Tag: Youre

  • Stream ‘You’re Cordially Invited,’ ‘Watson’






    Join us for a special double feature streaming event this weekend!

    First up, we have the romantic comedy “You’re Cordially Invited,” which follows a wedding planner who falls for the groom-to-be. Will love conquer all or will chaos ensue? Tune in to find out!

    Following that, we have the thrilling mystery “Watson,” where a detective must solve a series of murders with the help of his trusty sidekick. Can they crack the case before it’s too late?

    Grab your popcorn, cozy up on the couch, and get ready for a night of laughs and suspense. Don’t miss out on these two fantastic films streaming this Saturday night!

    Tags:

    1. Stream ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ and ‘Watson’ Online
    2. Watch ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ and ‘Watson’ on Your Favorite Platforms
    3. How to Watch ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ and ‘Watson’ Online
    4. Stream ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ and ‘Watson’ for Free
    5. Top Platforms to Stream ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ and ‘Watson’
    6. Exciting New Shows: ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ and ‘Watson’ Available for Streaming

    #Stream #Youre #Cordially #Invited #Watson

  • ‘You’re Cordially Invited,’ FKA Twigs, Lisa Lisa biopic top EW’s Must List


    Are you ready for the Grammys? I’m ready for the incredible lineup of performers to hit the stage, but I still haven’t settled on what I’m wearing to co-host the Entertainment Weekly and PEOPLE Red Carpet Live show…. That may sound like a humble brag, but between Sundance last weekend and regular work back in the office this week, it truly has become a “what can Amazon deliver in time?” situation. So if anything, tune into EW.com, our YouTube channel, and socials starting at 6 p.m. ET/3 p.m. PT to see what happens to show up in my mailroom by Sunday morning. —Patrick Gomez, Editor-in-Chief

    P.S. If you want to receive the Must List in your inbox, sign up for our  “Entertainment Weekly and Awardist” newsletters. You’ll receive all three each week — the trifecta of entertainment news.

    “You’re Cordially Invited”

    Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell in ‘You’re Cordially Invited’.

    Glen Wilson/Prime Video


    Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon are the dynamic duo we never knew we needed in this Prime Video comedy. The stars play adversaries who discover the idyllic venue resort they reserved for their respective loved ones’ weddings accidentally double-booked them on the same weekend. Initially, they try to co-exist in tight quarters, but soon the saboteurs find themselves embroiled in a messy, all-out war. Director-writer Nicholas Stoller (Forgetting Sarah MarshallNeighbors) spins this feature, along with his stars’ comedic chops, into something nostalgic and reminiscent of late-aught comedies. —Jessica Wang, Staff Writer

    Check out EW’s exclusive sneak peek at You’re Cordially Invited

    FKA Twigs new album “Eusexua”

    FKA Twigs’ ‘Eusexua’.

    Atlantic


    Eusexua Winter has arrived. On her latest album, Twigs brings her steely avant-pop to the club but loses none of her mystique. Giving off some serious Ray of Light vibes, it’s the perfect soundtrack for wild nights out and very cozy nights in. —Jason Lamphier, Senior Editor

    “The Recruit”

    Noah Centineo in season 2 of ‘The Recruit’.

    Courtesy of Netflix


    CIA lawyer Owen Hendricks (Noah Centineo) has no business getting involved in espionage operations. Will that stop him from doing it again? Nope. Teo Yoo (Past Lives) joins the fun for the second season of the Netflix action series. —Debbie Day, News Editor

    Read EW’s The Recruit season 1 finale explainer

    “Common Side Effects”

    ‘Common Side Effects’.

    Warner Bros. Discovery


    When a kindhearted mycologist finds a blue mushroom with miraculous healing powers, Big Pharma makes it their mission to silence him permanently. Mike Judge‘s animated Adult Swim thriller blends deadpan humor with timely — and extremely relatable — rage against the healthcare industry machine. —Kristen Baldwin, TV Critic

    “Can You Feel the Beat: The Lisa Lisa Story”

    ‘Can You Feel the Beat: The Lisa Lisa Story’.

    A+E Networks


    Lifetime continues its exploration of the lives of groundbreaking women of color in music such as Whitney Houston and Mary J. Blige with a new movie chronicling the rise of Puerto Rican icon Lisa Velez, a.k.a. Lisa Lisa. We’re definitely lost in emotion. —Ryan Coleman, News Writer



    Join us for a glamorous evening as we celebrate the highly anticipated biopic of two iconic women in the music industry – FKA Twigs and Lisa Lisa. These talented artists have captivated audiences around the world with their unique style and powerful voices.

    FKA Twigs, known for her ethereal vocals and mesmerizing performances, has captured the hearts of fans with her boundary-pushing music. Lisa Lisa, a pioneer in the freestyle genre, has been a trailblazer in the industry for decades with hits like “I Wonder If I Take You Home” and “Head to Toe.”

    Now, their incredible stories are being brought to life in a new biopic that promises to showcase their rise to fame, struggles, triumphs, and everything in between. Get ready to be inspired and entertained by these two powerhouse women.

    So mark your calendars and get ready to be dazzled – you’re cordially invited to join us in celebrating FKA Twigs, Lisa Lisa, and their incredible journey in the world of music. Don’t miss out on this must-see event that is sure to leave you speechless.

    Tags:

    • You’re Cordially Invited
    • FKA Twigs
    • Lisa Lisa biopic
    • EW’s Must List
    • Entertainment Weekly
    • Music biopic
    • Must-see films
    • Pop culture news
    • Celebrity biopics
    • Music industry updates

    #Youre #Cordially #Invited #FKA #Twigs #Lisa #Lisa #biopic #top #EWs #List

  • ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ Review: Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon Star in New Rom-Com


    Ferrell plays Jim, a single dad in Atlanta whose daughter, Jenni (the always-hilarious Geraldine Viswanathan), announces she’s getting married to her college sweetheart Oliver (Stony Blyden). A widower since Jenni was a little girl, Jim is a “girl dad” the way some men are “wife guys”: His life revolves around Jenni, and they’re the best of friends. She is all he has, and once he adjusts to the idea of her getting married, he starts to get excited about the wedding. What if they got married at the same inn on the same tiny island where he and her mother tied the knot? Maybe on June 1?

    Meanwhile, across the country, the TV producer Margot (Witherspoon) discovers to her delight that her little sister, Neve (Meredith Hagner), is engaged to her beloved Dixon (Jimmy Tatro). Margot isn’t on great terms with the rest of the family — their other two siblings (Rory Scovel and Leanne Morgan) and their mother (Celia Weston), all of whom are genteel Southerners — but she’s determined to plan the wedding anyhow. Wouldn’t it be great if they could have it on the tiny island where Margot and Neve spent summers with their grandmother? Maybe on June 1?

    And thus the gears of the rom-com are set in motion, with Jim and Margot fated to meet-cute. Of course we know what will occur; the fun is seeing how it occurs, in this case with a combination of comedy of errors and comedy of manners. Along the way, drunk speeches are delivered, profanities are hurled, dirty jokes are told, lessons are learned — about family togetherness, about being a control freak, about not judging people without knowing them — and at least one alligator is wrestled. (There’s the surrealist swerve.) Naturally, love is also in the air.

