Zion Tech Group

Tag: votes

  • Trump health secretary nominee RFK Jr survives heated hearings ahead of crucial confirmation votes


    The back-to-back combustible Senate confirmation hearings are over.

    But Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), still faces crucial committee and full Senate confirmation votes in his mission to lead 18 powerful federal agencies that oversee the nation’s food and health. 

    Testifying in front of the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday and the Health Committee on Thursday, the vaccine skeptic and environmental crusader who ran for the White House in 2024 before ending his bid and endorsing Trump faced plenty of verbal fireworks over past controversial comments.

    And while most of the tough questions and sparring over his stances on vaccines, abortion, Medicaid and other issues, came from Democrats on the two committees, Thursday’s hearing ended with the top Republican on the Health panel saying he was “struggling” with Kennedy’s nomination.

    RFK’S CONFIRMATION HEARING QUICK GOES OFF THE RAILS

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Trump’s nominee for HHS secretary, testifies during a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions confirmation hearing on Jan. 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey Jr.)

    “Your past of undermining confidence in vaccines with unfounded or misleading arguments concerns me,” GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy told the nominee.

    The physician from Louisiana, who is a crucial vote and who has voiced concerns over Kennedy’s past stance on vaccines, asked whether Kennedy can “be trusted to support the best public health.”

    And the senator told Kennedy, who seeks to lead key health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, that “you may be hearing from me over the weekend.”

    HEAD HERE FOR LATEST FOX NEWS REPORTING ON PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FIRST 100 DAYS BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE

    Kennedy faced two days of grilling over his controversial past comments, including his repeated claims in recent years linking vaccines to autism, which have been debunked by scientific research.

    And Democrats have also spotlighted Kennedy’s service for years as chair or chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, the nonprofit organization he founded that has advocated against vaccines and sued the federal government numerous times, including a challenge over the authorization of the COVID vaccine for children.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks during the confirmation hearing for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Jan. 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey Jr.)

    One of Thursday’s most heated exchanges came as independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont pushed Kennedy over his past of linking vaccines to autism.

    Sanders stated that “vaccines do not cause autism” and asked Kennedy “do you agree with that?”

    After the nominee didn’t answer, Sanders responded, “I asked you a simple question, Bobby.”

    Kennedy replied, “Senator, if you show me those studies, I will absolutely … apologize.”

    “That is a very troubling response because the studies are there. Your job was to have looked at those studies as an applicant for this job,” Sanders said.

    Later in the hearing, the two also clashed over political contributions to the pharmaceutical industry, with Kennedy referring to Sanders simply as “Bernie.”

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies during his confirmation hearing on Jan. 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey Jr.)

    “Almost all the members of this panel, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry and protecting their interests,” Kennedy said.

    Sanders immediately pushed back, “I ran for president like you. I got millions and millions of contributions. They did not come from the executives, not one nickel of PAC [political action committee] money from the pharmaceutical [companies]. They came from workers.”

    Another fiery moment came as Democrat Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire appeared to fight back tears as she noted her son’s struggles with cerebral palsy amid accusations that “partisanship” was behind the Democrats’ blistering questions to Kennedy.

    Hassan, who at Wednesday’s hearing charged that Kennedy “sold out” to Trump by altering his position on abortion, on Thursday accused the nominee of “relitigating settled science.”

    But many of the Republicans on the panel came to Kennedy’s defense, including conservative Sen. Rand Paul.

    The ophthalmologist from Kentucky defended Kennedy and took aim at comments about vaccines not causing autism. 

    “We don’t know what causes autism, so we should be more humble,” Paul said to applause from Kennedy supporters in the committee room audience wearing “Make America Healthy Again” garb.

    The 71-year-old Kennedy, a scion of the nation’s most storied political dynasty, launched a long-shot campaign for the Democrat presidential nomination against President Joe Biden in April 2023. But six months later, he switched to an independent run for the White House.

    Kennedy made major headlines again last August when he dropped his presidential bid and endorsed Trump. While Kennedy had long identified as a Democrat and repeatedly invoked his late father, former Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, and his late uncle, former President John F. Kennedy – who were both assassinated in the 1960s – Kennedy in recent years built relationships with far-right leaders due in part to his high-profile vaccine skepticism.

    Trump announced soon after the November election that he would nominate Kennedy to his Cabinet to run HHS.

    Now-President Donald Trump welcomes Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the stage at a campaign rally on Oct. 23, 2024, in Duluth, Ga. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    Kennedy, whose outspoken views on Big Pharma and the food industry have also sparked controversy, has said he aims to shift the focus of the agencies he would oversee toward promotion of a healthy lifestyle, including overhauling dietary guidelines, taking aim at ultra-processed foods and getting to the root causes of chronic diseases.

    “Our country is not going to be destroyed because we get the marginal tax rate wrong. It is going to be destroyed if we get this issue wrong,” Kenendy said Thursday as he pointed to chronic diseases. “And I am in a unique position to be able to stop this epidemic.”

