Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: verdict
Appeals court upholds $5 million award in sexual abuse verdict against Donald Trump
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s finding in a civil case that Donald Trump sexually abused a columnist in an upscale department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a written opinion upholding the $5 million award that the Manhattan jury granted to E. Jean Carroll for defamation and sexual abuse.
The longtime magazine columnist had testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store’s dressing room.
Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. But he briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial earlier this year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir.
In its ruling, a three-judge panel of the appeals court rejected claims by Trump’s lawyers that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan had made multiple decisions that spoiled the trial, including by permitting two other women who had accused Trump of sexually abusing them to testify.
The judge also had allowed the jury to view the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape in which Trump boasted in 2005 about grabbing women’s genitals because when someone is a star, “you can do anything.”
“We conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings,” the 2nd Circuit said. “Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial.”
In September, both Carroll, 81, and Trump, 78, attended oral arguments by the 2nd Circuit.
Steven Cheung, a Trump spokesperson, said in a statement that Trump was elected by voters who delivered “an overwhelming mandate, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.”
Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer who represented Carroll during the trial and is not related to the judge, said in a statement: “Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision. We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments.”
The first jury found in May 2023 that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. That jury awarded Carroll $5 million.
In January, a second jury awarded Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages for comments Trump had made about her while he was president, finding that they were defamatory. That jury had been instructed by the judge to accept the first jury’s finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. The appeal of that verdict has not yet been heard.
Carroll testified during both trials that her life as an Elle magazine columnist was spoiled by Trump’s public comments, which she said motivated some people to send her death threats and leave her fearful to leave the upstate New York cabin where she lives.
Trump testified for under three minutes at the second trial and was not permitted to challenge conclusions reached by the May 2023 jury. Still, he was animated in the courtroom throughout the two-week trial, and jurors could hear him grumbling about the case.
During appeals arguments in September, Trump lawyer D. John Sauer said testimony from witnesses who recalled Carroll telling them about the 1996 encounter with Trump immediately afterward was improper because the witnesses had “egregious bias” against Trump.
And the attorney said the judge also should have excluded the testimony of the two women who said Trump committed similar acts of sex abuse against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump has denied those allegations too.
The 2nd Circuit wrote: “In each of the three encounters, Mr. Trump engaged in an ordinary conversation with a woman he barely knew, then abruptly lunged at her in a semi-public place and proceeded to kiss and forcefully touch her without her consent. The acts are sufficiently similar to show a pattern.”
It said the “Access Hollywood” tape was “directly corroborative” of the testimony by the women of the pattern of behavior they experienced.
The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done.
In a recent ruling, the appeals court has upheld a $5 million award in a sexual abuse verdict against former President Donald Trump. The case, which dates back to 2019, involved allegations of sexual assault and defamation brought forth by a woman who claimed that Trump had assaulted her at his Mar-a-Lago resort.Despite Trump’s attempts to appeal the verdict, the court ultimately sided with the victim, affirming the $5 million award and holding Trump accountable for his actions. This decision serves as a powerful reminder that no one, regardless of their status or power, is above the law.
The victim’s courage in coming forward and seeking justice has been validated by this ruling, sending a strong message that victims of sexual abuse will be heard and believed. It is a victory for survivors everywhere and a step towards holding perpetrators accountable for their actions.
This ruling also serves as a warning to those in positions of power that they will be held accountable for their actions, no matter how long it takes. Justice has been served in this case, and it is a victory for all those who have been victims of sexual abuse.
Tags:
- Donald Trump sexual abuse case
- Appeals court ruling
- $5 million award upheld
- Sexual abuse verdict
- Donald Trump lawsuit
- Legal victory for accuser
- Court decision on Trump case
- Justice served in abuse case
- Trump’s legal troubles
- Trump’s misconduct allegation
#Appeals #court #upholds #million #award #sexual #abuse #verdict #Donald #Trump
Donald Trump loses appeal against E Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict | E Jean Carroll
A federal appeals court has upheld the $5m verdict against Donald Trump for sexually abusing and defaming the magazine writer E Jean Carroll, dealing a legal setback to the president-elect.