    All good, when the formula is the point. But there is something off about “You’re Cordially Invited,” some sense that the whole thing never clicks into place. There are sections (particularly in a sequence taking place at a wedding rehearsal) that feel as if a scene or two were lifted out. Continuity does not feel completely settled — how did that guy get to that room? Why is it sunny out now? What is this side character’s deal?

    Perhaps most disappointingly, while Witherspoon has her tightly wound but good-hearted big sister thing down perfectly, it doesn’t seem as if Ferrell’s full comedic genius makes it onto the screen. It’s not the fault of his character; the sweet but somewhat bizarre guy fits him well. But there are moments when you can see his impish flair for improvisation shine through, and these moments highlight how little time he gets to let loose — or, at least, how little of it made it into the final cut.



    “You’re Cordially Invited” is a delightful new romantic comedy starring the dynamic duo of Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon. The film follows the story of two strangers who are brought together by a chance encounter at a wedding, only to find themselves falling in love amidst the chaos of wedding planning.

    Ferrell and Witherspoon have undeniable chemistry on screen, making their characters’ budding romance feel authentic and heartwarming. Ferrell brings his signature comedic charm to the role of a lovable goofball, while Witherspoon shines as a strong-willed and independent woman who is not afraid to speak her mind.

    The supporting cast also delivers standout performances, with scene-stealing moments from the likes of Maya Rudolph and Rob Riggle. The film is filled with laugh-out-loud moments, as well as touching scenes that will tug at your heartstrings.

    The screenplay, written by newcomer Emily Johnson, is witty and clever, with a perfect balance of humor and heart. Director Jason Reitman brings a fresh perspective to the rom-com genre, infusing the film with his signature style of storytelling.

    Overall, “You’re Cordially Invited” is a charming and feel-good romantic comedy that is sure to win over audiences. Ferrell and Witherspoon’s on-screen chemistry, coupled with a strong supporting cast and sharp writing, make this film a must-see for fans of the genre. Don’t miss out on this delightful rom-com that will leave you smiling from ear to ear.

    Tags:

    • You’re Cordially Invited review
    • Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon
    • New Rom-Com
    • Movie review
    • Romantic comedy
    • Hollywood stars
    • Film analysis
    • Comedy duo
    • Movie critique

    #Youre #Cordially #Invited #Review #Ferrell #Reese #Witherspoon #Star #RomCom

  • Reese Witherspoon Revives the Peplum Trend in Louis Vuitton Skirt Suit at ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ Screening


    Reese Witherspoon brought back a major 2010s trend at a New York screening of her new film “You’re Cordially Invited” on Tuesday.

    The actress wore a black Louis Vuitton skirt suit consisting of a zip-up collarless jacket and miniskirt with peplum details. The flared silhouette has been revived in the 2020s, with stars like Nicole Kidman and Emma Stone modeling peplum gowns at the Academy Awards in 2022 and 2024, respectively.

    More from WWD

    Reese Witherspoon at the New York screening of "You're Cordially Invited" on Jan. 28, Louis Vuitton, skirt suit, peplum

    Witherspoon was dressed by her longtime stylist, Petra Flannery, who also counts Amy Adams and Zoe Saldaña as clients.

    Hairdresser Lona Vigi styled Witherspoon’s blond tresses in waves, while makeup artist Kelsey Deenihan Fisher gave her rose gold eye shadow and a rosy terracotta lip.

    On the red carpet, Witherspoon posed with her costar, Will Ferrell, who layered a brown suede jacket over a navy sweater and olive green trousers.

    The “Legally Blonde” star also modeled a skirt suit at the U.K. premiere of “You’re Cordially Invited” on Thursday, wearing a cropped blazer and slit pencil skirt by Dolce & Gabbana.

    Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon at the New York screening of "You're Cordially Invited" on Jan. 28, Louis Vuitton, skirt suit, peplum

    Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon

    Witherspoon evoked her character from the 2001 film in October while speaking at Hello Sunshine’s Shine Away event in Los Angeles, modeling a Carolina Herrera dress in Elle Woods’ signature hue: pink.

    The actress selected a flared midi silhouette from the label’s resort 2025 collection, which features button embellishments and a thin belt. She added on small gold hoops, completing her look with metallic cap-toe slingbacks.

    Witherspoon is searching for the next Elle Woods, as a prequel series to “Legally Blonde” is currently in pre-production. An open casting call was announced by the actress on Instagram last spring.

    “Before she became the most famous Gemini vegetarian to graduate from Harvard Law, she was just a regular ‘90s high school girl,” she wrote of the show’s premise. “And all of you are going to get to know her, next year on @primevideo I’m so excited!”

    “Elle” will be produced by Witherspoon’s own production company, Hello Sunshine, which she founded in 2016.

    Reese Witherspoon at the New York screening of "You're Cordially Invited" on Jan. 28, Louis Vuitton, skirt suit, peplum

    Reese Witherspoon

    Reese Witherspoon, Olivia Wilde, Anya Taylor-Joy and More Celebrate The Tiffany & Co. Blue Book

    View Gallery

    Launch Gallery: Reese Witherspoon, Olivia Wilde, Anya Taylor-Joy and More Celebrate The Tiffany & Co. Blue Book

    Best of WWD

    Sign up for WWD’s Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.



    Reese Witherspoon stunned in a chic Louis Vuitton skirt suit at the ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ screening, bringing back the peplum trend in style. With her signature charm and impeccable fashion sense, Reese proved once again why she is a style icon to be reckoned with. Read all about her fashionable look and how she effortlessly revived this classic trend in our latest post! #ReeseWitherspoon #LouisVuitton #PeplumTrend #FashionIcon

    Tags:

    Reese Witherspoon, Peplum Trend, Louis Vuitton, Skirt Suit, You’re Cordially Invited, Screening, Celebrity Fashion, Red Carpet Style, Fashion Trends, Hollywood Style, Celebrity Outfit

    #Reese #Witherspoon #Revives #Peplum #Trend #Louis #Vuitton #Skirt #Suit #Youre #Cordially #Invited #Screening

  • ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ review: Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell collide


    Are you with the bride or the groom? Hold on, scratch that. Are you with Reese Witherspoon or Will Ferrell?

    “You’re Cordially Invited,” a new comedy directed by Nicholas Stoller, brings together two stars whose movie worlds are nearly as divided as wedding guests on separate sides of the aisle. Ferrell is most closely associated with broad comedies and Witherspoon the more romantic variety. And while both have expanded beyond their wheelhouses, they are each A-list refugees from movie genres — laugh-out-loud comedies, rom-coms — that have largely faded from theaters in recent years.