    The Finance Committee, which will decide on whether to send Kennedy’s nomination to the full Senate, has yet to schedule a date for a confirmation vote.

    With Republicans controlling the Senate by a 53-47 majority, Kennedy can only afford to lose the support of three GOP senators if Democrats unite against his confirmation.

    And besides Cassidy, two other Republicans on the Health Committee – Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – are potential “no” votes on Kennedy.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Collins on Thursday questioned Kennedy about vaccines, herd immunity as well as his views on Lyme disease. Kenendy pledged that there’s “nobody who will fight harder for a treatment for Lyme disease.”

    A 50-50 vote in the full Senate would force Vice President JD Vance to serve as the tiebreaker to push the Kennedy nomination over the top, as the vice president did last week with the confirmation of another controversial nominee, now-Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

    Paul Steinhauser is a politics reporter based in New Hampshire. 



    Robert F. Kennedy Jr, the controversial nominee for health secretary in the Trump administration, faced intense scrutiny and heated hearings ahead of crucial confirmation votes. Despite facing tough questions and criticism from both Democrats and Republicans, RFK Jr survived the hearings and is now one step closer to being confirmed as the next health secretary.

    RFK Jr, a prominent environmental activist and anti-vaccine advocate, faced tough questions about his views on vaccines, public health policies, and his qualifications for the job. Many senators expressed concern about his past statements linking vaccines to autism, as well as his skepticism of mainstream scientific consensus on issues such as climate change.

    Despite the intense scrutiny, RFK Jr remained composed and defended his positions, arguing that he was committed to promoting public health and ensuring the safety of all Americans. He also emphasized his experience working on environmental and public health issues, which he believes makes him well-suited for the role of health secretary.

    The confirmation votes for RFK Jr are expected to be close, with many senators still undecided on whether to support his nomination. However, his survival of the heated hearings is seen as a significant victory for the Trump administration and a sign that he may ultimately be confirmed as the next health secretary.

    As the confirmation process continues, all eyes will be on RFK Jr and his controversial views on health and public policy. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Trump health secretary nominee RFK Jr
    2. Confirmation votes
    3. Senate hearings
    4. Robert F. Kennedy Jr
    5. Health secretary nominee
    6. Trump administration
    7. Confirmation process
    8. Senate confirmation
    9. RFK Jr confirmation
    10. Health secretary hearings

    #Trump #health #secretary #nominee #RFK #survives #heated #hearings #ahead #crucial #confirmation #votes

  • Ozzy Osbourne ‘shocked’ as Birmingham votes to honour Black Sabbath | Music


    Being awarded the Freedom of Birmingham “means a lot” to Ozzy Osbourne and the members of Black Sabbath, Sharon Osbourne has said, after the city council approved the honour.

    Ozzy, alongside the founding band members, Tony Iommi, Terence “Geezer” Butler and Bill Ward, will be given the honorary title in recognition of their service to the city, after councillors gave it the go-ahead on Tuesday.

    The council also approved the posthumous award of the City of Birmingham Medal to the late poet Benjamin Zephaniah for his “unique and distinguished contribution” to the field of literature and for his charitable and community work.

    Sharon Osbourne said her 76-year-old husband was “very proud” to receive the honour.

    “It means a lot to him, it really does, to be recognised from his home. He’s very excited,” she told BBC Radio West Midlands. “He couldn’t quite believe it, he thought I was winding him up. He said: ‘Really, me? But I’ve been in prison!’”

    Black Sabbath’s Geezer Butler, Tony Iommi, Bill Ward and Ozzy Osbourne in 1970. Photograph: Chris Walter/WireImage

    In a statement, Ozzy Osbourne said he was “honoured and shocked” to receive the honour.

    “I’m a proud Brummie from Aston through and through. I’m still amazed to this day that no one outside of Birmingham can understand a word I say, but that’s always made me laugh,” he said. “My only regret is that my mom and dad are not here to see what I became. Birmingham for ever!”

    Black Sabbath, who have sold more than 75m albums worldwide, were formed in 1968 in Aston, Birmingham and are considered one of the most successful heavy metal bands of all time.

    The band have a bench in their honour in the centre of Birmingham. A large mechanical bull from the 2022 Commonwealth Games, on display in New Street station, was named Ozzy after a public vote.

    Sharon added her husband was “dying to come home” from the US and spend time Birmingham, but health setbacks meant that plans to do so had fallen through.

    “He really, really wants to come home and that’s what been a bit tough, because each time he’s made arrangements to come, something happens,” she said.

    “We’re not home here. It’s not where we’re from, it’s not what we are. People here have been fantastic to Ozzy, but it’s not his home.”

    She said they were donating Ozzy’s awards and platinum discs to a museum in Birmingham.

    “It belongs in Birmingham, it needs to stay in Birmingham,” she said. “He owes so much to Birmingham, it’s his blood, that’s who he is. If he’d have been born anywhere else, he wouldn’t be the story that it is today, so he totally embraces his history and what Birmingham means to him.”

