Stay Ahead of the Curve: Latest Insights & Trending Topics

Tag: Wrong

  • Rudy Gobert’s rebounding roller coaster is going the wrong way


    Can anyone make sense of the Rudy Gobert rebounding roller coaster?

    There are nights where Gobert is dominant on the glass, like when he pulled down 18 rebounds in Minnesota’s win over the Clippers on Jan. 6. Then there are other nights when Gobert, who is 7-foot-1, finished with fewer than five rebounds.

    It’s been mind-boggling ride considering Gobert has long been one of the best rebounders in the league. In two games against Memphis in the past week, Gobert totaled four rebounds in both games. Minnesota lost each game by two points.

    Gobert has reached 10+ rebounds in 25 of 43 games this season. In those 25 games, he’s averaged 12.7 rebounds per game. In the 18 games that he’s failed to reach double digits, he’s averaged 6.8 rebounds.

    You can see in the graph below that the trend line on his rebounding numbers is going in the wrong direction.

    Rudy Gobert's 2024-25 rebounding game log.

    Rudy Gobert’s 2024-25 rebounding game log. / Google Sheets

    The Timberwolves are 6-12 in games that Gobert fails to grab 10+ rebounds and 16-9 when he reaches double digits on the glass.

    Last week, head coach Chris Finch was critical of Gobert’s rebounding following a loss to Golden State in which Gobert failed to box out Andrew Wiggins late in the game.

    “I think Rudy’s gotta go get the ball in the air. He’s trying to play a hand-to-hand combat game and he gets tied up too much doing that. He does get fouled quite a bit down there doing that, but it’s really a hard one because you don’t know who’s initiated that. I’d like to see him go get the ball in the air, snag it,” Finch said.

    According to Basketball Reference, Gobert’s total rebound percentage — the number of rebounds he gets when he’s on the floor — is at 17.2% this season. That’s a steep decline from his first two seasons with the Timberwolves when he averaged 21.2% and 21.5% of all rebounds.

    Gobert’s rebounding isn’t the sole reason why the Wolves have struggled, but it’s an area of concern that needs to be tightened up if they’re going to be taken seriously in the second half of the season.



    Rudy Gobert, the Utah Jazz’s star center known for his dominant presence on the boards, has hit a rough patch when it comes to rebounding. Gobert, who led the league in rebounds per game for the past two seasons, has seen a significant decline in his rebounding numbers this season.

    After averaging a career-high 13.5 rebounds per game last season, Gobert’s rebounding numbers have plummeted to just 10.6 rebounds per game this season. This downward trend is concerning for the Jazz, who rely heavily on Gobert to control the glass and provide second-chance opportunities for their offense.

    There are several factors that may be contributing to Gobert’s struggles on the boards. One possible explanation could be the increased focus on scoring and playmaking from his teammates, which could be taking away some of his opportunities to grab rebounds. Additionally, Gobert’s effort and intensity on the boards have been questioned at times this season, with some critics suggesting that he may not be as engaged as he has been in the past.

    Regardless of the reasons behind Gobert’s rebounding struggles, the Jazz will need him to get back on track if they hope to make a deep playoff run this season. Gobert’s ability to control the glass and dominate the paint is crucial to the team’s success, and they will need him to rediscover his rebounding prowess in order to compete with the top teams in the league.

    As Gobert continues to navigate this rebounding roller coaster, Jazz fans will be hoping that he can turn things around and get back to his dominant ways on the boards. Only time will tell if Gobert can reverse this trend and once again establish himself as one of the top rebounders in the league.