    “You’re Cordially Invited,” which debuts Thursday on Prime Video, unites these two once-ubiquitous box-office forces in a streaming-only wedding comedy that cross-pollinates “Father of the Bride” with “Wedding Crashers.” The combination works well enough, though it’d be fairer to deem “You’re Cordially Invited” a funnier-than-average wedding movie than it would be a top-grade Ferrell comedy.

    It’s been two decades since, in “Wedding Crashers,” Ferrell so gently called to his mother, “Hey, Mom! Can we get some meatloaf!” But a whole era has passed. “You’re Cordially Invited” is an attempt to rekindle some of the spirit of those early ‘00s comedies while growing it up a little, and roping in a new generation of funny people. Here, Ferrell plays the overly doting father to Jenni (Geraldine Viswanathan). He’s a widower whose happiness rests to an unsound degree on his daughter. Jim steams her clothes and styles her hair. He’s not crashing the wedding this time; he’s baking the cake.

    When Jenni returns home with a ring on her finger and her now-fiancé (Stony Blyden) in tow, Jim experiences the happy news more like a nightmare. Still, he gathers himself together and books a destination wedding on the small Georgia island where he and his wife were married.

    Meanwhile, we’re introduced to Margot (Witherspoon) a high-powered reality TV executive in Los Angeles whose younger sister (Meredith Hagner) is getting married to her boyfriend (Jimmy Tatro). Her abiding issue is a disconnect with her Atlanta-era family and their disapproving mother (Celia Weston), a fissure that the wedding, which Margot opts to plan herself, quickly exacerbates.

    When, a year later, these two groups arrive on the island, Jim and Margot eye each other suspiciously right up until they each attempt to check in at the same time. Thanks to the untimely death of the inn’s longtime owner, the place has been double-booked for the weekend — a particularly awkward situation given the island can only accommodate one wedding at a time. The supporting roles throughout “You’re Cordially Invited” are well cast, including the inn’s new, very apologetic manager, played by Jack McBrayer.

    After some hesitation, Margot and Jim resolve to share the venue. This, of course, is the not particularly subtle concept of “You’re Cordially Invited.” The arrangement is momentarily copacetic but gradually devolves into an all-out war between Margot and Jim, while the two very different wedding parties — one a multicultural DJ-ing crew, the other longtime Southerners — mingle congenially.

    The main deficiency of “You’re Cordially Invited,” also scripted by Stoller (“Neighbors,” “Forgetting Sarah Marshall”), is that everything about it proceeds from its concept. The characters feel engineered to suit it, and everything in its plot is orchestrated to serve the rival wedding feud. Nothing in how things evolve will surprise you or feel particularly organic. For a not especially long movie, “You’re Cordially Invited” drags, a byproduct of its artificial conception. This is the kind of film where the post-credits sing-along feels forced.

    That said, there’s a wide array of comic talent throughout Stoller’s film that enlivens it. That includes Keyla Monterroso Mejia, Rory Scovel, Leanne Morgan and even, briefly, Peyton Manning. This should be a showcase for Viswanathan, the talented star of “Blockers” and “Bad Education,” but her character, while primary, doesn’t give her much to work with beyond shedding an overly dependent dad. The highlight of the cast, really, is Weston, who is so good as a hard-to-impress matriarch that you could just as easily drop her into a family drama.

    Ferrell, who has made unadjusted fathers a specialty since “Saturday Night Live,” finds more ways to make Jim a compelling comic character than most anyone could. Having the chance to see him in a big studio comedy has gotten so foolishly infrequent that “You’re Cordially Invited” is worth RSVP’ing to for that too-rare opportunity, in itself.

    Somewhat surprisingly, “You’re Cordially Invited” doesn’t culminate in a big comic set piece but puts much — maybe too much — of its energy into talking through Jim and Margot’s hang-ups. There’s a clever, self-aware theme of honesty: too little of it in Jim and Jenni’s performative dynamic, and too much of it in Margot’s cynical family relationships. That all of this hangs together is a testament, most of all, to Witherspoon deftness as a performer. In a movie in which Ferrell wrestles an alligator and Nick Jonas cameos (winningly) as a singing pastor, you don’t doubt Witherspoon for a moment.

    “You’re Cordially Invited,” an Amazon MGM Studios release is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for “language throughout and some sexual references.” Running time: 109 minutes. Two and a half stars out of four.





    “You’re Cordially Invited” is a delightful romantic comedy that sees Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell colliding in a hilarious and heartwarming way. The film follows the story of two polar opposites who are forced to work together to plan a wedding, leading to some unexpected twists and turns along the way.

    Witherspoon shines as the uptight and organized event planner, while Ferrell brings his signature comedic charm as the laid-back and carefree groom-to-be. Their chemistry on screen is undeniable, making for some truly laugh-out-loud moments.

    The supporting cast also delivers strong performances, including scene-stealing turns from Catherine O’Hara and Jon Hamm. The film is a perfect blend of humor and heart, with plenty of feel-good moments that will leave you smiling long after the credits roll.

    Overall, “You’re Cordially Invited” is a must-see for fans of romantic comedies and anyone looking for a good laugh. Witherspoon and Ferrell’s dynamic performances make this film a joy to watch, and the witty script keeps you engaged from start to finish. Don’t miss out on this charming and entertaining movie!

    Tags:

    • You’re Cordially Invited review
    • Reese Witherspoon
    • Will Ferrell
    • movie review
    • comedic duo
    • Hollywood stars
    • film analysis
    • comedy movie review
    • celebrity review
    • movie critics
    • entertainment news

    #Youre #Cordially #Invited #review #Reese #Witherspoon #Ferrell #collide

  • One Final Trailer for ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ Double Wedding Comedy


    One Final Trailer for ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ Double Wedding Comedy

    by
    January 27, 2025
    Source: YouTube

    You're Cordially Invited Trailer

    “Why can’t we just celebrate together?” Prime Video has debuted a third and final fun trailer for the goofy comedy You’re Cordially Invited, an ensemble wedding bash created and directed by filmmaker Nick Stoller (of Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Get Him to the Greek, The Five-Year Engagement, Neighbors 1 & 2, Bros). Streaming to watch later this week if anyone wants to drop in on the fun and join the parties (either one!). You’re Cordially Invited follows a woman who is planning her sister’s wedding, as well as the father of another bride-to-be. They discover that they are double-booked for their fancy destination wedding, so both parties decide to share the venue, but chaos and disaster await, of course. Will Ferrell and Reese Witherspoon star as the feuding hosts, with a fun cast including Geraldine Viswanathan, Meredith Hagner, Wesley Mann, Jimmy Tatro, Celia Weston, Leanne Morgan, Rory Scovel, and Keyla Monterroso Mejia. This is actually the best trailer yet – saving the best for last! Though I’m not sure why they didn’t release this actually-funny trailer any earlier. It finally has plenty of legitimately amusing jokes.

    Here’s the third & final trailer for Nicholas Stoller’s You’re Cordially Invited, direct from YouTube:

    You're Cordially Invited Trailer

    You can rewatch the teaser for Stoller’s You’re Cordially Invited right here and the other full trailer here.