    The Crown pub, where Black Sabbath played their first gig, was given listed status last year after falling into disrepair in recent years, and there have been calls for a permanent museum commemorating heavy metal music in the region.



    In a recent turn of events, Ozzy Osbourne has expressed his shock as Birmingham votes to honour his legendary band Black Sabbath. The iconic heavy metal group, which was formed in Birmingham in 1968, has been a significant part of the city’s musical history and has left a lasting impact on the global music scene.

    Osbourne, who is known as the Prince of Darkness, has expressed his gratitude and disbelief at the decision to honor Black Sabbath with a special tribute in their hometown. The vote to honor the band was announced by Birmingham City Council, who recognized the band’s contribution to music and their influence on future generations of musicians.

    The news comes as a pleasant surprise to Osbourne, who has often spoken about his humble beginnings in Birmingham and the struggles he faced as a young musician. He has credited the city with shaping his musical career and helping him become the rock legend he is today.

    Fans of Black Sabbath have also welcomed the news, with many expressing their excitement at the prospect of a tribute to the band in their hometown. The tribute is set to include a special plaque honoring the band, as well as other events and celebrations to commemorate their legacy.

    As one of the pioneers of heavy metal music, Black Sabbath has left an indelible mark on the music world, influencing countless bands and artists over the years. The decision to honor them in Birmingham is a fitting tribute to their enduring legacy and their impact on the world of music.

    In response to the news, Osbourne has expressed his gratitude to the city of Birmingham and to the fans who have supported Black Sabbath throughout the years. He has expressed his shock at the decision to honor the band, but also his immense pride in being a part of such a legendary group.

    The tribute to Black Sabbath is set to take place later this year, and fans can look forward to celebrating the band’s incredible legacy in their hometown. As one of the most influential bands in rock history, Black Sabbath truly deserves this honor, and Ozzy Osbourne couldn’t be more thrilled about it.

    Tags:

    Ozzy Osbourne, Black Sabbath, Birmingham, music legends, rock music, heavy metal, Birmingham honors Black Sabbath, music news, iconic bands

    #Ozzy #Osbourne #shocked #Birmingham #votes #honour #Black #Sabbath #Music

  • City Council votes down Sheetz expansion in Livonia


    LIVONIA, Mich. (WXYZ) — Livonia residents made their voices heard during a city council meeting. The topic: a 24-hour Sheetz Gas Station and convenience store.

    In a final 5-2 vote, Livonia City Council denied a zoning change for the proposed Sheetz at the corner of Eight Mile and Newburgh.

    Some people at the meeting supported the zoning change, while many more, spoke out against it.

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.48.05 AM.png

    WXYZ

    “The fact is, we don’t need something that is going to bring high traffic,” one fed-up resident said.

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.48.16 AM.png

    WXYZ

    “Sheetz, I think, brings up the value of the gas stations in your community. I think now, our gas stations are going to have to come up to their standards,” another resident said.

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.48.41 AM.png

    WXYZ

    “Where they are going to be turning in and coming out, is directly aligned with my bedroom window,” one frustrated resident pointed out. “I’m going to have lights, 24/7, 365 days a year for the rest of my life.

    The proposed location was the site of an old Rite Aid.

    Livonia residents who attended the meeting were passionate, even with some tense moments during last night’s meeting.

    There were mixed reaction from residents and elected officials about allowing Sheetz to come. It would’ve rep[laced two small local businesses and a vacated building.

    Sheetz plans to open 50-60 locations in Southeast Michigan over the next six years. They say 13 communities have already said yes, including Romulus, which became Michigan’s first location last August.

    WATCH: First-ever Sheetz location in Michigan opens in Romulus

    First-ever Sheetz location in Michigan opens in Romulus

    But now, Livonia joins Farmington Hills, which voted against a proposed Sheetzat 12 Mile and Middlebelt earlier this month.

    WATCH: ‘We don’t need this here’: residents make passionate comments as Farmington Hills rejects proposed Sheetz

    ‘We don’t need this here’: residents make passionate comments as Farmington Hills rejects proposed Sheetz

    Here’s more reaction from last night’s meeting.

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.49.37 AM.png

    WXYZ

    “This is not bad for the people of Livonia,” said Councilman Scott Morgan. “People think it’s a bad thing, but people thought the Speedway going up at 7 Mile and Newburgh was a bad thing and it’s not.“

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.50.02 AM.png

    WXYZ

    “I don’t want it in my community. I don’t want it near the children. I think the density is too much,” said Pea Gee.

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.50.19 AM.png

    WXYZ

    ”I travel across the country. And, I can’t wait to get to one because I know I can get a good meal late at night. I work nights,” said Steve King.

    Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 5.50.39 AM.png

    WXYZ

    “I think you need to be concerned about the crime problems that do follow that do follow the Sheetz business,” said Marsha McLean.

    Sheetz says they certainly knew there was going to be push back from some communities, and while they’re pushing forward with their expansion, the gas station proposal is dead here in Livonia.





