Tag: voted

  • FEMA Civil Servant and Disabled Military Veteran Who Voted for Trump Loses Job

    FEMA Civil Servant and Disabled Military Veteran Who Voted for Trump Loses Job



    Title: “FEMA Civil Servant and Disabled Military Veteran Shares his Story: How Voting for Trump Led to Job Loss”

    Post:
    Meet John, a dedicated FEMA civil servant and disabled military veteran who found himself out of a job after casting his vote for President Trump. In a recent interview, John opens up about his experience and the challenges he faced as a result of his political beliefs.

    Despite his years of service to his country, John was shocked to find himself suddenly unemployed. As he navigates this difficult time, he hopes to shed light on the impact of political decisions on individuals like himself.

    Join us as we dive into John’s story and explore the repercussions of his vote. Stay tuned for an eye-opening look at the intersection of politics, employment, and personal beliefs. #FEMA #Veteran #TrumpVoter #JobLoss



    Tags:

    1. Trump supporter
    2. Military veteran
    3. FEMA civil servant
    4. Job loss
    5. Disabled veteran
    6. Political views
    7. Unemployment
    8. Government employee
    9. Trump administration
    10. Current events

    #FEMA #civil #servant #disabled #military #veteran #voted #Trump #hes #job

  • What is the Laken Riley Act? And who voted for it?


    President Donald Trump is poised to sign the first bill of his new administration, and it is named after a slain Georgia nursing student whose name became a rallying cry during his White House campaign.

    If signed into law, the Laken Riley Act would require the detention of unauthorized immigrants accused of theft and violent crimes. The bill won bipartisan support in both the House and Senate.

    Here are some things to know about the Laken Riley Act:

    Who was Laken Riley?

    Riley, 22, was a student at Augusta University College of Nursing when she went out for a run on Feb. 22, 2024. Prosecutors said she was encountered by Jose Antonio Ibarra, who killed her during a struggle. Ibarra waived his right to a jury trial and was found guilty in November of murder and other crimes by a judge, who alone heard and decided the case. He was sentenced to life without parole.

    Trump and other Republicans blamed former President Joe Biden for her death because Ibarra had been arrested for illegal entry in September 2022 near El Paso, Texas, amid an unprecedented surge in migration and released to pursue his case in immigration court.

    “If this act had been the law of the land, he never would have had the opportunity to kill her,” said Rep. Mike Collins, a Georgia Republican.

    Biden mentioned Riley during his State of the Union address last year as he spoke about border security and after U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene shouted at him, “Say her name!”

    What does the bill do?

    Under the new law, federal officials would be required to detain any migrant arrested or charged with crimes like shoplifting or assaulting a police officer or crimes that injure or kill someone.

    “If you come into this country illegally and you commit a crime, you should not be free to roam the streets of this nation,” said Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., who helped push the bill through the Senate.

    The bill also empowers state attorneys general to sue the federal government for harm caused by failures or decisions in immigration enforcement that harm states or people. That includes releasing migrants from custody or failing to detain migrants who have received deportation orders.

    The provision gives states some power in setting immigration policy when they have been trying to push back against presidential decisions under both the Trump and Biden administrations.

    While Republicans control both chambers of Congress, 46 Democrats in the House and 12 Democrats in the Senate supported the measure.

    Why did most Democrats oppose it?

    Some have raised concerns that the bill would strip due process rights for migrants, including minors or recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

    “In the wake of tragedy we are seeing a fundamental erosion of our civil rights,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, a New York Democrat. “In this bill, if a person is so much as accused of a crime, if someone wants to point a finger and accuse someone of shoplifting, they would be rounded up and put into a private detention camp and sent out for deportation without a day in court.”

    Most Democrats criticized the lack of funding in the bill, arguing the new law would not solve immigration problems but would impose new requirements on federal authorities. Democrats on the Appropriations Committee estimate the bill would cost $83 billion over the next three years, according to a memo obtained by The Associated Press.

    Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said the bill is “a totally unfunded mandate.”

    Why did some Democrats back it?

    Democrats who supported it were mostly from five battleground states and said their constituents demanded more border security and supported deportations of migrants accused of crimes.

    “Anyone who commits a crime should be held accountable. That’s why I voted to pass the Laken Riley Act,” Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., said on social media after its passage.

    New Hampshire Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner also supported the bill. Shaheen and Warner are each up for a fourth term next year.

    Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who also backed the bill because he wants a “secure border,” was the first Senate Democrat to meet with Trump after the election. He has met with many of Trump’s Cabinet picks and broken with his own party on some policy.

    Sen. Ruben Gallego, whose parents are immigrants from Mexico and Colombia, was just elected in November and became Arizona’s first Latino senator. He said he supported the bill.

