Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Workers
A million Michigan workers may lose sick leave guarantee under House plan
Many small businesses already voluntarily provide paid sick leave, Calley said, noting 84% of businesses in his association reported doing so as of last year. The pending mandate creates onerous rules that could actually make it harder for businesses to provide the same benefits, he said.
But unions, workers’ rights groups and some Democrats contend that employees across the state deserve the higher wage and sick leave requirements set to take effect next month.
Preemptively dismantling the laws would spit in the face of voters who signed the 2018 petition poised to finally be implemented, argued state Rep. Dylan Wegela, D-Garden City.
“What’s best for the state, and the people of Michigan, is to give people the raise that they’re entitled to by the decision and make sure that people have paid sick leave,” Wegela told Bridge.
“To me, this is a no brainer.”
No call, no shows
Estimates from 2018 suggest that as many as one-third of Michigan workers are in jobs without a paid sick leave policy.
Of the workers who do not have paid sick time, they are most likely to be part-time workers, among the lowest paid or working in the hospitality industry, advocates say.
Calley, head of the state Small Business Association, argues it’s not that owners don’t want to give their employees paid sick leave, it’s just that the wording of the court ruling could cause significant complications.
As written, the decision will allow for workers to miss up to three consecutive days without calling their employer to explain. It also enables employees to take time off in the smallest amount of increments a business’ payroll allows.
A million Michigan workers may lose sick leave guarantee under House planA new proposal in the Michigan House of Representatives could strip over a million workers in the state of their guaranteed sick leave benefits. The plan, which aims to repeal the current law that requires employers to provide paid sick leave to their employees, has sparked outrage among workers and advocates for labor rights.
Under the current law, employees in Michigan are entitled to earn one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 40 hours per year. This benefit is crucial for workers who need to take time off to care for themselves or their families when they are sick.
If the proposed bill is passed, many workers in Michigan could be left without this important protection, forcing them to choose between their health and their livelihood. This could have devastating consequences for low-income workers, who are already struggling to make ends meet.
Advocates are urging lawmakers to reconsider the plan and to prioritize the health and well-being of Michigan’s workforce. They argue that paid sick leave is not only a basic human right, but also a public health necessity, especially in the midst of a global pandemic.
As the debate over the proposal continues, it is clear that the fight for workers’ rights in Michigan is far from over. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
Tags:
Michigan workers, sick leave guarantee, House plan, Michigan employment, sick leave policy, worker rights, Michigan labor laws, employee benefits, Michigan legislation, sick leave protection, Michigan working conditions, House bill, Michigan workforce, sick leave rights
#million #Michigan #workers #lose #sick #leave #guarantee #House #planUndocumented workers stay home to avoid ICE arrests
When reports surfaced over the weekend that mass deportations could potentially begin in the Chicago area Tuesday, Martin Ramos informed his boss that he was taking time off from work, stocked up on groceries and decided his kids would skip soccer practice this week.
Ramos — who emigrated from Guadalajara, Mexico, without the necessary work permits — spent the first full day of Donald Trump’s second presidency hunkered down with his family and trying to avoid being picked up by ICE agents. An arrest, he knows, would destroy everything he and his wife worked for and force their two boys into an uncertain future.
“We have to do everything possible to keep our children safe,” Ramos told the Tribune. “What will they do if we get deported?”
ICE agents did not show up at the Joliet factory where Ramos and his wife both work Tuesday, but the fear inflicted upon employees there was evident. A co-worker told Ramos that only 10 out of the typical 40 to 50 workers showed up.
In Little Village, one of Chicago’s largest Mexican immigrant communities, streets were mostly deserted and quiet. Tamale vendors, a hearty group used to braving all kinds of weather, weren’t lined up on the sidewalks. The hardware store parking lots, where day laborers search for work, also were largely empty.
The possibility of mass deportations has terrified some of the area’s roughly 400,000 undocumented immigrants, prompting many to skip work, keep their kids out of school and stay hidden until the promised raids end. Their trepidation only deepened Tuesday, when the Trump administration announced it would permit agents to make arrests at schools and churches.
“All we can do is take all precautions possible and stay home as long as we can,” Ramos said.
Trump’s inaugural address and the sweeping executive orders he signed afterward fulfill his campaign promise to be tough on immigration, even at the expense of long-standing principles.
The executive orders include plans to end birthright citizenship and deploy troops to enhance border security. The president also discontinued the U.S. Customs and Border Protection One app, which migrants had been using to schedule appointments with U.S. authorities and seek asylum, dashing the hopes of many prospective migrants in Mexico.
On Tuesday afternoon, the new administration officially rescinded the Biden administration’s guidelines that prevented immigration authorities from conducting arrests and raids in “sensitive” areas.
About a dozen people opposing ICE raids and roundups rally outside the Little Village Arch on 26th Street near Kedzie on Jan.21, 2025. The rally was held by Revcom Corps Chicago. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune) That means that ICE agents can now go inside churches and schools to detain people.
“Criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest,” said a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson in a statement. “The Trump Administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense.”
‘People are hiding’
The immigrant community was initially skeptical of Trump’s deportation threats, having faced similar tough talk from other administrations. But sentiment has changed over the last week, said Dolores Castañeda, a community leader and longtime resident of Little Village.