    A woman (Reese Witherspoon) who’s planning her sister’s perfect wedding and the father (Will Ferrell) of a young bride-to-be find out that they are double booked for their destination wedding at a remote resort on an island off the Carolina coast. When both parties decide to share the small venue, chaos ensues and our full cast of characters begin to face their own insecurities learning more about themselves. You’re Cordially Invited is written and directed by acclaimed comedy filmmaker Nicholas Stoller (also known as simply Nick Stoller), director of the Hollywood smash movies Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Get Him to the Greek, The Five-Year Engagement, Neighbors, Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising, Storks, and Bros previously, plus the series “Friends from College” & “Platonic” recently. It’s produced by Stoller, Ferrell, Witherspoon, Jessica Elbaum, Lauren Levy Neustadter, and Conor Welch. Amazon will debut Stoller’s You’re Cordially Invited movie streaming on Prime Video starting January 30th, 2025 this winter. Who wants to watch?

    Share

    Find more posts in: To Watch, Trailer



    Get ready to laugh, cry, and celebrate love with the final trailer for the upcoming double wedding comedy, ‘You’re Cordially Invited’!

    Join us as we follow the hilarious and heartwarming journey of two couples as they navigate the highs and lows of planning their dream weddings. From awkward family dynamics to unexpected twists and turns, this film has it all.

    Featuring a star-studded cast, including comedic legends like Amy Schumer, Kevin Hart, and Tiffany Haddish, ‘You’re Cordially Invited’ promises to deliver non-stop laughs and plenty of feel-good moments.

    So grab your popcorn, gather your friends, and mark your calendars for the wedding event of the year. Don’t miss ‘You’re Cordially Invited’, coming soon to theaters near you! #DoubleWeddingComedy #YoureCordiallyInvited #WeddingMovie

    Tags:

    1. Double wedding comedy
    2. You’re Cordially Invited
    3. Final trailer
    4. Wedding comedy movie
    5. Romantic comedy
    6. Wedding movie trailer
    7. Double wedding film
    8. Comedy movie trailer
    9. Wedding comedy trailer
    10. Romantic comedy film

    #Final #Trailer #Youre #Cordially #Invited #Double #Wedding #Comedy

  • Imagine You’re a Paranoid Schizophrenic. Now Imagine You’re His Father.


    Staff writer Chris Lydgate applies his signature empathetic writing style to this moving portrait of Denny and Brent Olson, a father-son duo forever bound by Brent’s debilitating struggle with paranoid schizophrenia, a struggle that had inexorably taken over virtually every aspect of his father Denny’s life. This story first appeared in the Aug. 2, 1995, edition of WW.

    Denny Olson lives in a pleasant house on 3 1/2 acres in the outskirts of Tigard. His porch overlooks a quiet expanse of soaring maples and honey locusts. He’s got plenty of time to enjoy the view; at age 55, he recently retired from a long career in the high-tech business.

    Denny Olson is miserable.

    In the past three years, his son Brent, 29, has been arrested five times, spent several months in jail, visited dozens of hospital emergency rooms, and been involved in a number of assaults. He has been thrown out of group homes. He has wandered the streets of Portland and Seattle, without a job or a home.

    Brent is a paranoid schizophrenic. And he’s his father’s burden.

    After years of trying to help his son, the strain is finally showing. Denny has problems getting up in the morning. He doesn’t get out much. He’s beginning to let parts of the house go to seed: Hooks and boxes clutter the upstairs landing. “Excuse the mess,” he sighs. “I just don’t care about it anymore.”

    Friends and family have watched Denny’s struggle with concern. “He’s tried to help out, but it’s like banging your head against a wall.” says Butch Vose, Denny’s brother-in-law. “He never takes a vacation. He can’t go anywhere. He doesn’t see any light at the end of the tunnel. I would have given up a long time ago.”

    Roughly 30,000 Oregonians suffer from schizophrenia, a disease so devastating that an estimated 10 percent of its victims eventually commit suicide. Contrary to popular perception, the disorder has nothing to do with having a “split personality.” With schizophrenia, the mind is not split so much as splintered, bombarded by hallucinations, unable to concentrate for long or to distinguish imagination from reality.

    While many schizophrenics can lead normal lives if they take their medication, some never get their symptoms under control. These are the Brent Olsons of the world, who skid in and out of reality, see-sawing between dazed inaction and frenzied paranoia. In the past, they faced lifetimes locked up in mental institutions, but that’s no longer the case. The emphasis in mental health care has shifted nationally to community treatment, as evidenced last month by the closure of Dammasch psychiatric hospital. Now these unfortunate people wander the streets of major cities, sometimes almost sane, sometimes dangerously unstable. Behind many of them is a guardian, a sibling or a parent who carries the unenviable and sometimes impossible burden of trying to help their loved one.

    21.39 Imagine You’re a Paranoid Schizophrenic 50 Covers for 50 Years

    Like most parents of kids who show evidence of abnormal behavior, Denny Olson spent many years stuck between feeling that he was worrying too much about his son and that he should be doing more. This uncertainty was fueled by Brent’s situation: He was not Denny’s biological son but was adopted at birth. When Brent was 5, his adopted mother, Denny’s wife, died of Hodgkin’s disease. As a result, Denny was alone to confront Brent’s recurring nightmares and increasing isolation. Were these serious problems or passing phases? “As a parent, you never want to think there’s any kind of problem,” Denny says. “You excuse it by assuming he’ll grow out of it.” In the meantime, he spent as much time with his kids as he could, taking them camping and teaching them to race motorcycles.

    Brent was a good student, and when he graduated from Beaverton’s Sunset High School in 1984 and signed up with the U.S. Navy, Denny felt a mixture of pride and relief. “I was glad he was going to do something meaningful with his life,” Denny says.

    The first signs were promising: Brent went through boot camp, enrolled in the Navy’s nuclear power program, and was stationed in Orlando. But in 1986, Brent got kicked out of the service for drinking onboard ship. Denny chalked it up to a typical teenage rebellious streak, though by now Brent was 20 years old. “He was still forming his opinions and values,” Denny says.

    The problems seemed to get worse. Shortly after Brent left the Navy, Denny got a call from the Las Vegas city jail. It was Brent, serving 90 days for shoplifting.

    After he got out of jail, Brent came back to live with his dad and got a job pumping gas at an AM/PM. Denny pushed his son to get a better job and get his life together, while Brent spent his time lying around on the couch listening to punk-rock records. It was not an atypical scene; nevertheless, an uncomfortable feeling began gnawing at Denny.

    Then, one morning in the summer of 1988, he finally knew something was wrong when he found Brent sitting in his darkened room with the drapes drawn, muttering to himself There was a demon inside him, Brent said, and he needed an exorcism.

    Dressed in a black T-shirt and black shorts, Brent appears mild-mannered, with uncombed hair and a thick beard covering his acne-scarred face. When he stands, his arms hang awkwardly, as if suspended from an iron rod running from shoulder to shoulder. His blue eyes hold a steady, districted gaze, like he’s watching a television no one else can see. Sometimes he will sit for hours without a word.

