Process
name the outcomes, in-house keepers, vendor edges, and exit before any MSA language is treated as the plan
Home / Blog / IT Outsourcing: Consulte First Before You Sign Another Blanket MSA
Pay vs ConsulteBlanket IT outsourcing MSAs hide scope risk: hours without outcomes, vendors who become the strategy, and no named exit. Consulte first. Use Discovery $99 to frame the map. Starter ZG06 is only a narrow execution slice — never a full-outsourcing or blanket-MSA substitute.
Discovery $99 Consulting $499 Starter $2,500 Growth $8,000/mo Response within 24h
This is a fit guide for the commercial shape of IT outsourcing — Consulte to name outcomes before paper, Discovery to frame owners, and Pay only if a slice is already bounded. It is not a case study and it does not invent a cost-takeout percentage, headcount cut, SLA letter grade, or certified outcome. Published commercial prices live on /plans/. The diagnostic is Discovery $99. Human-scoped work starts at /contact/.
Service entry: Managed IT services. Related reading: Co-managed IT vs MSP and IT vCIO Pay vs Consulte.
name the outcomes, in-house keepers, vendor edges, and exit before any MSA language is treated as the plan
the stack a vendor would actually touch — identity, tickets, endpoints, cloud accounts — and who already owns each
a written outcome list you can accept or reject — not a fabricated savings or headcount number
Starter ZG06 is not staff-aug and not a blanket MSA. If the first sentence is “outsource IT,” use Consulte.
Blanket MSAs, multi-tower coverage, unclear keep-vs-send, or no named exit. Consulte writes outcomes and the SOW. Pay is optional later, and only for a slice.
Start Consulte — outcomes first. Do not sign another open-ended MSA to avoid the conversation.
One bounded execution slice after the map exists: one queue, one runbook, one landing-zone control. Never a substitute for full outsourcing.
Pay Starter ZG06 only when the slice is already named on /plans/.
If you cannot name the outcomes, the keep-in-house list, and the acceptor for “done,” do not Pay and do not sign. Use Consulte or Discovery $99 for a written frame (Consulte SOW, a later Pay slice, or stop). Adjacent coverage model: Co-managed IT vs MSP.
A blanket MSA feels like progress because a vendor is “on contract.” The usual failure is commercial, not technical:
That is why this page leans Consulte. Signing first and scoping later is how blanket MSAs expand. Consulte names outcomes, owners, and edges. Discovery $99 is the cheap written frame when you are not ready for a SOW conversation. Starter ZG06 can follow only as a bounded execution slice — one queue, one runbook, one control — never as “we outsourced IT for $2,500.”
Discovery is not implementation and it is not a substitute for Consulte on a multi-tower deal. Implementation of a named slice is Starter or a scoped SOW. Ongoing coverage is Growth after the model is clear. Desk-level slice language: IT service desk automation Pay vs Consulte.
If the conversation slid from one slice to “all of IT,” stop and re-scope. That is Consulte, not a silent expand of Pay.
Only if a single execution slice is already named (one queue, one runbook, or one control), systems are reachable, and someone will accept “done.” Starter is never a blanket MSA. If the job is “outsource IT,” start at /contact/ or map first with Discovery $99.
No. Consulte is a human-scoped conversation via /contact/ when the SKU is unclear or the paper would be a blanket MSA. Discovery is the $99 written diagnostic. There is no free consultation SKU.
No. This guide uses fit patterns only. Use an operating signal you already measure. Board language without fake math starts from the Consulte SOW or the Discovery map.
Consulting $499 sits between Discovery and a SOW when you need RACI or roadmap without a vendor paper yet. Growth $8,000/mo is ongoing coverage after the model is clear — still not a blanket MSA. Ladder: /plans/.
See also: Co-managed IT vs MSP · vCIO Pay vs Consulte · Service desk automation · Managed IT · Blog · Discovery $99 · Plans · Consulte