Sunday Mass at St. Agnes of Bohemia Catholic Church was unusually empty, she said. And she personally advised a group of street vendors based on the Southwest Side to stay home during the week until they learn how ICE will operate. Out of 13 street vendors, only one told her that she couldn’t stay home because she depends on the money she earns each day to feed her family and pay rent.
Most vendors declined to speak to the Tribune out of fear that they could be identified and targeted by federal immigration officials.
“People are hiding,” she said. “They call me and ask me what to do, but my hands are tied, I don’t think anyone knows what to do.”
Even though the raids have not materialized, Gov. JB Pritzker said Tuesday that his office heard that ICE will be targeting as many as 2,000 in the city of Chicago alone. Trump has said agents will only go after immigrants accused of crimes, but he has not defined which offenses would be subject to deportation.
“I don’t know whether they’ll effectuate that, or how,” Pritzker said, adding that immigration authorities had not communicated with his office.
Gov. JB Pritzker answers questions after signing the Dignity in Pay Act into law at the Access Living of Metro Chicago on Jan. 21, 2025. (Eileen T. Meslar/Chicago Tribune) Community members, elected officials and supporters of The Resurrection Project listen as José Frausto, executive director at Chicago Workers Collaborative, speaks at a news conference Jan. 18, 2025, at Dominican University’s Chicago Campus about Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportations. (Audrey Richardson/Chicago Tribune) Over the past month, community leaders and local officials have been hosting “Know Your Rights” workshops in various languages, giving presentations and handing out pamphlets about what to do if confronted by a police officer or immigration agent. Community members have gathered in public libraries, in plazas and on street corners to prepare.
Jennifer Aguilar, the executive director of the Little Village Chamber of Commerce, said the business group is expecting fear of immigration raids to affect businesses throughout the neighborhood.
Some small businesses in Little Village are keeping their doors closed this week, she said, though the majority have remained open. However, some people are going into work despite their fear because they simply can’t afford not to.
“It’s going to be an effect similar to the pandemic,” Aguilar said. “That’s what we’re predicting.”
A manager of a popular bar on the North Side, who requested that his name be withheld for his safety and that of his workers, said many of his employees had expressed concerns about the potential raids and at least one asked for the week off.
“We will not be able to operate without them,” the bar owner said. “They are an essential part of our business, but we understand their fear.”
Others in the restaurant industry in Chicago are experiencing a bigger impact, he said, because most of their employees are undocumented.
Economic impacts
There were 300,000 undocumented workers in Illinois in 2022, according to the Pew Research Center. At that time — the most recent year for which data is available — those workers made up 5% of the state’s labor force, just slightly above the national average of 4.8%.
The industry with the most undocumented workers in Illinois was manufacturing, according to Pew. The construction industry had the largest percentage of workers who were undocumented.
Business leaders in Illinois and elsewhere have raised alarm about the potential impacts of mass deportations on the economy.
Sam Toia, president of the Illinois Restaurant Association, said rumors Tuesday of immigration checks at Chicago restaurants were unsubstantiated. Still, workers were scared, and Toia had heard of some restaurant employees calling out of work, though he suggested some may have called out because of the extreme cold.
Toia stressed the need to expand work authorizations to more immigrants. He said he supports the deportation of violent criminals but warned of the impacts mass deportations would have on the economy.
“Trump ran on bringing inflation down,” Toia said. “If you’re going to do mass deportations, you will see inflation go through the roof.”
The threatened arrests could have an economic impact across many industries, said Rebecca Shi, CEO of the American Business Immigration Coalition. According to Shi, housing, food and health care have been major contributors to inflation in recent years. Mass deportations, she said, could cause a price surge.
No temporary workers stand at the entryway or along the black fence surrounding the Home Depot along North Cicero Avenue in Chicago during the frigid weather on Jan. 21, 2025. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) “If law-abiding workers are caught in the raids, there would be ripple effects across the labor market driving upward prices for everyday Americans,” Shi said.
A study released last year by researchers at the Center for Migration Studies laid out ways in which mass deportations could have broad-ranging effects on the U.S. economy. Workers in the U.S. without legal permission contributed $96.7 billion in taxes in 2022, researchers found.
And because around 1.5 million households with at least one undocumented person have mortgages, the researchers said, mass deportations could lead to a significant number of defaults and “(threaten) the US housing market with destabilization.”
‘Mouths to feed’
Marcos Ceniceros, the executive director of the Warehouse Workers for Justice, said the organization has heard from workers who plan to skip work over the next few days.
But the decision to forgo a day or more or more of pay is one with a cost, he said.
“People need to work,” Ceniceros said. “They need to pay their bills and feed their families.”
A Home Depot parking lot in North Lawndale that is usually filled with day laborers looking for work was eerily quiet Tuesday morning. Just a few men stood on the sidewalk, wrapping their faces with scarves, their thumbs out to passing cars.
“There’s usually so many people, but no one came to look for work today. They’re all scared. … But for me, none of what Trump says matters when I have bills to pay and mouths to feed,” said Pedro, a 38-year-old undocumented father of three who came to Chicago from Michoacán, Mexico, three years ago.
His wife works at a factory on Pulaski Road, he said. She also had no choice but to work.
Vanessa, a 33-year-old mother of three who lives in Little Village, said her undocumented husband is a carpenter and their family’s primary source of income. He’s not working this week.
If he was picked up by ICE and deported, it would rip apart their family, she said. The fear is too much, but the financial cost of hiding may soon grow even greater.
“Eventually, he’s going to have to get back,” said Vanessa, who asked that her last name be withheld.