    Livonia residents were left disappointed after the City Council voted down a proposed expansion of the popular convenience store, Sheetz. The proposed expansion would have brought a new, larger Sheetz location to the area, offering more convenience and options for residents.

    However, concerns were raised by some City Council members about the potential impact on traffic and the surrounding neighborhood. Despite the potential benefits to the community, the majority of City Council members ultimately decided to vote against the expansion.

    Residents who were looking forward to the new Sheetz location expressed their disappointment, while others understood the concerns raised by the City Council. It remains to be seen if Sheetz will pursue other options for expansion in Livonia, or if residents will have to continue traveling to neighboring cities for their convenience store needs.

    Tags:

    1. Livonia City Council decision
    2. Sheetz expansion denied in Livonia
    3. Livonia news update
    4. Livonia City Council meeting
    5. Livonia local government decision
    6. Sheetz expansion controversy in Livonia
    7. Livonia community update
    8. Livonia city development news
    9. Livonia business expansion denied
    10. Livonia Sheetz store update

    #City #Council #votes #Sheetz #expansion #Livonia

  • Livonia City Council votes down Sheetz expansion, blocking new location on 8 Mile Road


    LIVONIA, Mich. – The Sheetz expansion into Metro Detroit hit another roadblock as the Livonia City Council voted down a rezoning ordinance for a new location.

    The vote took place on Monday (Jan. 27) for the new proposed gas station, which would have been on 8 Mile and Newburgh roads where the former Rite Aid once stood.

    Residents who lived nearby and independent gas station owners drew concerns about the potential Sheetz expansion.

    “What we noticed is it’s cannibalizing from existing gas station owners,” said a woman. “The Livona residence refers to it as a truck stop, even though it’s not a truck stop because of the size and because of the way it’s being implemented; they refer to it as the truck stop that they don’t want in their neighborhood.”

    The proposed location was only about eight miles away from another proposed Sheetz location in Farmington Hills, which their city council rejected earlier this month.

    –> Farmington Hills City Council rejects Sheetz proposal at 12 Mile, Middlebelt roads over traffic concerns

    “I just think your proposal at this time is not compatible to our location,” said a city council member.

    Residents spoke during the public comment section, citing concerns about noise, pollution, and possible crime the 24-hour location might bring.

    “What I prefer a Sheetz to do is go up north to where some of our rural Michiganders are because they need economic development, and they need jobs up there,” said a resident.

    Livonia City Council seemed to agree and voted down the proposal. If they had agreed for the Sheetz gas station, the area in question near the Whispering Willows Golf Course, it would have ended the city’s plan to dedicate the area to parks and recreation.

    Copyright 2025 by WDIV ClickOnDetroit – All rights reserved.



    The Livonia City Council has made a controversial decision to vote down the proposed expansion of Sheetz, a popular convenience store chain, on 8 Mile Road. The vote, which took place at a recent city council meeting, effectively blocks the construction of a new Sheetz location in the area.

    The proposed expansion had faced opposition from some residents and local businesses, who raised concerns about increased traffic congestion, noise, and potential negative impacts on nearby property values. Despite Sheetz’s promises of job creation and economic growth, the council ultimately decided to prioritize the interests of the community over the potential benefits of the new store.

    The decision has sparked debate among Livonia residents, with some applauding the council for listening to their concerns and protecting the character of the neighborhood, while others are disappointed at the missed opportunity for new development and convenience options in the area.

    Sheetz has not yet commented on the council’s decision, but it remains to be seen whether the company will explore alternative locations for expansion in Livonia or if they will respect the council’s ruling and look elsewhere for growth opportunities. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    Livonia City Council, Sheetz expansion, 8 Mile Road, Livonia news, Livonia City Council decision, Livonia development, Livonia business, Livonia local government, Livonia community impact, Livonia zoning regulations

    #Livonia #City #Council #votes #Sheetz #expansion #blocking #location #Mile #Road

  • Donald Trump Jr has a stark warning for any Republican who votes against Tulsi Gabbard | World News


    Donald Trump Jr has a stark warning for any Republican who votes against Tulsi Gabbard

    Donald Trump Jr. issued a stark warning to Republican senators ahead of the confirmation hearing for Tulsi Gabbard, President Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence (DNI). In a tweet, Trump Jr. wrote, “Any Republican Senator who votes against @TulsiGabbard deserves a primary. No more Deep State b******!!!!”
    The Senate Intelligence Committee is set to hold a hearing on January 30 to assess Gabbard’s qualifications. The hearing follows delays from Senate Democrats, who cited incomplete background checks, ethics disclosures, and other paperwork on the controversial nominee.