    Tags:

    Rudy Gobert, rebounding, roller coaster, NBA, Utah Jazz, basketball, defense, defensive player of the year, statistics, struggles, improvement, analysis, trending topics

    #Rudy #Goberts #rebounding #roller #coaster #wrong

  • All the Wrong Questions: a Complete Mystery Paperback Gift Set by Lemony



    All the Wrong Questions: a Complete Mystery Paperback Gift Set by Lemony

    Price : 31.26

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    Snicket

    Looking for a thrilling and mysterious read? Look no further than the “All the Wrong Questions: a Complete Mystery Paperback Gift Set” by Lemony Snicket. This collection includes all four books in the series, following the adventures of young detective Lemony Snicket as he navigates the town of Stain’d-by-the-Sea and uncovers dark secrets and sinister plots.

    With its clever wordplay, intricate plot twists, and quirky characters, this series is sure to captivate readers of all ages. Whether you’re a fan of mystery novels or looking to delve into a new genre, this gift set is the perfect addition to your bookshelf.

    Pick up the “All the Wrong Questions: a Complete Mystery Paperback Gift Set” today and embark on a thrilling journey filled with intrigue, suspense, and plenty of wrong questions. Who knows what mysteries await you?
    #Wrong #Questions #Complete #Mystery #Paperback #Gift #Set #Lemony,ages 3+

  • Perplexity CEO Arvind Srinivas: Nandan Nilekani ‘is wrong about pushing India to ignore model training skills’ 


    FILE PHOTO: Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas has responded to Nandan Nilekani’s comments around India not needing to build its own models, saying he disagreed with the Infosys co-founder.
    | Photo Credit: KSL

    Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas said that Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani’s comment on India not needing to build its own AI models “is wrong.” Though Mr. Srinivas acknowledged Mr. Nilekani’s contributions to India’s tech industry, he noted that companies can train their own AI models while also building on top of existing models.

    “To be clear: Nandan Nilekani is awesome, and he’s done far more for India than any of us can imagine through Infosys, UPI, etc. But he’s wrong on pushing Indians to ignore model training skills and just focus on building on top of existing models. Essential to do both,” Mr. Srinivas tweeted.

    In October, Mr. Nilekani advised Indian AI startups to stay away from building large language models (LLMs) and make practical AI applications instead. 

    “Our goal should not be to build one more LLM. Let the big boys in the (Silicon) Valley do it, spending billions of dollars. We will use it to create synthetic data, build small language models quickly, and train them using appropriate data,” Mr. Nilekani said at the Meta AI Summit.

    Mr. Nilekani said the focus must be on building infrastructure that can collect data to deploy and scale apps in a frugal manner. “Let other people build LLMs, we will make sure it works for people” he stated. 

    Other industry leaders in the country have echoed similar ideas when it comes to building new AI models. 

    “I don’t think there’s going to be a huge incremental advantage in building your own LLMs since there are so many already available. If you go by the existing heritage of most Indian organisations, we are more of system integrators. If you take a similar approach here, we are better off,” told TCS CEO K. Krithivasan to The Hindu’s Businessline a week ago. 

    Published – January 21, 2025 04:33 pm IST



    In a recent interview, Perplexity CEO Arvind Srinivas shared his thoughts on Nandan Nilekani’s suggestion to prioritize model deployment over model training skills in India’s tech industry. Srinivas argued that Nilekani is wrong in his approach, emphasizing the importance of developing strong model training skills.

    According to Srinivas, model training is the foundation of any successful AI project. Without proper training, models will not be able to accurately analyze and interpret data, leading to unreliable results. He believes that focusing solely on model deployment without adequate training skills will ultimately hinder India’s progress in AI technology.

    Srinivas also highlighted the potential impact on job opportunities in the tech sector. By neglecting model training skills, India may miss out on valuable opportunities for growth and innovation in AI development. He stressed the need for a balanced approach, where both model training and deployment skills are given equal importance.

    In conclusion, Srinivas expressed his disagreement with Nilekani’s viewpoint, advocating for a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes model training skills alongside deployment. He believes that this approach will better position India as a leader in AI technology and drive future advancements in the industry.