The three-judge panel at the second US circuit court of appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump’s arguments for a new trial, ruling that evidence including testimony from other accusers – as well as the infamous Access Hollywood tape that captured him boasting about how it was normal for him to “grab [women] by the pussy” – was properly admitted.
The May 2023 verdict found Trump liable for sexually assaulting Carroll in a New York department store dressing room in about 1996, 20 years before winning his first presidency, though the jury stopped short of calling the case a rape. The verdict included $2.02m for sexual assault and $2.98m for defaming Carroll in an October 2022 social media post where he called her allegations a “hoax”.
The appeals court said testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct – the businesswoman Jessica Leeds as well as the former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff – helped establish “a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct” that aligned with Carroll’s allegations.
“Mr Trump’s statements in the [Access Hollywood] tape, together with the testimony of Ms Leeds and Ms Stoynoff, establish a repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct consistent with what Ms Carroll alleged,” the opinion stated.
The ruling follows a separate $83.3m defamation verdict that Carroll won against Trump in January over his 2019 denials of her allegations. Trump is appealing that verdict.
Trump has consistently denied all allegations, claiming he never met Carroll and that she was “not my type”.
The case is expected to continue even after Trump takes office for his second presidency on 20 January 2025, as the US supreme court ruled unanimously in 1997 that sitting presidents have no immunity from civil litigation over actions predating their official duties.
In a major blow to former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has rejected his appeal to dismiss E Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against him. Carroll, a prominent writer and journalist, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s.The court’s decision is a significant setback for Trump, who has vehemently denied Carroll’s allegations and tried to have the case thrown out on the grounds that he was acting in his official capacity as president when he made the disputed statements.
Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, hailed the ruling as a victory for survivors of sexual assault. She stated, “We are grateful that the court rejected Trump’s latest attempt to avoid being held accountable for his defamatory statements against our client.”
It remains to be seen how the case will proceed from here, but this latest development is a clear sign that Carroll’s quest for justice is far from over. Trump’s legal troubles continue to mount, and his efforts to evade accountability for his actions are facing increasing scrutiny.
Tags:
- Donald Trump
- E Jean Carroll
- Sexual abuse
- Verdict
- Appeal
- Lawsuit
- Court ruling
- Legal case
- President
- Politics
#Donald #Trump #loses #appeal #Jean #Carroll #sexual #abuse #verdict #Jean #Carroll
Donald Trump verdict in E. Jean Carroll case upheld
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s finding in a civil case that Donald Trump sexually abused a columnist in an upscale department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a written opinion upholding the $5 million award that the Manhattan jury granted to E. Jean Carroll for defamation and sexual abuse.
The longtime magazine columnist had testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store’s dressing room.
Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. But he briefly testified at a followup trial earlier this year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir.
In a recent court ruling, the verdict in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against former President Donald Trump has been upheld. Carroll, a writer and columnist, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s and filed a lawsuit after he denied the allegations and called her a liar.The judge’s decision to uphold the verdict is a significant victory for Carroll and a blow to Trump, who has been embroiled in numerous legal battles since leaving office. The ruling reaffirms the importance of holding powerful individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their status or political affiliations.
While Trump has vowed to continue fighting the case, this latest development is a step towards justice for Carroll and a reminder that no one is above the law. Stay tuned for further updates on this ongoing legal battle.
Tags:
- Donald Trump
- E. Jean Carroll
- Verdict upheld
- Donald Trump lawsuit
- E. Jean Carroll case
- Sexual assault allegations
- Legal ruling
- President of the United States
- Court decision
- Justice system.
#Donald #Trump #verdict #Jean #Carroll #case #upheld
Appeals court rejects Trump’s attempt to overturn E. Jean Carroll verdict
A federal appeals court on Monday rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn a jury’s verdict last year that found he sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s.
The Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided “Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings” and “has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial.”
The jury in the civil case held Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a dressing room at a Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in the mid-1990s, and determined that, in 2022, he made defamatory statements about her. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.