Vanessa said her husband is active in the church and community. Her kids are happily enrolled in school. But in the past week, they’ve started thinking about a contingency plan to go back to Mexico if need be.
“I feel like we’re grieving something that hasn’t even happened,” she said. “Or like we’re waiting for something that’s going to happen that we know we’re going to grieve.”
Tribune reporter Olivia Olander contributed.
Originally Published:
In light of recent ICE raids and increased enforcement of immigration policies, many undocumented workers are choosing to stay home to avoid risking arrest and deportation. The fear and uncertainty surrounding immigration status have led many individuals to prioritize their safety and well-being by staying out of the public eye.This decision has significant consequences for both the individuals themselves and the industries that rely heavily on immigrant labor. Undocumented workers often play crucial roles in sectors such as agriculture, construction, and service industries, and their absence can create labor shortages and disrupt operations.
It is important to recognize the challenges faced by undocumented workers and the difficult choices they must make in order to protect themselves and their families. As the immigration debate continues to unfold, it is crucial to consider the human impact of these policies and work towards finding solutions that are compassionate and fair.
#UndocumentedWorkers #ICEArrests #ImmigrationPolicy #LaborShortages
Tags:
undocumented workers, ICE arrests, immigration, undocumented immigrants, workplace safety, fear of deportation, immigration enforcement, labor rights, immigrant workers, ICE raids.
#Undocumented #workers #stay #home #avoid #ICE #arrestsC.E.O.s, and President Trump, Want Workers Back in the Office
Five years since the pandemic began, workers have grown accustomed to a script. Their bosses make return-to-office plans, which then get shelved. And then shelved again.
In recent weeks, the calls to end remote work have come back with gusto, and with authority.
On Monday, President Trump signed an executive order requiring federal department heads to “terminate remote work arrangements” and require all federal workers to return to in-person work five days a week. He previewed the move in December when he said those federal workers who refused to go into the office were “going to be dismissed.”
Some chief executives, who have long been enthusiastic about ditching remote work, have also announced full return-to-office plans. Amazon, JPMorgan and AT&T told many employees they would have to be back in the office five days a week this year. Even in popular culture, the office is making a comeback, with “Babygirl” glamorizing the blouse wearing C.E.O., “Severance” returning for a new season probing corporate psychological drama, and buzzy newsletters like “Feed Me” declaring remote work “out.”
And some workers, who have come back to in-person work of their own volition, are eager to pick up their prepandemic work routines.
Two years ago, Ellen Harwick would have said she wanted to work remotely forever. Last fall, a switch flipped.
A marketing manager for an apparel brand in Bellingham, Wash., Ms. Harwick worked remotely for two weeks in Portugal while still working on Pacific time. Suddenly, she began to crave office chatter.
“Something just shifted for me,” said Ms. Harwick, 48. “Working from home was really novel for the first bit, and then I just felt isolated.” She is now back in the office five days a week.
But many proponents of remote work, who underscore the benefits it offers to people with caregiving responsibilities, voiced concern about flexibility evaporating entirely.
“It’s very challenging to find child care that allows you to be in the office 9 to 5,” said Sara Mauskopf, the chief executive and founder of Winnie, a start-up that connects families with child care providers. Her company is fully remote.
Amazon’s return to office began on Jan. 2, when the company instructed most workers to come in five days a week, up from the three days required as of May 2023. In some locations, the deadline has been postponed as the company reconfigures office space. Andy Jassy, the company’s chief executive, told employees in a memo that returning to the office would better allow workers to “invent, collaborate and be connected” to one another and to the company culture.
“Before the pandemic, it was not a given that folks could work remotely two days a week, and that will also be true moving forward,” Mr. Jassy wrote.
JPMorgan told employees that in-person work would support better mentorship and brainstorming. The company will start rolling out its return to office in March.
“We know that some of you prefer a hybrid schedule and respectfully understand that not everyone will agree with this decision,” JPMorgan wrote in a memo to employees. “We feel that now is the right time to solidify our full-time in-office approach.”
Many work force experts point out that executives have wanted people back in the office for a while, for the purposes of building culture and relationships. What has changed, they say, is that employers feel they have more leverage now that the labor market is not quite as tight as it was at the height of the Great Resignation, when there were more open jobs for the number of unemployed people.
“It becomes like another dimension of compensation — in a really tight labor market, employees get their way more, employers might not pressure them to come back because they might want to quit,” said Harry Holzer, an economist at Georgetown University. “In a labor market where there’s more slack, employers might be less worried about that.”
Sometimes a return-to-office push has less to do with building an office culture and more to do with cost. Nick Bloom, an economist at Stanford University who studies remote work and advises executives on hybrid arrangements, said he had seen some companies press employees to return to the office as a way to reduce head count, understanding that calling all workers back would encourage some to quit.
“The waning of the D.E.I. movement has made it a bit easier,” added Mr. Bloom, referencing the backlash to corporate diversity initiatives, and explaining that women and employees of color have tended to voice more support for remote work in surveys.
In spite of these high-profile efforts to get workers back five days a week, many other employers are holding on to a hybrid approach.
Data from a Stanford project tracking work-from-home rates shows that over one-quarter of paid full days in the United States are worked remotely. And about three-quarters of Americans whose jobs can be done remotely continue to work from home some of the time, according to Pew.