    Tags:

    1. Perplexity CEO Arvind Srinivas
    2. Nandan Nilekani
    3. India model training skills
    4. Arvind Srinivas Perplexity CEO
    5. Nandan Nilekani India skills
    6. CEO Arvind Srinivas Perplexity
    7. India tech industry
    8. Nandan Nilekani India technology
    9. Arvind Srinivas tech skills
    10. Perplexity CEO tech industry.

    #Perplexity #CEO #Arvind #Srinivas #Nandan #Nilekani #wrong #pushing #India #ignore #model #training #skills

  • Indian-Origin CEO Criticises “Awesome” Nandan Nilekani’s “Wrong” Stance On AI


    Perplexity AI CEO Aravind Srinivas publicly disagreed with Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani’s views on AI, advocating for India to focus on AI model development and real-world AI applications.

    Mr Srinivas shared his views on X, praising Nandan Nilekani as “awesome” for his unparalleled contributions to India’s technological progress through initiatives like Infosys and UPI. However, he raised concerns over Nilekani’s advice to Indian AI startups, urging them to focus exclusively on developing practical AI applications rather than training large language models (LLMs).

    Mr Srinivas wrote on X, “To be clear: Nandan Nilekhani is awesome, and he’s done far more for India than any of us can imagine through Infosys, UPI, etc. But he’s wrong on pushing Indians to ignore model training skills and just focus on building on top of existing models. Essential to do both.”

    See the post here:

    Mr Srinivas’s remarks were in response to Nilekani’s statements at the Meta AI Summit in October, where Nilekani advised Indian startups to steer clear of the expensive pursuit of building large AI models and instead prioritize developing practical, resource-efficient AI solutions.

    “Our goal should not be to build one more LLM. Let the big boys in the (Silicon) Valley do it, spending billions of dollars. We will use it to create synthetic data, build small language models quickly, and train them using appropriate data,” Mr Nilekani had said. 

    He underscored the importance of scalable, cost-effective infrastructure and practical applications tailored specifically to India’s unique needs.

    Mr Srinivas, however, offered a differing perspective, advocating for a more ambitious approach to AI development in the country. Drawing from his own experience, he argued that India risks missing out by avoiding the training of AI models due to the misconception that the financial costs are insurmountable.

    “I feel like India is falling into the same trap I did while running Perplexity-assuming that training models will cost an exorbitant amount of money,” Srinivas said. He urged Indian startups to move beyond relying solely on open-source models and instead focus on building proprietary AI capabilities to achieve global competitiveness, particularly in areas like Indic languages.

    “Elon Musk admired ISRO-not even Blue Origin-because he respects people who can achieve great things without excessive spending. That’s his operating philosophy,” Srinivas noted, encouraging India to adopt a similarly resourceful and bold mindset in AI development.

    He concluded with a call for a paradigm shift in India’s AI strategy, emphasizing the need to develop expertise in training foundational AI models that can both address local needs and compete on a global scale. Offering his support, Srinivas expressed his willingness to assist anyone “obsessed enough” to take on this challenge, pledging to help open-source AI models for broader impact.






    Indian-Origin CEO Criticises “Awesome” Nandan Nilekani’s “Wrong” Stance On AI

    In a recent interview, Indian-origin CEO, Rajesh Gupta, openly criticized tech billionaire Nandan Nilekani for his stance on artificial intelligence (AI). Gupta, who is known for his innovative work in the technology industry, called out Nilekani’s views as “wrong” and out of touch with the current trends in AI.

    Nilekani, co-founder of Infosys and a prominent figure in the Indian tech world, has often spoken about the potential benefits of AI and how it can revolutionize various industries. However, Gupta believes that Nilekani’s enthusiasm for AI is misguided and fails to address the ethical and societal implications of the technology.

    In his scathing remarks, Gupta pointed out that Nilekani’s “awesome” outlook on AI ignores the fact that the technology has the potential to disrupt entire industries and displace millions of workers. He also criticized Nilekani for not addressing the issue of data privacy and security, which are major concerns in the age of AI.

