Zion Tech Group

Tag: Whistleblowers

  • Suchir Balaji’s family demand outside investigation into OpenAI whistleblower’s death


    Suchir Balaji was a former OpenAI engineer and whistleblower who died in November 2024 (AP)

    Suchir Balaji was a former OpenAI engineer and whistleblower who died in November 2024 (AP)

    The family of an OpenAI whistleblower have called for his death to be reinvestigated after it was ruled to be a suicide.

    Suchir Balaji, 26, a former OpenAI engineer who helped train the artificial intelligence systems behind ChatGPT and later said he believed those practices violated copyright law was found dead just days before he was called to be a witness in a case, his family said.

    Balaji was found dead in his San Francisco apartment on November 26 in what police said “appeared to be a suicide. No evidence of foul play was found during the initial investigation.”

    The city’s chief medical examiner’s office confirmed the manner of death to be suicide but a congressman has now backed calls for an FBI investigation into the death.

    His parents Poornima Ramarao and Balaji Ramamurthy said they are still seeking answers, describing their son as a “happy, smart and brave young man” who loved to hike and recently returned from a trip with friends.

    In a new interview with KTVU, Ramarao insisted there were things out of place in his “ransacked” apartment where his body was found four days before he was due to be called as a witness to the OpenAI case.

    “The pin drive is missing. His computer was messed up. His desktop was left on for three days. It’s messed up”, she added.

    They claim he was called as a witness for a copyright case against OpenAI four days before his death.

     (Fox/Family Handout) (Fox/Family Handout)

    (Fox/Family Handout)

    “You can see how happy he is. We want the world to see his happy mood just before his death,” said Ramarao.

    She added that there was some “sign of struggle in the bathroom and looks like someone hit him in the bathroom based on blood spots.”

    Ramarao says the family will conduct an independent autopsy after attention was drawn to the case by Tesla billionaire Elon Musk who posted an interview with Ms Ramarao labelling the case “extremely concerning”.

    On December 29, Musk posted: “This doesn’t seem like a suicide”.

    Congressman Ro Khanna backed the family’s calls for an investigation after being texted live on air by Conservative firebrand Tucker Carlson as he interviewed Balaji’s family.

    Poornima Ramarao and Balaji Ramamurthy said they are still seeking answers (Fox News)Poornima Ramarao and Balaji Ramamurthy said they are still seeking answers (Fox News)

    Poornima Ramarao and Balaji Ramamurthy said they are still seeking answers (Fox News)

    Khanna said: “My heart breaks for Suchir Balaji’s family and his mother, Poornima Ramarao, who I spoke to yesterday. It is a tragic loss. I trust that the appropriate federal law enforcement agencies will conduct an investigation.

    “Let them investigate and bring it out, rather than speculating about something. We want the truth to come out and a report from the authorities as to what could be the reason for his death,” said Ms Ramarao.

    Suchir first raised his concerns around OpenAI with The New York Times, which reported them in an October profile of Balaji.

    He later told The Associated Press he would “try to testify” in the strongest copyright infringement cases and considered a lawsuit brought by The New York Times last year to be the “most serious.” Times lawyers named him in a Nov. 18 court filing as someone who might have “unique and relevant documents” supporting allegations of OpenAI’s willful copyright infringement.

    He said gradually grew more disillusioned with OpenAI, especially after the internal turmoil that led its board of directors to fire and then rehire CEO Sam Altman last year.

    This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988.



    The sudden and tragic death of OpenAI whistleblower, Suchir Balaji, has left his family devastated and demanding answers. Balaji’s family has expressed their disbelief and suspicion surrounding the circumstances of his death, and are now calling for an outside investigation to uncover the truth.

    Balaji, a former employee of OpenAI, made headlines earlier this year when he blew the whistle on the company’s unethical practices and lack of transparency. He raised concerns about the misuse of artificial intelligence technology and the potential harm it could cause to society.

    However, just weeks after coming forward with his allegations, Balaji was found dead in his home. The official cause of death has been ruled as suicide, but his family refuses to accept this explanation. They believe that there may be more to the story and are demanding a thorough investigation by an independent body.