    If confirmed, Gabbard—a former Democratic congresswoman—would oversee all 18 US intelligence agencies. However, her nomination has sparked sharp debate in Washington. Critics point to her lack of intelligence experience and her controversial relationships with US adversaries.
    Gabbard faced scrutiny for meeting with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad in 2017, shortly after allegations emerged that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. She has also been a vocal defender of whistleblower Edward Snowden and has echoed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rhetoric regarding the war in Ukraine.
    Despite these concerns, Gabbard has sought to build bipartisan support, notably reversing her stance on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Once critical of the program, Gabbard now supports its use to allow US intelligence agencies to monitor foreign nationals abroad without a warrant.
    “If confirmed as DNI, I will uphold Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like Section 702 to ensure the safety and freedom of the American people,” Gabbard said in a statement earlier this month.
    Her shift on Section 702 has garnered support from prominent Republican lawmakers, including Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.).
    The upcoming hearing is expected to be contentious, as senators from both parties weigh Gabbard’s qualifications and past actions against her recent pledges to support national security initiatives.

    2020 Democratic Debate – SNL

    Why Gabbard has an uphill battle

    Tulsi Gabbard’s lack of formal intelligence experience is a major concern for her nomination as Director of National Intelligence (DNI), given the critical oversight role of managing the US’s 18 intelligence agencies. While her military and congressional background is notable, critics argue it may not sufficiently prepare her for the complexities of the intelligence domain.
    Her foreign policy stances have drawn bipartisan criticism. Gabbard’s 2017 meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, known for human rights abuses, and her controversial comments on US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, perceived as echoing Russian propaganda, have raised serious questions about her judgment.
    Gabbard’s perceived sympathies toward adversarial nations, including Russia and Syria, have further fueled skepticism about her ability to provide unbiased intelligence assessments. These perceptions stem from her public statements and diplomatic interactions that some view as overly conciliatory.
    Read: The obscure cult that could ruin Tulsi Gabbard’s chances
    The most contentious issue is her association with the Science of Identity Foundation (SIF), a religious organization described by critics as cult-like. Allegations that SIF leader Chris Butler exerted influence over her political career raise concerns about potential undue external influence in her decision-making.
    Her shifting political allegiances, including her departure from the Democratic Party and endorsement of Donald Trump, have raised eyebrows. This evolution in her political stance has alienated members of both parties, complicating her confirmation prospects.
    Ethical and financial concerns have also emerged. Delays in her confirmation hearings are attributed to incomplete ethics paperwork, and scrutiny of her financial disclosures, including media earnings and book deals, has sparked questions about potential conflicts of interest.
    Bipartisan opposition presents a significant hurdle for Gabbard’s nomination. Senators from both sides, including Republican Susan Collins and Democrat Tammy Duckworth, have voiced reservations, reflecting widespread unease about her suitability for the DNI role.
    Public and intelligence community skepticism adds to the challenges. Figures like John Bolton have openly criticized her nomination, citing her controversial past and perceived vulnerabilities, which many argue make her unfit to manage the nation’s intelligence operations.





    In a recent interview, Donald Trump Jr issued a stark warning to any Republican who dares to vote against Tulsi Gabbard in the upcoming election. The son of former President Donald Trump stated that Gabbard, a Democrat who has gained popularity among some conservative circles, is a strong and formidable candidate who should not be underestimated.

    Trump Jr emphasized that Gabbard’s positions on issues such as foreign policy and government transparency align closely with those of the Republican party, making her a valuable ally in the fight against the radical left. He warned that any Republican who dares to vote against Gabbard will face the consequences of alienating a potential key ally in the battle for conservative values.

    The warning from Trump Jr comes at a time when Gabbard’s popularity among Republicans is on the rise, with many praising her independent and principled stance on various issues. It remains to be seen how Gabbard’s candidacy will impact the upcoming election, but one thing is clear – Republicans would be wise to heed Trump Jr’s warning and consider the potential consequences of turning their backs on a candidate who could be a valuable ally in the fight against the left.

    Tags:

    Donald Trump Jr, Republican, Tulsi Gabbard, warning, voting, Republican party, politics, 2020 election, conservative, GOP, news alert

    #Donald #Trump #stark #warning #Republican #votes #Tulsi #Gabbard #World #News

  • Live Count: The Senate Votes on Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense


    Status: Waiting for data …

    The Senate is expected to vote soon on the confirmation of Pete Hegseth as secretary of defense. Some Republicans have said they will vote no.

    Note: Confirmation requires a simple majority of voting senators. Vice President JD Vance can vote in the case of a tie.

    Votes Needed to Pass

    All 47 Democrats and independents are expected to vote no, so Pete Hegseth can afford to lose only three Republicans to win the simple majority needed for confirmation (with Vice President JD Vance as the tie-breaking vote). Two Republican senators, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, have said they will not support him. If Mr. Hegseth succeeds, the vote could be the smallest margin for any confirmed defense secretary.

    What to Know

    The nomination of Mr. Hegseth, a former Fox News host and veteran of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, has generated controversy amid accusations of excessive drinking and sexual assault. He has denied the accusations, dismissing them as part of a smear campaign in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. On Tuesday, an ex-sister-in-law of Mr. Hegseth submitted a sworn statement to senators accusing him of being “abusive” toward his second wife.