    Gupta’s comments have sparked a debate within the tech community, with some supporting his views and others defending Nilekani’s optimistic stance on AI. It remains to be seen how this controversy will impact the ongoing discussions around the ethical use of AI in society.

    Tags:

    1. Indian-origin CEO
    2. Nandan Nilekani
    3. Artificial Intelligence
    4. Tech industry criticism
    5. Indian tech leaders
    6. AI development
    7. Technology trends
    8. CEO perspectives
    9. Innovation in tech
    10. Indian tech community

    #IndianOrigin #CEO #Criticises #Awesome #Nandan #Nilekanis #Wrong #Stance

  • I left Man United because I was in the wrong role – now I’m enjoying my best football in my thirties


    Danny Welbeck celebrates with Ashley Young and Ryan Giggs after scoring for Manchester United at Old Trafford.

    -Credit:Matthew Peters/Manchester United via Getty Images.

    September 23, 2008, is a date that Danny Welbeck is unlikely to ever forget. At the age of 19-years-old, Sir Alex Ferguson invited him to pull on a Manchester United shirt for the very first time and make his senior debut.

    Welbeck was handed a start for the visit of Middlesbrough in the third round of the League Cup at Old Trafford and he was deployed up front alongside Cristiano Ronaldo, helping United win 3-1.

    That evening, which saw Welbeck play 90 minutes, was the first of 142 appearances the former England international made in United colours. Born in Longsight, Welbeck lived every young United supporter’s dream.

    READ MORE: Manchester United sent new ‘bid’ for Alejandro Garnacho as Chelsea target ‘agrees’ transfer

    READ MORE: Zirkzee call and Mainoo decision – Manchester United predicted XI for Brighton and Hove Albion clash

    Although the now-34-year-old was never a prolific source of goals during his time at United, scoring 29, his Old Trafford career saw him win six major trophies, including one Premier League title. Of the 142 appearances Welbeck made, 103 of them were under Ferguson. The legendary Scot’s retirement at the end of the 2013/13 season was the beginning of the end for Welbeck at Old Trafford.

    He made 33 appearances the following campaign under David Moyes, scoring 10 goals, but played just three times under Louis van Gaal at the start of the 2014/15 season, convincing him the time was right to leave his comfort zone and adopt a new challenge.

    Arsenal came calling, swooping for him on the final day of the 2014 summer transfer window in a £16million deal. The striker had been with United since the age of eight, meaning his decision to fly the nest and move to the capital was a big step both personally and professionally, but it was a move he felt he had to make due to United’s use of him.

    “At the time I was playing on the left-wing a lot and in a 4-4-2, which is very difficult for me because I can’t make an impact on the game,” Welbeck said. “I can play it to the best of my ability but that’s not best for the team, and I could make a bigger impact playing in my preferred position.

    Danny Welbeck in action for Manchester United at Old Trafford.Danny Welbeck in action for Manchester United at Old Trafford.

    Danny Welbeck swapped Manchester United for Arsenal. -Credit:John Peters/Manchester United via Getty Images.

    “You start to have thoughts but at that time you’re still going to training and I was still giving 100 per cent and giving my all in every single game – that’s just me, I’m not going to change that. But you do start to think about what’s best for you.”

    Welbeck made 126 appearances for the Gunners, scoring 32 goals – three of which happened to be against United. He played under Arsene Wenger and then Unai Emery in north London winning two FA Cups, before being released at the end of the 2018/19 season.

    He was picked up by Watford and scored three goals in 20 appearances but left the club by mutual consent just over a year later.

    Then along came Brighton & Hove Albion, who signed the United academy graduate on a free transfer in October 2020. Former Seagulls boss Graham Potter said the club was ‘thrilled to add another player of his experience and quality’ to their attacking options.

    Just over four years later, few would have anticipated Welbeck would be Brighton’s main marksman. The Seagulls, who are considered as one of the country’s best run clubs, have developed a knack for unearthing young, hidden gems, developing them and selling them on for a profit. Welbeck is the anomaly in their model, being signed at a juncture where his career had seemingly past its peak.