A different jury, in a separate civil trial, ordered Trump to pay Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist, $83 million in damages. Trump’s appeal of that verdict is pending.
In the first trial, Trump claimed District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan erred by allowing two women, Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff, to testify about Trump’s alleged sexually assaults of them. Trump has denied the claims of those two women.
Trump also faulted Kaplan’s decision to allow part of the now-infamous “Access Hollywood” tape into evidence. In the 2005 recording, Trump is heard describing to then-Access Hollywood host Billy Bush how he kissed and grabbed women without first obtaining their consent.
President-elect Donald Trump delivers remarks at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, Dec. 16, 2024.
Evan Vucci/AP
The appellate court, in Monday’s opinion, decided the tape was admissible “as evidence of a pattern” of alleged behavior by Trump.
“The jury could have reasonably concluded from those statements that, in the past, Mr. Trump had kissed women without their consent and then proceeded to touch their genitalia,” the opinion said.
Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, hailed Monday’s decision.
“Both E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision,” Kaplan said in a statement. “We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments.”
ABC News’ Olivia Rubin contributed to this report.
In a recent decision, the appeals court has rejected former President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the verdict in the defamation case brought against him by author E. Jean Carroll. Carroll had accused Trump of raping her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s, a claim he vehemently denied.The appeals court ruled that Trump’s statements about Carroll were made in his official capacity as President and therefore he cannot be held personally liable for defamation. This decision is seen as a blow to Carroll and a victory for Trump, who has been embroiled in numerous legal battles since leaving office.
Carroll’s attorney has vowed to continue fighting for justice for his client, stating that they will explore all legal options available to them. The case has reignited the debate over the limits of presidential immunity and the accountability of public officials for their actions.
Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.
Tags:
- Trump lawsuit
- E. Jean Carroll case
- Court ruling
- Legal news
- Trump legal battle
- E. Jean Carroll lawsuit
- Appeal court decision
- Verdict overturned
- President Trump lawsuit
- E. Jean Carroll defamation case
#Appeals #court #rejects #Trumps #attempt #overturn #Jean #Carroll #verdict
Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5 million defamation verdict
Writer E. Jean Carroll arrives at the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where former U.S. President Donald Trump will arrive to ask a federal appeals court to overturn a $5 million jury verdict finding him liable for sexually assaulting and defaming her, who accused Trump of raping her nearly three decades ago, in Manhattan, New York, U.S., September 6, 2024.
Adam Gray | Reuters
A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
A unanimous three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump’s argument that the trial judge made mistakes in letting jurors hear evidence about the Republican’s alleged past sexual misconduct, making the trial and verdict unfair.
The court said that evidence, including Trump bragging about his sexual prowess on an “Access Hollywood” video that surfaced during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, established a “repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct” consistent with Carroll’s allegations.
“Taking the record as a whole and considering the strength of Ms. Carroll’s case, we are not persuaded that any claimed error or combination of errors in the district court’s evidentiary rulings affected Mr. Trump’s substantial rights,” the court said in an unsigned decision.
Lawyers for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for Carroll did not immediately respond to similar requests.
The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll, now 81, said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll’s claim as a hoax.
Though jurors in federal court in Manhattan did not find that Trump, 78, committed rape, they awarded the former Elle magazine advice columnist $2.02 million for sexual assault and $2.98 million for defamation.
A different jury ordered Trump in January to pay Carroll $83.3 million for defaming her and damaging her reputation in June 2019, when he first denied her rape claim.
In both denials, Trump said he did not know Carroll, she was “not my type,” and that she fabricated the rape claim to promote her memoir. He is appealing the $83.3 million verdict.
Evidence showed a ‘pattern’
Carroll’s cases are continuing despite Trump’s having won a second four-year White House term on Nov. 5.
In 1997, in a case involving former President Bill Clinton, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that sitting presidents have no immunity from civil litigation in federal court over actions predating and unrelated to their official duties as president.
Trump’s lawyers argued the $5 million verdict should be thrown out because the trial judge, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, should not have let jurors hear testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct.