One of the reasons that hybrid work has remained so sticky is that workers have made clear their preference for flexibility. Nearly half of remote workers surveyed by Pew said they would consider leaving their jobs if their employers no longer allowed them some remote flexibility. At Amazon, corporate workers staged a walkout in May 2023 protesting R.T.O. Some employers said they had no plans to change course from hybrid arrangements.
“We are committed to providing flexibility to the work force and believe the hybrid-flex approach allows teams to collaborate intentionally,” said Claire Borelli, the chief people officer at TIAA, an investment firm that called its employees back to the office three days a week in March 2022.
Some remote work stalwarts say that the policy has had no impact on productivity and that it has helped employee retention. When Yelp’s lease came up for renewal in 2021, the company decided to shift locations and sublease a smaller space from Salesforce. The company now allows employees to work fully remotely, bucking broader return-to-office trends.
“At this point, we almost drop the descriptor of remote work — it’s just the way we work,” said Carmen Amara, the company’s chief people officer.
Ms. Amara said any skepticism the company faced over its remote policy went away because of bottom-line results. The company reported record net revenue and profitability in the third quarter of 2024, as well as a 13 percent decrease in turnover since 2021.
But with big names like Amazon and JPMorgan returning to the office in full force, and with President Trump insisting that the federal work force do the same, the commercial real estate industry is tentatively optimistic, according to Ruth Colp-Haber, the chief executive of Wharton Property Advisors, a real estate brokerage.
Office occupancy is still shaky — a little over half of what it was prepandemic — according to Kastle, a workplace security firm whose “return-to-office” barometer has reflected the ups and downs of remote work since 2020. But that is up from what it was in 2022.
“These things take a while to work their way into the numbers, but there’s no question the momentum is on the positive side,” Ms. Colp-Haber said. “For a variety of reasons, one of them being the push by big companies to have five days a week back in the office, we’re seeing greater demand for office space.”
As companies start to reopen and transition back to normal operations, many CEOs and President Trump are pushing for employees to return to the office. Despite the ongoing pandemic and the rise of remote work, these leaders are eager to get their workforce back in the office.The push for employees to return to the office comes as a surprise to many, as remote work has proven to be successful for many companies during the pandemic. However, CEOs and President Trump argue that in-person collaboration and communication are critical for the success of their businesses.
While some employees may be hesitant to return to the office due to health and safety concerns, companies are implementing strict safety protocols and guidelines to ensure a safe work environment. Additionally, some companies are offering flexible work arrangements to accommodate those who are not comfortable returning to the office full-time.
As the debate over remote work versus in-person work continues, it is clear that CEOs and President Trump are eager to see employees back in the office. Only time will tell if this push will be successful or if remote work is here to stay.
Tags:
- C.E.O.s
- President Trump
- Workers back in the office
- Return to the office
- Workplace transition
- Corporate leadership
- Employee productivity
- Remote work challenges
- Office culture
- Post-pandemic work environment
#C.E.O.s #President #Trump #Workers #Office
Trump targeting of federal workers creates job uncertainty
Chelsea Milburn remembers feeling “blessed” to find her ideal job as a public affairs specialist for the Department of Education, a near-perfect situation after her life dramatically changed two years ago after an illness.
But, like more than 228,000 federal workers who telework, Milburn’s job is at risk if President-elect Donald Trump makes good on his promise to require federal workers to return to the office five days a week. She has a disability that makes it hard for her to sit at her desk full-time.
Many more of the 2.3 million civilian federal workers could lose their jobs if Trump fulfills other campaign promises to shutter the Department of Education, and overhaul agencies including the Justice Department and Health and Human Services.
“It’s not the first time this has come up, it just feels louder this time,” said Milburn, who in November started remote work for the Department of Education after having a similar job for the Navy.
Trump, through his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), believes he could save millions of dollars through reorganizing and layoffs, but restructuring the government would also cost jobs in unexpected places.
It’s easy to think federal workers are only in Washington, D.C., and serve within nameless bureaucracies. But only about 15% of federal employees work in the nation’s capital, according to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. The remaining 85% are spread across big cities like Dallas and state capitals like Carson City, Nevada, where Milburn lives.
They are, among others, the postal workers, the civil engineers and the TSA agents. They are mostly represented by the American Federation of Government Employees, a union of 750,000 federal workers. About 56% of civil service workers are covered by collective bargaining contracts, many of which include remote work arrangements.
While Trump’s return-to-office mandate is expected to get major pushback from federal workers, he recently reinforced his strategy, threatening to take legal action against the AFGE’s latest contract that extended remote worker protections until 2029.
“If people don’t come back to work, come back into the office, they’re going to be dismissed,” Trump told reporters about the deal on Dec. 23. “It was a gift to the union, and we are going to obviously be in court to stop it.”
However, AFGE National President Everett Kelley told USA TODAY the union will push back.
“What we worked for is not a gift, it’s called negotiation. Telework and remote work are tools that have helped the federal government increase productivity and efficiency,” said Kelley, citing Office of Management and Budget statistics that only 10% of federal workers are remote.
Although it’s unclear how exactly DOGE would cut government spending, Trump has entrusted Tesla CEO, SpaceX founder and billionaire Elon Musk and tech entrepreneur and former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the unofficial department’s effort to streamline the government.
The federal government’s spending in the 2024 fiscal year was $6.75 trillion.
Musk said he could quickly eliminate $2 trillion from the federal budget but has not provided any specifics on how, and later softened his stance, calling $2 trillion a “best-case outcome.”