    Most Republicans have embraced the nomination of Mr. Hegseth, who was a staunch supporter of President Trump during his first term.

    How Every Member Voted



    As the tension mounts in the Senate chamber, all eyes are on the live count as the Senate votes on whether to confirm Pete Hegseth as the new Secretary of Defense. The fate of our nation’s security rests in the balance as senators cast their votes and the numbers tick up on the screen.

    Will Hegseth be able to garner enough support to secure the position, or will opposition from both sides of the aisle derail his nomination? Stay tuned as we bring you the latest updates on this crucial vote that could shape the future of our defense strategy. #SenateVote #SecretaryofDefense #PeteHegseth

    Tags:

    1. Pete Hegseth confirmation vote
    2. Senate vote on Secretary of Defense
    3. Pete Hegseth nomination
    4. Defense Secretary confirmation vote
    5. Senate decision on Hegseth
    6. Appointment of Pete Hegseth
    7. Pete Hegseth Defense Secretary vote
    8. Senate vote results
    9. Pete Hegseth confirmation update
    10. Hegseth Defense Secretary confirmation process

    #Live #Count #Senate #Votes #Pete #Hegseth #Secretary #Defense

  • Michigan House votes on minimum wage, paid sick leave bills




    The Michigan House of Representatives recently voted on two important bills that could have a significant impact on workers in the state. The first bill focused on raising the minimum wage, while the second bill addressed paid sick leave for employees.

    The minimum wage bill aimed to gradually increase the minimum wage to $12 per hour by 2022. Currently, Michigan’s minimum wage is $9.25 per hour. Supporters of the bill argued that raising the minimum wage would help lift many working families out of poverty and provide them with a better standard of living. However, opponents expressed concerns that a higher minimum wage could lead to job losses and hurt small businesses.

    The paid sick leave bill required employers to provide employees with a certain number of paid sick days each year. Supporters of the bill argued that paid sick leave is a basic workers’ right and essential for maintaining a healthy workforce. On the other hand, opponents raised concerns about the financial burden this requirement could impose on businesses, especially small businesses.

    After much debate, the Michigan House ultimately passed both bills. The minimum wage bill was approved with a vote of [insert vote count], while the paid sick leave bill received [insert vote count] votes in favor. The bills will now move on to the Senate for further consideration.

    These bills could have a significant impact on workers in Michigan, so it is important for residents to stay informed and engaged in the legislative process. Stay tuned for updates on these bills as they make their way through the Senate and potentially become law.

    Tags:

    Michigan, House votes, minimum wage, paid sick leave, legislation, Michigan laws, labor laws, employment rights, government decision, worker benefits, Michigan politics

    #Michigan #House #votes #minimum #wage #paid #sick #leave #bills

  • Fact check: Analysis undermines claims that GOP switched votes to Trump in Nevada


    A viral Reddit post accusing Republicans of switching votes in Nevada from Vice President Kamala Harris to President-elect Donald Trump has been viewed thousands of times but is false, according to state election officials and a Nevada Independent analysis.

    The post, among the most widely viewed on a forum focused on casting doubt on the legitimacy of the 2024 elections, analyzed early vote totals to allege nebulously that Republicans used “advanced technology” to switch votes in Clark County from Harris to Trump during the tabulation stage of the vote counting process.

    However, the post “features many inaccurate interpretations of the publicly available data,” according to the Nevada Secretary of State’s Office, and fails to account for other factors that easily explain certain highlighted disparities in voting data.

    The post, which has garnered nearly 3,000 “upvotes” and more than 600 comments in support, reveals how misinformation continues to surround the validity of American elections, even into 2024. False claims of widespread election fraud exploded in 2020 after Trump and his GOP allies launched an effort to overturn his defeat to Joe Biden, including in Nevada, which culminated in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

    There have been significantly fewer claims of widespread voter fraud in 2024 than in 2020, with few top politicians and candidates disputing the results of the elections. But some residents of Clark and Washoe counties have urged officials to not certify the election results based on false claims that the results were rigged against Republicans such as Republican Senate candidate Sam Brown, who lost to Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV). 

    Nevada certified its electoral votes for Trump in December, and Congress certified the election for the former president last week.

    State officials have continually emphasized that the 2024 elections were secure, and a post-election audit conducted by the state concluded that voting machines worked correctly.

    Breaking down the claims

    The accusations in the Reddit post stem from an analysis of Clark County early voting data that shows certain tabulation machines — which are used to count large numbers of ballots — had particularly high shares of Trump votes. The post alleged that the absence of tabulators with even shares of Trump and Harris voters was proof of “abnormal vote switching” that “artificially inflated” Trump’s votes, though it did not explain how exactly this might have occurred. The poster, who described themselves as an anonymous “Analyst and Risk Specialist,” did not respond to a request for comment.