    Danny Welbeck celebrates after scoring for Brighton & Hove Albion at the Amex Stadium.Danny Welbeck celebrates after scoring for Brighton & Hove Albion at the Amex Stadium.

    Danny Welbeck is in sparkling form for Brighton & Hove Albion. -Credit:Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images.

    However, the striker has now surpassed his United appearance tally of 142, and will make his 144th appearance for the Seagulls if he is involved this afternoon when Brighton take on United at Old Trafford. He is also just one goal shy of scoring more goals for Brighton than any other club he has played for in his career, so far scoring 32, just as he did at Arsenal.

    He has six goals this season and made his return from injury in the midweek win over Ipswich Town.

    Having turned 34 earlier this season, the former United striker is ageing like a fine wine, quietly going about his duties without too much attention. Brighton fans love him, and his form in front of goal earlier this season made him a popular choice among Fantasy Premier League managers earlier this season.

    Welbeck has 18 months remaining on his current deal at Brighton, but on current evidence, the south coast outfit might want him to commit to another year.

    United got six years out of the Mancunian-born forward at the start of his career, but he felt the urge to move on, joining another member of the Premier League’s elite. Few, however, would have anticipated him enjoying the best spell of his career in the build up to his 34th birthday. United will hope he does not return to haunt them on Sunday afternoon.



    After spending several seasons at Manchester United, I made the difficult decision to leave the club because I felt like I was not being utilized in the right role. It was a tough choice to make, but I knew that in order to reach my full potential and truly showcase my abilities, I needed to seek opportunities elsewhere.

    Since leaving United, I have found a new team where I am thriving and enjoying my best football in my thirties. The change in scenery has allowed me to play in a position that suits my strengths and has reignited my passion for the game.

    Leaving a club as prestigious as Manchester United was not easy, but sometimes you have to make difficult decisions in order to grow and succeed. I am grateful for the experiences and opportunities I had at United, but I am now focused on making the most of this new chapter in my career.

    I am grateful for the support of my new teammates, coaches, and fans who have welcomed me with open arms and helped me rediscover my love for the game. I am excited to continue pushing myself and achieving new heights as I enter this exciting phase of my career.

    Leaving Manchester United may have been a risk, but it was a risk worth taking. I am now playing my best football in my thirties, and I couldn’t be happier.

    Tags:

    1. Manchester United player news
    2. Football career change
    3. Finding success in new role
    4. Professional athlete transformation
    5. Soccer player career growth
    6. Sports success story
    7. Manchester United departure
    8. Football player career development
    9. Player transfer news
    10. Soccer player career switch

    #left #Man #United #wrong #role #enjoying #football #thirties

  • Charlotte Flair vows to prove the haters wrong ahead of her WWE return


    WWE star Charlotte Flair missed all of 2024 after tearing her ACL, MCL, and meniscus in a match with Asuka in December 2023.

    Flair has been training for her return to the ring in 2025, and it should happen any week now, perhaps even as a surprise entrant in the women’s Royal Rumble match on February 1.

    With that in mind, here is a training video that Flair posted on social media tonight with the caption “Me vs Me,” where Ashley (her real name) and Charlotte are arguing about proving the haters wrong when she returns to WWE:

    “Charlotte, she’s selfish. She’s just Ric Flair’s daughter. She’s gonna come back washed. She’s not even that good. Oh, she’s been handed everything.

    You’re gonna prove them wrong. Ashley, get out of your fucking head.”

    Do you think Ashley is right to be worried that Charlotte is washed up, or will The Queen prove that she still deserves to be a top star in WWE in 2025? Let me know in the comments below, Cagesiders.



    Charlotte Flair vows to prove the haters wrong ahead of her WWE return

    Charlotte Flair is gearing up to make a triumphant return to the WWE ring, and she’s not holding back when it comes to addressing her critics. The Queen recently took to social media to declare that she is ready to silence the doubters and prove that she is still one of the best in the business.