He’s promised to make cuts that would shrink the federal workforce and cut federal agencies to about 99 from more than 440.
In Trump’s initial statement announcing DOGE, he said the new department would provide advice and guidance from outside the government and partner with the White House and the OMB to bring “large-scale structural reform.”
DOGE may be unable to do much, as Congress controls federal spending. Still, the increasing rhetoric has some government workers nationwide unsettled.
Fed worker, disabled veteran believes ‘I still have value’
Milburn, 34, began her public affairs specialist job for the Department of Education only two months ago. The Navy reservist, and a member of AFGE Local 252, a union representing Education Department workers, joined a tight-knit unit where most of her colleagues are veterans like her. Even though Milburn works remotely, she said, she’s quickly formed a bond.
Milburn developed “long COVID” shortly after a particularly severe bout with the virus in 2022. Then, last year, she was diagnosed with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome or POTS, a chronic condition that often leaves her dizzy when she stands, breathless and exhausted.
“I have chronic inflammation all over. I can’t stay in the same posture for too long,” said Milburn, who takes heart medication. “It’s been a life-altering experience.”
She was promoted to chief petty officer while on active duty in the Navy in San Diego and now believes she will soon receive a Medical Retention Review status to “determine her ability to continue serving” and likely a medical discharge.
“It’s been a really hard transition for me, going from an active person and a Navy chief to where I can’t work in an office,” Milburn said, choking up. “And when I got hired as a civil servant in this job I have now, it showed me that even with my disability, my country sees that as an individual, I still have value.”
‘People are in a panic’
Jesus Soriano, the president of an AFGE union representing workers at the National Science Foundation, doesn’t mince words about the incoming Trump administration’s desire to disrupt the federal government.
“Yeah, people are in a panic,” said Soriano, a program director for the NSF Partnerships for Innovation initiative, which helps provide funding to academic and nonprofit researchers and broaden access to STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) research. “We are facing public harassment at a maximum scale.”
Soriano, 57, has worked for the NSF in numerous capacities for 13 years. He’s also been involved with his union for seven years, including serving as the NSF lead representative for the last two years. He lives in Northern Virginia and is married with three kids, including a freshman in college. Sleepless nights are common.
“I look at my kids, and as someone who works about 120 hours per pay period, I ask myself, ‘Will I have a job?’” Soriano said. “Will I be able to feed them two months from now?”He’s worried Trump’s federal government upheaval will also impact workers who live in Washington, Maryland and Virginia. Soriano cannot believe how some are not taking what could happen to the nation’s capital and the surrounding areas more seriously.
“If someone plans to fire about 300,000 in a region, why don’t you first talk with leaders in those cities, the towns, communities, and the governors in those states? Try telling them the purpose and what the impact would be,” Soriano said. “Evaluating the efficiency of the government is good and necessary, but why would you want to just blow it up?”
He said he and his colleagues were hired based on merit and expertise, and “have decided to dedicate our professional lives to this country.”
“We work extremely hard, and we’re being vilified as lazy thugs. So, I’m having a hard time grasping all of this. Can you imagine how painful this is?” he asked. “There is a whole gamut of feelings ranging from fear to depression when you think you are being rejected for doing nothing but your job.”
Trump threats are ‘different this time around’
As a civil rights attorney in the Department of Education, Sheria Smith’s job is to determine whether schools and districts nationwide are compliant, or whether they may risk losing federal funding.
As president and chief negotiator of AFGE Local 252, representing nearly 3,000 employees in her department, Smith, a Harvard graduate, fights for the rights of her colleagues who mostly work remotely from coast to coast.
“It feels like we’ve been down this road before, but the threats are different this time around,” Smith said. “Scary? Yeah, that’s the right word to use.”
Smith remembers her continuous struggles when she took the lead union position in 2019 with then-President Trump and his education secretary, Betsy DeVos. This included the department imposing a non-union negotiated contract that workers said violated their rights.
The union filed an unfair labor practices charge with the Federal Labor Relations Authority. The union and the Education Department eventually settled in 2022.
“They were almost successful,” Smith said. “But we fought back.”
Smith now worries about Trump’s proposal to eliminate the 45-year-old education department and distribute some of its programs across other federal agencies.
Smith also said returning to the office isn’t realistic for everyone.
Many federal workers don’t have offices to go to, Smith said, as her union negotiated with the Department of Education to get out of the agency’s $12-million-per-year office lease in New York City in 2023.
Other agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service and the Environmental Protection Agency, have reduced office space post-pandemic and plan to do even more, according to an Office of Management and Budget report in August.
Smith and Kelley, the AFGE national president, contend working remotely increases productivity.
“It has worked well in our favor. They are passionate about the work, and if they don’t have a commute and set times, instead of making small talk or playing office politics, we have shown we can be productive and efficient,” said Smith, who lives in Dallas and practiced corporate law before joining the department in 2016.
“I did not take this job to be unduly influenced by changing political whims,” Smith said. “It’s disconcerting to have an incoming government department talk about your possible elimination in such a way that’s so callous. It’s as if we’re not American citizens who contribute in every way to this nation. Extremely disconcerting.”
‘I don’t want anything happening on my watch’
Although the federal government averted a shutdown last month, Johnny Jones said he still would’ve showed up to do his job — no matter what.