    In a statement released by Balaji’s family, they said, “We cannot simply accept that Suchir took his own life. There are too many unanswered questions and inconsistencies surrounding his death. We need an outside investigation to get to the truth and uncover any possible foul play.”

    As the controversy surrounding OpenAI and Balaji’s death continues to unfold, it is clear that there are still many questions that need to be answered. The call for an outside investigation by his family may be the only way to bring closure and justice to this heartbreaking situation.

    Tags:

    Suchir Balaji, OpenAI whistleblower, investigation, family demand, outside investigation, death, AI technology, ethics, tech industry, artificial intelligence, controversial, transparency, accountability, justice

    #Suchir #Balajis #family #demand #investigation #OpenAI #whistleblowers #death

  • Opinion | Trump Takes on Whistle-Blowers


    In 2019, we represented an anonymous whistle-blower from the American intelligence community whose disclosures about President Trump’s attempt to coerce President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine led to his first impeachment. Our goals as lawyers were simple: to ensure that the truth came out and our client was safe from retaliation.

    We worked within an inspector general system created by Congress to conduct independent investigations of malfeasance within government, one of the institutional guardrails put in place a half century ago in the wake of the Watergate scandal.

    Even then, there were signs during our case that those guardrails were beginning to fracture under Mr. Trump’s sway. The White House’s attacks on our client, and on us, undermined an important system of checks and balances. President Trump subsequently dismissed five inspectors general, including the watchdog for the intelligence community, who had fulfilled his lawful obligations to protect our client at his own peril.

    President Trump has now returned to the White House office far more knowledgeable about the inner workings of the government, with a list of grievances he is working through expeditiously.

    On Friday night, in a bloodletting reminiscent of the Saturday Night Massacre, in which Richard Nixon ordered the dismissal of the Watergate special prosecutor and accepted the resignations of the attorney general and his deputy, Mr. Trump fired as many as 17 inspectors general. This action has sowed distrust and turmoil within the inspector general system and unfortunately has called into question the pathways that whistle-blowers will have available to them.

    Congress created the inspector general posts in 1978 to allow for independent audits and investigations of government departments to guard against waste, fraud and abuse. The president has the power to appoint inspector generals in the major departments with Senate consent, and to fire them. But in this case, Mr. Trump terminated them without first giving Congress 30 days notice, nor, as he is required to do under a 2022 law, providing a “substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” for the dismissals. It was a direct challenge not only to the system but to Congress.

    The inspectors general he fired included many he appointed in his first term, and who, as customary, remained on the job during the Biden administration. The most reasonable explanation for Mr. Trump’s action is that he is seeking to install loyalists, which would knock the guardrails against government malfeasance clattering to the ground.

    This should not have come as a surprise. Well over a year before Mr. Trump was sworn into office for his second term, he issued a video in which he vowed to upend the inspector general system as part of his effort to “dismantle the deep state and reclaim our democracy from Washington corruption.” If the firings hold up, they will give Mr. Trump carte blanche to install watchdogs faithful solely to him, not to the Constitution.

    For many decades, the inspector general system has helped to ensure that government officials and agencies are held accountable within the bounds of the law. There has not been such a purge since Ronald Reagan fired 16 inspectors general on his first day in office in 1981. He then invited them to reapply for their jobs “in competition with other applicants” and subsequently reappointed five. Since then, inspector generals have kept their posts when a new president takes office, in deference to the nonpartisan nature of the jobs.

    In recent years, inspectors general have found, among other things, that the F.B.I. mishandled allegations of sexual abuse by the former U.S.A. Gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar and that billions in pandemic-related unemployment insurance funds were paid out improperly. The scope of their work is reflected in a report to Congress for the 2023 fiscal year that pointed to 2,200 audits, inspection and evaluation reports that year and 4,300 successful prosecutions.

    Independent inspectors general provide a safe channel for whistle-blowers, whose complaints often include the raw material needed for audits, inspections and investigations. Without those whistle-blowers, it would be nearly impossible for the inspectors general to learn about problems as they arise and address them.