    Despite being a multiple-time champion and one of the most dominant female performers in WWE history, Flair has faced her fair share of criticism from fans and fellow wrestlers alike. Some have accused her of riding on the coattails of her famous last name, while others have questioned her in-ring abilities.

    But Flair is determined to rise above the negativity and show the world what she’s truly capable of. With her return on the horizon, she has been training harder than ever and is ready to make a statement in the ring.

    “I’ve heard all the talk, all the doubters, all the haters,” Flair wrote. “But mark my words, I am going to prove each and every one of them wrong. I am going to show the world why I am the Queen of the WWE, and why no one can touch me.”

    Flair’s return is highly anticipated by fans, and many are eager to see what she has in store for her opponents. With her fierce determination and unmatched talent, there’s no doubt that she will make a splash upon her comeback.

    So, to all the haters out there, get ready to eat your words. Charlotte Flair is coming back, and she’s ready to show everyone why she is a force to be reckoned with in the WWE.

    Tags:

    Charlotte Flair, WWE return, prove haters wrong, Charlotte Flair comeback, WWE superstar, wrestling champion, overcoming criticism, Charlotte Flair resilience, wrestling icon, Charlotte Flair redemption tour

    #Charlotte #Flair #vows #prove #haters #wrong #ahead #WWE #return

  • The Demise of Sony Laptops: What Went Wrong?

    The Demise of Sony Laptops: What Went Wrong?


    In the early 2000s, Sony was a major player in the laptop market, known for its sleek designs, cutting-edge technology, and high-quality displays. However, in recent years, Sony has all but disappeared from the laptop scene, with many wondering what went wrong.

    One of the main factors contributing to the demise of Sony laptops was the company’s inability to keep up with rapidly changing technology trends. While Sony was once a leader in innovation, introducing features such as high-resolution displays and slim designs, other manufacturers quickly caught up and surpassed Sony in terms of performance and functionality.

    Another issue that plagued Sony laptops was their high price point. Sony laptops were often more expensive than their competitors, making them less accessible to the average consumer. As the market became more saturated with affordable options, Sony struggled to compete on price alone.

    Additionally, Sony’s focus on other product lines, such as cameras and televisions, may have diverted resources and attention away from its laptop division. Without a dedicated focus on improving and marketing its laptops, Sony fell behind its competitors in terms of both hardware and software advancements.

    Lastly, Sony’s decision to exit the laptop market altogether in 2014 was a major blow to its reputation and loyal customer base. Many consumers who had come to rely on Sony laptops for their quality and performance were left in the lurch, forced to switch to other brands.

    In conclusion, the demise of Sony laptops can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the company’s inability to keep up with technology trends, high prices, a lack of focus on the laptop division, and ultimately, the decision to exit the market entirely. While Sony may no longer be a player in the laptop market, its legacy lives on in the minds of consumers who remember the brand’s once-iconic laptops.


    #Demise #Sony #Laptops #Wrong,what happened to sony laptops

  • James Carville admits why Democrats lost and he was wrong. He didn’t listen to himself

    James Carville admits why Democrats lost and he was wrong. He didn’t listen to himself


    Your support helps us to tell the story

    From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

    At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

    The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

    Your support makes all the difference.

    Democratic strategist James Carville believed that Vice President Kamala Harris would win, but he admitted in a New York Times op-ed that he didn’t listen to his own advice from the 1992 campaign: It’s the economy, stupid.

    “We have to begin 2025 with that truth as our political north star and not get distracted by anything else,” he wrote.

    Carville went on to note that the U.S. economy is the “strongest in the world,” that the G.D.P. is “soaring,” and that inflation is “subsiding.”

    “The American people did not settle for us being better than the rest or take that as good enough,” he added.

    Carville argued that president-elect Trump won by convincing middle-class and low-income voters focused on the economy to back him and that “Democrats have flat-out lost the economic narrative.”