“They say we’re considered ‘essential,’” said Jones, 46, a longtime TSA agent at Love Field in Dallas and the secretary-treasurer for AGFE Council 100, the union representing 45,000 of his fellow TSA colleagues. “But right now, we’re certainly not feeling that way.”
Jones said the TSA workers who screen passengers at airport security and clear flights for takeoff would have continued working without pay in the short term, as mandated by their contract, as they anticipated screening about 40 million people during the holiday season.
But it’s also a matter of pride, he said.
“This is the profession we chose, to keep our fellow Americans safe, whether the government takes care of us or not, because we took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States,” said Jones, who was among the first group of TSA workers hired in 2002, shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.
“And since the federal government took over, there hasn’t been a similar incident since,” said Jones, adding the TSA screens more than 2 million passengers daily. “It matters to us. I don’t want anything happening on my watch.”
He remembers working as a local restaurant manager in 2001 and, like most of his friends, feeling somewhat obligated to protect the country when he joined the TSA.
“It was a call to duty for me. Some of my friends joined the Marines, but I had custody of my two kids at the time, so it was impossible for me to go to the military as a single parent,” Jones said. “That was not in the cards. This was the next best option for me.”
The talk of government cost-cutting hasn’t mentioned the TSA, but Jones said it still makes him and other agents anxious.
“All of this uncertainty is affecting us,” Jones said. “The last thing we want to hear when you’re a frontline worker making sure people get from Point A to Point B is a bunch of political rhetoric coming out of Washington saying, ‘Oh, we’re going to cut this and cut that to save some money,’ possibly at our expense.”
Jones, a married father of four children, said he and his co-workers can’t afford to sugarcoat their feelings. He said the typical TSA worker makes between $60,000 and $70,000.
They worry about what Jan. 21, the day after Trump’s inauguration, will look like as he prepares to sign his initial stack of executive orders.
“It’s so childish,” Jones said. “You shouldn’t be playing security games with our livelihoods, as all it takes is for something bad to happen, and then the finger-pointing begins.”
The Trump administration’s targeting of federal workers has created job uncertainty for thousands of government employees. With ongoing threats of budget cuts, hiring freezes, and potential layoffs, many federal workers are living in a state of constant fear and uncertainty about the future of their jobs.The recent government shutdown, which lasted for over a month, left many federal workers without pay and struggling to make ends meet. This experience has only heightened the anxiety and insecurity felt by those working in federal agencies.
Trump’s repeated attacks on federal workers and attempts to undermine the effectiveness of government agencies have created a toxic work environment for many employees. The constant threat of job loss and lack of support from the administration has led to low morale and decreased productivity among federal workers.
As the Trump administration continues to target federal workers, it is important for us to recognize the valuable contributions that these employees make to our country. They play a crucial role in ensuring the smooth functioning of government agencies and providing essential services to the American people.
It is vital that we support and protect federal workers during these uncertain times and advocate for policies that promote job security and fair treatment for all government employees. Only by standing together can we ensure that federal workers are able to continue serving the public with dedication and professionalism.
Tags:
- Donald Trump
- Federal workers
- Job uncertainty
- Government employees
- Political targeting
- Job security
- Trump administration
- Employment concerns
- Federal government
- Workforce turmoil
#Trump #targeting #federal #workers #creates #job #uncertainty
DWP says workers have been threatened with bodily harm and a rifle
In the wake of the Palisades fire, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power employees have alerted police to a pair of incidents that have raised alarm inside the utility.
Shortly after noon Wednesday, officers responded to Mulholland Drive in Beverly Crest after a person threatened a DWP employee who was working on a downed electrical pole, L.A. Police Department officials said.
A person in a gray Mercedes-Benz drove up to the utility worker and threatened bodily harm. The DWP employee phoned 911, and by the time officers responded, the person had left the area, police said.
On Tuesday, officers were alerted around 7 p.m. to a man possibly armed with a rifle at the downtown headquarters of the DWP, the John Ferraro Building on Hope Street. No details were provided on what occurred during the incident.
Police searched the area and detained a man matching the description of the suspect. Officers determined, however, the man was walking home with dinner and flowers for his wife.
Additional supervisors responded to the call, canvassed the area, and did not recover a weapon. No arrests were made.
“We can confirm that threats have been made against our employees,” said a DWP spokesperson. “We take every threat and incident seriously and report them immediately to law enforcement. “
Calling its staff an “essential part of the city family,” the DWP spokesperson added: “Our employees are working tirelessly around the clock to support the city’s response, and their work is critical to those efforts.”
Since the Palisades fire, the DWP is one of several city and state agencies to face scrutiny and public criticism. The utility supplies water and electrical service to 4.1 million residents of L.A., including Pacific Palisades.
Late in the evening on the first night of the Palisades fire, firefighting crews reported difficulty getting water from several hydrants. The utility has said enormous demand from the wildfire strained the water system, which has occurred in other areas contending with massive fires, and that about 20% of hydrants in the Palisades saw a loss in pressure.
The DWP also faced criticism over the empty Santa Ynez Reservoir, located in the middle of the Palisades burn area. The reservoir was drained nearly a year ago for repairs to its floating cover, which have not been completed.
Former DWP general manager Martin Adams told The Times that he believed the reservoir would have helped prolong water pressure in the Palisades but would not have averted the inevitable drop in pressure due to the wildfire.
Times staff writer Matt Hamilton contributed to this report.