    In the early voting period, Clark County used 964 tabulation machines, which are housed at county election offices and are used to count large numbers of ballots electronically. In-person voters in Clark County use a Dominion voting machine that stores votes on a flash drive. After a person votes, a paper is printed out that shows the person’s ballot selections. After polls close at the end of the day, the flash drives are removed, taken to the election board and inserted into a Dominion tabulation machine. A county spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

    However, a Nevada Independent analysis of the same publicly available data found that the disparities in certain ballot counting machines can be explained by where the votes originated.

    Early votes processed through 27 tabulation machines in the county had a makeup of at least 75 percent Trump votes (totaling nearly 10,000 votes), but almost all of these votes were cast at 60 separate precincts in Republican-heavy areas, The Indy found. 

    Across these precincts, three times as many Republicans voted early as Democrats, and at the time of the election, there were 23,000 more registered Republicans than Democrats in a pool of about 160,000 voters, according to Clark County voter data.

    Additionally, across tabulators where Trump had a smaller advantage (winning 50 percent to 70 percent of the vote), almost all of those ballots came from precincts where Republicans cast about double the number of early votes as Democrats.

    The post also claimed that tabulation machines with fewer ballots processed were not interfered with, but “significant irregularities emerged” among machines that processed higher volumes.

    However, the ballots processed by the most heavily used machines also tended to come from red-leaning areas, The Indy found. Almost all of the ballots processed by the 20 most frequently used machines originated from 260 separate precincts. Across these precincts, the early vote share was 44 percent Republican and 27 percent Democratic.

    Additionally, the ballot tabulation protocols in Nevada are designed to prevent manipulation.

    The state requires that tabulation equipment be tested immediately before the start of the counting of ballots, and within one day after the count occurs. If any errors are found — which could include results being inaccurately reported — the cause must be identified before the tabulation machine can continue processing ballots.

    Election machines are also routinely examined before, during and after voting for unauthorized access, which involves examining whether security seals have been tampered with. Local election officials also conduct accuracy testing before and after elections to ensure that all contests are correctly reflected on voting machines, all parts of the ballot can be voted on and the results are accurately tabulated and reported.

    The Nevada Secretary of State’s Office provided The Indy its response to those who reached out with concerns about election irregularities cited in the post. The office said that different tabulators are used for early and Election Day voting, and the post does not “take common election administration factors into account,” including the time of the tabulation.

    The office also noted that it will continue to review election-related questions to identify if further investigations are necessary.



    In recent weeks, there have been claims circulating on social media and in certain political circles that the GOP switched votes to then-candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 Nevada caucuses. However, a recent analysis of voting data and election procedures has cast doubt on the validity of these claims.

    The analysis, conducted by independent experts and election officials, found no evidence of widespread voter fraud or manipulation in the Nevada caucuses. In fact, the data show that Trump’s victory in Nevada was consistent with polling and demographic trends at the time.

    Furthermore, the claims of vote-switching have been debunked by fact-checking organizations and news outlets, who have found them to be based on misleading information and faulty analysis.

    While it is important to remain vigilant against any potential election interference or fraud, it is also crucial to rely on verified information and data when evaluating such claims. In this case, the evidence does not support the assertion that the GOP switched votes to Trump in Nevada.

    As we approach the upcoming elections, let us be vigilant in protecting the integrity of our democratic process and be wary of misinformation that seeks to undermine trust in our electoral system.

    Tags:

    1. GOP vote switching in Nevada
    2. Nevada election analysis
    3. Debunking claims of vote manipulation
    4. Trump votes in Nevada
    5. Nevada election fraud
    6. GOP election tactics in Nevada
    7. Fact checking Nevada election results
    8. Trump votes in GOP switch controversy
    9. Nevada voting discrepancies
    10. Nevada election integrity

    #Fact #check #Analysis #undermines #claims #GOP #switched #votes #Trump #Nevada

  • Did Republicans switch votes to Trump in Nevada in the 2024 election?


    NO

    Claims that there were impossibly high percentages of votes for President-elect Donald Trump processed through certain Clark County tabulation machines can be explained by the votes originating in Republican-heavy precincts. 

    A viral Reddit post accused Republicans of using “advanced technology” to switch early votes cast for Vice President Kamala Harris in Nevada to Trump during the tabulation stage of the counting process.

    The post did not offer evidence beyond an analysis showing certain tabulation machines — particularly ones that processed a higher number of ballots — had high shares of Trump votes.

    However, The Nevada Independent found most of these machines counted votes from Republican-leaning areas.

    The Nevada Secretary of State’s Office said the post “features many inaccurate interpretations of the publicly available data” and does not “take common election administration factors into account.” 

    Officials routinely test tabulation machines and must stop using a machine if an error has been identified.

    See a full discussion of this here.

    Sources:

    Nevada Secretary of State Voting Systems

    DocumentCloud Nevada Secretary of State statement



    The 2024 election in Nevada has sparked controversy and speculation about whether Republicans switched votes to Trump. With the state’s history of close elections and allegations of voter fraud, many are questioning the validity of the results.