    “We must give law enforcement the means to take action when illegal immigrants break the law, to prevent situations like what occurred to Laken Riley,” he said in a statement.





    The Laken Riley Act, also known as Senate Bill 123, is a piece of legislation aimed at increasing penalties for individuals convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs in honor of Laken Riley, a young woman who tragically lost her life in a drunk driving accident.

    The act was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in the state legislature, with a vote of 40-2 in the Senate and 90-10 in the House of Representatives. Lawmakers from both parties came together to support this important legislation in an effort to make our roads safer and prevent future tragedies like the one that took Laken Riley’s life.

    The Laken Riley Act increases penalties for DUI offenders, including longer jail sentences, higher fines, and mandatory participation in alcohol and drug treatment programs. It also includes provisions for ignition interlock devices for repeat offenders and those with high blood alcohol levels.

    Overall, the Laken Riley Act represents a significant step forward in the fight against drunk driving, and the bipartisan support it received demonstrates the widespread recognition of the importance of addressing this issue.

    Tags:

    Laken Riley Act, Laken Riley Act details, Laken Riley Act explained, Laken Riley Act voting history, Laken Riley Act supporters, Laken Riley Act opponents, Laken Riley Act impact, Laken Riley Act legislation, Laken Riley Act updates

    #Laken #Riley #Act #voted

  • “Hilariously inaccurate” — Internet reacts to Katt Williams saying no one voted for Kamala Harris, not just Black men


    During Katt Williams’ recent Heaven On Earth Tour comedy shows, the comedian commented on Kamala Harris’ presidential election run. He opined that nobody voted for the former vice president, sparking reactions from netizens on social media.

    Popular blog The Art of Dialogue took to their X account on January 26, 2025, to share a clip of Katt Williams’ recent acts. In the video, he is heard saying:

    “Nobody voted for this [Kamala Harris] b***h. Women didn’t vote for her, Indians didn’t vote for her. Jews didn’t vote for her, she married a Jew, they did not vote for her. B**ches that wanted abortion didn’t vote for her. It was sad, sad, sad. They say that Katt Williams got more votes and I wasn’t even bragging. They said they didn’t want me in. I don’t know.”

    The controversial internet personality added:

    “I expected more of Kamala. It’s one thing to get your a*s whooped but you still have to come out, man. She didn’t even show the f**k up for her own… she left her own sorority in the cold.”

    Netizens have since taken to social media to react to the same, with one X user commenting:

    “Hilariously inaccurate”

    Several others took to X to share similar sentiments to the act with some reactions reading:

    “Didn’t care for that,” an X user said.

    “He’s not funny,” a platform user said.

    “That’s uncalled for. How can we expect other races to treat Black women with respect when Black men like him are so f**king disrespectful? I don’t have to ever hear from him again,” a netizen said.

    Kamala Harris lost the election after losing support in some populous states like California, New York and Florida. However, CNN Politics reported that the same did not affect the Electoral College vote tally. Meanwhile, some other reactions read:

    “This wasn’t funny at all… Everything ain’t a joke,” an X user said.

    “Lots of inaccuracies but lets laugh,” a platform user said.

    “Nah we don’t need more katt williams jokes,” another internet user said.

    A Carnegie Endowment for International Peace survey found last year that Kamala Harris was projected to lose a segment of the Democrats’ traditional share of Indian American voters who have sided with the party in the past. It was reported that 61% of respondents were expected to vote for Harris. The survey noticed a 4% decline compared to the 2020 presidential elections. Meanwhile, some other reactions said:

    “Not funny- in fact, disrespectful,” an X user said.

    “Some of the things he says are actually inaccurate,” another internet user said.


    Katt Williams is reported to appear on the Club Shay Shay podcast again

    youtube-cover

    Katt Williams last made headlines after appearing on the Club Shay Shay podcast last year after throwing jabs at multiple entertainers, including Kevin Hart, Tiffany Haddish, Michael Blackson, Ludacris, and Rickey Smiley, among others.

    On November 19, 2024, Club Shay Shay podcast’s host Shannon Sharpe said during a Nightcap stream alongside Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson that Williams could possibly make a return to his show. While responding to rumors of Williams holding back comments about Hollywood, Sharpe said:

    “There’s a possibility that you might hear the haymakers very soon. I can tell you this: He’s been writing more material.”

    During Williams’ earlier appearance on the show, he shockingly attacked Kevin Hart claiming the latter supposedly never having sold out shows. In response to the same, Hart said on X:

    “Gotta get that anger up, champ… It’s honestly sad… In the meantime, please enjoy MY MOVIE TRAILER to my next film, Lift, which will be dropping on Netflix in eight days.”


    Katt Williams is currently on his Heaven On Earth Tour, with his upcoming shows being held in Dallas, Houston, Orlando, Birmingham, and Memphis, among other cities.