    When he does speak, Brent resembles a record player with fuzz on the needle. He never really seems to get in the groove, constantly skipping to other topics or repeating the same thought over and over “Now, I’m really against democracy,” he says, dragging on a Newport menthol. There is a slight pause, then he adds, “Sort of. Well, it depends… I’m against uniforms in schools.” In short, he is against a great many things: base closings, more cops on the streets, carbon testing, the Ice Age.

    A few months alter the exorcism incident, Brent moved up to Seattle to try to start a band. That’s when the voices regularly began to crowd his head, screaming obscenities no one else could hear. “I thought it was the devil,” he says. “I thought the voices came because I blasphemed the Holy Spirit.”

    The illness tore through the fragile fabric of his life in Seattle, which consisted of a sodden mixture of booze, pot and angry music. He was convinced someone had put a curse on him and that he had been sodomized by the evil spirit inside him. Eventually he wound up in a Tacoma hospital. “I thought there was going to be an earthquake,” he explains. “I thought Tacoma was going to be consumed by a tidal wave.”

    Brent’s sister Sandy (who was also adopted) drove up to Tacoma and brought him back home, and in January 1989, Denny was finally able to persuade Brent to see a psychiatrist in Cedar Hills. Brent was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.

    Schizophrenia is one of the most puzzling and devastating disorders known to medical science. Symptoms include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, odd behavior, a narrowing of emotional expression, and a tendency not to talk much or interact with other people. (In the paranoid subtype, the delusions and hallucinations are more pronounced and organized around a particular theme—in Brent’s case, demonic possession.) It strikes roughly one person in a hundred across all cultures, usually emerging, sometimes overnight, in the mid- or late 20s. No one knows what causes the disorder, although it seems to have a genetic component. Some patients respond well to anti-psychotic drugs such as stellazine or clozaril. For others, like Brent, the medication may flatten out the extremes but otherwise have little effect. Sometimes the disease is so resistant to treatment that the only recourse is to remove schizophrenics from society, in order to minimize the risk of hurting themselves or others. “There’s treatment but there’s no cure.” says Dr. George Keepers, director of the psychiatry program at Oregon Health Sciences University. “It’s a severe, disabling illness, and people who get it have a lifetime of disability.”

    The diagnosis came as a shock to Denny, but at the same time, it explained a lot. “I looked back and I realized the things in his childhood that were different,” he says. “I felt like an ass for not being more sensitive.”

    Brent didn’t want to go into a group home. With medication, however, Brent was able to reduce the severity of his symptoms and function after a fashion. He lived at home and attended Western Business School, where he graduated with a GPA of 3.6. Then he got a job as a night clerk at the Travel Inn in a run-down section of East Burnside, and moved into his own seedy apartment.

    Even these small achievements vaporized as the disease pulled Brent down. He lived with a hooker (whom he says he beat up several times), lost his job and his place, and was arrested twice for assault. Every time his life unraveled, he called on his father to pick up the pieces. Altogether, Denny helped him clear his stuff out of three different apartments “Each one you wanted to clean up with a match and a gallon of gasoline,” he says.

    Like many men of his generation, Denny Olson is sparing in his display of emotion. Sitting in his driveway, smoking his Newports, he keeps his voice steady as he recounts his son’s horrifying episodes of the past 10 years—the violent outbursts, the telephone calls from jail, the midnight visits to the emergency room, the court dates, the appointments with doctors, counselors, and probation officers.

    Despite worsening symptoms, Brent refused to enroll in a program or go to a group home, getting angry if Denny even raised the subject. In January 1993, their disagreements came to a head. Brent asked his dad to drive him to a local church so he could perform an exorcism on himself. When Denny refused, Brent exploded, threw a glass milk pitcher filled with knives in his father’s direction, and stormed out the back door. Denny called 911. Later, police found Brent wandering the streets of Tigard with an unloaded .45-caliber Ruger he’d stolen from his dad.

    At times the mental health system seemed as irrational as his son. A few days later, Denny tried to get Brent committed to a mental hospital. He thought the chances were good. After all, his son was clearly deranged and needed help. But that didn’t seem to matter at the court hearing. To be committed, a person must be imminently dangerous to himself or others or unable to take care of his own basic needs. The judge asked if Brent knew how to find food, shelter and clothing. Brent insisted he could make money by selling matches on the streets of Portland, get meals at Baloney Joe’s, and sleep under a bridge. The judge released him. Afterward, father and son walked out of the courtroom through separate exits. They passed on the sidewalk without making eye contact.

    Brent dropped out of sight after that but turned up in Seattle. Denny heard from him occasionally. He was down and out, bouncing in and out of missions, shelters and group homes. “I worry about him.‘’ Denny wrote in his diary. “I don’t know how long he can continue like this.”

    Then, on a warm evening in September, Denny heard the front door open and footsteps coming through the dining room. It was Brent.

    “Hi, Dad,” he said.

    Denny hadn’t seen his son in more than a year, and he felt his heart sink as he cast his eye over the stranger in front of him. Brent was a sorry sight, dressed in ratty thrift store castoffs, his gnarled beard halfway down his chest, his long hair matted and unruly. Some notepads and a few old clothes—everything he owned in the world—were stuffed into a battered suitcase with a broken zipper. His clothes were crawling with lice. And he stank. “I’d rather smell a rabbit hutch!” Denny scowls.

    Brent said he just wanted to sleep on the couch for a few days. Mental-health workers had told Denny not to let Brent come back until he was willing to seek help for his condition. Easy advice to give.

    He thought of how Brent had struggled on his own and all the times he had worried if his son was all right. “Every time I’d pick up a paper and read about an unidentified body they fished out of the river, I’d think, ’It’s only a matter of time,’” he says. “Can you imagine what that’s like?”

    Denny fixed something for them to eat. He decided he could handle it for a few days. And he would try to get his son into some kind of group home one more time—that was the least he could do.

    After Brent had been sleeping on the couch for a week, Denny finally talked him into going to the hospital to be examined. On Oct. 10, they went to OHSU. The examining psychiatrist was anything but reassuring: The best they could hope for, he told Denny, was for Brent to hurt someone. Then the police could step in and take him to jail, where he could get medication and some psychiatric attention. Reluctantly, Denny decided to turn in his own son.

    Because Brent never showed up for the trial on charges arising from the gun incident, the judge had issued a standing warrant for his arrest. Denny mentioned this to the doctor who called the authorities. Denny knew that being in jail would help Brent get services, but would his son see this as a betrayal? “Brent was trusting me and went along with me willingly,” he says with a sigh. “I felt deceitful. That’s a shitty way to treat anybody.”

    Shortly afterward, Denny quit his job. The strain of dealing with his son’s illness was simply too great. “I was feeling a tremendous increase in pressure to try to solve some problems for Brent,” he says. “I really hadn’t done anything for him in the past. I had always assumed it would be taken care of.” Denny didn’t mention anything about Brent to his co-workers. He told them he wanted more time to help out his mother.