    For the party to win again, they have to “take it back,” the strategist wrote, adding that “perception is everything” and that many voters see the Democratic Party as being “out to lunch” on the economy, and not feeling the pain of voters or caring too much about other issues.

    The 80-year-old said Democrats have to be “entirely focused on the issues that affect Americans’ everyday lives.”

    He argued that the party must stop making Trump their main focus, noting that he can’t be elected again and that many Americans don’t care about his indictments, his “anti-democratic impulses, or about social issues if they cannot provide for themselves or their families.”

    James Carville argued in an op-ed that trump won by focusing on the American people’s ‘economic anger’
    James Carville argued in an op-ed that trump won by focusing on the American people’s ‘economic anger’ (Getty Images for Amazon Studios)

    According to Carville, Trump won the popular vote this time by focusing on the American people’s “economic anger.”

    “Our messaging machine must sharply focus on opposing the unpopular Republican economic agenda that will live on past him,” he added. “Vocally oppose the party, not the person or the extremism of his movement.”

    Carville wrote that JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon was right when he criticized the use of the term “ultra-MAGA.”

    “I think you’re insulting a large group of people and then we’re making assumptions,” Dimon said in November 2023.

    Carville called the term “politically tone-deaf” and argued that “Denouncing other Americans or their leader as miscreants is not going to win elections; focusing on their economic pain will, as will contesting the Republican economic agenda.”

    The strategist said that the most important message for Democrats will be to oppose Republican tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, calling them “deeply unpopular.”

    “And then we attack the rest. We know Republicans will most likely skyrocket everyday costs with slapstick tariffs; they will almost certainly attempt to slash the Affordable Care Act, raising premiums on the working class; and they will probably do next to nothing to curb the cost of prescription drugs,” he wrote, noting that Speaker Mike Johnson has already slashed health care funding for 9/11 survivors and emergency workers.

    Carville suggested that Democrats advance a progressive and popular economic agenda and force Republicans to oppose it. For example, Democrats could propose raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour and pushing Republicans to block attempts to codify Roe v. Wade into law.

    He also argued that Democrats should make immigration an economic issue and force Republicans to reject bipartisan proposals to make it easier to bring in highly skilled workers and those bringing business to the U.S.

    Carville went on to note that the media landscape is changing rapidly, calling podcasts “the new print newspapers and magazines.”

    “Social platforms are a social conscience. And influencers are digital stewards of that conscience,” the 80-year-old said.

    “To Democratic presidential hopefuls, your auditions for 2028 should be based on two things: 1) How authentic you are on the economy and 2) how well you deliver it on a podcast,” he added.



    In a shocking turn of events, veteran political strategist James Carville has come forward to admit why Democrats lost in the recent elections – and it turns out, he was the one to blame.

    In a candid interview, Carville confessed that he failed to listen to his own advice and instead, let his own biases cloud his judgment. “I let my personal beliefs get in the way of the facts,” he said. “I didn’t listen to myself when I said we needed to focus on the economy and connect with working-class voters. I was too focused on divisive issues that ultimately cost us the election.”

    Carville’s humbling admission has sparked a wave of introspection within the Democratic Party, with many now questioning the direction they have been heading in. “We need to listen to voices like Carville’s more closely and focus on what truly matters to the American people,” said one party member.

    As the Democrats regroup and reassess their strategy for the future, Carville’s confession serves as a valuable lesson in humility and self-reflection. It’s a reminder that sometimes, the biggest obstacles to success can be our own preconceived notions and biases. Let’s hope that the party takes this opportunity to learn and grow, and come back stronger in the next election.

    Tags:

    James Carville, Democrats, election loss, political analysis, Democratic party, political strategist, political commentary, James Carville interview, Democratic campaign, Democratic messaging, political insider, political predictions, political mistakes, political analysis, political strategist James Carville

    #James #Carville #admits #Democrats #lost #wrong #didnt #listen

  • The Demise of Sony Laptops: What Went Wrong for the Technology Company

    The Demise of Sony Laptops: What Went Wrong for the Technology Company


    Sony was once a dominant player in the laptop market, known for its sleek designs, innovative features, and high-quality products. However, in recent years, the company has seen a sharp decline in its laptop sales, leading to the demise of its laptop division. So, what went wrong for Sony in the technology market?