The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) has reported that several of their workers have been threatened with bodily harm and a rifle while on the job. This disturbing trend of violence towards DWP employees is unacceptable and must be addressed immediately.The safety and well-being of our workers is of utmost importance, and it is unacceptable for anyone to threaten or harm them in any way. The DWP is working closely with law enforcement to ensure the safety of their employees and to hold those responsible for these threats accountable.
We urge anyone who has information about these threats to come forward and report it to the authorities. Violence in the workplace is never acceptable, and we must work together to ensure the safety of all workers.
Tags:
- DWP threats
- Workplace safety concerns
- Employee safety
- DWP rifle incident
- Threats in the workplace
- DWP employee safety
- Workplace violence
- DWP news
- Employee security
- DWP safety concerns
#DWP #workers #threatened #bodily #harm #rifle
Rudy Giuliani testifies at contempt hearing as lawyers for election workers pursue $148M judgment
NEW YORK (AP) — Rudy Giuliani testified Friday at a contempt hearing to decide whether he has dodged and deceived lawyers trying to recover a $148 million judgment for two Georgia election workers, lamenting the speedy deadline imposed on him to turn over information about his assets.
The former New York City mayor testified in Manhattan federal court that the two-week time frame he was given to respond to the requests “was very short,” in comparison to how long he was given to provide information in 15 to 20 other court cases he’s involved in.
Judge Lewis J. Liman indicated he would not rule immediately on whether Giuliani will face civil sanctions for failing to turn over some assets.
Giuliani asked Thursday if he could appear remotely at the hearing, but he changed his mind after the judge said his options at the proceeding would be limited if he didn’t show up in person.
The lawyers claim Giuliani has displayed a “consistent pattern of willful defiance” of Liman’s October order to give up assets, after he was found liable in 2023 for defaming the poll workers by falsely accusing them of tampering with ballots during the 2020 presidential election.
They said in court papers earlier this week that he has turned over a Mercedes-Benz and his New York apartment, but not the paperwork necessary to monetize the assets. And they said he has failed to surrender valuable watches and sports memorabilia, including a signed Joe DiMaggio shirt, and not “a single dollar from his nonexempt cash accounts.”
Liman said in an order last week that Giuliani’s lawyer should be ready to explain why Giuliani should not be held in contempt with resulting sanctions that could make it less likely that he gets to keep his Florida residence. A trial over the disposition of the Palm Beach condominium and World Series rings is scheduled for mid-January.
Giuliani has maintained that the Palm Beach property is his personal residence now and should be shielded from the judgment.
Giuliani’s lawyers have predicted that Giuliani will eventually win custody of the items on appeal.
___
Associated Press writer Larry Neumeister contributed to this report.
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, once known as “America’s Mayor” for his leadership after the September 11th attacks, found himself in a different kind of spotlight today as he testified at a contempt hearing. Giuliani, who served as former President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, was called to testify in a case brought by lawyers representing election workers who are seeking a $148 million judgment against him.The lawyers for the election workers allege that Giuliani spread false claims about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, leading to threats and harassment against them. They argue that Giuliani’s actions were reckless and that he should be held accountable for the harm caused to their clients.
During the hearing, Giuliani maintained his innocence, claiming that he was simply exercising his First Amendment rights to free speech. However, the judge overseeing the case was not convinced, citing evidence that Giuliani knowingly spread misinformation and incited violence.
As the hearing continues, the fate of Giuliani and the $148 million judgment hangs in the balance. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
Tags:
- Rudy Giuliani
- Contempt hearing
- Election workers
- $148M judgment
- Lawyer
- Testify
- Legal proceedings
- Election fraud
- Court case
- Legal battle
#Rudy #Giuliani #testifies #contempt #hearing #lawyers #election #workers #pursue #148M #judgment
Rudy Giuliani, Slow to Transfer Assets to Election Workers, Could Be Held in Contempt
After several missed deadlines and extensions, Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, could be found in contempt of court on Friday for failing to deliver assets worth $11 million to two poll workers he defamed after the 2020 presidential election.
If he is held in contempt, he could face steep penalties, including jail time.
Mr. Giuliani, 80, appeared in federal court in Lower Manhattan to try to justify the stalled handover of some of his most prized possessions, including a penthouse apartment in Manhattan, a collection of Yankees memorabilia, luxury watches and a vintage Mercedes-Benz convertible.
Mr. Giuliani’s presence wasn’t assured. A day before, Mr. Giuliani’s lawyer asked if his client could appear virtually, because of medical issues related to his left knee, as well as breathing problems that he attributed to his time spent at the World Trade Center after the Sept. 11 attacks.
But the judge, Lewis J. Liman, who had a testy exchange with Mr. Giuliani about the case in November, said he would not accept Mr. Giuliani’s testimony unless he attends in person. So the former mayor, in a dark blue suit and glasses, walked into the 15th floor courtroom with a visible limp and a dry cough.
Mr. Giuliani is expected to take the stand sometime after lunch.
The transfer was originally scheduled to take place in October, as a down payment on a $148 million judgment that he was ordered to pay to two Georgia election workers, Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Shaye Moss. Mr. Giuliani had claimed, without evidence, that the women had helped steal the presidential election from Donald J. Trump more than four years ago.
But one deadline after another has passed, and lawyers for the women said they have received only a fraction of the property.
Mr. Giuliani has argued that he has largely complied with the handover request and said that some of the items sought by the plaintiffs are not in his possession.