One, businesswoman Jessica Leeds, said Trump groped her on a plane in the late 1970s. The other, former People magazine writer, Natasha Stoynoff, said Trump forcibly kissed her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005.
Trump’s lawyers also said the trial judge should not have let jurors watch the 2005 “Access Hollywood” video, where Trump boasted graphically about forcing himself on women.
But the court said that in each of these encounters, “Mr. Trump engaged in an ordinary conversation with a woman he barely knew, then abruptly lunged at her in a semi-public place and proceeded to kiss and forcefully touch her without her consent.”
It said this was “relevant to show a pattern tending to directly corroborate witness testimony and to confirm that the alleged sexual assault [of Carroll] actually occurred.”
The court also rejected Trump’s claim that Kaplan should have allowed evidence that a prominent Democratic critic, billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, funded Carroll’s case, saying it had “little probative value.” Carroll is also a Democrat.
Kaplan also oversaw the trial that ended with the $83.3 million verdict.
In a recent development, former President Donald Trump has lost his appeal of E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million defamation verdict. Carroll, a writer and former advice columnist, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the mid-1990s. In response, Trump denied the allegations and called Carroll a liar, leading her to file a defamation lawsuit against him.The initial verdict in Carroll’s favor was handed down in 2020, with the judge ruling that Trump’s statements were not protected by the presidency and therefore constituted defamation. Trump’s appeal was based on the argument that his statements were made in his official capacity as president, but the court ultimately rejected this claim.
This decision is a significant blow to Trump, who has faced multiple legal challenges since leaving office. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of holding public figures accountable for their words and actions, especially when they have the potential to harm others. Carroll’s victory is not only a win for her personally, but also for all survivors of sexual assault who deserve to have their voices heard and believed.
Tags:
- Trump defamation lawsuit
- E. Jean Carroll verdict
- Trump legal appeal
- E. Jean Carroll defamation case
- $5 million verdict
- Trump court ruling
- E. Jean Carroll lawsuit update
- Trump defamation trial
- E. Jean Carroll defamation lawsuit
- Trump legal battle
#Trump #loses #appeal #Jean #Carroll #million #defamation #verdict
Appeals court upholds $5 million E. Jean Carroll verdict against Trump
A federal appeals court has upheld writer E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million civil judgment against President-elect Donald Trump.
A jury had awarded Carroll the sum in 2023 after finding Trump liable for sexual abusing her in the 1990s and then defaming her after she went public with her allegations.
Trump has denied the allegations and appealed the verdict, charging it was “grossly excessive” and should be tossed because of what he claimed were unfair rulings from the judge who presided over the 9-day trial.
A panel of 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges disagreed.
“We conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings. Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial,” their ruling said.
Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump, said in response to the ruling, “The American People have re-elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.”
Carroll attorney Roberta Kaplan said she and her client “are gratified by today’s decision. We thank the Second Circuit for its careful consideration of the parties’ arguments.”
In a recent development, the appeals court has upheld the $5 million verdict against former President Donald Trump in the defamation case filed by writer E. Jean Carroll. The court ruled in favor of Carroll, stating that Trump’s statements denying the allegations of sexual assault were not protected by the presidency.Carroll accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. In response, Trump denied the allegations, calling Carroll a liar and claiming he had never met her. Carroll then filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, seeking damages for his statements.
The appeals court’s decision to uphold the $5 million verdict is a significant victory for Carroll and a blow to Trump. It sends a strong message that false and defamatory statements made by public figures, including former presidents, will not be tolerated.
This ruling serves as a reminder that no one is above the law, and that individuals who make defamatory statements will be held accountable for their actions. Carroll’s victory in this case is a win for all survivors of sexual assault and a step towards justice and accountability.
Tags:
- Appeals court ruling
- E. Jean Carroll lawsuit
- Trump defamation case
- $5 million verdict
- Legal battle updates
- Political news
- Court decision analysis
- Trump’s legal troubles
- Media coverage
- Public figure lawsuits
#Appeals #court #upholds #million #Jean #Carroll #verdict #Trump