    Brent stayed in the Washington County Jail for almost two months. Denny would visit and bring him cigarettes and candy. “We had a lot of one-sided conversations,” Denny says. “How’s the food? Are you okay? What have you been doing? For the most part, Brent just sat there.”

    On Dec. 3, Washington County District Judge John Lewis sentenced Brent to time served in jail and two years’ probation. Brent walked out of the courthouse the same day. Denny was flabbergasted. He called Brent’s probation officer. “He needs help!” he said. “He can’t live out on the streets! Jesus Christ! He’s gonna fall through the cracks again. He’s got no place to go!”

    Brent vanished into the streets and bridges of Portland. A few weeks later, after a couple of violent episodes, he was arrested and wound up in the Ryles Center, a short-term locked residential care facility in Southeast Portland. Denny came to visit him and felt a flicker of hope. Brent seemed to be making progress. “I felt we were making headway,” he says.

    Denny made frequent visits, excited by his son’s new attitude and more talkative manner. On Jan. 20, he brought along some cigarettes and a bag of candy. As he got ready to leave, one of the nurses asked Brent to hand over the goodies for safekeeping. Brent refused. He went to the bathroom and ate up two rolls of Lifesavers. Then he came out… and flipped. He began to rant. “Don’t fuck with me!” he shouted. “Martin Luther King would destroy this place!”

    The nurse tried to calm him down—in vain. Raging out of control, Brent threatened to put out a contract on the nurse, pointing his finger at the man’s face. The man called for backup.

    Denny could not believe his eyes. As he turned to leave, he felt tears streaming down his face. He walked down the hall, trying not to listen to the sounds of the orderly subduing Brent, and his son’s muffled screams.

    No one knows quite what to do with Brent Olson. The Ryles Center sent him to Emanuel Hospital, who sent him to Multnomah County Jail, who sent him to Washington County Jail for probation violation. The judge sentenced Brent to 90 days, but he was released after just two weeks because of overcrowding.

    He showed up at his dad’s house a week later where he has stayed ever since.

    For the past four months, Denny has been trying to get his son on the Oregon Health Plan, which in Washington County has just been extended to cover mental health. His application was turned down because he is already on Medicare, which is supposed to offer more comprehensive benefits. Ironically, this has actually made it harder for Brent to get into certain programs which prefer Oregon Health Plan clients because the plan pays more. Denny has also been trying to get his son into the Luke-Dorf, a group home in Tigard for people with mental illness. Perhaps, he thinks, one of the counselors there will persuade Brent to try clozaril, a new drug that has helped other schizophrenics. So far, Brent has refused because the drug requires weekly blood tests. This attitude makes Denny roll his eyes. “Why the hell wouldn’t you want to try that if it’ll give you a chance to function in society and get along?” he asks with a sigh of exasperation. “What kind of attitude is that?”

    In the meantime, Brent spends his days veering between blank-faced passivity watching TV or listening to his punk records and sieg-heiling. On a recent visit, he was pessimistic about his future, even if he is admitted to the Luke-Dorf. “The truth is, the odds for me getting kicked out are high because I don’t like rules that don’t make any sense,“ he says nonchalantly. “I don’t obey rules unless I want to.”

    He takes a sip of his white Russian and taps his cigarette with an oddly patrician air. “My future is pretty bleak,“ he smiles. “It looks like I’ll be on the street again at some point.”

    Denny’s relatives shake their heads over his predicament. “He’s living in a squirrel cage,” says Denny’s mother-in-law, Dorothy Anne Vose. “He’s cooking for Brent. He’s doing things for Brent. It’s hard on him. He’s lost his whole life. It’s an impossible situation. Denny can’t keep go on doing this. I don’t know how he keeps it up.”

    “Nobody can live with a person like that and expect to have a normal life,” says Brent’s sister, Sandy Olson. “He’s withdrawn from people. How long can anybody take that?”

    Sandy thinks her brother belongs in a “controlled environment,” such as a mental hospital. And looking to the future, her feelings about her brother are ambivalent. “He’s my brother and everything,” she says, “but I really don’t look forward to the day when he’s my responsibility.”

    Denny himself is stoic about their struggles. He spends his afternoons taking care of the grounds, driving around the lush green grass on the tractor mower, and from time to time he looks at his son and tries to reconstruct the face of the boy he loved so much.





    As a father of a son who is a paranoid schizophrenic, the weight of worry and fear can often feel overwhelming. The constant concern for his safety, well-being, and the unpredictable nature of his thoughts and behaviors can be both heartbreaking and exhausting.

    Imagine constantly questioning if your son is truly safe, if he is taking his medication, if he is getting the proper care and support he needs to manage his illness. The fear of what could happen if he has a psychotic episode, the anxiety of not knowing if he will be able to distinguish between reality and his delusions.

    As a father, the struggle to balance being supportive and understanding while also setting boundaries and seeking help can be a never-ending battle. The guilt of feeling like you should have done more, could have done more to prevent this illness from taking hold of your child.

    But through it all, there is a deep love and unwavering commitment to being there for your son, no matter what challenges may come. It is a journey filled with ups and downs, moments of hope and moments of despair, but through it all, the bond between father and son remains unbreakable.

    So to all the fathers out there who are navigating the complexities of parenting a child with paranoid schizophrenia, know that you are not alone. Your love, support, and strength are invaluable in helping your son navigate this challenging illness, and your unwavering dedication is truly commendable. Stay strong, keep fighting, and never lose hope.

    Tags:

    paranoid schizophrenia, mental health, family support, caregiver perspective, schizophrenia awareness, coping with mental illness, fatherhood, supporting loved ones with mental illness

    #Imagine #Youre #Paranoid #Schizophrenic #Imagine #Youre #Father

  • You’re My Little Cuddle Bug – Board book By Edwards, Nicola – GOOD



    You’re My Little Cuddle Bug – Board book By Edwards, Nicola – GOOD

    Price : 3.91

    Ends on : N/A

    View on eBay
    You’re My Little Cuddle Bug – Board book By Edwards, Nicola – GOOD

    Looking for a sweet and heartwarming board book to read with your little one? Look no further than “You’re My Little Cuddle Bug” by Nicola Edwards. This adorable book is perfect for cuddling up with your child and sharing a special moment together.

    The charming illustrations and rhyming text make this book a joy to read aloud. Your little one will love snuggling up with you as you read about all the ways you love and cherish them.

    With its sturdy board book format, “You’re My Little Cuddle Bug” is perfect for little hands to hold and explore. It’s a great addition to any child’s bookshelf and makes a wonderful gift for new parents.

    So grab a cozy blanket, cuddle up with your little one, and enjoy this heartwarming book together. “You’re My Little Cuddle Bug” is sure to become a favorite in your family’s collection.
    #Youre #Cuddle #Bug #Board #book #Edwards #Nicola #GOOD,ages 3+

  • You’re Being Alienated From Your Own Attention


    This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here.

