dimensions : 8.5 x 0.25 x 11 inches
Are you a pet groomer or a pet care business looking for a convenient way to keep track of your clients’ information? Look no further than the Dog Grooming Client Record Book!This notebook is specifically designed to help you organize all the important details about your furry clients. From contact information and pet details to allergies, vaccinations, and grooming preferences, this book has everything you need to provide the best care for each and every dog that walks through your door.
With sections for each individual client, you can easily keep track of their grooming history, schedule appointments, and even jot down notes to ensure each grooming session is tailored to their specific needs.
If you want to take your pet grooming business to the next level, the Dog Grooming Client Record Book is the perfect tool to help you stay organized and provide top-notch care for your clients. Get your copy today and see the difference it can make for your business!
#Dog #Grooming #Client #Record #Book #Notebook #Organizing #Contact #Information #Pet #Details #Allergies #Vaccinations #Perfect #Pet #Groomers #Pet #Care #Businesses