Why Upstart Might’ve Reached Its Peak, For Now

Cumulatively, Upstart’s key drivers have contributed to its cyclical performance, displayed by the fact that the stock remains nearly $300 below the heights it achieved in 2021 when it reached the $380 handle.

An observation of Upstart’s stock price shows its correlation to interest rates. For example, the stock regressed since 2022’s rate hike cycle started, yet recovered when certainty of an interest rate pivot occurred earlier this year.

Source: Yahoo Finance

The main reason for Upstart’s sensitivity to interest rates derives from its dependency on loan volumes. The company’s marketplace platform relies on fee-based earning and, therefore, acts counter-cyclically to interest rate levels.

Lower interest rates visibly spiked Upstart’s stock price since mid-year. However, disinflation has slowed, reducing the capacity for interest rate cuts. In fact, factors such as President Trump’s proposed tariffs, China’s stimulus, enhanced consumer sentiment, Middle Eastern tensions’ influence on oil prices, and enhanced industrial production might contribute to an argument for a 2025 re-inflation scenario.

Source: Trading Economics

Whether effective rates decline in the coming quarters remains to be seen. Nonetheless, key variables suggest that investors might’ve overestimated the velocity of future disinflation, which, in turn, caused Upstart’s stock to surge beyond its fair value.

This sub-section’s title refers to the fact that Upstart’s advanced data analysis likely won’t defend against severe macroeconomic headwinds. The company’s methodology might produce relative value. However, a rapid rise in credit risk will ultimately reduce lenders’ willingness to write high-risk loans.

Credit spreads remain tight, suggesting the U.S. credit market is healthy. However, spreads are cyclical and mean-reverting; therefore, widening will likely occur at some stage. Upstart’s marketplace and loan book has flourished in 2024’s low-spread environment. Nevertheless, as mentioned, widening may disrupt its flow.

Source: St. Louis Federal Reserve

The question now becomes, what may cause spreads to widen again? A key driving factor could be consumer loan delinquencies. Delinquencies remain elevated, and lower U.S. interest rates haven’t decreased delinquencies by a material level. Thus, an argument exists that the real economy’s credit risk might be underpriced by spreads, causing investors to ramp up Upstart’s stock in recent months.

Source: St. Louis Federal Reserve

As with interest rates, 2025’s credit risk outlook is up for discussion. However, a decaying credit environment would likely dent Upstart’s loan origination volumes through lower conviction from banks and other lenders. Moreover, a secondary impact can occur as the company has consumer debt on its own balance sheet, with auto loans spanning most of Upstart’s loan book.

Source: Upstart

Upstart’s business has scaled since its inception yet struggled to achieve profitability. Although running at a loss is normal for growth-stage firms, the nature of Upstart’s expenses conveys how expensive it is to expand its business model.

The following figure shows Upstart’s comprehensive income statement; a discussion follows.

Source: Upstart

A telling feature of the company’s income statement is its engineering and product development line item, which spans approximately 32% of the company’s operating costs. While innovation is key, engineering costs can be persistent as top talent usually costs a premium. Upstart’s competitive advantage is product-driven; therefore, retaining top-tier engineering capabilities will be vital in the years ahead.

Furthermore, Upstart’s sales and marketing expenses comprise about 20% of the company’s expense base, while general and administrative expenses span roughly 29%. These costs are more straightforward to dilute than engineering expenses, especially if broad-based inflation stabilizes; however, a competitive environment poses challenges, likely forcing Upstart to inflate its marketing budget.

In effect, Upstart has a scalable business model. However, the competitive environment and Upstart’s product-centric approach mean Upstart’s top-line success is expensive to ascertain.

As pointed out earlier, JP Morgan is concerned about Upstart’s valuation outlook. Key metrics agree with the investment bank’s consensus. For example, Upstart’s price-to-sales ratio has nearly doubled since last year. Moreover, the company’s price-to-book ratio has surged to 11.78x from roughly 5.55x a year ago, while its price-to-free cash flow ratio is arguably outlying at 86.87x.

Source: Macro Trends

An isolated view of the Upstart’s price multiples accompanies the thesis’ fundamental argument. It is unlikely that Upstart’s fundamental growth will sustain its current multiples, especially if investors decide to ‘take profit.’

Lastly, Upstart had a 14-day relative strength index of 66 at the time of writing the article. For those unaware, an RSI of 70 and above suggests a stock is technically overbought. Therefore, Upstart’s RSI will likely cause concern in light of its elevated fundamental price multiples.

Upstart Holdings is a growing company with a highly compelling business model emphasizing a product-driven approach. However, history has proven that Upstart’s stock is cyclical, and key identifiers suggest that Upstart stock’s latest form might come to a halt in 2025.

While some might disagree with the fundamental argument, Upstart’s valuation multiples and technical features are hard to pass, even in a bull market.

Upstart’s stock seems overcooked for the time being.

This article first appeared on GuruFocus.