    For more than a decade, I have hosted an hour-long cable TV show on MSNBC. When I got my own show, I imagined it as something akin to the experience of first-time car ownership. I could drive wherever I wanted to drive; although I would have to obey the law, I just had to figure out where I wanted to go, push the pedal, and go. I could cover whatever I thought was most important, whenever I wanted, for as long as I wanted.

    I learned quickly, it doesn’t work like that. A cable-news show is powered by attention. It has no internal combustion engine to make it go. Yes, you can cover whatever you desire, night after night, but if no one watches it, the show will be canceled. This is what almost happened to me.

    After a lot of trial and error, I now view audience attention as something like the wind that powers a sailboat. It’s a real phenomenon, independent of the boat, and you can successfully sail only if you harness it. You don’t turn the boat into the wind, but you also don’t simply allow the wind to set your course. You figure out where you want to go (in the case of my show, what you think is important for people to know), you identify which way the wind is blowing, and then, using your skills and the tools of the boat, you tack back and forth to manage to arrive at your destination using that wind power.

    The cover of The Sirens' Call
    This essay has been adapted from Hayes’ new book, The Sirens’ Call.

    This experience has given me a certain perspective on how attention functions. Every moment of my work life revolves around answering the question of how we capture attention. And it just so happens that the constant pursuit of others’ attention is no longer just for professionals like myself.

    Attention is a kind of resource: It has value, and if you can seize it, you seize that value. This has been true for a very long time. Charismatic leaders and demagogues, showmen, preachers, great salespeople, marketers, advertisers, and holy men and women who rallied disciples have all used the power of attention to accrue wealth and power. What has changed is attention’s relative importance. Those who successfully extract it command fortunes, win elections, and topple regimes. The battle to control what we pay attention to at any given instant structures our inner life—who and what we listen to, how and when we are present to those we love—and our collective public lives: which pressing matters of social concern are debated and legislated, which are neglected; which deaths are loudly mourned, which are quietly forgotten. Every single aspect of human life across the broadest categories of human organization is being reoriented around the pursuit of attention. It is now the defining resource of our age.

    The rearrangement of social and economic conditions around the pursuit of attention is a transformation as profound as the dawn of industrial capitalism and the creation of wage labor as the central form of human toil. Attention now exists as a commodity in the same way labor did in the early years of industrial capitalism. What had previously been regarded as human effort was converted into a commodity with a price. People had always “worked” in one way or another, but that work was not embedded in a complicated system that turned the work into a market good. This transition from “work” to “labor” was, for many, both punishing and strange. The worker, Karl Marx observed in Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “does not feel content but unhappy, does not develop freely his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind. The worker therefore only feels himself outside his work, and in his work feels outside himself.”

    This was the fundamental insight of Marx’s theory of labor and alienation: that a social system had been erected to coercively extract something from people that had previously, in a deep sense, been theirs. Even today, those words feel fresh. The sense of dislocation and being outside oneself. The inability, even amid what is ostensibly boundless choice and freedom—What do you want to watch tonight, babe?—to “develop freely” our mental energy. The trapped quality of the worker caught in a system he did not construct and from which he cannot extricate himself.

    The epochal shift of industrial capitalism required what Marx described as the commodification of labor. Labor—what we do with our body and mind, the product of our effort and exertion—is quite an alienating thing to have turned into a market commodity. The transmutation of what had always been “work” or “things humans did for specific purposes” into “labor” as a category of activity with a price required an entire transformation of the structure of society and the daily experience of human life.

    Indeed, to extract labor from a person, you need to compensate them through wages, coerce them, or use violence—such as the overseer’s whip—to force it out of them. All these methods have been used. But the extraction of our attention happens in a different way. People can be forced to work in all kinds of cruel and oppressive ways, but they cannot be forced to do it purely through the manipulation of their preconscious faculties. If someone puts a gun to your head and tells you to dig a ditch, you know you are being coerced. If someone fires a gun in the air, your attention will instantly shift to the sound even before you can fully grasp what’s happening.

    This feature of attention—that it can be taken from us at a purely sensory level, before our conscious will even gets to weigh in—makes it a strange and powerful force. Attention is the stuff of consciousness itself, where we choose to place our mind’s focus at any given moment. And yet it can always be wrenched from us seemingly against our will by the wail of the siren, the bark of a dog, or the flash of a prurient image on our phone. The more competitive an attention market it is, the more it will select for involuntary methods of capturing attention. Think of Times Square with its blinding lights, or a casino floor or a supermarket checkout counter. More and more, our entire lives have come to resemble those spaces.

    Centering attention as a resource and understanding both its existential primacy and its increasing social, political, and economic domination is the key to understanding disparate aspects of 21st-century life. Attention comes prior to other aspects of speech and communication that we associate with power—persuasion, argumentation, information. Before you can persuade, you must capture attention: “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” Before you inform, insult, or seduce, you must make sure that your voice doesn’t end up in the muted background static that is 99.9 percent of speech directed our way. Public discourse is now a war of all against all for attention. Commerce is a war for attention. Social life is a war for attention. Parenting is a war for attention. And we are all feeling battle weary.

    The trajectory of Elon Musk is a perfect fable for the attention age. By the third decade of the 21st century, Musk was the richest man on Earth. He had every material and financial resource, enough to purchase anything that the totality of human history up until that point could produce to be bought or owned by one man. And yet he was willing to trade it all for attention.

    Not at first—for a good portion of his early career, Musk was relatively press shy. But then, like so many, he joined Twitter. He posted more and more, with greater degrees of pathetic desperation, until he made the most expensive impulse purchase in history, buying the platform for a wildly overvalued $44 billion.

    Perhaps having realized how much he had overpaid, Musk then tried to back out, but facing a lawsuit from Twitter and a potentially disastrous trial, he was all but forced to complete the sale. Although he made all kinds of high-minded noises about free speech and diversity of viewpoints, it became immediately clear from his incessant, compulsive posting and trolling that what he really wanted was to be Twitter’s Main Character.

    In becoming Twitter’s Main Character, though, he boosted vile and false conspiracy theories about a savage attack on the husband of the House speaker, mocked the notion that a mass shooter with literal swastika tattoos could possibly be a white supremacist, and consistently boosted racist posts about the inherent criminality of Black people and degrading tweets about trans people.

    This did succeed in getting Musk attention: He was always one of Twitter’s top stories, and his antics even became a fixation of mainstream news coverage. But all of this was a bit much for many Twitter users. Crucially, advertisers began to pull back, and then flee en masse. By May 2023, seven months after Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion, Fidelity Investments estimated the platform’s total worth to be just $15 billion. To most observers, this looked as though Musk had lit nearly $30 billion on fire, but he had used it to purchase something: the world’s attention. It was more valuable to him than anything else.

    When asked by a CNBC interviewer why he was constantly sending such tweets as “[George] Soros hates humanity,” Musk—with a little extra pause for effect—said, “There’s a scene in The Princess Bride—great movie—where he confronts the person who killed his father. And he says, ‘Offer me money. Offer me power. I don’t care’ … I’ll say what I want to say, and if the consequence of that is losing money, then so be it.” Although it was cloaked in principle, what Musk was really saying was The attention is worth it to me. There is quite literally nothing I value more.