“The Court should see that I gave everything that I could give,” Mr. Giuliani wrote in a personal plea to Judge Liman, on Christmas Eve.
But lawyers for the women said Mr. Giuliani continues to defy orders, despite repeated warnings from the court.
The plaintiffs have yet to receive legal possession of his 10-room apartment on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, once listed for over $6 million, in part because paperwork has not been updated since his divorce from his ex-wife, Judith Giuliani, according to court filings. The title to Mr. Giuliani’s 1980 Mercedes convertible, which he said was once owned by Lauren Bacall, has yet to be transferred.
And the whereabouts of a signed and framed Joe DiMaggio Yankees jersey, which once hung over Mr. Giuliani’s fireplace, are unknown, Mr. Giuliani has said. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the item was removed from his apartment sometime before they gained access.
“It is hard to square Mr. Giuliani’s position with reality,” Aaron E. Nathan, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, wrote in a letter to the court on Dec. 30. “Enough is enough.”
The hearing marks a low point in Mr. Giuliani’s many legal battles stemming from his stint as Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer. In November, Mr. Giuliani’s lawyers withdrew from the handover case, citing an undisclosed professional ethics reason.
In a recently unsealed letter explaining their departure, one of the lawyers, Kenneth Caruso, said Mr. Giuliani was not cooperating in the discovery process related to a condominium he owns in Palm Beach, Fla., and was withholding access to his electronic devices.
Later this month, Mr. Giuliani also faces the possibility of contempt charges in a Washington, D.C., court, where he has been accused of continuing to publicly make false claims about the two Georgia poll workers.
Former New York City mayor and personal attorney to former President Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, is facing potential contempt charges for failing to transfer assets to election workers as ordered by a federal judge.Giuliani, who has been at the center of controversy surrounding the 2020 presidential election and baseless claims of voter fraud, was ordered to transfer funds to a group of election workers who were suing him for defamation. The workers had alleged that Giuliani had spread false claims about election fraud in an effort to overturn the results of the election.
Despite the court order, Giuliani has been slow to comply with the judge’s directive, prompting the possibility of contempt charges. This latest development adds to the legal troubles facing Giuliani, who is also facing a $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems for spreading false claims about their voting machines.
As the legal battles continue to mount for Giuliani, it remains to be seen how this latest development will impact his standing in the legal community and his future legal endeavors. Stay tuned for further updates on this ongoing legal saga.
Tags:
Rudy Giuliani, election workers, asset transfer, contempt, legal implications, Giuliani investigation, election fraud, legal proceedings
#Rudy #Giuliani #Slow #Transfer #Assets #Election #Workers #Held #ContemptLocal guides struggle to earn due to low tour bookings, union rejects hiring foreign workers as solution
31st December 2024 – (Hong Kong) The Hong Kong government has recently released the “Development Blueprint for Hong Kong’s Tourism Industry 2.0,” outlining ambitious plans to enhance the tourism sector. The blueprint aims to increase the industry’s value added to HK$120 billion by 2029, up from HK$75.3 billion in 2023. It also anticipates a rise in employment within the industry, projecting 210,000 jobs by 2029 compared to the current 145,600.
Sara Leung Fong-yuen, chairwoman of the Federation of Hong Kong Trade Unions in Tourism, has expressed optimism about the initiative, particularly the introduction of a tour guide bridging programme by the Travel Industry Authority. She believes this approach will help address the shortage of local guides. However, Leung cautioned that hiring foreign workers to fill these roles may not be the best solution, given the current challenges in the industry, including insufficient trip bookings that hinder earnings.
In a recent radio interview, Leung highlighted that the core issue facing local guides is not the lack of licensed professionals, but rather the reduced number of tours available, which has led many experienced guides to seek alternative careers. She noted that employing foreign guides could exacerbate the problem, as they may lack familiarity with local culture and customs.
The blueprint outlines four key strategies aimed at revitalising the tourism industry, including diversifying visitor source markets and focusing on attracting high-value overnight guests. Additionally, it promotes smart tourism and aims to enhance overall service quality within the sector.
Rosanna Law, the secretary for culture, sports and tourism, emphasised the importance of community involvement in supporting the tourism industry. She urged Hong Kong residents to embrace the mindset of “everyone is a tourism ambassador,” encouraging a warm and welcoming attitude towards visitors.
Local guides in [insert city or region] are facing a tough challenge as they struggle to earn a living due to low tour bookings. With the tourism industry experiencing a significant downturn, many guides are finding it difficult to secure enough work to support themselves and their families.In an effort to address this issue, some have suggested hiring foreign workers to fill the gap in tour bookings. However, the local guides union has rejected this proposal, arguing that it would only exacerbate the problem for local guides who are already struggling to make ends meet.
The union believes that the focus should be on supporting and promoting local guides, rather than outsourcing work to foreign workers. They argue that by investing in training and development programs for local guides, the industry can be revitalized and local guides can have a better chance at earning a sustainable income.
As the debate continues, it is clear that finding a solution to the challenges facing local guides will require collaboration and cooperation between all stakeholders in the tourism industry. Only by working together can we ensure that local guides have the support they need to thrive in a competitive and challenging environment.
Tags:
- Local guides
- Tour bookings
- Union rejection
- Foreign workers
- Tourism industry
- Local economy
- Job opportunities
- Economic impact
- Travel industry
- Labor market
#Local #guides #struggle #earn #due #tour #bookings #union #rejects #hiring #foreign #workers #solution