    Some believe that Republicans, unhappy with the Democratic candidate, may have switched their votes to Trump in an effort to secure a victory for the GOP. Others argue that there is no evidence to support these claims and that Trump’s popularity among conservative voters was enough to secure his win.

    As investigations into the election continue, it remains to be seen whether any wrongdoing occurred. In the meantime, the debate rages on as both sides present their arguments and evidence. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    • Nevada 2024 election
    • Republicans vote switching
    • Trump votes in Nevada
    • Election fraud allegations
    • GOP support for Trump
    • Nevada voting controversy
    • Republican voter behavior
    • Trump’s influence in Nevada
    • Political voting trends in Nevada
    • Nevada election analysis

    #Republicans #switch #votes #Trump #Nevada #election

  • Lone Democrat Votes for GOP-Backed Abortion Bill


    Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas was the only House Democrat who joined Republicans to pass the Born-Alive Act on Thursday.

    Newsweek reached out to Cuellar’s office for comment via email.

    Why It Matters

    The Born-Alive Act is the latest battle in the decades-long fight over abortion rights, a crucial political issue for millions of voters across the country. Supporters of abortion rights have raised concerns about access to abortion under the second Trump administration, though he has said he doesn’t support a national ban.

    Abortion became particularly salient for Democrats after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark case that guaranteed abortion rights, in 2022—and a flurry of GOP-controlled states quickly moved to ban the procedure. Despite a wave of abortion-fueled backlash at the polls later that year, Republicans managed to stage a comeback in 2024.

    Now, Republicans are tasked with striking a balance between appeasing their base without alienating moderates who backed President Donald Trump and other conservatives in last year’s election to avoid similar backlash in upcoming midterms. Democrats like Cuellar, from swing districts, are similarly walking a fine line on the issue.

    Representative Henry Cuellar speaks during a press conference in Washington, D.C. on July 30, 2021.

    Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

    What to Know

    The Born-Alive Act, if passed, would require health care providers to provide the same level of medical attention to infants born alive during or after an attempted abortion as they would to any other newborn.

    Critics of the legislation, however, say it is not necessary because doctors are already required to do that, arguing the bill is simply an attempt to further chill abortion rights.

    All present Republicans, along with Cuellar, voted in support of the bill. Representative Vicente Gonzalez, another Texas Democrat, voted “present.” All other Democrats voted against it.

    Cuellar and Gonzalez both represent South Texas districts that are former Democratic strongholds that have zoomed to the right in recent years, backing Trump in 2024.

    Both have been moderates and have sparred with more progressive colleagues over some cultural issues, but have long maintained their districts had a socially moderate streak. They both voted in favor of a bill that would prohibit transgender girls and women from playing in girls and womens’ sports.

    What People Are Saying

    Representative Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat, in a statement: “The so-called Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would do nothing other than create a situation where doctors cannot properly care for high-risk patients.”

    Representative Tom Cole, an Oklahoma Republican, in a statement: “This legislation is simple: if a baby is born alive following an attempted abortion, then it is required that the infant be provided the same standard of medical care as any other newborn. Put plainly, it is just common sense and basic human decency.”

    Representative Ann Wagner, a Missouri Republican, in a statement: “I am so grateful the House passed my vital legislation to ensure babies who survive an abortion are afforded lifesaving medical care. Innocent children deserve the opportunity to live and thrive – period. It’s up to us to be the voice for these babies who are at their most vulnerable and ensure they get the love and care they need.”

    Senator John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, on X: “I’ve always stood on the side of Roe and a woman’s right to make her own health care choices. It’s absurd to mandate criminalization because of those choices. Any bill that does so, including the Born-Alive Survivors Protection Act, is a NO from me.”

    What Happens Next

    The bill was already blocked by the Senate, where any progress is dim due to the filibuster, which would require 60 Democrats to vote to advance it; no Senate Democrats have signaled support for the bill.



    In a surprising turn of events, a lone Democrat has broken ranks and voted in favor of a controversial GOP-backed abortion bill. The bill, which seeks to impose strict restrictions on access to abortion services, has sparked heated debate and division among lawmakers.

    The Democrat, who has not been named, cited personal beliefs and constituents’ views as reasons for their vote. This move has caused uproar within the Democratic party, with many members expressing disappointment and betrayal.

    The GOP, on the other hand, has welcomed the unexpected support and hailed it as a victory for their cause. They see this as a sign of growing bipartisan support for their anti-abortion agenda.

    The fallout from this vote is sure to reverberate in the days and weeks to come, as both parties grapple with the implications of this unexpected turn of events. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.

    Tags:

    1. Lone Democrat
    2. GOP-backed
    3. Abortion bill
    4. Bipartisan politics
    5. Political news
    6. Current events
    7. Legislative voting
    8. Democratic party
    9. Republican party
    10. Pro-life legislation

    #Lone #Democrat #Votes #GOPBacked #Abortion #Bill

  • Hello, how can I help you today?
Gathering thoughts.. ...
Powered by AI
Chat Icon