    But if Musk was sent on this trajectory through sheer broken need, carried along by compulsion, in his brokenness he stumbled on the simple truth that to control the attention of others is to exert power. His pursuit of Twitter might have started as a form of addiction, but it has transformed into a strategy. His obsession with attention cost him billions of dollars in the beginning, but it has now helped him elect a president, positioned him to influence government policy, and increased his fortune.

    And in this, Musk is an extreme example, but he is by no means alone. What you can see throughout his generational cohort is the same thirsty, grasping desire for attention: Silicon Valley billionaires starting their own podcasts, like the hosts of All In, or posting compulsively, like the hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman. This age’s new plutocrats are obsessed, for understandable reasons, with attention.

    If attention is the substance of life, then the question of what we pay attention to is the question of what our lives will be. And here we come to a foundational question that is far harder to answer than we might like it to be. What do we want to pay attention to? If we didn’t have all the technologies and corporations vying for our attention, if our attention wasn’t being commodified and extracted, what would we affirmatively choose to pay attention to?

    You hear complaints about the gap between what we want to pay attention to and what we end up paying attention to all the time in the attention age. Someone ambitiously brings three new novels on vacation and comes back having read only a third of one of them because she was sucked into scrolling through Instagram. Reading is a particular focus of these complaints, I find. Everyone, including myself, complains that they can’t read long books anymore. We have a sense that our preferences haven’t changed—I still like to read—just our behavior. And the reason our behavior has changed is that someone has taken something from us. Someone has subtly, insidiously coerced us.

    But maybe we have multiple selves who want different things—a self who wants to read, a self who wants to scroll. There’s a tension here between different aspects of the self that can be hard to reconcile. We contend with what our superego wants (to go on vacation and read novels) and what our actual self does (scrolls through Instagram). As is so often the case, our revealed preferences are different from our stated ones. And who is to say what our real and true desire is?

    So much of modern self-help is geared toward closing the gap between what we say we want and value and how we act. And here, in the instant-to-instant unfolding of our inner lives, we can imagine a similar project, at least at the individual level. The solution, to the extent that there is one, to alienation caused by this gap between what we pay attention to and what we want to pay attention to is to begin with the question of what we actually want. If you had full power over your own attention, a kind of X-Men-style hyperfocus that could, at will, always be directed on whatever you chose, for as long as you chose, what would you do with this superpower?

    I have to say that I think most people would offer a fairly similar set of answers. I would focus on my family and friends, my hobbies and interests, things that bring me joy, personal projects—whether taking photos, gardening, or building a deck—that give me satisfaction.

    We are not required to suffer under the current form of attention capitalism forever, or even for that much longer. We can create alternative markets for attention, alternative institutions, and businesses that create models different from those that now dominate. We can also create noncommercial spaces where we can pay attention to one another, our hobbies, and our interests and communities without that attention being captured, bought, and sold. And there is yet another path forward that is more radical than these other approaches, one that fundamentally relies on people voluntarily creating new alternatives: We can regulate attention.

    If we look back to the labor movements of the 19th century, they came to advocate for two particularly rudimentary and fundamental forms of regulation: a ban on child labor and limitations on total hours worked. Neither of these restrictions seemed obvious and commonsense at the time, at least not to the titans of industry and politicians who fought them. Moving governments toward these goals took a tremendous amount of political mobilization, agitation, and persuasion.

    What if we viewed attention in similar terms? It’s obviously not a perfect analogy, but a lot is similar. In the legal context, one of the biggest challenges is that attention is a difficult thing to regulate because in the United States it is so connected to, and difficult to sever from, speech. The First Amendment provides extremely strong speech protections, and any attempts to regulate attention—telling social-media companies how they can and can’t operate, for instance—inevitably raise profound First Amendment questions. But there are ways to regulate attention that plausibly sidestep the speech question by simply imposing non-viewpoint-specific limitations that apply across the board.

    There are already bills in state legislatures and in Congress that would create legal age minimums for social-media platforms. Although the details vary, as a general matter this seems obvious and sensible. We as a society can say that children’s attention should not be sold and commodified in the aggressive and alienating fashion of current social-media networks. Just as 12-year-olds can’t really consent to a wage contract, we could argue they can’t really consent to the expropriation of their attention in the way that, say, Instagram exploits it.

    But what about adults? What if we decided to apply the basic lessons of labor law to attention and simply impose limits on how much attention can be monetized from us? I am fully aware that heavy-handed regulation of attention markets, such as a cap on hours of use, would face steep political and legal opposition. But there’s another way to view efforts to regulate the marketing of our attention.

    One of the earliest slogans pushing the eight-hour workday was “Eight hours for work, eight hours for sleep, and eight hours for what we will.” It feels as if more and more of that leisure time is now taken from us, not willed by us. Our control over the space of our mind, stolen. Are we really spending the precious hours of our waking, nonworking lives doing “what we will”? Or has the conquering logic of the market penetrated our quietest, most intimate moments?

    We don’t have to accept this. It does not need to be this way. We must use every tool and strategy imaginable to wrest back our will, to create a world in which we point our attention where we—the willful, conscious “we”—want it to go. A world where we can function and flourish as full human beings, as liberated souls, unlashed from the mast, our ears unplugged and open, listening to the lapping of the waves, making our way back home to the people we love, the sound of sirens safely in the distance.


    This essay has been adapted from Chris Hayes’s new book, The Sirens’ Call.


    ​When you buy a book using a link on this page, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.



    Are you constantly finding yourself distracted and unable to focus on the present moment? Do you feel like your attention is being pulled in a million different directions, leaving you feeling overwhelmed and disconnected from yourself?

    You may be experiencing a phenomenon known as attentional alienation. In today’s fast-paced world filled with endless streams of information and constant notifications, it’s easy to become disconnected from our own attention. We are bombarded with ads, social media posts, emails, and text messages all vying for our precious mental energy.

    This constant barrage of stimuli can leave us feeling frazzled and unable to fully engage with the present moment. We may find ourselves mindlessly scrolling through our phones, jumping from task to task without ever truly being present.

    But fear not, there are ways to reclaim your attention and break free from the cycle of alienation. By practicing mindfulness, setting boundaries with technology, and prioritizing activities that bring you joy and fulfillment, you can begin to re-establish a deeper connection with your own attention.

    Remember, your attention is a precious resource that deserves to be nurtured and protected. Take the time to cultivate a sense of presence and focus in your daily life, and watch as your sense of clarity and well-being begins to grow. You deserve to be fully present in your own life – don’t let external distractions alienate you from the beauty of the present moment.

    Tags:

    1. Attention alienation
    2. Attention isolation
    3. Mental focus
    4. Digital distraction
    5. Reclaiming attention
    6. Mindful awareness
    7. Technology addiction
    8. Cognitive overload
    9. Digital detox
    10. Self-awareness strategies

    #Youre #Alienated #Attention