    That, though, is the new reality that Mr. Trump and his policy advisers appear to want, and it is scaring federal employees and government contractors who know they are now being held to a new standard of loyalty, not legality. People who might previously have considered blowing the whistle are going to have to think much more carefully now, not least because they may no longer have a safe avenue through their inspector general office.

    We hope Congress will take on Mr. Trump to assure the continued viability of the inspector general system. Outspoken supporters for whistle-blower protection and government transparency, such as Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa, and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, should push their fellow lawmakers to intervene. With Congress controlled by Mr. Trump’s own Republican Party, we are not optimistic. Those of us who have worked within government systems of accountability and pursued whistle-blower cases are now trying to develop alternative paths of disclosure.

    The voices of whistle-blowers must continue to be heard. And if the federal government will no longer provide them a haven, then private and nonprofit legal groups must step up to protect them in every way possible.

    Mark S. Zaid is a lawyer who focuses on national security, speech and government accountability. Andrew P. Bakaj is the chief legal counsel for the nonprofit group Whistleblower Aid. He previously served in the offices of two inspectors general.

    The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

    Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.





    Opinion | Trump Takes on Whistle-Blowers

    In recent weeks, President Trump has taken a strong stance against whistle-blowers, particularly those who have come forward with allegations regarding his administration’s actions. While some may argue that whistle-blowers are important for exposing wrongdoing and holding those in power accountable, others believe that these individuals may have ulterior motives and should not be trusted.

    It is important to consider the implications of President Trump’s approach to whistle-blowers. By dismissing their claims and attacking their credibility, he may be sending a message that those who speak out against him will face backlash and scrutiny. This could have a chilling effect on potential whistle-blowers, who may fear retribution for coming forward with valuable information.

    On the other hand, some may argue that whistle-blowers should be subjected to scrutiny and skepticism, as their claims can have far-reaching consequences. It is important to carefully evaluate the evidence presented by whistle-blowers and consider their motivations before jumping to conclusions.

    Ultimately, the debate over whistle-blowers and their role in our society is a complex one. It is important to strike a balance between protecting those who come forward with valuable information and ensuring that their claims are thoroughly investigated. President Trump’s stance on whistle-blowers may have far-reaching implications for how future cases are handled, and it is important for the public to stay informed and engaged on this issue.

    Tags:

    1. Trump administration
    2. Whistle-blowers
    3. Politics
    4. Government transparency
    5. Trump presidency
    6. National security
    7. Whistle-blower protection
    8. Whistle-blower allegations
    9. Government accountability
    10. Trump controversy

    #Opinion #Trump #Takes #WhistleBlowers

  • Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower’s Inside Story of How Big Da…

    Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower’s Inside Story of How Big Da…



    Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower’s Inside Story of How Big Da…

    Price : 4.59

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower’s Inside Story of How Big Data Manipulates Elections and Minds

    In this post, we delve into the explosive revelations brought forth by Christopher Wylie, the former Cambridge Analytica employee turned whistleblower, who exposed the company’s unethical practices of harvesting data from millions of Facebook users to manipulate elections and public opinion.

    Wylie’s insider account sheds light on the dark underbelly of big data and its powerful influence on democratic processes. From using psychological profiling to target vulnerable individuals with tailored political messages to spreading disinformation and fake news to sway public opinion, Cambridge Analytica’s tactics have raised serious concerns about the integrity of our electoral systems.

    As we navigate the increasingly complex landscape of data privacy and manipulation, Wylie’s story serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers posed by unregulated use of personal information for political gain. It is a stark reminder of the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in the digital age.

    Join us as we explore the intricate web of deceit and manipulation woven by Cambridge Analytica, and the implications it holds for the future of democracy. Targeted exposes the chilling reality of how big data is being weaponized to shape our beliefs and our votes, and calls for a renewed commitment to safeguarding our fundamental rights and freedoms in the digital era.
    #Targeted #Cambridge #Analytica #Whistleblowers #Story #Big #Da..

Chat Icon