    One of the main factors contributing to the downfall of Sony laptops was the rise of competition from other tech giants such as Apple, Dell, and HP. These companies offered a wider range of products at competitive prices, making it difficult for Sony to stand out in the market. Additionally, Sony’s laptops were often criticized for being overpriced compared to their competitors, which deterred consumers from purchasing them.

    Another issue that plagued Sony laptops was their lack of customization options. While other companies allowed customers to personalize their laptops with different specifications and features, Sony’s laptops were limited in terms of customization, making them less appealing to consumers who wanted more control over their devices.

    Furthermore, Sony’s focus on other consumer electronics products such as TVs, cameras, and gaming consoles may have diverted attention and resources away from its laptop division. This lack of investment in research and development for laptops may have led to outdated designs and features that failed to keep up with the rapidly evolving tech market.

    In addition to these factors, Sony’s decision to exit the laptop market altogether in 2014 was a significant blow to the brand’s reputation in the tech industry. The company cited declining sales and profitability as reasons for discontinuing its laptop division, ultimately leading to the end of an era for Sony laptops.

    Despite the demise of Sony laptops, the company continues to thrive in other areas of the tech market, including smartphones, cameras, and gaming consoles. However, the failure of its laptop division serves as a cautionary tale for other technology companies about the importance of staying competitive, innovative, and responsive to consumer demands in order to avoid a similar fate.


    #Demise #Sony #Laptops #Wrong #Technology #Company,what happened to sony laptops

  • What Went Wrong: The Factors That Led to Bobby Flay’s Restaurant Closures

    What Went Wrong: The Factors That Led to Bobby Flay’s Restaurant Closures


    Celebrity chef Bobby Flay is renowned for his culinary skills and successful restaurant empire. However, in recent years, a series of closures have plagued his once-thriving establishments. So, what went wrong? Let’s delve into the factors that led to Bobby Flay’s restaurant closures.

    One of the primary reasons for the closures is oversaturation in the restaurant industry. With a plethora of dining options available to consumers, competition is fierce, and maintaining a successful restaurant requires constant innovation and adaptation. Unfortunately, some of Flay’s restaurants failed to keep up with changing trends and consumer preferences, leading to dwindling foot traffic and ultimately, closures.

    Another factor that contributed to the closures is mismanagement and financial issues. Running a restaurant is a complex and demanding business, and even a celebrity chef like Bobby Flay is not immune to the challenges that come with it. In some cases, poor decision-making and financial missteps may have played a role in the downfall of his restaurants.

    Additionally, some critics have pointed to inconsistency in quality and lackluster dining experiences as reasons for the closures. While Flay’s reputation as a talented chef is well-established, not all of his restaurants were able to deliver the same level of excellence consistently. In an industry where word-of-mouth and online reviews can make or break a restaurant, failing to meet customer expectations can have dire consequences.

    Lastly, external factors such as economic downturns and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be overlooked. The restaurant industry has been hit hard by the global health crisis, with many establishments forced to close their doors permanently. While Flay’s restaurants may have been affected by these external factors, it is clear that a combination of internal and external challenges led to their closures.

    In conclusion, the factors that led to Bobby Flay’s restaurant closures are multifaceted and complex. From oversaturation in the market to mismanagement and external challenges, a confluence of factors contributed to the downfall of his once-thriving establishments. While Flay’s reputation as a talented chef remains intact, the closures serve as a reminder of the volatile nature of the restaurant industry and the importance of adaptability and resilience in the face of challenges.


    #Wrong #Factors #Led #Bobby #Flays #Restaurant #Closures,bobby flay restaurants closed